Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth
Pena were 14 and 16 years old, respectively. They were friends who attended
the same high school in Houston, Texas, Waltrip High
School. On June 24,
1993, the girls spent the day together....and then died together.
They were last seen by friends
about 11:15 at night, when they left a friend's apartment to head home,
to beat summer curfew at 11:30. They knew they would be late if they took
the normal path home, down W. 34th Street to T.C. Jester, both busy streets.
They also knew they would have to pass a sexually-oriented business on
that route and so decided to take a well-known shortcut down a railroad
track and through a city park to Elizabeth's neighborhood.
The next morning, the girls parents
began to frantically look for them, paging them on their pagers, calling
their friends to see if they knew where they were, to no avail. The families
filed missing persons reports with the Houston Police Department and continued
to look for the girls on their own. The Ertmans and Penas gathered friends
and neighbors to help them pass out a huge stack of fliers with the girls'
pictures all over the Houston area, even giving them to newspaper vendors
on the roadside.
Four days after the girls disappeared,
a person identifying himself as 'Gonzalez' called the Crimestoppers Tips
number. He told the call taker that the missing girls' bodies could be
found near T.C. Jester Park at White Oak bayou. The police were sent to
the scene and searched the park without finding anything. The police helicopter
was flying over the park and this apparently prompted Mr. 'Gonzalez' to
make a 911 call, directing the search to move to the other side of the
bayou. When the police followed this suggestion, they found the badly decaying
bodies of Jenny and Elizabeth.
Jennifer Ertman's dad, Randy
Ertman, was about to give an interview regarding the missing girls to a
local television reporter when the call came over a cameraman's police scanner
that two bodies had been found. Randy commandeered the news van and went
to the scene that was now bustling with police activity. Randy Ertman
appeared on the local news that evening, screaming at the police
officers who were struggling to hold him back, "Does she have blond
hair? Does she have blond hair?!!?" Fortunately, they did manage
to keep Randy from entering the woods and seeing his daughter's brutalized
body and that of her friend Elizabeth, but they were unable to escape that
fate themselves. I saw hardened, lifelong cops get tears in their eyes
when talking about the scene more than a year later. The bodies were very
badly decomposed, even for four days in Houston's brutal summer heat and
humidity, particularly in the head, neck and genital areas. The medical
examiner later testified that this is how she could be sure as to the horrible
brutality of the rapes, beatings and murders.
The break in solving the case
came from, of course, the 911 call. It was traced to the home of the brother
of one of the men later sentenced to death for these murders. When the
police questioned 'Gonzalez', he said that he had made the original call
at his 16 year-old wife's urging. She felt sorry for the families and wanted
them to be able to put their daughters' bodies to rest. 'Gonzalez' said
that his brother was one of the six people involved in killing the girls,
and gave police the names of all but one, the new recruit, whom he did
not know.
His knowledge of the crimes came
from the killers themselves, most of whom came to his home after the murders,
bragging and swapping the jewelry they had stolen from the girls.
While Jenny and Elizabeth were
living the last few hours of their lives, Peter
Cantu, Efrain
Perez, Derrick
Sean O'Brien, Joe Medellin and Joe's 14 year old brother were initiating a new
member, Raul
Villareal, into their gang, known as the Black and Whites.
Raul was an acquaintance of Efrain and was not known to the other gang members.
They had spent the evening drinking beer and then "jumping in"
Raul. This means that the new member was required to fight every member
of the gang until he passed out and then he would be accepted as a member.
Testimony showed that Raul lasted through three of the members before briefly
losing consciousness.
The gang continued drinking and 'shooting the breeze'
for some time and then decided to leave. Two brothers who had been with
them but testified that they were not in the gang left first and passed
Jenny and Elizabeth, who were unknowingly walking towards their deaths.
When Peter Cantu saw Jenny and Elizabeth, he thought it was a man and a
woman and told the other gang members that he wanted to jump him and beat
him up. He was frustrated that he had been the one who was unable to fight
Raul.
The gang members ran and grabbed
Elizabeth and pulled her down the incline, off of the tracks. Testimony
showed that Jenny had gotten free and could have run away but returned
to Elizabeth when she cried out for Jenny to help her.
For the next hour or so, these
beautiful, innocent young girls were subjected to the most brutal gang
rapes that most of the investigating officers had ever encountered. The
confessions of the gang members that were used at trial indicated that
there was never less than 2 men on each of the girls at any one time and
that the girls were repeatedly raped orally, anally and vaginally for the entire hour.
One of the gang members later said during the brag session that by the
time he got to one of the girls, "she was loose and sloppy."
One of the boys boasted of having 'virgin blood' on him.
The 14-year-old juvenile later testified
that he had gone back and forth between his brother and Peter Cantu since
they were the only ones there that he really knew and kept urging them
to leave. He said he was told repeatedly by Peter Cantu to "get some".
He raped Jennifer and was later sentenced to 40 years for aggravated
sexual assault, which was the maximum sentence for a juvenile.
When the rapes
finally ended, the horror
was not over. The gang members took Jenny and Elizabeth from the clearing
into a wooded area, leaving the juvenile behind, saying he was "too little
to watch". Jenny was strangled with the belt of Sean O'Brien, with
two murderers pulling, one on each side, until the belt broke. Part of
the belt was left at the murder scene, the rest was found in O'Brien's
home. After the belt broke, the killers used her own shoelaces to finish
their job. Medellin later complained that "the bitch wouldn't die"
and that it would have been "easier with a gun". Elizabeth was
also strangled with her shoelaces, after crying and begging the gang members
not to kill them; bargaining, offering to give them her phone number so
they could get together again.
The medical examiner testified
that Elizabeth's two front teeth were knocked out of her brutalized mouth
before she died and that two of Jennifer's ribs were broken after she had
died. Testimony showed that the girls' bodies were kicked and their necks were stomped on
after the strangulations in order to "make sure that they were really
dead."
The juvenile pled guilty to his
charge and his sentence will be reviewed when he turns 18, at which time
he could be released. The other five were tried for capital murder in Harris
County, Texas, convicted and sentenced to death. I attended all five trials
with the Ertmans and know too well the awful things that they and the Penas
had to hear and see in the course of seeing Justice served for their girls.
Two VERY important things in
the criminal justice system have changed as a result of these murders.
After the trial of Peter Cantu,
Judge Bill Harmon allowed the family members
to address the convicted. This had not previously been done in Texas courts
and now is done as a matter of routine.
The other change came from the
Texas Department of Corrections which instituted a new policy allowing
victims' families the choice and right to view the execution of their perpetrators.
I had an ever-swaying opinion
on the death penalty before this happened to people I know, before I watched
the justice system at work firsthand. I have now come to believe that there
are some crimes so heinous, so unconscionable that there can be no other
appropriate punishment than the death penalty.
Charlene
Hall
Vinnie Medellin was sentenced
at age 14 to forty years in the Texas Department of Corrections for the crime
of aggravated sexual assault upon Jennifer Ertman, to which he pled guilty.
As a juvenile, he was remanded to the custody of the Texas Youth Commission
where he would remain until age eighteen. He testified at all of the other
trials except for that of his brother, Jose Medellin. He refused to answer
any questions at his brother's trial and was held in contempt of court
and sentenced to six months in county jail, to be served at the end of his
current sentence.
On September 26, 1996, after
three years in the custody of the TYC, a hearing was held to determine
the future of the juvenile. Three outcomes were possible; he could have
been released on parole, a possibility which was never even discussed;
he could have been returned to TYC custody until he reached the age of
21 at which time another hearing would have been held; or he could have
been sent to TDC to serve the remainder of his sentence as an adult.
The recommendation of TYC was
that he continue treatment at TYC until age 21. He was said to be an excellent
inmate and did not have behavior problems and participated in all required
therapies. On the other hand, his counselors reported that he still seemed
to show no remorse for his part in the crimes and also did not take responsibility
for his part.
The courtroom was filled
with supporters of the girls' families, most of whom did not know them
before the murders and who have become friends through Justice For All
or Parents of Murdered Children. There was testimony about the details
of the crime from a detective who was present at the murder scene and participated
in the investigation and arrests. A therapist from TYC testified as to
Vinnie's stay at TYC and the reports of various counselors and therapists.
Vinnie's father testified as to his good behavior before this incident.
Randy Ertman took the witness
stand to tell the court about his daughter, Jennifer. When asked what Jenny's
hobbies were, he elicited bittersweet smiles in the courtroom when he responded,
"Shopping!" Randy told the judge that he was living through
the worst possible thing that could happen to a family and implored the
judge to send Vinnie to TDC and to not make the families repeat this process
in three years.
Vinnie took the stand and was
asked about his past behavior, his grades at school and how he happened
to be with his brother on this night. He read a letter that he had written,
telling the parents of the victims that he was sorry for their losses and
warning other teenagers away from gangs, saying that he had gone with this
gang for one hour and had ruined his life forever.
Judge Pat Shelton did not take
a recess to ponder his decision. He said that he agreed with Mr. Ertman,
that this is the nightmare of nightmares for a parent. He said that he
also agreed with Vinnie Medellin that gangs were destructive but that "you
have to mean what you say when you are walking out the front door of your
house, not just when you are walking in the door of the courtroom."
He also said "I'm not sure
that your future parole officer has even been BORN yet and I'm not sure
that you deserve for him to have even been born yet." He rejected
the report from the TYC as "psycho-babble" and transferred custody
of Venancio Medellin to the Texas Department of Corrections.
Charlene
Hall
Update
I just wanted to
let visitors know what is going on with the killers' appeals.
Two of the
murderers had an execution date set for June 2004, on and the
day after the 11th anniversary of the murders. The two were
Efrain Perez and Raul Villarreal. They both received a stay
because of an appeal that was to be heard before the US Supreme
Court regarding a case from Missouri that challenged the
execution of any murderer who was under the age of 18 at the
time of the crime. Both of these killers were not yet 18 when
they brutally attacked and killed the girls. Villarreal turned
18 in three months, and Perez turned 18 five months after the
murders.
The arguments in
this case were heard in the fall of 2004 and the decision was handed down
a few months later; no more death penalties for "juvenile"
murderers. This resulted in these two killers, plus dozens
more across the country, being removed from death row and given
life sentences instead. In this case, it is life without the
possibility of parole for 35 years because that was the
alternative to a death sentence in a capital case at the time of
the murders. They will certainly never be
released from prison, but they should have been executed.
The only
consolation is that they will no longer have the protection they
now have on death row - they will be in the general population
of the prison system and most regular prisoners do not like
people who rape and murder children. They might have gotten a
reprieve but it may be much worse in the end, a true case of
be careful what you wish for...
Additionally, a
third killer out of the five who were put on death row for this crime had an
appeal pending before the US Supreme Court. In this instance,
Joe Medellin
claimed that he should have received a new trial because he was a Mexican
national and should have been allowed to contact the Mexican
consulate for legal assistance. However, he had lived in the
US since he was six years old and had gone to elementary, middle
and high school here. The Supreme Court heard arguments in
the case in spring of 2005. In the meantime, then-US President George
Bush instructed, via a "determination," that Texas courts comply
with the 2004 ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
and hold a hearing for Medellin. Texas refused to comply,
saying that the federal government and the international ruling
have no bearing on state criminal justice statutes. The
US Supreme Court agreed to hear Medellin's case again, and sided
with Texas against the President, saying that President Bush did
not have the authority to order such a review.
Sean O'Brien was
executed on July 11, 2006. His final statement was, "I'm sorry.
I have always been sorry. It's the worst mistake that I ever
made in my whole life. Not because I am here but because of what
I did and I hurt a lot of people, you and my family."
Joe Medellin was executed on August 5, 2008. In his final statement,
Medellin apologized for his part in the crime: "I'm sorry that
my actions brought you pain. I hope this brings the closure to
what you seek."
The leader of the gang, Peter Cantu, after over 17 years, was
finally executed on August 17, 2010. He refused the
opportunity to make a final statement.
Email me at charlene@murdervictims.com
Memorial
Service on the five year anniversary of the murders
We mourn not just for the loss of what was but also for what
will never be.
Two benches were placed
in TC Jester Park, each bearing the names of one of the
girls,
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. Speakers included Dianne
Clements; Marie Munier and Jeannine Barr
from the Harris County District Attorney's Office; Kim Ogg
from the Houston Gang Task Force; John Sage and Woody
Clements.
Adolph & Melissa Pena, speaking to the audience.
Just before sunset,
dozens of balloons were released over the spot where
Jennifer and Elizabeth lost their lives that sad night.
Each balloon had a note attached to it that showed a photo
of the girls along with the following text:
We can heal, but we
will never forget.
Elizabeth and
Jennifer were brutally murdered five years ago this month.
This balloon was released on June 29, 1998, from Houston,
during a remembrance gathering for the girls. If you
find this balloon message, please call xxx-xxx-xxxx and let
us know how far the message traveled.
The furthest distance
reported was approximately sixty miles, in Anahuac, Texas.
In Memory of Elizabeth Pena and Jennifer Ertman
- 1993
S. P. Waltrip High School
News articles
about these murders (if you want to read
them in chronological order,
start at the bottom of the page)
Wed 8/6/2008
Somber tribute held to the teen victims / Group gathers where 2
girls slain and neighborhood was shaken to core
While all eyes were on Huntsville, a small group gathered
near an Oak Forest railroad trestle to pay quiet tribute to the
two girls whose deaths shook the Houston neighborhood to its
foundation.
It was the spot where, in the 1980s and early '90s, dense woods
sheltered teenagers playing hooky, and where the railroad bridge
over the bayou beat a shortcut back to their middle-class
neighborhood.
It was the same spot where, in 1993, 14-year-old Jennifer Ertman
and 16-year-old Elizabeth Peņa were raped, tortured and killed
when they stumbled upon a late-night gang initiation.
"This is where we came to skip school," said 46-year-old Sissy
Odell, waving to the park, a shorn and manicured version of its
former self. "We've all been walking the train tracks, just like
they did, all our lives."
On Tuesday, the girls' neighbors and former friends recounted
the graphic details that have stayed fresh in their memory. They
didn't want to gloss over them. They wanted everyone to remember
the sadism, the senselessness.
"They were so close to home," said Odell, whose niece was a
close friend of both girls. "They were almost there."
Before the killing, city officials often denied there was a gang
problem in the city.
"This was part of the impetus for the anti-gang programs in
Houston," said Officer C.E. Andersen, who worked the case in
1993, and stopped by Tuesday night to pay his respects.
The group disbanded around 7 p.m., after Medellin's execution
was put on hold.
As they left, a former middle school classmate of Jennifer's
carried two bouquets of roses to the granite benches in a stand
of pines and live oaks that serve as a memorial for the pair.
Sylvia Orta Perez, 32, set one bouquet by Elizabeth's marker,
among the soggy stuffed animals and ceramic angels other friends
had placed there.
Perez lowered her head, and a few minutes later, did the same
for her childhood friend.
"They're getting some peace now," she said.
Tue 8/6/2008
Medellin executed for rape, murder of Houston teens
HUNTSVILLE - The state of Texas defied an international court
and executed Jose Ernesto Medellin late Tuesday after the U.S.
Supreme Court denied a stay of execution for the killer in the
1993 Houston gang rape-murders of two teenage girls. Medellin,
33, was pronounced dead by lethal injection at 9:57 p.m., nine
minutes after receiving the fatal cocktail and nearly four hours
after his scheduled 6 p.m. execution. In his final statement,
Medellin apologized for his crime: "I'm sorry that my actions
brought you pain. I hope this brings the closure to what you
seek," he said. "Don't ever hate them for what they do. Never
harbor hate." He then looked toward the witness room in which
his friend, Sandra Crisp, was watching, crying softly, and
smiled. "I love you," he said. In the adjoining witness room,
relatives of the two victims watched with little apparent
emotion.
Medellin, a Mexican national who spent most of his life in the
United States, was condemned for the June 1993 murders of
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16. The girls were
raped and strangled with a belt and shoelace after they stumbled
into a drunken gang initiation rite while cutting through the
park to get home before their curfew. Four days after the crime,
a tip from a gang member's brother led authorities to the
bodies, then to the suspects. Within three hours of his arrest,
Medellin admitted his role in the gruesome murders, appalling
authorities with his boastful, callous description of the
night's events.
At issue in Medellin's last-minute appeal was his assertion that
authorities refused his right to contact the Mexican Consulate
after his arrest. By doing so, his attorneys argued, officials
violated a 1963 treaty signed by the U.S. and 165 other
countries that should have granted him access. His case stirred
international controversy when the United Nations' high court
found his rights had been violated. The court ordered the
execution be stayed.
While some cheered Texas' decision to execute him on Tuesday,
others warned that his death could render the treaty void,
putting the lives of American citizens arrested overseas in
jeopardy. The fathers of the victims, however, expressed relief.
"It's a long time coming," Adolfo Peņa said, "Fifteen years is a
long time. I wish those two girls could've lived that long."
Randy Ertman stood with his arm around Christina Alamaraz, a
close friend. He said recent media attention had been too
focused on Medellin and not their daughters.
Sandra Babcock, a law professor at Northwestern University in
Chicago and an attorney for Medellin, said the case was not just
about one Mexican national on death row. "It's also about
ordinary Americans who count on the protections of the consulate
when they travel abroad in strange lands," she said. "It's about
the reputation of the U.S. as a nation that adheres to the rule
of law."
Hours before the execution, death penalty supporters and
opponents gathered at Huntsville's Walls Unit, site of the state
execution chamber. Elaine Jackson of Houston, who identified
herself as a friend of the Peņas, was among those supporting the
execution. "The girls didn't get a second chance, why should
he?" Jackson demanded. "Why should he keep on breathing?" On the
other side of the street, Nancy Bailey was among those opposing
the execution. Putting Medellin to death, she said, would flout
the nation's treaty commitments and endanger Americans arrested
abroad.
Medellin, who granted few interviews on death row, told a
Mexican news reporter that he'd had 15 years in prison to
compose his emotions. On Monday and Tuesday he visited with his
parents, whom he had not seen since 2001, and spoke by phone
with his younger brother, who is serving 40 years for his part
in the crime. Jose Medellin had insisted he told police he was a
Mexican citizen; Gov. Rick Perry's office said he did not. In
2004, the world court, acting on a Mexican lawsuit against the
U.S., ordered hearings to determine if the cases of Medellin and
dozens of other Mexican nationals in custody had been damaged by
the treaty violations.
President Bush urged the hearings be held. Texas, however,
appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that only
Congress had authority to demand such hearings. Weeks after the
decision, a bill retroactively calling for the hearings was
introduced in Congress. The bill, however, remains in
legislative limbo. "Outside of Texas this is a huge diplomatic
misstep," said Columbia Law School professor Sarah Cleveland.
"Unfortunately, I doubt the international community is likely to
brush this off as simply the actions of Texas. In the
international community ... the United States is responsible for
Texas' actions."
Judge Cathy Cochran, of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals,
took a different view. "Some societies may judge our death
penalty barbaric," she noted. "Most Texans, however, consider
death a just penalty in certain rare circumstances. Many
Europeans disagree. So be it."
Medellin was the second person executed for the attack. Derrick
O'Brien was put to death in July 2006. Gang leader Peter Cantu
remains on death row. Two others, 17 at the time of the crime,
had their death sentences commuted to life in prison.
Mon 5/4/2008
Medellin set to die Tuesday for Ertman-Pena killings
HOUSTON - "Texas. It's like a whole other country." Coined to
promote tourism, that wry verbal wink at the state's mythic
image has assumed a literal meaning as Texas finds itself in
defiance of the United Nations, the Organization of American
States and national leaders in its planned Tuesday execution of
Mexican citizen Jose Medellin. Unless the U.S. Supreme Court or
Gov. Rick Perry acts in his favor, Medellin, 33, will die for
the 1993 rape-strangulation of two teenage Houston girls,
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa. Jennifer's father, Randy
Ertman, dismissed international opposition to the execution.
"It's just a last-ditch effort to keep the scumbag breathing,"
Ertman said. "He never should have been breathing in the first
place. I don't care, I really don't care what anyone thinks
about this except Texas. I love Texas. Texas is in my blood."
At issue is Texas' refusal to hold a hearing to determine
whether Medellin's defense was harmed by his inability to confer
with Mexican consular officials at the time of his arrest. A
suspect's right to talk with his consulate is guaranteed by the
United Nations' Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to
which the United States is a party. Medellin insists he told
both Houston police and Harris County officers that he is a
Mexican citizen. Prosecutors say the killer never informed
authorities of his nationality. In a sworn statement, Medellin
said he learned that the Mexican Consulate could possibly help
him in 1997, four years after his arrest. He unsuccessfully
petitioned the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on the issue in
1998. In 2004, the U.N.'s world court, responding to a Mexican
lawsuit against the United States, ordered that hearings be held
for Medellin and dozens of other inmates denied their consular
rights. In 2005, President Bush called for the hearings to be
held. Texas challenged the decision, and the Supreme Court
determined that only Congress could mandate such action. In
July, the world court ordered Medellin's execution be stayed.
Perry has argued Texas isn't bound by the decisions of
international courts and that the state is determined to hold
killers, regardless of their nationality, responsible for their
crimes. Texas has rebuffed not only the U.N. and Bush, but
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, U.S. Attorney General
Michael Mukasey and the judicial arm of the Organization of
American States, which has demanded Medellin receive a new
trial.As politicians worried about the impact on Americans
arrested in foreign countries should Texas fail to honor the
world court order, prison officials moved Medellin to a special
death row cell, where he will be held under constant video
surveillance until he is driven to Huntsville's death house.
The big city wept when little Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth
Peņa died. Students at Waltrip High School, Jennifer was 14, and
Elizabeth had just turned 16. Their lives were filled with the
things that occupy teenage girls. Friends recalled Elizabeth,
who was beginning to dabble with makeup, as a "social
butterfly." Jennifer tried her hand at basketball before
concluding she wasn't cut out for athletics. On June 24, 1993,
the girls were at a party at a friend's apartment when they
realized the lateness of the hour. Following the railroad tracks
through T.C. Jester Park, they concluded, would shave 10 minutes
off their trip to Elizabeth's Oak Forest home.
As the girls made their way past a thicket near White Oak Bayou,
they stumbled onto the tail end of a drunken gang initiation.
When they blundered into the group of youths, Medellin - 5 feet,
5 inches tall and weighing just 135 pounds - grabbed Elizabeth
and flipped her to the ground. Jennifer, drawn by Elizabeth's
scream, turned to help and was herself captured. As the teens
cried and struggled, six gang members took turns raping them.
Finally, gang leader Peter Cantu told Medellin, "We're going to
have to kill them." Gang members Derrick O'Brien and Raul
Villarreal looped a belt around Jennifer's throat, pulling with
such force that the belt broke. Cantu, Medellin and Efrain Perez
strangled Elizabeth with a shoelace. Then they stomped on the
girls' throats for good measure.
Four days later, police, acting on a tip from a gang member's
brother, found the teens' bodies, badly decomposed in the summer
heat. The victims were identified through dental records.
Judge Cathy Cochran, a member of the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals, which last week rejected his appeals, wrote that
Medellin bragged to his friends that the victims had been
virgins until they were attacked by the gang. "His written
confession," Cochran wrote, "displayed a callous, cruel and
cavalier attitude toward the two girls that he had raped and
helped to murder. Surely no juror or judge will ever forget his
words or his sordid deeds."
O'Brien was first to be executed, going to his death in July
2006 with the parting words: "I am sorry. I have always been
sorry." Cantu, also convicted of capital murder, awaits a death
date. Medellin, who grew up in poverty amid drug abuse and an
unstable home environment, twice refused to be interviewed for
this story. But on his Web site, posted by a Canadian anti-death
penalty group, he claims: "I'm where I am because I made an
adolescent choice. That's it! My life is in black and white like
old western movies," he wrote. "But unlike the movies, the good
guys don't always finish first."
'Uncaring and hateful'
This time, death penalty opponents believe, the sovereign state
of Texas has gone too far. "Most of our friends abroad have long
since come to the conclusion that this country, on this topic,
just doesn't get it," said Southern Methodist University history
professor Rick Halperin. "This state is seen as uncaring and
hateful. And this case is just right on the top." The Medellin
case will solidify stereotypical views of the Lone Star State,
said Halperin, president of the Texas Coalition to Abolish the
Death Penalty and former board chairman of Amnesty International
USA.
Cochran, however, disagreed in her appeals court concurrence.
"Some societies may judge our death penalty barbaric," she
wrote. "Most Texans, however, consider death a just penalty in
certain rare circumstances. Many Europeans disagree. So be it."
The politics of capital punishment aside, some legal observers
worry that the United States may suffer as a result of Texas'
noncompliance with the world court order. "Outside of Texas this
is a huge diplomatic misstep," said Columbia Law School
professor Sarah Cleveland. " ... Unfortunately, I doubt that the
international community is likely to brush this off as simply
the actions of Texas. In the international community (and under
all U.S. treaty obligations) the United States is responsible
for Texas' actions."
Wide-ranging effect
If the United States fails to observe its treaty commitments,
said Cleveland, co-director of the Human Rights Institute, other
nations might be inclined to disregard agreements when they
become inconvenient. Affected could be treaties ranging from
those mandating protection for foreign nationals to nuclear
nonproliferation. Texas Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, a frequent
traveler abroad, said he fears Texas' noncompliance will put
American military personnel and civilians at risk. In ruling
that Bush could not unilaterally force states to hold hearings
to consider Vienna Convention violations, the Supreme Court
noted that power lies in Congress. Within weeks, U.S. Rep.
Howard Berman, D-Calif., introduced such a bill. It is pending
in the House Judiciary Committee and can't be enacted until next
year.
Sun 8/3/2008
Texas to World Court: Murderer should die
HOUSTON - The likely prospect of Texas
carrying out the death penalty in one of Houston's most brutal
murder cases in a generation is making the planned execution
among the most contentious in the nation's busiest capital
punishment state.
The scheduled execution of convicted killer Jose Medellin in
Huntsville Tuesday evening has attracted international
attention. The International Court of Justice, also known as the
World Court, said the Mexican-born Medellin and some 50 other
Mexicans on death rows around the nation should have new
hearings in U.S. courts to determine whether a 1963 treaty was
violated during their arrests. Medellin, now 33, is the first
among them set to die.
His attorneys contend Medellin was denied the protections of the
Vienna Convention, which calls for people arrested to have
access to their home country's consular officials. "The United
States's word should not be so carelessly broken, nor its
standing in the international community so needlessly
compromised," Medellin's attorneys said, seeking a reprieve in a
filing late last week with the U.S. Supreme Court. President
Bush has asked states to review the cases. Texas has refused to
budge.
Medellin's lawyers went to the Supreme Court after the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest criminal court,
refused to stop the lethal injection. The justices in March
ruled that neither President Bush nor the international court
can force Texas' hand. Medellin's supporters says either
Congress or the Texas legislature should be given a chance to
pass a law ordering a new hearing before he can be executed.
"There is no dispute that if Texas executes Mr. Medellin in
these circumstances, Texas would cause the United States
irreparably to breach treaty commitments made on behalf of the
United States as a whole and thereby compromise U.S. interests
that both this Court and the President have described as
compelling," Medellin's attorneys said in their filing.
If executed, Medellin would become the 410th condemned prisoner
to die, far more than any other state since Texas resumed
carrying out capital punishment in 1982. At least six other
Mexican nationals are in that total. Medellin was sentenced to
die in October 1994. "Medellin and five others brutally and
viciously gang raped, stomped, kicked, slashed, strangled and
murdered two teenage girls," Allison Castle, a spokeswoman for
Gov. Rick Perry, said. "The governor's not feeling any pressure
on this. He's considering the facts of the crime."
The facts are horrific. Medellin was one of six teenagers
arrested and charged with the gang rape and murders of Elizabeth
Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14. The two Houston girls,
returning from a friend's house, took a shortcut home along some
railroad tracks and stumbled on a group of teenagers drinking
beer after initiating a new gang member. Evidence showed the
girls were gang raped for more than an hour, then were kicked
and beaten before being strangled. A red nylon belt was pulled
so tight around Ertman's neck that the belt snapped. Four days
later, the girls' bodies were found, decomposing and mummifying
in 100-degree heat, culminating a frantic search by families and
police under the glare of intense media coverage. A tip from the
brother of one of the gang members led police to arrest Medellin
and the others.
One of the gang members convicted for the slayings, Derrick
O'Brien, was executed last year. O'Brien said Medellin was at
one end of a belt being pulled around Ertman's neck as he yanked
on the other. Two others, Efrain Perez and Raul Villarreal, had
their death sentences commuted to life in prison when the
Supreme Court barred executions for those who were 17 at the
time of their crimes. Peter Cantu, described by authorities as
ringleader, remains on death row. He does not have an execution
date. The sixth person convicted, Medellin's brother, Vernancio,
was 14 at the time and is serving a 40-year prison term.
In the legal frenzy to save Medellin, the fact that two girls
were killed is being lost, said Randy Ertman, whose daughter was
one of the victims and who looked forward to attending
Medellin's execution. "They've forgotten Jennifer and
Elizabeth," he said. "They care only about saving Jose Medellin.
This is not about vengeance. This is not about a deterrent or
about closure. It's about the punishment. Everybody wants me to
say closure or vengeance. I'm never going to have closure. It's
just a miracle word that's going to make us feel good, but it
ain't going to happen."
Texas officials acknowledged Medellin was not told he could ask
for help from Mexican diplomats but argued he forfeited the
right because he never raised the issue until four years after
his conviction. In any case, the diplomats' intercession
wouldn't have made any difference in the outcome of the case,
they said.
State and federal courts rejected Medellin's claim when he
raised it on appeal. "Concluding that the World Court cannot
force Texas to release convicted murderers, last March the U.S.
Supreme Court rejected Medellin's claims and found that he would
have received the same sentence with or without consular
notification," said Jerry Strickland, a spokesman for the Texas
Attorney General's Office.
Medellin, who came to the United States at age 3, speaks, reads
and writes English. He gave a written confession. "I am a
Mexican through and through," Medellin said on an anti-death
penalty Web site where inmates seek pen pals. "I don't want
sympathy or pity, I'd rather have your anger. Don't feel sorry
for me. I'm where I'm at because I made an adolescent choice."
Mexico, which has no death penalty, initially sued the United
States in the World Court in 2003. Mexico and other opponents of
capital punishment have sought to use the court to fight for
foreigners facing execution in the U.S. Medellin would not be
the first foreign national executed in Texas. Two years ago,
infamous train-hopping serial killer Angel Maturino Resendiz,
who became known as "The Railroad Killer," became at least the
sixth Mexican executed in Texas.
"The law is clear: Texas is bound not by the World Court, but by
the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed this matter and
determined that this convicted murderer's execution shall
proceed," Strickland said of Medellin's case.
Fri 8/1/2008
Mexican citizen asks high court to block execution
HOUSTON - Texas officials remained adamant
that a convicted killer in a gruesome gang rape-slaying in
Houston should be executed next week despite an international
court's ruling he should be entitled to additional legal reviews
because he's a Mexican citizen. Lawyers for Jose Medellin, four
months after losing his case at the U.S. Supreme Court, returned
to the high court Friday seeking a last-minute reprieve.
Medellin is set to die Tuesday in Huntsville for his
participation in the 1993 gang rape and beating deaths of two
Houston girls, Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16.
Medellin's lawyers want the justices to block his lethal
injection until Texas grants him a new hearing to comply with a
ruling from the International Court of Justice, also known as
the World Court.
The state has so far refused. "We don't care where you're from,"
Allison Castle, a spokeswoman for Gov. Rick Perry, said Friday.
"If you commit a despicable crime like this in Texas, you'll
face the ultimate penalty under our laws." The Supreme Court
ruled in March that neither President Bush nor the international
court can force Texas' hand. "The truth is, Texas is not bound
by a foreign court's ruling," Castle said.
Medellin says Congress or the Texas Legislature, which doesn't
meet again until January, should be given a chance to pass a law
ordering a new hearing before he can be executed. Four
Democratic lawmakers have introduced such a bill in Congress,
but it probably won't be acted upon this year. Medellin is one
of roughly 50 Mexicans on death rows around the nation,
including about a dozen in Texas, who contend they were denied
prompt access to their country's consular officials after being
arrested in the United States. The access is guaranteed by
international treaty.
On Thursday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's
highest criminal court, rejected similar arguments from
Medellin, who was 18 when the two girls were killed. In a
concurring opinion to the court's ruling, Judge Cathy Cochran
said Medellin, who was brought to the United States when he was
3, indeed was a Mexican citizen. But she said he had lived in
the U.S. for 15 of his 18 years and spoke fluent English while
he never obtained or sought American citizenship. "His claim is
that no one informed him of his right to contact the Mexican
consulate," she wrote. "This is true. It also is true that he
was never denied access to the Mexican consulate. "The problem
is that he apparently never told any law enforcement or judicial
official that he was a Mexican citizen until some four years
after his conviction." Cochran said while Texas authorities
"clearly failed in their duty" to inform Medellin of his rights
under the Vienna Convention, "this foreign national equally
failed in his duty to inform those authorities that he was a
Mexican citizen."
In 2004, the World Court said the prisoners should have new
court hearings to determine whether the absence of contact with
consular officials affected the cases. Bush, while saying he
disagreed with the ruling, nevertheless said the United States
was obligated by treaty to comply with it and ordered the states
to follow suit. Texas refused, which is how Medellin's case
initially ended up before the Supreme Court. Bush was in the
unusual position of siding with the death row inmate against the
state he served as governor, and after having overseen 152
executions in Texas.
The World Court last month ordered U.S. authorities to do
everything possible to halt executions scheduled in Texas of
Medellin and four other Mexicans until their cases are reviewed.
The Bush administration has said it expected the World Court's
order to have little impact.
Evidence showed the girls were gang raped for more than an hour,
then were kicked and beaten before being strangled. Four days
later, the girls' bodies were found, decomposing and mummifying
in 100-degree heat. A tip from the brother of one of the gang
members led police to arrest Medellin and his companions. Two of
the gang members, Efrain Perez and Raul Villarreal, had their
death sentences commuted to life in prison when the Supreme
Court barred executions for those who were 17 at the time of
their crimes. One of the gang, Derrick O'Brien, was executed
last year. O'Brien said Medellin was at one end of a belt being
pulled around Ertman's neck as he yanked on the other. Peter
Cantu, described by authorities as ringleader of the gang,
remains on death row without an execution date. A sixth person
convicted, Medellin's brother, Vernancio, was 14 at the time and
received a 40-year prison term.
Fri 8/1/2008
Court's rejection brings Medellin closer to execution / Despite
calls for delay, Mexican citizen set for execution
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has dealt capital killer
Jose Medellin a major setback in his bid to escape the
executioner's needle, throwing out his bid for a post-conviction
writ of habeas corpus and his motion for a stay. Medellin, 33,
convicted in the 1993 rape-murder of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and
Elizabeth Pena, 16, still has motions for stays pending with the
U.S. Supreme Court and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.
He is scheduled to be put to death Tuesday. Medellin's attorneys
could not be reached for comment Friday.
Medellin, a Mexican national, had filed his appeal based on
arguments that Houston police deprived him of his right to
contact the Mexican consulate after his arrest. The right is
guaranteed by the United Nation's Vienna Convention of Consular
Relations, to which the United States is a party. Last month,
the UN's world court ordered Medellin be granted a stay so that
a hearing could be held on whether that violation damaged his
defense. Texas authorities responded that Medellin was not
informed of his UN rights because he did not identify himself as
a Mexican citizen. Thus far, they have resisted pressure from
President Bush and other U.S. officials to comply with the world
court order.
The Texas appeals court, in a ruling posted today, held that the
latest petition, supposedly containing late-developing arguments
and facts that could not have been presented earlier, was not
filed in a timely manner. Medellin was one of six gang members
arrested in the dual killings in TC Jester Park. Gang member
Derrick O'Brien was executed in July 2006. Peter Cantu also has
been condemned. Two other gang members, minors at the time of
the crime, have had their death sentences commuted to life.
Medellin's brother, only 14 at the time of the killings, is
serving a 40-year sentence.
Judge Cathy Cochran, in concurring with the appeals court's
majority opinion, wrote that there is "no likelihood at all"
that the inadvertent violation of the Vienna Convention harmed
Medellin's defense. "This was a truly despicable crime committed
by ...deadly brutal young men who were deadly dangerous to
anyone who might find themselves near them. All five were
sentenced to death by separate juries after hearing all of the
evidence in each of their individual trials. "No matter how long
the courts of this state, this nation, or any other nation
review, re-review and re-review once again the disgusting facts
of this crime and these perpetrators, the result should be the
same: These juries reached a reasonable verdict, beyond a
reasonable doubt, that a sentence of death was the only
appropriate punishment under Texas law."
Thu 7/17/2008
TEXAS TO WORLD COURT: EXECUTIONS ARE STILL ON / Gov. Perry's
office rebuffs call to let Medellin's case be reviewed
Texas will go ahead with the scheduled Aug. 5 execution of
Houston rapist-killer Jose Medellin despite Wednesday's United
Nations world court order for a stay, a spokesman for Gov. Rick
Perry said. The U.N.'s International Court of Justice's call for
stays in the cases of Medellin and four other Mexican nationals
awaiting execution in Texas came in response to a petition filed
last month by the Mexican government. The petition sought to
halt executions to allow for review of the killers' cases to
determine whether denying them access to the Mexican Consulate
after arrest impaired their trial defenses. The Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations stipulates that, upon request,
an alien offender's national consulate must be notified of his
arrest.
In its order, the world court quotes the Mexican government's
argument that "Texas has made clear that unless restrained, it
will go forward with the execution without providing Mr.
Medellin the mandated review and reconsideration," which will
"irreparably" breach the U.S. government's obligations to the
court's 2004 order. The Mexican government reasons that "the
paramount interest in human life is at stake," according to the
court's order. If Medellin and the other nationals are executed
without additional court reviews, "Mexico would forever be
deprived of the opportunity to vindicate its rights and those of
the nationals concerned."
Perry's office dismissed the argument. "The world court has no
standing in Texas and Texas is not bound by a ruling or edict
from a foreign court," Perry spokesman Robert Black said. "It is
easy to get caught up in discussions of international law and
justice and treaties. It's very important to remember that these
individuals are on death row for killing our citizens."
But international law expert Sarah Cleveland, a professor of
human and constitutional rights at New York City's Columbia Law
School, said if the U.S. fails to act on the world court order,
other countries may follow suit. "This can only come back to
hurt U.S. citizens when they are detained abroad," she wrote in
an e-mail. " ... When a global leader like the U.S. refuses to
comply with its clear international legal obligations (and
everyone agrees that this is a clear legal obligation), it
undermines the willingness of other states to comply with their
own obligations and it inspires them not to trust us to obey
ours."
Deadly gang initiation Medellin, 33, was condemned for the 1993
killings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16, who
stumbled into a drunken midnight gang initiation rite at T.C.
Jester Park in north Houston. Medellin's accomplice, Derrick
O'Brien, was executed in July 2006. Also sentenced to die is
gang leader Peter Anthony Cantu. Three other accomplices are
serving prison sentences. Medellin was the only non-American
involved in the murders.
Wednesday's U.N. court decision in The Hague, Netherlands, was
the latest development in an an ongoing legal wrangle that has
involved President Bush, the U.S. Supreme Court and the Mexican
government. In 2004, the U.N. court ordered a review of the
cases of 51 Mexican nationals facing execution in the United
States because they had not been allowed to speak with their
nation's consular officials. In February 2005, Bush directed
state courts to abide by the U.N. court decision, specifically
asking Texas to review Medellin's case. In March, the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled that Bush had overstepped his authority.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the president cannot mandate
such court reviews without congressional concurrence. On Monday,
U.S. Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., filed a bill providing for
such reviews. As of Wednesday, it was in committee. Weeks after
the Supreme Court's ruling, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
and U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey jointly wrote Perry
asking for his help in obtaining the reviews. The United States,
they wrote, continues to be bound by the world court's decision
under international law.
Girls' fathers adamant
Meanwhile, Randy Ertman, father of Jennifer Ertman, hotly
denounced the world court's order for stays. "The world court
don't mean diddly," he said. "This business belongs in the state
of Texas. The people of the state of Texas support the
execution. We thank them. The rest of them can go to hell."
Adolfo Peņa, father of Elizabeth Peņa, agreed. "I believe we've
been through all the red tape we can go through," he said. "It's
time to rock and roll."
EYE OF THE STORM: These five Texas inmates are among the 51
Mexican nationals at the center of the world court ruling:
JOSE ERNESTO MEDELLIN, 33, was convicted
in the 1993 strangulation, rape and kidnapping of Houston
teenagers Elizabeth Pena, Jennifer Ertman.
CESAR ROBERTO FIERRO, 51, has served on
death row since 1980 for shooting El Paso taxi driver,
Nicolas Castanon.
RUBEN CARDENAS, 38, and another man in
1997 took their victim to a remote area, where Cardenas
raped, beat and strangled her.
HECTOR GARCIA, 47, was convicted for the
1989 killing of 14- year-old Eduardo Rios during a robbery
of a Rio Grande Valley convenience store.
ROBERT RAMOS, 54, was convicted for the
1992 slayings of his wife Leticia Ramos, 42, and their two
children, Abigail Ramos, 7, and Jonathan Ramos, 3.
CHRONOLOGY
March 31, 2004: The United Nation's
International Court of Justice issued an order that U.S. courts
must review the cases of 51 condemned Mexican prisoners. The
court ruled the prisoners' rights to speak with Mexican consular
officials after their arrests had been violated.
Feb. 28, 2005: President Bush directed state courts to abide by
the world court's decision. He also asked Texas specifically to
review the case of Jose Medellin, now scheduled to die by lethal
injection Aug. 5.
March 25, 2008: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Bush could not
compel Texas to review Medellin's case. Chief Justice John
Roberts said the president cannot unilaterally carry out an
international treaty without concurrence of the legislative
branch.
June 20: The Mexican government made an emergency appeal to the
U.N.'s highest court to block the executions of its citizens on
death row in the U.S.
July 16: The world court ordered the U.S. to halt the five
pending executions of Mexican nationals on Texas' death row.
WORLD COURT
Some facts about the International Court of Justice, also known
as the World Court:
Established: 1945
Location: The Hague, Netherlands
Role: Judicial arm of the United Nations.
Decisions: Binding on member countries. No appeal, the court
cannot enforce judgments.
Justices: 15 justices, each elected to nine-year terms by the
U.N. General Assembly or the U.N. Security Council.
Lawsuits: Court acts on matters brought by member states;
individuals cannot bring suits.
Tue 5/6/2008
Execution date for teens' killer set for Aug. 5 / The lawyer for
Medellin hopes to stop it, saying client didn't get to talk to
consulate
A Houston man who was convicted of capital murder 14 years ago
for the gang rapes and slayings of two teenage girls received a
death date Monday after the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way
for his and other killers' executions. Jose Medellin, 33, is set
to die by injection on Aug. 5 for the 1993 murders of Jennifer
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16. The girls were beaten, raped
and killed after they happened upon a drunken midnight gang
initiation rite in T.C. Jester Park in northwest Houston.
State District Judge Caprice Cosper set the date in a hearing
Monday. Medellin was convicted and sentenced in 1994. "I'm ready
for this to be over," said Adolph Peņa, Elizabeth's father."I
know it takes a long time, but how much time do you need?"
However, Medellin's attorney, Sandra Babcock, said she expected
to stop the execution, based on concerns about international
justice agreements between the United States and other nations.
She said she will ask congressional leaders to put pressure on
the government to adhere to the agreements, which include
notifying the consulates of foreign nationals who are arrested.
She said Medellin, who was born in Mexico but lived most of his
life in Houston, was not given the opportunity to notify his
consulate.
Mexico sued U.S.
A legal struggle over international law had kept Medellin's case
on appeal to the Supreme Court. Mexico, which opposes the death
penalty, sued the United States in 2003 in the International
Court of Justice in The Hague on behalf of about 50 Mexican
citizens, including Medellin, on death rows in the United
States. The Mexican government said U.S. officials violated the
1963 Vienna Convention when they failed to allow the citizens of
another country access to its representatives after arrest. The
World Court agreed and said the inmates deserved new hearings.
President Bush had said Texas should reconsider the Medellin
case and others based on the Vienna Convention. But the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled in March that a memo by Bush instructing
states to comply with the international court was not sufficient
to require states to act. A few days after he wrote the memo,
Bush withdrew the United States from the part of an
international treaty that gives the International Court of
Justice final say in international disputes.
Supreme Court ruling
The Supreme Court removed another impediment to the execution of
Medellin and others when it ruled in April on a Kentucky case
that lethal injection is not cruel and unusual punishment.
Kentucky uses the same lethal three-drug cocktail that is used
in 35 other states, including Texas. Defense attorneys argued
that it violated inmates' constitutional rights. Executions were
halted in September when the high court agreed to hear the
Kentucky case.
Five other reputed gang members were convicted in connection
with the Ertman and Peņa slayings. Derrick Sean O'Brien was
executed in 2006. Peter Anthony Cantu is on death row for the
killings, but his execution date has not been set. Raul
Villarreal and Efrain Perez were sentenced to death but had
their sentences commuted to life in prison in 2005 after the
U.S. Supreme Court determined that it was cruel to execute those
who were juveniles. They were months away from turning 18 when
the killings occurred. Venacio Medellin, Jose Medellin's brother
who was 14 at the time of the crime, testified against the
others and is serving a 40-year sentence.
Tue 4/1/2008
Court won't hear 7 killers' appeals / Execution dates for
Mexicans pending ruling on lethal injection
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the
appeals of seven Mexican-born prisoners condemned to die in
Texas, including two who had committed murders in Houston in the
1990s. The action followed a high court ruling last week in
which the justices rebuffed President Bush for directing the
state of Texas to abide by a world court ruling and rehear the
case of another Mexican on death row. The prisoner, Jose
Medellin, had been convicted of the 1993 rape-murders of two
Houston teenagers - Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16
- who had stumbled upon a gang initiation.
Mexico, which opposes the death penalty, sued the United States
in the International Court of Justice in the Hague on behalf of
some 50 Mexican citizens, including Medellin, on death rows in
the United States. The Mexicans said American officials violated
the 1963 Vienna Convention when they failed to allow the
citizens of another country access to its representatives after
arrest. The world court agreed. But in a 6-3 ruling on March 25,
the Supreme Court said the president overstepped his bounds when
he ordered states in a memo to abide by the world court's
ruling. The U.S. court said a president must consult Congress
before issuing an order based on a treaty.
The court did not comment Monday when it declined to hear the
appeals by the seven men. But their execution dates were not
expected to be set until the court rules on another death
penalty issue, whether lethal injections are constitutional.
Jordan Steiker, who co-directs the Capital Punishment Center at
the University of Texas Law School, said it was not unusual for
the justices to resolve the overarching legal issues based on
one case and then apply it to others in similar situations.
"These cases were already in the pipeline," he said. Steiker and
others, including state Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, warned
that the court's decisions regarding the Mexican inmates could
undermine the rights of American citizens traveling abroad.
"Showing regard for the foreign nationals in the United States
under our treaty obligations serves to protect American citizens
by ensuring that any detention is followed by contact with a
local United States consulate so that legal assistance and other
moral support can be provided," said Ellis, who sits on the
state Senate criminal justice committee. "The Supreme Court's
decision makes those kinds of assurances harder to establish."
A spokesman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry praised Monday's action by
the high court. "Foreign courts have no jurisdiction in Texas,"
said Krista Piferrer. "The governor believes that justice has
been and will be served for these individuals who committed
atrocious crimes."
Among the seven Mexican-born inmates who lost appeals Monday are
31-year-old Felix Rocha, who was convicted of shooting a
security guard in a Houston apartment complex in 1994, and
42-year-old Virgilio Maldonado, who was convicted of shooting a
man three times in the back of the head during a 1995 Houston
drug robbery.
Others whose appeals were denied included:
Ignacio Gomez, 38, convicted of shooting
three teenage boys and burying them in desert sand dunes
outside El Paso in 1996;
Humberto Leal, 35, convicted of abducting
a San Antonio woman, raping her and crushing her head with a
35-pound chunk of asphalt in 1994;
Ruben Cardenas, 37, convicted of raping
and strangling a teenager in Hidalgo County in 1997.
Robert Ramos, 53, convicted of killing of
his wife and two children at their home in Progreso in 1992,
then burying them beneath the bathroom floor.
Cesar Fierro, 51, who was convicted of
robbing and killing an El Paso taxi driver in 1979.
Fourteen Mexican citizens are awaiting
execution in Texas, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
reported.
As of late February, 122 foreign nationals were on death row
throughout the United States, according to the Washington-based
Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit organization that
monitors capital punishment issues.
Wed 3/26/2008
HIGH COURT RULES BUSH ERRED IN HOUSTON CASE / President can't
force a new trial for Mexican in 1993 murders, the justices find
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Texas cannot
be forced by President Bush to reopen the case of Jose Medellin,
a Mexican citizen sentenced to death for raping and murdering
two teenage girls in Houston. By a 6-3 vote, the court said that
a memo by Bush instructing the state to comply with a world
court decision for a new hearing in the 1993 case was not
sufficient to require the state to act. The dissenters, however,
expressed concerns that the ruling would harm the United States'
relationship with Mexico and make it more difficult to enforce
international treaties.
Tuesday's decision will not immediately lead to an execution
date for Medellin, who has exhausted all appeals and confessed
to the killings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16,
after they happened upon a gang initiation. Harris County
Assistant District Attorney Roe Wilson said the next step must
wait until the justices resolve another case regarding the
legality of lethal injections. All executions are on hold until
that ruling is handed down. Mark Vinson, a former Harris County
assistant district attorney who prosecuted Medellin, said, "I've
been waiting for this decision for a long time. It looks like
the court saw through this masquerade and rendered the proper
ruling."
Donald Donovan, Medellin's attorney, said he was disappointed in
the decision, which he called "a departure from the original
intent of the framers of the Constitution and over 200 years of
enforcement of U.S. treaties by U.S. courts." At issue was a
2004 ruling by the world court - formally known as the
International Court of Justice - that the United States violated
the rights of Medellin and 50 other citizens of Mexico as
spelled out in the 1963 Vienna Convention. Mexico, which opposes
the death penalty, brought suit in the court at The Hague,
arguing that the U.S. violated the treaty by not allowing the
defendants to notify a Mexican Consulate of their arrests.
The Mexican foreign ministry criticized the Supreme Court's
ruling, complaining that the world court's decision "should be
respected by those governments that have accepted its
jurisdiction." Mexico "will continue making use of each and
every one of the resources at its disposal to achieve the full
respect for the rights" of its citizens, the foreign ministry
said.
Presidential powers
Even though Bush presided over 152 executions as governor of
Texas, he sided with the world court and issued a memo in 2005
without consulting Congress. The memo directed state courts to
comply with the decision to rehear the cases. But the Supreme
Court on Tuesday agreed with Texas that Bush had overstepped his
bounds. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts
said the president cannot unilaterally carry out an
international treaty without concurrence of the Legislative
Branch. "The responsibility for transforming an international
obligation arising from a non-self-executing treaty into
domestic law falls to Congress," Roberts wrote. In a dissent,
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that it would be impractical to
involve Congress in carrying out numerous international
agreements. He added that the ruling could lead to "worsening
relations with our neighbor Mexico, of precipitating actions by
other nations putting at risk American citizens who have the
misfortune to be arrested while traveling abroad, or of
diminishing our nation's reputation abroad as a result of our
failure to follow the rule of law principles we preach." Breyer
was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg and David Souter in
the dissent. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a separate opinion
concurring with Roberts' but nevertheless urged Texas to hold
another hearing. An unusual coalition of liberal academics and
conservative politicians had opposed the Bush administration's
effort to force states to abide by the world court decision.
A spokeswoman for Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry, who has been
a close ally of Bush, welcomed the decision. "What the Supreme
Court's decision did was affirm what the governor has always
believed," said spokeswoman Krista Piferrer, "that the state has
rights and that a court based in some foreign country has no
jurisdiction in Texas."
Oval Office 'disappointed'
Ernest Young, a former University of Texas law professor, had
filed a friend-of-the-court brief along with other professors, a
number of them liberal, on behalf of the state of Texas. "This
was a very broad claim to executive power," Young said of the
administration's arguments. Young, now at Duke University, said
he was surprised that the majority decision was written by
Roberts, who in his confirmation hearing had expressed an
expansive view of the powers of the president. White House
spokeswoman Dana Perino dismissed suggestion that the decision
was a blow to the president's powers, saying it applied only to
this one issue. "But of course, since we urged a different
result, we're disappointed with the decision," she said. "But
we're going to accept it, and we're going to be reviewing it in
regards to the impacts that it may have."
Thu 10/11/2007
Texas fights at high court for turf / Official argues World
Court and president don't trump state law in death row case
WASHINGTON - In spirited arguments before the U.S. Supreme
Court, a lawyer for Texas said Wednesday that neither a
presidential order nor a ruling by the International Court of
Justice should be allowed to trump state law and interfere with
the cases of Mexican inmates on U.S. death row. Texas Solicitor
General Ted Cruz conceded that police violated the 1963 Vienna
Convention in denying Jose Medellin, a Mexican citizen, the
chance to contact the Mexican consulate for legal help after his
1993 arrest in the gang rape and murder of two Houston
teenagers. But he said President Bush's remedy for the treaty
violation - making state courts review the convictions and death
sentences of Medellin and 50 other Mexican inmates - would give
the president unprecedented power over the judiciary and give
the "World Court" authority over U.S. law.
The treaty dispute, which the World Court decided in Mexico's
favor after that country sued the U.S., should be resolved
through political and diplomatic channels, Cruz told the
justices. No other nation, including Mexico, would allow U.S.
inmates in their countries to use their court systems to enforce
the World Court's ruling, he said. He said that long before the
World Court's involvement, state and federal courts had rejected
Medellin's consular claim and decided that since he failed to
raise it at his original trial, he had waived it. Even if
Medellin had been represented by his countrymen, he still would
have been convicted and sentenced to death, Cruz said.
Mexican officials, whose country has no death penalty, had
argued that if they had been informed of Medellin's arrest, they
would have advised him not to speak to police without a lawyer
present. Within hours of his arrest, Medellin confessed to a
role in the killing of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa.
Medellin's attorney, Donald Donovan, and U.S. Solicitor General
Paul Clement, who sided with Medellin on behalf of the Bush
administration, countered Wednesday that the U.S. voluntarily
entered into the treaty more than four decades ago and agreed to
resolve international disputes at the World Court and to abide
by its decisions. Therefore the U.S. must comply, even though it
disagrees with the outcome, they said.
Chief Justice John Roberts said he was concerned about the
position on Medellin that the Supreme Court's role is only to
force compliance with the World Court's ruling. "We have no
authority to review the judgment itself?" he asked. Justice
Anthony Kennedy asked if the court could "interpret the meaning
of the (World Court) ruling, if it's ambiguous,"saying that it
was.
Justice Antonin Scalia balked at Clement's assertion that the
president's order for state courts to review the Mexican cases
was a critical part of the case. Clement had argued that the
president alone has the power to conduct foreign policy and that
his order trumps everything. "You're telling us we don't need
Congress? The president can make law by writing a memo to his
attorney general?" Scalia asked. And Scalia said he had a
problem with giving the World Court any say in U.S. domestic
law. "I am rather jealous of that power," he said.
But Justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg indicated
they were leaning toward cooperation. "The United States gave
its promise," Ginsburg said. Outside on the courthouse steps,
Donovan agreed. "The United States did not have to go to this
court, but once we agree to go, we abide by its decision because
we are a country of laws," he said. "A deal is a deal."
A decision is expected by summer.
Mon 10/8/2007
MURDER CASE PITS TEXAS AGAINST BUSH / As U.S. justices consider
local killer's consular issue, control of courts is at stake
WASHINGTON - When Jose Medellin was arrested in 1993, he signed
a confession detailing how he and five fellow gang members had
raped and sodomized two Houston teenagers before strangling them
with their shoe laces. He bragged that he had pocketed one
girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir. Medellin and four
others eventually were convicted of capital murder and sent to
Texas' death row. A juvenile court sentenced Medellin's younger
brother, who was 14 at the time, to 40 years in prison. This
week, Medellin's case makes its second trip to the Supreme
Court. The issue now is not his confession to the murders of
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa, but something else he said
during his arrest: He informed the police that he is a Mexican
citizen. But officers didn't inform him of his right to contact
the Mexican Consulate for legal assistance.
That mistake, a violation of a 1963 treaty known as the Vienna
Convention, has since sparked an international court battle,
bruised relations between the United States and its southern
neighbor and ultimately will force the high court to answer a
rather large constitutional question: What authority, if any,
does President Bush have to order courts in the state of Texas
to do anything about it? "We find ourselves in an unusual
position. Texas is not regularly litigating against the United
States," said Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz. "But sadly
enough, the United States will appear alongside Medellin at the
argument."
Medellin v. Texas, which will be argued on Wednesday and decided
by next summer, could determine the fate of Medellin and 50
other Mexican killers on death rows in the United States,
including more than a dozen in Texas. They were not informed of
their right under the treaty to contact their countrymen when
they were arrested. The case also could affect the treatment of
an estimated 6,000 U.S. citizens accused of crimes each year
while traveling or living abroad. They, too, are protected by
the treaty. More significantly to most Americans, though, the
justices are expected to produce a major ruling clarifying what
powers reside with the president, Congress and courts, what
powers belong to the federal government versus the states, and
what the relationship is between international and domestic law.
A presidential order
The Bush administration became involved in the Medellin case in
2003 when Mexico sued the U.S. over the consular issue in the
International Court of Justice at The Hague. The so-called
"World Court" is the United Nations' top court for resolving
international disputes. The court ruled in Mexico's favor in
late 2004 and ordered the United States to reconsider the
Mexican inmates' murder convictions and death sentences. In
February 2005, Bush announced that while he disagreed with the
World Court's decision, the U.S. would comply, and he declared
how: He would order courts in Texas and elsewhere to review the
cases. A few days later, however, the president withdrew the
United States from the part of the Vienna Convention that gives
the World Court final say in international disputes.
The Supreme Court, which had agreed to hear Medellin's case,
dismissed it later in 2005 to allow the case to play out in
Texas. Last November, the all-Republican Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals balked at the Republican president's order, saying Bush
had overstepped his authority.
The Texas court said the judicial branch, not the White House,
should decide how to resolve the Mexican cases. It also said
Medellin wasn't entitled to a new hearing because he failed to
complain at his original trial about any violation of his
consular rights and had therefore waived them. Medellin appealed
again to the U.S. Supreme Court, which announced last May that
it would hear his case. His lawyer, Donald Donovan of New York,
will argue this week that Bush was correct when he took action
to comply with the World Court's decision. In addition, Donovan
said that, independent of Bush's order, the Texas court has its
own obligation under the U.S. Constitution to do its part to
abide by international treaties. The Bush administration, now
siding with Medellin and Mexico, will try to help Donovan's team
convince the justices that the Texas court is undermining the
president's efforts to conduct foreign policy.
Setting a precedent?
Cruz, who will argue the case for Texas, called Bush's
unprecedented attempt to issue orders to the judicial branch -
and the state courts in particular - "breathtaking. It is
emphatically not the province of the president to say what the
law is," he said. "If this president's assertion of authority is
upheld in this case, it opens the door for enormous mischief
from presidents of either party. What might these presidents be
inclined to do if they had the power to flick state laws off the
books?"
Meanwhile, Randy and Sandra Ertman, the parents of one of
Medellin's victims, also have weighed in. In a court brief filed
on their behalf by the California-based Criminal Justice Legal
Foundation, the Ertmans argue that their 14-year-old daughter's
rights, and the rights of other victims, will be given short
shrift if the justices further delay the "already long-overdue
execution of this well-deserved sentence." "This case has
produced much lofty discussion about international law and the
separation of powers. We must not forget, though, that this case
is about a real crime against real people," they wrote. "Enough
is enough."
OTHER DEFENDANTS
Besides Jose Medellin, the five others involved in the 1993
rape-murder of Houston teenagers Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth
Peņa were:
Derrick Sean O'Brien: Executed in 2006
Peter Cantu: Awaiting execution, no date set
Efrain Perez, Raul Villarreal: Sentences commuted to life in
2005 after Supreme Court outlawed executions for those under 18
at the time of their crimes
Venancio Medellin: The younger brother of Jose Medellin, who was
14 at the time and pleaded guilty in juvenile court, is serving
a 40-year sentence
Tue 5/1/2007
U.S. SUPREME COURT / Ertman-Peņa killer will get case heard /
Mexican citizen on death row for '93 rape-murders
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider
whether one of the six killers of Houston teenagers Jennifer
Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa should escape execution because he was
denied a chance to get legal assistance from the Mexican
Consulate. As requested by the Bush administration, the high
court will hear arguments in the fall on the case of Jose
Medellin, a Mexican citizen sent to Texas' death row in the
notorious 1993 rape-murder case. A decision, expected by summer
2008, may resolve a long-running debate over the protection
offered to accused foreigners by a treaty known as the 1963
Vienna Convention. The debate has strained relations between the
United States and Mexico and could determine the fate of more
than 50 Mexicans on death row in the United States, including
more than a dozen in Texas. It also could affect the treatment
of about 6,000 U.S. citizens accused of crimes each year while
traveling or living abroad, who also are protected by the
treaty.
Siding with the killer are the Mexican government, a group of
international law experts and the pro-death penalty White House,
which considers a Texas court's decision in Medellin's case an
affront to the president's sole authority to conduct foreign
policy. Harris County Assistant District Attorney Roe Wilson
said Medellin is not a great example of the foreigners that the
Vienna Convention was meant to protect because he spent the bulk
of his life in Houston from about age 6. "When you talk about
the Vienna Convention, you envision someone visiting another
country and not knowing anything about the country's legal
system," Wilson said Monday. "And that's not true in his case.
He grew up in Houston and was not by any stretch of the
imagination a foreigner in a foreign land." Wilson said
Medellin's experience in the criminal justice system, which
began when he was in middle school, should have given him a
clear understanding of the law and of his rights.
Mexico sued the U.S. over the consular issue in the
International Court of Justice, or World Court, at The Hague,
the United Nations' top court for international disputes. In
February 2005, after the World Court ruled that the convictions
of Medellin and 50 other Mexican prisoners violated the treaty,
President Bush ordered new state court hearings for the
defendants. A few days later, he also withdrew the U.S. from the
part of the treaty that gives the World Court final say in
international disputes.
In November, a unanimous, all-Republican Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals said the Republican president had overstepped his
authority in ordering the state court reviews. The Texas court
said the judicial branch, not the White House, should decide how
to resolve the cases. It also said Medellin wasn't entitled to a
new hearing because he failed to complain at trial about any
violation of his consular rights. Medellin then appealed to the
Supreme Court. The Bush administration has said in court papers
that while it disagrees with the World Court's decision in the
matter, it intends to keep its promise to abide by it. The Texas
court, the administration now argues in its
"friend-of-the-court" brief supporting Medellin, is undermining
Bush's determination of how the United States will comply with
its treaty obligations. "The authority to decide whether this
nation will comply with a (World Court) decision, and if so, how
compliance should be achieved, falls on the president," the
administration told the justices.
Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, who represents the state in
the case, disagreed. He said in writing Monday that Medellin
"voluntarily confessed to the brutal gang rape and murder of two
teenage girls and his conviction has been upheld at every stage
of the legal process." The president's intervention in the case,
Cruz said, "exceeds the constitutional bounds of presidential
authority."
The high court agreed to take Medellin's case once before, but
dismissed it in 2005 after Bush ordered the state court reviews.
Ertman and Peņa were sexually assaulted, strangled and beaten to
death in a northwest Houston park on June 23, 1993, by members
of a youth gang known as the "Black and Whites" who were
initiating a new member. The girls' bodies were found four days
later. Medellin and four other gang members were convicted of
capital murder in the case and sentenced to death.
Ertman's father, Randy Ertman, said he no longer invests much
energy or emotion into his daughter's killers' court cases. "No
matter what he does in his life," he said, "he will always be
responsible for the deaths of Elizabeth Peņa and my daughter."
Randy Ertman witnessed O'Brien's execution last year and intends
to attend the execution of Peter Cantu.
THE OTHER CASES
Besides Jose Medellin, whose appeal was accepted by the U.S.
Supreme Court on Monday, the five other men involved in the
notorious 1993 rape-murders of Houston teenagers Jennifer Ertman
and Elizabeth Peņa were:
Derrick Sean O'Brien: Executed in 2006.
Peter Cantu: Awaiting execution; no date set.
Efrain Perez and Raul Villarreal: Sentences commuted to life in
prison in 2005 after the Supreme Court outlawed executions for
those who were under 18 at the time of their crimes.
Venancio Medellin: Younger brother of Jose who was 14 at the
time of the killings; pleaded guilty in juvenile court and is
serving a 40-year sentence.
Thu
11/16/2006
Court: Bush overstepped in capital cases / Judges say he had no
authority to order hearings for 46 Mexicans
Texas' top criminal court rebuffed President Bush on Wednesday,
ruling that he overstepped his bounds last year when he told
state courts to give new hearings to more than a dozen death row
inmates from Mexico. The unanimous opinion from the
all-Republican Court of Criminal Appeals was the first decision
in dozens of cases pending across the nation that rely heavily
on the president's unusual intervention on behalf of 46
condemned Mexican inmates. "We hold that the President has
exceeded his constitutional authority by intruding into the
independent powers of the judiciary," Judge Michael Keasler
wrote for the nine-member court.
Though the context was different, the Texas judges' logic
faintly echoed a U.S. Supreme Court ruling earlier this year
that threw out the tribunals that Bush created to try terrorism
suspects. In both cases, the courts said Bush erred in acting
unilaterally. In other respects, the Texas court seemed to draw
a new limit on presidential power and, for that reason, one
expert said its decision could draw the scrutiny of the nation's
highest court.
The Texas ruling specifically addressed Jose Ernesto Medellin, a
gang member convicted of participating in the 1993 murder and
rape of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16, in Houston.
But the decision is expected to dictate the results in 12
similar cases filed by others on death row in Livingston. Bush
waded into the process last year after the International Court
of Justice, the judicial arm of the United Nations, decided that
arrests of the Mexican inmates had violated the Vienna
Convention on Consular Relations. Specifically, the World Court
said they deserved new hearings - not necessarily new trials -
because they weren't told they could contact the Mexican
consulate upon arrest, a requirement of the 1967 treaty.
Bush, allowing his support for capital punishment to bow to
diplomatic interests, said the United States would recognize the
World Court ruling out of respect but not because it had to.
This directive, spelled out in a short memo to the U.S. attorney
general, represented an unprecedented usurpation of the
judiciary's job of interpreting and applying the law, including
treaties, the Texas court ruled.
Crucial to the judges' analysis was the fact that Bush acted
alone, without explicit approval from Congress and without first
reaching an agreement with Mexico to resolve this treaty
dispute. Additionally, the court said, Medellin wasn't entitled
to a new hearing because he had failed to complain at trial
about the violation of his consular rights.
Sandra Babcock, who represented Medellin and frequently works on
behalf of the Mexican government in capital cases, described the
court's refusal to grant her client the hearing as a mistake
with international implications. By denying him even that
opportunity, the Texas court has undermined the security of
Americans abroad who depend on the Vienna Convention for
protection," she said.
Roe Wilson, a Harris County prosecutor who handled the appeal,
described the Texas decision as unremarkable in light of a
Supreme Court ruling in June that indicated U.S. law trumped the
World Court ruling. We follow our laws, and under our law, you
don't exclude a confession if there's been a violation of the
Vienna Convention," she said.
Second-guessing
Julian Ku, a professor of international law at William & Mary
School of Law in Williamsburg, Va., said some of the ruling's
reasoning might be vulnerable to second-guessing because it
seemed to break some new ground. The judges suggested that if
Bush first had reached a formal agreement with his counterpart
in Mexico, he might now have the necessary authority to order
state courts to give the inmates new hearings. "That argument
alone is likely to attract the attention of the Supreme Court,"
Ku said.
The White House and Justice Department had no immediate comment.
Neither did the office of Mexican President Vicente Fox, but the
court's ruling was predictably unwelcome in Mexico. "It is a
violation of human rights, and I strongly reject this decision,"
said Maria Eugenia Campos Galvan, a congresswoman from the
border state of Chihuahua and a member of the Foreign Relations
Committee.
Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which
argued on Texas' behalf, said in a statement that the consular
flap has needlessly delayed justice. "While the constitutional
issues here are important, underneath them is a patently
meritless claim delaying a long overdue execution," he said.
Wed 07/12/2006
O'Brien executed for rape-murders / Killer apologizes to the
families of Peņa and Ertman
HUNTSVILLE - As the parents of his victims wordlessly watched,
their faces just inches away from the glass that separated them
from the execution chamber, killer-rapist Derrick O'Brien went
to his death Tuesday, expressing deep sorrow for his crimes. One
of six men convicted of the 1993 rape-murders of Jennifer
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16 - teens who stumbled into a
drunken midnight gang initiation rite - O'Brien, 31, was the
first to die. Two others await execution, and three more,
juveniles at the time of the crime, are serving prison terms for
the attacks.
"I am sorry. I have always been sorry," O'Brien said as he lay
on the gurney, awaiting for the lethal flow of drugs to begin.
"It is the worst mistake that I ever made in my whole life. Not
because I am here, but because of what I did. I hurt a lot of
people - you and my family." Adolfo Peņa, Elizabeth Peņa's
father, later said the apology "doesn't mean anything to me.
Maybe he is sorry. God only knows that," Peņa said as his wife,
Melissa, sat silently at his side. "He's probably up there
talking to him right now. So it really didn't mean much to me
what he said. ... It doesn't make me feel any better. Maybe he
was sorry, but it's just a little late for that, right?"
Peņa, who wore a T-shirt bearing photographs of the dead girls,
said only the execution of all six killers - an event he
recognized is not possible - might bring him closure. "These
kids deserve to die," Peņa said. "There's no excuse for what
they did. I don't want to use the a-word, but they're animals. I
wouldn't do this to my worst enemy. ... I want to thank you from
the bottom of my heart that we finally got justice for my
daughter. I just wish I had her for 13 more years."
Randy and Sandra Ertman, parents of the second victim, did not
talk with reporters. But Andy Kahan, Mayor Bill White's crime
victims advocate, spoke on their behalf, saying they expressed
satisfaction with O'Brien's execution. "They were really glad
after 13 years that they finally got the execution," Kahan said.
"They can close that chapter."
The lethal drugs, which O'Brien's lawyer unsuccessfully argued
constituted cruel and unusual punishment, were administered at
6:12 p.m. - shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court turned down his
final appeal. He was declared dead seven minutes later. "He just
closed his eyes," Peņa said, "and went to sleep."
As the execution began, three women witnessing the procedure at
O'Brien's request crowded near the window of a second witness
room. "I love you," one cried as a second tried to comfort her.
"I'll always love you." As O'Brien lapsed into unconsciousness,
the woman cried inconsolably, repeating again and again that she
loved him. rison officials could not identify the woman.
2 others face execution
O'Brien was the 14th killer executed in Texas this year.
Also facing execution in the rape-murders are gang leader Peter
Anthony Cantu, 30, and Jose Medellin, 31. Death sentences for
Raul Villarreal and Efrain Perez, both 30, were commuted to life
in prison because they were juveniles at the time of the
killings. Venacio Medellin, 14 at the time of the attacks, is
serving a 40-year sentence.
The rape-murders led to changes in Texas law that now allow
relatives of victims to make statements at a trial's conclusion
and witness the execution of killers. "That's a positive that's
come out of a negative," Kahan said. "Seventy-five percent of
families elect to witness executions, and that would not have
been possible except for them (the Peņa and Ertman families)."
Ertman and Peņa, students at Waltrip High School, spent the
hours leading to the attack with friends poolside at a northwest
Houston apartment complex. As their midnight curfew approached,
they debated the fastest route to Peņa's residence. The chosen
path - a shortcut via the railroad tracks through T.C. Jester
Park - brought them into the midst of a drunken gang initiation.
The girls were dragged into a nearby wooded area where, during
the course of an hour, they were repeatedly raped, and then, as
they pleaded for their lives, strangled. Police, acting on a
phone tip from one of the killers' brothers, found the badly
decomposed bodies four days later.
History of violence
During ensuing trials, witnesses testified that O'Brien had a
reputation for drunkenness and violence. On one occasion, a
former teacher told jurors, O'Brien broke another student's jaw.
The future killer openly boasted of his exploits as a car thief.
Court records indicate that O'Brien's mother and grandfather
described him as "cruel" and "intentionally harsh." Defense
counsel did not call O'Brien's relatives to testify. But
O'Brien's final attorney, Catherine Burnett, an associate dean
at the South Texas College of Law, found her client surprisingly
meek. "The portrait the jury saw was that of a terrifying
monster," she said as his execution approached. "The man I know
does not seem to be the defendant in this case."
O'Brien turned down repeated requests for interviews. But on a
Web site provided by death penalty opponents, O'Brien wrote that
"Life is a miracle and therefore precious. Each time one is
taken ... the world loses something special." His observation
was in reference to his own life, not that of his victims.
One day before O'Brien's scheduled May 16 execution, the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals granted a stay in order to consider
the condemned prisoner's claim that death by injection
constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The court lifted the
stay two days later.
Mon 07/10/2006
Killer's death date up again / Execution set for Tuesday in '93
rape, slaying of 2 teens at park
It wasn't news to anyone that Derrick Sean O'Brien was bad news.
He fought often at school, once breaking a kid's jaw. Lots of
times he was drunk. Sometimes he carried a knife. He was full of
bluster about his prowess as a car thief. But it was in 1993
that O'Brien hit rock bottom. In January of that year, O'Brien
later admitted, he murdered and tried to rape Patricia Lopez, a
27-year-old mother of two young children, in Melrose Park. And
on June 24, 1993, he took part in the brutal gang rapes and
murders of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16, after
the girls stumbled into a drunken midnight gang initiation rite
in T.C. Jester Park. Tuesday, O'Brien, 31, is scheduled to be
executed for his role in that crime.
The death date is the killer's second this year. In May, O'Brien
received a brief stay as judges considered his claim that death
by injection is cruel and unusual punishment. O'Brien's
attorney, Catherine Burnett, an associate dean at the South
Texas College of Law, filed a new appeal on his behalf with the
U.S. Supreme Court. "I hope the son of a bitch rots in hell,"
Ertman's father, Randy, said last week. "He deserves it."
"It doesn't make me happy," Peņa's father, Adolfo, said in a
recent interview. "But this is the punishment he was given, and
it's justifiable. ... I kind of feel numb in a way, knowing that
I've been waiting so long for this day to come. ... I've been
looking forward to this for a long time."
The murders of
Ertman and Peņa rocked the city in a way that few deaths could.
The Waltrip High School students, balanced at that awkward point
between childhood and young womanhood, spent the hours before
their deaths at a poolside party at a northwest Houston
apartment complex. As their midnight curfew approached, they
debated the best way to Peņa's home. Their normal route would
have taken half an hour, but they chose a well-known shortcut
down the railroad tracks through the park. Minutes after the
girls left the party, they were intercepted by O'Brien and five
other members of the loose-knit gang, who had just concluded a
track-side initiation rite. The girls were pulled from the
tracks, raped and strangled. Court testimony revealed that
O'Brien grunted with exertion as he tightened a belt around
Ertman's neck. Then, after stomping on the girls' throats, the
killers divided the victims' belongings.
O'Brien was at the crime scene four days later when police,
alerted to the bodies' location by the brother of a gang member,
began their investigation. Unobtrusively, the killer stood among
spectators who gathered in the park. Ertman's father also was in
the crowd. Days later, O'Brien was arrested. He will be the
first of the convicted gang members to be put to death. Others
facing execution are Peter Anthony Cantu, described as the
gang's leader, and Jose Ernesto Medellin, both 31. Death
sentences for two others - Efrain Perez and Raul Omar Villarreal
- were commuted to life in prison when the U.S. Supreme Court
ruled that those who were minors when they committed murders
could not be executed. The sixth gang member, Venacio Medellin,
who was 14 at the time of the murders and testified against the
others, received a 40-year sentence.
"Don't say time makes things better," Peņa's father said. "It
never goes away. It's never going to go away. The hurt is still
the same. I still find myself crying just out of the blue."
Thu 06/29/2006
High court axes foreigners' plea / Denial of suspects' claims of
consular rights violations could affect Texas case
In a ruling
that could have implications for a Houston death row case, the
U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled against foreign suspects
who want to suppress statements they gave to police during
interrogations when they were not informed of their right to
contact consulate officials from their home countries. The court
ruled 6-3 that Mexican Moises Sanchez-Llamas' and Honduran Mario
Bustillo's rights under the Vienna Convention were not violated
because the treaty's consulate-notification provision does not
apply to searches or interrogations.
Those cases originated in Oregon and Virginia, respectively. But
the court's ruling could affect a Texas death-penalty case as
well. Mexican national Jose Ernesto Medellin raised the same
issue of Vienna Convention violations in his appeals. Medellin
was one of six defendants convicted in the 1993 rape and murder
of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16, in a northwest
Houston park. "The court could have used Jose's case a long time
ago to hand down the same ruling they handed down today,"
Medellin's attorney, Michael B. Charlton, said from his office
in El Prado, N.M. "That pretty much ends Vienna Convention
claims on confession claims but not on the other issues," he
added. Medellin's case is under review by the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals after President Bush's edict last year for
courts in Texas and other states to review his and 50 others
involving foreign nationals who raised consular violation
claims. But the court's decision does not relate to Bush's
order.
In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts specified
that Article 36 of the Vienna Convention "secures only a right
of foreign nationals to have their consulate "informed" of their
arrest or detention - not to have their consulate intervene, or
to have law enforcement authorities cease their investigation
pending any such notice or intervention." Under the convention,
ratified by the United States in 1969, when a national of one
country is detained by authorities in another country,
authorities must notify the consular offices of the foreigner's
home country when requested. Roberts also wrote that a detained
foreign national, "like everyone else in our country, enjoys
under our system the protections of the Due Process Clause." He
set aside, however, the matter of whether police must advise
defendants of their legal options. Roberts was careful to
stipulate that the ruling "in no way disparages the importance
of the Vienna Convention."
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that the
decision runs afoul of the treaty's interpretation "not only
with the treaty's language and history, but also with the
(International Court of Justice's) interpretation of the same
treaty provision." Justices John Paul Stevens and David Souter
joined in the dissent. Breyer wrote that the ruling may weaken
respect abroad for the rights of foreign nationals and
diminishes the treaty's proviso that foreign nationals are
deserving of fair treatment throughout the world. A spokesman
for the Texas Attorney General's Office, which is handling the
Court of Criminal Appeals case involving Medellin, declined to
comment about the potential impact of the court's ruling.
Thu 05/25/2006
Ertman, Peņa murderer set to die on July 11 / Appeals court had
granted, then reversed, a stay for teens' killer
A man whose execution for the murders of two teenage girls was
blocked recently has been rescheduled for the death chamber on
July 11. State District Judge Jan Krocker set the new execution
date for Derrick Sean O'Brien, one of six gang members convicted
in the 1993 slayings of Waltrip High School sophomores Jennifer
Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa. O'Brien, 31, originally was set to
die on May 16, but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a
stay of execution. The appeals court reversed course the next
day, voting 5-4 to lift the stay and dismiss O'Brien's claim
that Texas' lethal-injection procedure would violate his Eighth
Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
O'Brien would be the first of Ertman's and Peņa's killers to
die. Four others also were condemned, but two later saw their
sentences commuted to life in prison after the U.S. Supreme
Court banned the execution of those who were juveniles when they
committed murder. Another gang member, who was 14 at the time of
the attack, received a 40-year sentence. Ertman, 14, and Peņa,
16, were walking home through a wooded area in northwest Houston
on the night of June 24, 1993, when they were gang-raped and
tortured, then strangled and stomped. Their bodies were found
four days later.
Thu 05/18/2006
Ertman, Peņa killer again faces execution / Case reversed;
another inmate who challenged lethal injection is put to death
In a reversal
with life-or-death consequences, the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals on Wednesday lifted the stay of execution it granted
earlier this week for Derrick Sean O'Brien of Houston, who
likely will be rescheduled for lethal injection for his role in
the notorious slaying of two teenage girls in 1993. "See, we're
back on the ride again, riding up and down," said Melissa Peņa,
mother of one of the girls who was gang-raped, tortured and
strangled. "At least this is some good news. Maybe things will
swing back our way."
The appeals court also denied a claim by another death row
inmate, Jermaine Herron, who was then put to death in Huntsville
for killing a South Texas mother and son nine years ago. Both
men had argued that the state's use of a three-drug cocktail
would cause pain and therefore violate their constitutional
protection against cruel and unusual punishment. After the court
issued its stay for O'Brien on Monday, his attorney and legal
experts wondered whether the move signaled the court's
willingness to wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to decide the
issue over lethal injections raised in a Florida case now before
it. Herron's attorneys filed a similar claim late Tuesday. In a
5-4 ruling Wednesday, the Texas court rescinded the stay it had
issued for O'Brien and dismissed his claim that the state's
lethal injection procedure would violate his Eighth Amendment
rights. At issue, in this and a growing number of claims around
the country, is whether an anesthetic administered as part of
the lethal-injection cocktail can fail, and whether the dying
inmate's agony is masked by a second drug that paralyzes the
muscles. The U.S. Supreme Court has so far declined to address
the constitutional question directly. But in a Florida case
argued last month, Hill v. McDonough, the justices pondered a
related procedural issue.
In an opinion issued Wednesday concurring with the majority
vote, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Cathy Cochran
explained that the court postponed O'Brien's execution to look
more closely at the procedural issues as well as the merits of
O'Brien's claim. She wrote that O'Brien failed to do more than
speculate about the "problems or mistakes that "might" occur."
She wrote further that he has not provided evidence that the
three-drug protocol used during executions "is subject to any
realistic risk of unnecessary pain or suffering." On Monday,
Cochran had voted with five other judges to grant O'Brien a
postponement. In a dissenting opinion Wednesday, Judge Tom Price
wrote that the question before the court was not whether
O'Brien's appeal proved an Eighth Amendment violation. It was
the court's job, he wrote, to determine whether the appeal was
appropriately filed as a state habeas corpus petition. "It is
manifestly unfair, in my estimation, to fault the applicant for
a failure of proof without first affording him an opportunity to
present evidence at a hearing or through one of the other
mechanisms that the statute allows for presentation of
evidence," Price wrote. Rob Owen, a University of Texas law
school adjunct professor and death penalty expert, agreed with
Price, saying that the court skirted the procedural question.
"It sounds like Price is criticizing the court saying it has
gone around that question and gone straight to the underlying
constitutional question," Owen said. "He's saying they're
putting the cart before the horse."
Roe Wilson, a Harris County prosecutor, said she will file a
request for a state district court to reschedule O'Brien's
execution. She said she had not received the order Wednesday
afternoon and would not comment further. A new execution date
could be set within 30 days.
The reversal was the latest twist in a case that has already
seen two death sentences commuted to life. O'Brien and four
other gang members were sentenced to death for the June 24,
1993, deaths of Waltrip High School sophomores Jennifer Ertman,
14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16. Another gang member, a juvenile,
received a 40-year sentence. Last year, two gang members were
spared from the death chamber after the Supreme Court ruled
those who kill when they are younger than 18 should not be put
to death.
Randy Ertman, father of Jennifer Ertman, said he is frustrated
that the waiting process now starts anew. "It's just
nerve-racking," he said. "I don't know what the hell to think
anymore." Andy Kahan, Mayor Bill White's crime victims advocate,
said the court relented because the judges concluded "it would
be foolhardy to put a halt to justice." "It's a bleeping roller
coaster ride," Kahan said. "Everything that can possibly happen
on these cases has. ... The (families) have been belted around
so much this week by the system."
Tue 05/16/2006
Murderer of Ertman, Peņa given a stay of execution / Families
irate that his claim of lethal injection's cruelty has put his
death on hold
An appeals court on Monday postponed the execution of Derrick
Sean O'Brien for the vicious gang rape and murder of two teenage
girls in Houston in 1993, enraging the victims' parents and
extending the debate over how condemned inmates are put to
death. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued the order
Monday afternoon, in response to an appeal filed last week
challenging the injection process as unconstitutionally cruel.
The ruling marked the third time that an execution has been
scheduled - then postponed - in connection with the June 24,
1993, slayings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16,
as the girls took a shortcut home through T.C. Jester Park. "We
were all ready for this to happen," fumed Adolph Peņa, who had
planned to witness the execution tonight in Huntsville with his
wife, Melissa. "You talk about cruel? ... We've been waiting 13
years for this son of a bitch to be executed. It's time for him
to be executed."
O'Brien was "emotional" when he heard about the court's ruling,
said his attorney, Catherine Burnett, who spoke to him by
telephone at death row in Livingston. Monday's stay comes at a
time when condemned inmates around the country increasingly are
challenging the injection method as unconstitutionally "cruel
and unusual punishment." Lethal injection has long been used in
37 of the 38 states that have the death penalty because it is
considered more humane than shooting, hanging or electrocution.
But defense attorneys have recently cited new medical
information that they say shows the inmates may suffer
excruciating pain because they are sometimes conscious when the
lethal drug takes effect. The inmates are unable to indicate
they are in pain because of a paralyzing agent that is part of
the three-drug combination used in such executions, the
attorneys say.
O'Brien's scheduled execution is the ninth this year to be
postponed to consider such claims. The U.S. Supreme Court has so
far declined to address the constitutional question directly.
But in a Florida case argued last month, Hill v. McDonough, the
justices pondered a related procedural issue. By July, the high
court will decide whether Clarence Hill, who was convicted in
the 1982 murder of a police officer, can get a last-minute
hearing to challenge the execution method. That likely
influenced the state court, O'Brien's attorney said. "I think
the Court of Criminal Appeals is taking the prudential view not
to rush this issue when it's pending before the Supreme Court,"
said Burnett, who also is an associate dean of the South Texas
College of Law. O'Brien - who admitted to but was never tried
for killing a 27-year-old woman months before the Ertman and
Peņa slayings - also has a separate appeal pending before the
Supreme Court.
Despite the
court's ruling Monday, a spokesman for the Attorney General's
office denied there is a de facto moratorium on executions in
Texas. Another execution is scheduled for Wednesday; 14 more are
set through October. Harris County Assistant District Attorney
Roe Wilson said she was surprised by the stay for O'Brien and
suggested the Texas court may be awaiting movement from the high
court on the issue. "We have had some (death penalty cases)
where that has been a claim, and those executions have gone
through," Wilson said. "So it's very surprising."
It also dealt another frustrating blow to the families of the
victims. Last year, two other men convicted in the Ertman-Peņa
case had their death sentences commuted to life in prison after
the Supreme Court determined that people could not be executed
for crimes committed when they were minors. O'Brien, who was 18
at the time of the crime, would have been the first of the
killers to die; two others remain on death row, while a sixth
man, who was 14 at the time, is serving a 40-year sentence.
Ertman's father, Randy Ertman, on Monday called the Texas
appellate judges "spineless" and thanked "the people of Houston
for their thoughts, concerns, overwhelming support and prayers
over the past week, actually over the last 13 years." "And
that's about it," he added. "There's nothing else I can say
that's printable. ... We'll get over it, like everything else.
It's just another bump in the road of the justice system."
Ertman, who also had planned to view the execution, said he no
longer intends to. "I'm not going to view any executions now.
I'm not going to allow them to beat me again," he said. "I feel
like I've gone a round with Muhammad Ali. I'm not going to view
it. There's no sense to it."
Sun 05/14/2006
ERTMAN-PENA CASE / As the first execution nears, the effects of
two girls' slayings linger in both court procedures and their
survivors' lives / Murders still felt across city
Catching up with friends after a family vacation in Florida,
Elizabeth Peņa beamed as she showed off the stuff she'd bought
with her 16th birthday money: a new pager, some new
underclothes. As the summer evening waned, Jennifer Ertman,
another Waltrip High School sophomore, checked her Goofy
wristwatch and saw that it was pushing midnight. She and Peņa
would break their curfews if they didn't get home in a hurry.
The girls debated how to get to Peņa's Oak Forest home in
northwest Houston. One route would take half an hour; a
well-known shortcut along the railroad tracks through T.C.
Jester Park would save about 10 minutes. The shorter route
instead led the girls into the hands of six teenage gang members
who had just finished an initiation ritual. For an hour, the six
raped and tortured the girls before strangling them - stomping
on their necks for good measure. Their bodies were discovered
four days later, horrifying a city that shrugs off hundreds of
homicides each year. The Ertman-Peņa case captivated a
generation of Houstonians the way the Dean Corll-Elmer Wayne
Henley multiple murders had an earlier one.
On Tuesday, the
first of Ertman and Peņa's killers is set to die by injection.
"I've waited 13 years to view an execution," said Ertman's
father, Randy Ertman, who will witness the act thanks to a
policy change prompted by the case. "In the grand scheme, it may
not mean a whole hell of a lot. But Derrick Sean O'Brien will
never kill again." Barring court intervention or a last-minute
reprieve, O'Brien, a ninth-grade dropout who last month turned
31, will be the ninth killer to die in Texas' death chamber this
year. He turned down requests to be interviewed for this
article. But in affidavits that appellate attorneys have filed
in an effort to save O'Brien's life, relatives said his
behavioral problems began in school, after he claimed a teacher
made sexual advances toward him. Administrators sided with the
teacher, and O'Brien was transferred to an alternative school.
During his trial, other evidence was presented about O'Brien's
violent past, which included another murder months before the
girls' slayings. The five other gang members involved, most of
whom are in their early 30s, remain in state prisons. The former
gang leader, Peter Anthony Cantu, 30, and Jose Medellin, 31, are
on death row, but their execution dates have not been set. Two
others who were sentenced to death had their sentences commuted
to life in prison last year after the U.S. Supreme Court
determined that it was cruel to execute those who were juveniles
when they killed. Raul Villarreal and Efrain Perez, now both 30,
were months away from turning 18 when they participated in the
gang rapes and murders. Venacio Medellin, 14 at the time of the
crime, testified against the others and is serving a 40-year
sentence.
In the years
since, as the killers became adults behind bars, Adolph and
Melissa Peņa became grandparents. They said they were "saved" by
their two other children, who gave them a reason to wake each
morning, though their son, Michael, remains bitter. The Peņas,
like Randy Ertman, plan to witness O'Brien's execution. For
years, Randy Ertman sought escape through alcohol, but he now
remains sober for the sake of his wife, Sandy. The couple, who
have no other children, now live a quiet life tending to their
garden at their small, two-story lakefront home in Somerville.
By the time Villarreal and Perez were scheduled to die - on the
11-year anniversary of the crime - the Supreme Court already had
begun considering the juvenile-killer issue and the executions
were postponed. The ruling that followed was hard on the girls'
parents. But they cling to the expectation that, at least, the
state will dispatch three of the killers.
On the moonless
night of June 24, 1993, members of a little-known gang had
gathered near a patch of woods along White Oak Bayou near West
34th. Villarreal, who was 17, had trash-talked his way into
being "jumped into" the gang. It was time to prove himself. The
gang members - Cantu, O'Brien, Perez, brothers Roman and Frank
Sandoval, Medellin and his brother Venacio - took turns
pummeling the inductee. Then, they all downed beer and talked
about what it meant to be in a gang. The Sandovals, heading
home, passed two girls along the railroad tracks. A moment later
they heard: "What's y'all's name?" The brothers watched as Jose
Medellin grabbed Elizabeth and threw her to the ground. She
screamed for help. Jennifer broke away but returned and was
grabbed by Cantu and O'Brien. The girls cried and struggled
while the gang members repeatedly sexually assaulted them. At
times, two would assault one girl. Afterward, according to court
records, Cantu flatly told Jose Medellin, "We're going to have
to kill them."
The girls
pleaded for their lives, but the gang members took them into a
clearing beneath a canopy of trees. O'Brien and Villarreal
forced Jennifer to her knees and looped O'Brien's belt around
her neck. Jennifer clawed at the belt and struggled to breathe.
O'Brien grunted as both pulled on the belt so hard it snapped.
Jose Medellin, Perez and Cantu killed Elizabeth in a similar
manner. They then stomped on the girls' throats to make sure
both were dead. Later that night, the gang members divided up
money and Jennifer's jewelry. Cantu handed Venacio Medellin her
Goofy watch. The girls' clothes, including Elizabeth's new
undergarments, were strewn among empty beer cans. When Jennifer
did not return home that night, her parents began to frantically
page her. After the Peņas returned from work the next day, they
realized that their daughter, too, was missing. They figured
that if she and Jennifer had simply fallen asleep at their
friend's apartment on West 34th, she would have called. The
parents called police and began papering the neighborhood with
fliers. An anonymous tipster, later revealed as Cantu's brother,
led police to the site where the bodies had been left. Ramon
Zaragoza, a Houston police homicide investigator, was struck by
the grotesque condition of the girls' bodies. Decomposition had
claimed their facial features. Jennifer had three fractured
ribs, and Elizabeth had several missing teeth. Zaragoza
encountered Jennifer's father at the park. "Does she have blond
hair?" Randy Ertman screamed as he was being restrained by
police. Zaragoza, now retired, told Ertman that investigators
would need dental records to identify the bodies. "I think that
gave him an idea of what the situation was," he said. When
O'Brien was arrested a day later, he told officers he had been
expecting them. The other killers also were arrested.
Randy Ertman
will be inside the death house in Huntsville on Tuesday because
of a simple request he made during the trials. His inquiry
ultimately led to policy changes granting victims' relatives the
chance to witness executions. The case also established what has
become accepted court procedure that allows victims to address
defendants. "This case set a lot of precedents," said Andy Kahan,
the mayor's victims rights advocate. " ... and it has enhanced
victims' rights in the state." Catherine G. Burnett, O'Brien's
appellate attorney, said it did something more. "This case has
become part of the collective consciousness of the city of
Houston," she said. "It's definitely part of that ethos."
The Ertmans and
Peņas all will be in Huntsville on Tuesday, though Sandy Ertman
has decided not to watch the execution. None plans to celebrate.
"I kind of feel numb in a way knowing that I've been waiting so
long for this day to come," said Peņa, who lives in Hockley with
his wife. His wife added, "I don't want anyone to think we are
happy. This will not be a happy day for us. It's going to be a
difficult day for us." The Peņas' other children, Michael and
Rachel, were 12 and 5, respectively, when their sister was
murdered. "I don't think it affected Rachel like it did her
brother," Adolph Peņa said. "Michael is still really, really
angry about the deaths." Peņa often wonders what he could have
done differently that day, whether he failed to keep his
daughter safe. He warned her that her beauty might attract
unsavory characters. "You have to be careful. You can't trust
just anybody," he told her. "At your age, as pretty as you are,
you can't trust anyone you don't know." The girls knew, their
parents said, they could always call home, and they always had
money for cab fare. Why they chose to walk home is a mystery.
Jennifer, who had played on a basketball team but decided it
wasn't for her, had just started dabbling with makeup, her
mother said. Elizabeth was known to wear distinctive red
lipstick that contrasted with her fair skin. Both girls were
well-liked at Waltrip. Anne-Marie Franz, a former physical
education teacher, said she was close to both. After their
deaths, she organized the planting of a crape myrtle and the
erection of a memorial plaque on campus. Jennifer was a girl
"who walked the line without getting in trouble, but knew where
the magic line was," said Franz, now a teacher in Austin. "She
didn't want to cross it or get in trouble at home." Elizabeth,
she said, was a social butterfly who loved to talk to her
friends. After their murders, many of the girls' friends found
it difficult to even walk the same halls as they had, Franz
said. Some transferred or dropped out. "The events that took
place that day changed our lives," former student Carrie
McCleary wrote in an e-mail to the Chronicle. "Tears come to my
eyes as I sit here and remember all of the details. I remember
that day as the day that ended our innocence." Mike Maddux,
another student, wrote that Waltrip became "a very large family
after that."
Before his trial, O'Brien's mother, Ella Jones, and his
stepgrandfather described O'Brien as "cruel and intentionally
harsh," according to court records. Neither testified because
his defense attorneys concluded both would be more helpful to
the prosecution. "What the hell went wrong with this guy?" asked
Harris County Assistant District Attorney Steve Baldassano, who
prosecuted O'Brien. "How bad could it be in his head that he
could walk around and do this stuff? I'm not a huge fan of the
death penalty, but this is the kind of guy I think it's for. It
fits the crime." During his trial, one of his teachers testified
that a "very aggressive" O'Brien fought with other students and
often had to be restrained. She witnessed him break another
student's jaw. A school bus driver said O'Brien was often drunk,
sometimes carried a knife and often spoke of stealing cars.
Testimony of an assault at a fast-food restaurant was presented.
Jurors also were told during the punishment phase of his trial
that he was a model inmate while at the Harris County Jail. But
appellate attorney Burnett said that wasn't enough. "The
question at punishment is whether there is anything in this
person's life that warrants a finding of life rather than
death," said Burnett, also an associate dean of the South Texas
College of Law. "I don't think the jury got to make that
decision fairly because they didn't get anything else."
Acknowledging that the crime was "devastating," Burnett said
O'Brien was not what she expected. "The portrait the jury saw
was that of a terrifying monster," she said. "The man I know
does not seem to be the defendant in this case."
From his prison
cell four years ago, O'Brien posted a lengthy Internet essay
about the costliness of capital punishment and reflected on the
value of life. "Life is a miracle and therefore precious. Each
time one is taken before its time the world loses something
special," O'Brien wrote. "All of this may sound strange coming
from me, a death row inmate, but if I never strove to change
even knowing my wrongs, I couldn't call myself human."
Baldassano
noted that after O'Brien's arrest, he confessed that he was
behind another slaying months before the Ertman and Peņa
murders. On Jan. 4, 1993, police found the partially nude body
of Patricia Lopez, a 27-year-old mother of two, in Melrose Park.
Empty beer cans, cigarettes and a broken belt were found nearby.
O'Brien attempted to rape Lopez, then he killed her. She was
stabbed in the abdomen, neck and back. Now, life for Jennifer
and Elizabeth's parents revolves around simple pleasures:
fishing and gardening for the Ertmans; caring for grandchildren
for the Peņas. The grief remains. "It's never going to go away.
The hurt is still the same," Peņa said. "I still find myself
crying just out of the blue." Today, Elizabeth would likely
revel in her role as an aunt. She probably would be married
herself with children, her parents muse. Jennifer's parents
simply say that if she were alive today, their only daughter
would be happy.
And, if O'Brien
had chosen a different path, his attorney asks, where would he
be today? "I wonder when I'm meeting and talking with him how
his life could've been different," Burnett said, "how all of our
lives could've been different."
GANG VICTIMS
Lives cut short: Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa, both
Waltrip High School sophomores, were raped and murdered in the
summer of 1993 by members of the Black and White Gang. One
member, Derrick Sean O'Brien, will be executed Tuesday.
THE AFTERMATH
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa were attacked, gang-raped and
strangled as they walked through T.C. Jester Park on June 24,
1993. Six gang members were convicted and punished for the
murders:
Derrick
Sean O'Brien is set to be the first person executed in the
case. O'Brien, now 31, also admitted to the Jan. 4, 1993,
strangulation murder of Patricia Lopez, a mother of two.
Jose
Ernesto Medellin, a Mexican native who was raised in
Houston, is also on death row. He is appealing on the
grounds that he was denied access to a Mexican consulate
official during his arrest.
Efrain
Perez, 17 at the time of the crime, also had his death
sentence commuted by the Supreme Court ruling.
Venacio
Medellin, who was 14 at the time of the rapes and murders,
received a 40-year sentence and testified against the
others. A parole hearing will be conducted in the coming
weeks.
Raul Omar
Villarreal was 17 when he was inducted into the Black and
White Gang. His death sentence was commuted to life in
prison when the Supreme Court ruled last year that juvenile
killers could not be executed.
Peter
Anthony Cantu was considered the ringleader of the gang. He
was also condemned, but no execution date is set.
Thu 03/30/2006
Justices skeptical consul calls would change verdicts /
Foreigners want new trials because they were never told they
could contact consulates
WASHINGTON -
Lawyers for two foreign nationals found guilty of violent crimes
tried to convince the Supreme Court on Wednesday that those
convictions should be thrown out, because the men were not told
they could contact their consulates before talking to police.
But the justices appeared skeptical that the oversight would
justify suppressing the evidence that led to the guilty
verdicts. The two cases, which are being considered together by
the high court, were brought by Mario Bustillo, a Honduran
convicted of killing a Virginia teenager with a baseball bat in
1999, and Moises Sanchez-Llamas, a Mexican found guilty of
attempted murder in the shooting of an Oregon police officer in
1997.
Lawyers for both men said the Vienna Convention, a treaty signed
by the United States in 1969, required American officials to
contact the embassies of foreign nationals "without delay." It
is not enough for arrested foreigners to be told they can remain
silent, hire a lawyer or have a lawyer appointed, the Miranda
rights extended to Sanchez-Llamas, said his attorney, Peter
Gartlan. "Foreign nationals have a fourth option" - to
immediately contact their consulate, Gartlan said. Failure to
observe that right, he said, should compel prosecutors to throw
out all evidence obtained by police from interrogations.
The high court justices on Wednesday did not appear to buy the
argument of the convicted men's attorneys. Justice Antonin
Scalia said the Vienna Convention set up a mechanism for one
country to protest the actions of another country toward its
citizens, not establish a set of individual rights for foreign
nationals. He also noted that no other country has interpreted
the treaty as requiring evidence obtained before consular
notification to be suppressed. "It is implausible that we signed
a treaty that requires us to suppress (evidence from
interrogations), but it lets other countries do what they like,"
Scalia said. Justice Stephen Breyer said he was inclined to
accept that the men's rights under the treaty had been violated.
But he said he doubted that suppressing evidence obtained by
police was the proper remedy.
The court is
expected to rule on the cases before July. The decision could
have an impact on thousands of foreigners in U.S. jails and
prisons. In Texas, 10,205 inmates claimed to be citizens of a
foreign country at the end of 2005, according to the state's
Department of Corrections. Medellin is one of 17 Mexicans on
Texas' death row.
The Vienna Convention, signed by 168 countries, established the
ground rules under which countries must treat the citizens of
other nations that signed it. But Gregory Garre, U.S. deputy
solicitor general who argued Wednesday in support of the states
of Virginia and Oregon, said the treaty set up ways for
governments to address violations through diplomatic channels.
It did not give Americans overseas or foreigners in the United
States individual rights not granted the citizens of those
countries, he said. Several justices suggested that police need
to make a better effort to let foreigners know they have the
right to contact their country's officials. "It's not like
rocket science. Give the advice. End of case," said Justice
Anthony Kennedy.
BACKGROUND
In Texas: The cases before the Supreme Court echoed the claim
last year by Texas death row inmate Jose Medellin, who sought to
have his conviction in the 1993 murders of two Houston teenagers
- Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16 - overturned
because Mexican authorities were not contacted. The high court
appeal was dismissed after President Bush told Texas to give
Medellin another hearing to comply with international law. The
hearing has not yet been held.
Thu 12/29/2005
Killer in Ertman-Peņa case loses appeal
Convicted killer Derrick Sean O'Brien, one of five gang members
condemned for the savage rape-slayings of two teenage Houston
girls more than a dozen years ago, has lost an appeal before the
5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. O'Brien, now 30, was 18 in
June 1993 when he and five companions attacked Jennifer Ertman,
14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16, both high school sophomores who were
walking home at night after visiting a friend. In the ruling
released Tuesday, a three-member panel of the New Orleans-based
court denied O'Brien's request for a certificate of
appealability, which is needed before he can appeal a federal
district court's January denial of his case.
TUE 05/24/2005
Death row case returns to Texas / Supreme Court says state must
review conviction of Mexican killer
WASHINGTON - The fate of a Mexican on Texas' death row for
killing two Houston teenagers more than a decade ago is back in
the hands of state courts following the U.S. Supreme Court's
denial of his appeal Monday. The conviction of Jose Medellin,
one of five gang members sentenced to die for raping and killing
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa in 1993, remains in question
because Medellin was not advised of his right to get help from
Mexican consular officials before his trial.
In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that Texas must reconsider
the case as directed by President Bush in February. Bush
instructed Texas and other states where similar appeals are
pending to give Mexican defendants new hearings to comply with
international law. Medellin already has filed an appeal with
state district court in Houston based on Bush's order.
In its unsigned opinion, the high court reserved the right to
reconsider Medellin's case based on the state's decision.
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in a dissenting opinion that
the court was avoiding a central issue. "It seems to me unsound
to avoid questions of national importance when they are bound to
recur," she wrote. "Noncompliance with our treaty obligations is
especially worrisome in capital cases."
The decision puts the merits of the appeal on hold, "but it does
it in a way that certainly leaves open the opportunity for a
change in sentence perhaps, or better compliance with the Vienna
conventions," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the
Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center, which opposes
capital punishment. Under international law, Medellin and 50
other Mexicans on death row in the United States, 16 of them in
Texas, should have been able to seek help from their consulates
when preparing their defense, Mexican officials argued. They
said they learned of Medellin's sentence when he wrote to them
from death row.
The International Court of Justice in The Hague agreed with
Mexico last year, ruling that the United States violated the
1963 Vienna Convention by failing to inform Mexican nationals of
their right to confer with their consulates. That's when Bush
stepped in and ordered states to reconsider the cases. The
administration maintained that the Vienna accord and
international law had no legal binding in U.S. courts but said
the president had the right to decide whether to comply with
international conventions in the interests of American foreign
policy. His intervention in the death row cases was widely
viewed as designed to improve strained relations with Mexico.
Days after issuing his memorandum, Bush withdrew the United
States from the part of the treaty that gives the World Court
the final say in international disputes. Bush can give executive
orders to states, but it's unclear whether he can do the same
with courts. That's a question the Texas court will address in
the Medellin case, Dieter said.
When Ted Cruz, solicitor general for the Texas Attorney
General's office, argued the case before the Supreme Court in
March, he said Medellin failed to show that the outcome of his
case would have been different had the Mexican consulate been
notified of his arrest. In earlier appeals, attorneys for the
state said his conviction should be upheld because he did not
ask for consular help during his initial trials. Donald Donovan,
Medellin's attorney, said Monday's Supreme Court ruling clears
the way for his client to exercise his rights in Texas.
"We are confident that the Texas courts will agree with the
president that the United States must comply with the treaty
commitments made by its elected representatives, especially when
the United States itself depends on that treaty for the safety
of Americans working and traveling abroad," he said.
Medellin admitted that he and several other gang members
abducted the two girls when they were walking home in the dark,
then raped and strangled them.
TUE 03/29/2005
Reviews give hope to Mexicans on death row / Possible violation
of right to local consular notification may lighten sentences
On a sultry
summer night in 1993, Jose Medellin and a loose band of friends
entered the ranks of local infamy by committing one of the worst
crimes in the city's collective memory. Half-drunk, stoked by an
evening of fighting and trash talking, the group abducted two
girls walking home in the dark and raped them repeatedly before
finally strangling and stomping them to death. "This crime was
every parent's nightmare," Medellin's prosecutor, Terry Wilson,
said at the trial during closing arguments. "That nightmare has
a face, and there he is." The jury wasted little time in
sentencing Medellin to die, one of five death sentences handed
down for the brutality visited upon Jennifer Ertman and
Elizabeth Peņa.
Eleven years later, Medellin's attorneys are hoping to convince
a judge that if he had the benefit of a better trial counsel and
more money for an investigation, the jury might have settled on
a different punishment. It may be a hard sell, but at least they
are going to get a hearing, something that did not look likely
until earlier this month when President Bush ordered that the
convictions of Medellin and 50 other Mexican nationals on
American death rows be reviewed by a court because their rights
to have local Mexican consuls notified after arrest - a right
guaranteed by an international treaty - were violated.
Bush said he felt that the United States' full participation in
the Vienna Convention on Consular Rights required him to uphold
a ruling by the International Court of Justice that the 51
Mexicans are entitled to individual judicial review. Ten days
later, in a move to prevent the issue from coming up again, the
administration decided to withdraw from the optional provision
of the convention that allowed the world court to have a final
say on cases brought to it.
Though it may be a moot point now, the state of Texas on Monday
challenged Medellin's right to have additional access to federal
courts because of the international court. In U.S. Supreme Court
arguments scheduled before Bush agreed to comply with the
ruling, the state contended there is no valid constitutional
claim for federal courts to consider. It also disputed the
authority of President Bush to order state courts to do
anything. For Mexico, just getting Bush to order the hearings
was a long-anticipated victory. A staunch opponent of the death
penalty, the Mexican government now helps pay for the legal
defense of its citizens charged with capital murder in the
United States. That can make a difference in result, especially
in Texas, where the quality of capital defense has been
inconsistent.
"The government of Mexico would be finding first-class lawyers,"
said Mike Charlton, one of Medellin's appellate lawyers. "That's
a huge advantage over your average court-appointed lawyer."
Whether the unusual hearing will prove of real benefit to
Medellin is questionable, at best.Barring surprising
revelations, it might be an uphill battle to convince a judge
that a better lawyer would have led a Houston jury to a
different conclusion - assuming that is the standard that will
be applied. If his attorneys are required to prove only that the
performance of Medellin's trial counsel was poor enough to harm
his case, that might be another matter. "Nobody knows what the
standards are going to be, or much anything else yet, because
there are still so many questions," Charlton said. "But the sad
fact is that the guy who tried the case didn't do jack. He
didn't do anything to help his client. He called one witness. He
did not talk to any members of his family."
In at least a few cases, the chance to be heard anew offers real
hope. Attorneys for Cesar Fierro, for instance, relish the
opportunity to get back into court to challenge a conviction
that has been troubled almost from the beginning. Fierro, 49,
was convicted in the February 1979 shooting death of an El Paso
taxi driver. He insists officers coerced him into a confession
by telling him his parents were in jail and they would remain
there until he admitted to the crime.
A district judge in 1994 recommended a new trial for Fierro. The
prosecutor in the case later said he would have moved to dismiss
the indictment had he known of the circumstances of the
confession and if he could not have uncovered significant
evidence to corroborate it. Appellate courts, however, have so
far provided no relief. "He has a very compelling consular
assistance claim - his parents were in essence abducted and held
and threatened with torture," said Mark Warren, a legal analyst
who specializes in consular rights. "Had he been advised of his
consular rights, one thing that would have happened was Mexican
officials would've secured his parents' release from custody."
Francisco Molina Ruiz, former attorney general of the state of
Chihuahua, has submitted a sworn statement that his office would
have intervened with police had it been notified and ordered the
release of Fierro's parents.
The international court stopped short, however, of suggesting
there should be a new outcome in Fierro's case or any other,
said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty
Information Center. "It may be the minority of cases where there
is even an argument to be made," Dieter said. "It may be in some
cases there would be a little more mitigating evidence to be
presented. Each case will have to make it on its merits that
(consular assistance) would have made a difference. In some
cases there could be an entirely new sentencing trial, or
perhaps a new guilt trial, though the prosecutors are already
required to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." At the
moment, no one knows the precise procedure to be followed in the
hearings. Some might occur in state courts, some in federal. The
issues that these judges may take into account will not be as
limited as in a normal appeal, in part because the rules that
prohibit consideration of an issue not raised at the original
trial - the rules of so-called procedural default - will not be
enforced. The only real issue to be resolved is whether the lack
of consular assistance, and whatever that implies, likely
affected the outcome of the trial.
THE ECHOES OF A MURDER CASE
The 1993 murders of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa shocked
the city of Houston as no other crime has in recent memory. The
criminal proceedings against their six assailants have made
legal headlines as well. Five of the defendants were certified
as adults and each received a death sentence - at the time the
most for a single crime in the modern era. Other legal issues in
which they have been involved include:
Victim impact: Texas law was changed during the 1980s to give
crime victims or their families the right to make a statement at
the end of a trial. The Ertman/Peņa prosecutions, however,
marked the first time a judge permitted it in a high-profile
case.
Juvenile killers: The U.S. Supreme Court's decision earlier this
year to ban the death penalty for juvenile offenders took two of
the Ertman/Peņa killers off death row. Efrain Perez and Raul
Villarreal were 17 at the time of the slayings. Their capital
murder convictions stand, and they will serve life sentences.
Consular access: President Bush's decision to order the judicial
review of the cases of 51 Mexican citizens on death row in the
United States was brought about in part through the efforts of
attorneys for Jose Medellin, one of the Ertman/Peņa killers.
Bush's order enforces the ruling of the International Court of
Justice, which said the lack of consular notification could have
compromised the defense of the 51 defendants.
TUE 03/29/2005
Houston killer `had his day,' U.S. Supreme Court told / Lawyers
argue Mexican's guilt in 2 girls' murders should be upheld
WASHINGTON - The conviction of a Mexican national for the
infamous killing of two Houston girls should be upheld even
though he was not advised of his right to help from his
country's consulate, a lawyer for the state of Texas told the
U.S. Supreme Court Monday. In the dispute over the domestic
application of international law, Texas contends the case of
Jose Medellin, who was sentenced to death in 1994, should not be
reconsidered because he failed to raise the consular advice
issue during his state court trials. "It is time for the Supreme
Court to rule that Mr. Medellin has had his day in court," said
R. Ted Cruz, solicitor general for the Texas Attorney General's
office. Medellin "had no constitutional claims," he added.
Medellin's attorneys have seized on the International Court of
Justice's ruling that U.S. courts must review Medellin's
sentence and that of 50 other foreign nationals in nine states
on death row. The ruling was based on the 1963 Vienna
Convention, signed by the United States, which requires consular
access for people detained in a foreign country. Donald Donovan,
Medellin's attorney, told the justices that an international
treaty signed by the president and ratified by Congress is
legally binding on the courts.
Medellin's case was bolstered by a directive from President
Bush, who has asked that state courts review the 51 death
penalty cases, he said. After agreeing to comply with the
international body's decision, the White House notified the
United Nations that it was dropping out of the provision of the
treaty that allows the court to referee disputes. The Bush
administration also weighed in separately in the Medellin case,
with the Justice Department asking the Supreme Court to let the
Texas courts decide how to handle the matter. Michael Dreeben,
U.S. deputy solicitor general, told the court that a ruling
favoring Medellin could hamstring the president if he wanted to
reject a finding by the international court. Medellin was one of
five boys and men involved in the 1993 rape and murder of
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16, who were attacked
while on their way home.
The justices
appeared divided Monday on whether they should rule now or wait
until the state courts to decide. Chief Justice William
Rehnquist said that it seemed "topsy-turvy" that the legitimacy
of an international treaty should be decided in a state court
rather than the Supreme Court. But Justice John Paul Stevens
said that by deferring to the state courts, the high court could
sidestep some thorny issues. "Isn't it true that the Texas
proceedings could make this moot?" Stevens asked. Donovan argued
that if the Supreme Court dismisses the case, state courts might
take that as a sign that they do not need to act. Sandra
Babcock, counsel for Mexico, said the case's outcome is
important for Americans who may find themselves unfairly
arrested by local authorities in foreign countries and need the
help of U.S. officials.
Medellin's attorneys have also filed a challenge with the state
district court in Houston. Cruz said the state will fight Bush's
order to reconsider the case of Medellin and 14 other foreign
nationals on death row in Texas. The president overstepped his
authority by ordering the courts to automatically review all of
the sentences without considering the merits of each case, he
said.
Peņa's father, Adolph, who traveled from Houston, was present
for Monday's Supreme Court proceedings with his wife, Melissa,
and 17-year-old daughter, Rachel. With all the legal wrangling,
the crime against his daughter was being overlooked, Adolph Peņa
said. "Those scumbags have been in there (prison) long enough,"
he said. "It is time for them to be executed." Peņa also
expressed anger at Bush for intervening in the case, saying the
president was acting for political reasons.
The issue of Mexican nationals on death row in the United States
has been a source of friction between the White House and the
Mexican government. The high court agreed to take up the case
after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled
Medellin was not entitled to federal court relief because he had
not objected during his trial to the fact that the Mexican
consulate was not notified.
WED 03/09/2005
BUSH ORDERS HEARINGS FOR MEXICAN NATIONALS / The directive in
death row cases sparks challenge from Texas officials
In a move that could spawn a fight over presidential powers, the
Bush administration has ordered Texas and other states to
conduct hearings for 51 Mexican nationals on death row who claim
their rights were violated when local consulates were not
notified of their arrests. The directive came after years of
criticism from foreign governments and an adverse decision last
year by the International Court of Justice, which decreed that
U.S. courts should provide "effective review" of each case to
determine whether the lack of consular assistance could have
affected the outcome. "It's historic. It's a first," said Mark
Warren, an international legal analyst who specializes in
consular rights. "Whether it will end up providing the rule of
decision, as judges like to say, remains to be seen. It is a
remarkable development and a very important step toward
satisfactory resolution to this issue. But the final chapter has
yet to be written."
The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, ratified by the
U.S. Senate in 1969, provides that "consular officers shall have
the right to visit a national of the sending State who is in
prison, custody or detention; to converse and correspond with
him; and to arrange for his legal representation." The Mexican
government has complained loudly for years that these rights are
often ignored by U.S. authorities. Legal experts were uncertain
precisely how the courts in eight states holding the 51 inmates
would comply with the executive order, or whether all would even
try. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott immediately challenged
the right of President Bush to tell Texas courts what to do. "We
respectfully believe the executive determination exceeds the
constitutional bounds for federal authority," Abbott said in a
prepared statement. His comment echoed Gov. Rick Perry's
rejection last year of the international court's opinion. Perry
said the court had no jurisdiction over the state's criminal
justice system.
Bush's order covers 15 of the 16 Mexican nationals on death row
in Texas. Only admitted serial killer Angel Resendiz, convicted
of one murder in Houston and implicated in a dozen others in
five states, failed to join the case. Houston lawyer Danalynn
Recer, who represents Mexican nationals in capital murder cases
on behalf of the Mexican government, said Bush's order was
significant because it recognizes the importance of U.S. courts
complying with established international rights. "When any
foreign national is not notified of their right to contact their
consulate, they're being denied their government's assistance,"
Recer said.
Bush's order comes weeks before the U.S. Supreme Court is
scheduled to hear arguments in the case of Jose Medellin, who
was sentenced to death along with four others for the 1993
murders of Houston teenagers Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Peņa.
Medellin, who was born in Mexico but lived most of his life in
Houston, has asked the high court to order a new hearing based
the violation of his consular rights under the Vienna
Convention. "Medellin has the best chance for a new trial he has
ever had," said Mike Charlton, one of his attorneys, who claims
that better legal representation paid for by the Mexican
government could have made a difference during the sentencing
portion of his trial. Abbott said Medellin's conviction has been
given ample review and he is not entitled to another one based
on the decision of the international court. "Medellin
voluntarily confessed to the brutal gang rape and murder of two
teenage girls," Abbott said. "He was convicted after a fair
trial, applying U.S. and Texas law. The state of Texas believes
no international court supersedes the laws of Texas or the laws
of the United States."
As a matter of law, the Bush administration agreed with Abbott's
assertion. In a brief filed in connection with Medellin's case
by the U.S. solicitor general, the administration said neither
the Vienna accord nor the international court ruling was legally
binding on U.S. courts. However, it also claimed the president
had an absolute right to decide, on the basis of foreign policy
interests, if and how the U.S. would comply with its
international obligations. "The president, the nation's
representative in foreign affairs, has determined that the
United States will comply with the ICJ decision," the brief
states. "Compliance serves to protect the interests of U.S.
citizens abroad, promote the effective conduct of foreign
relations, and underscores the United States' commitment in the
international community to the rule of law. That presidential
determination, like an executive agreement, has independent
legal force and effect, and contrary state rules must give way
under the Supremacy Clause."
Death penalty expert Dudley Sharp said that, barring a similar
directive by the U.S. Supreme Court, the state courts likely
will decide that their previous reviews have been adequate. "The
states are already handling it the way the solicitor general put
it in his brief," Sharp said.
WED 03/09/2005
Mexico cheers U.S. decision on Texas inmates
WASHINGTON - Mexico welcomed the Bush administration's decision
to allow Mexican citizens on Texas' death row to have their
sentences reviewed. The reception in the president's home state,
in contrast, was varied. The development came in the Supreme
Court case of Jose Medellin, one of five alleged gang members
sentenced to die for the Houston killing of Jennifer Ertman and
Elizabeth Peņa in 1993. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said
the Bush administration's decision intruded on the state's legal
authority. But he did not immediately decide whether to appeal.
U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, a Republican and frequent Bush backer,
said last week that "Texas is simply trying to enforce its laws;
Medellin has been given access to an attorney, a right to a fair
trial, and all of the appeals and habeas corpus rights our
system affords." But on Tuesday the senator had no quarrel with
the Bush decision, because the American president, not the
international court, was passing judgment, Cornyn spokesman Don
Stewart said Tuesday. The administration's call for new hearings
in state or federal courts, depending on where the cases were
originally tried, goes forward unless Texas decides to contest
the order in court.
Richard Stoll, a Rice University political science professor,
said Bush's decision showed a proper willingness to buck Texas
Republicans now that he has broader responsibilities. "There is
a certain amount of irony in the president siding against Texas
in this case, but when he changed jobs he changed his
perspective." he said.
Mexican officials cheered.
"It is very important that the Mexican government express its
satisfaction and its recognition of this determination by the
United States' executive power, which without a doubt will have
an important effect on the cases of our compatriots," said
Arturo Dager, legal representative to Mexico's foreign ministry.
THU 03/03/2005
Ruling is a `relief,' but inmates not celebrating / Harris
County killers spared by Supreme Court action ponder new
sentences
LIVINGSTON - Locked away on Texas' death row for more than a
decade, Raul Villarreal knew the meaning of good days and bad.
The good days came when appeals were filed to free him from the
death sentence he received for the 1993 rape and murder of two
teenage Houston girls; the bad, when those appeals met
rejection. The worst day came not long ago when the U.S. Supreme
Court turned down his most recent appeal, thereby clearing the
way for him to be put to death. The best came Tuesday when the
same court ruled the execution of murderers who were minors when
they committed their crimes is unconstitutional.
On Wednesday, Villarreal, 29, still was struggling to digest the
meaning of the ruling, which has spared him and 27 other Texas
death row inmates from the executioner's needle. Eleven of those
inmates are from Harris County. "In a way," he said after a
thoughtful sigh, "it's a big relief. But I didn't act like I was
celebrating. It's bittersweet. There are still a lot of guys
left behind facing execution."
Villarreal, who was 17 when he and a group of other youths
fatally attacked Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peņa, 16,
said he has spent recent days coming to grips with the
probability that he would be executed. The high court had stayed
his scheduled June 24 execution pending a decision in the case
resolved Tuesday. "My main worries concerned my family," he said
of his mother, Louisa Villarreal, and his four siblings.
"They're the ones who would be left behind. I tried to take
things one day at a time. I've worked at accepting my
responsibilities for the actions that brought me here. It's
helped me accept my fate."
Similar thoughts of life, death and the long prison sentences
they now likely will have to serve have occupied other Harris
County killers spared by the ruling. Johnnie Bernal, 28, who
claims he is innocent of the August 1994 killing of Lee Dilley
at a Houston ice house, has been on death row since July 1995.
He thinks Tuesday's ruling is "a step in the right direction."
Villarreal and Bernal were caught up in a spike in juvenile
crime in the late 1980s and early 1990s that resulted in an
unprecedented number of young offenders on death row. And
because those crimes were concentrated in gang-heavy urban
centers, the bulk of those offenders were minorities. Of the 28
"juvenile" offenders on Texas' death row, 21 were black,
Hispanic or Asian; nine of 13 such offenders executed since 1982
were minorities.
Perry wants cases reviewed
In the wake of Tuesday's ruling, Gov. Rick Perry has directed
the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to review the 28 cases
and recommend appropriate action. It is likely that many will
receive life sentences, requiring that they serve 40 years in
prison before becoming eligible for consideration for parole.
Bernal has appeals pending and is optimistic he ultimately will
be cleared of the crime and freed from prison. But he
acknowledged that a long sentence would be daunting. "Watching
your loved ones passing away and not being able to be there
would be heartbreaking," he said. A long prison sentence would
also be a continuation of a near-decade behind bars that he said
has been filled with remorse. "Every time I pray, I include the
Dilley family," he said. "A life's been lost, lives have been
destroyed and crushed. Every year I've been in here the depth of
my feeling for his family has grown." Life on death row, he
said, has not been easy. "I've seen friends almost every other
day going to their last Mass," Bernal said. "I've been around.
All you could do is prepare yourself mentally and spiritually.
... The more I've thought of the thing, the more at peace with
God I've become. I'm not afraid, but I feel sorrow."
"They treat you like you are already dead," added Robert Acuna,
19, who has been on death row about six months for the 2003
killing of his Baytown neighbors, James Carroll, 75, and his
wife, Joyce, 74. "They are as life-draining as they legally can
be. They keep you out of society. There is no contact
visitation, no watching the news on TV, no contact with other
inmates. They don't go by names, you have a number. They make
you feel unimportant." Acuna said his trial and incarceration
often have seemed unreal. "I've seen all this stuff on TV," he
said. "But then I realize there's no TV screen." Only when Tyler
murderer Donald Aldrich was executed shortly after Acuna's
arrival last fall did the young killer recognize the seriousness
of his situation. "They took him away and I knew I wasn't going
to see him again," Acuna said. Acuna, too, insisted he is
innocent, and expressed confidence he will be cleared. "Forty
years in prison is a long time," he said. "But if I'm alive, I
can't complain."
Hoping to help others
Acuna and Bernal said they would like to work to end the death
penalty. "I can't see myself in prison just wasting time,"
Villarreal said of his expected future. "I would like to use my
experience to help others. Maybe in a youth program or
something." Villarreal said he is deeply remorseful for his
crime, and he is aware that the Supreme Court ruling sparing his
life angers his victims' families. "If the shoe were on the
other foot," he said. "If my children were dead ... I would feel
the same way."
WED 03/02/2005
THE SUPREME COURT RULING / Families of victims attempt to come
to grips with ruling. They voice their concern that the killers
someday may be set free
Janet Green was teaching her sixth-grade class in Conroe when
her husband called with news about Tuesday's high court
decision.
A hush came over the classroom as her expression darkened.
Green said she remained composed and only began to cry hours
later when she spoke publicly about the court's decision that
spares the life of her son's killer, Michael Lopez.
"I've been a teacher for 30 years and I've never had a kid that
did not know right from wrong," Green said.
Lopez was convicted of capital murder in the Sept. 29, 1998,
slaying of 25-year-old Michael Eakin, a Harris County deputy
constable who had pulled him over for speeding. Lopez, who was
just 7 months shy of his 18th birthday, jumped out of his car
and ran into a field, followed by Eakin. The pair struggled
before Eakin was shot twice at close range.
Another family outraged
During a news conference with other crime victims' relatives,
Janet and Bill Green said they are concerned Lopez may be
released one day.
"We don't want these guys on our streets to kill other sons and
daughters," Bill Green said.
The Supreme Court decision outraged Adolph and Melissa Peņa.
The couple's daughter Elizabeth Peņa, 16, and her friend
Jennifer Ertman, 14, took a shortcut home June 24, 1993, and
unwittingly walked into a drunken gang initiation in northwest
Houston. The Waltrip High School sophomores' badly mauled bodies
were found four days later.
"We're shocked and appalled our judicial system can let this
happen," Melissa Peņa said Tuesday.
Her husband added, "They will be able to get out in 40 years -
it's just not right. Where would the justice be for the girls?"
The couple, like the Greens, had intended to witness the
executions of their daughters' killers.
"Hell yeah, I was gonna be there," Adolph Peņa said.
Now the couple said they will have to make sure that Efrain
Perez and Raul Villarreal, who were both 17 at the time of the
murders, get life without parole. In all, six young men were
convicted in the crime.
Others praise decision
Perez and Villarreal, both now 29, were convicted for the
abduction, rape and murder of the girls. Three other defendants
received the death penalty. The sixth, who was 14 at the time,
was sentenced to prison.
While those families struggled with Tuesday's decision,
Villarreal's mother, Louisa, said she considers the high court's
decision a "miracle."
"I'm so happy that the Supreme Court has removed the death
penalty," the mother of five said, choking back tears. "This is
a miracle. I'm happy like never before. This is the best good
news in all my life."
Villarreal said she last visited her son in prison Saturday, and
"he and me and a lot of other people" prayed for a favorable
ruling from the high court.
She said she has no illusions about her son's guilt in the
crime.
"I will tell you," she said, "I think he was in the wrong place
with the wrong boys at the wrong hour. He was very nice, and he
still is very nice. I don't know what happened on that horrible
day."
WED 03/02/2005
THE SUPREME COURT RULING / JUVENILES SPARED FROM DEATH ROW / IN
TEXAS / A `vicious generation' spawned push to condemn
Juvenile offenders were infrequent arrivals to Texas' death row
until the 1990s, when escalating juvenile violence and a new
breed of young killer prompted a severe reaction from the
criminal justice system.
Only four Texas juvenile offenders were executed for crimes
committed in the 1970s. Ditto for the 1980s, though one inmate
from that decade remains on death row.
The turbulent 1990s saw a different story.
An explosion of juvenile crime, including a huge increase in
juvenile homicides, brought the gloves off. Most juvenile
offenders currently on Texas' death row - 25 of 28 - committed
their crimes in that decade. Half of the total occurred from
1994-99.
In this case, Texas mirrored a national trend. Across the
country, 76 juveniles were given death sentences during the last
half of the 1990s. That's almost as many as the previous 12
years.
Typically, getting a death sentence for a juvenile offender has
been harder than for an adult, not only because of age but
because of a more limited criminal record. That changed in the
last decade.
Experts think the impact of publicity about juvenile crime made
its way to the courthouse. Not only were there more cases to
consider, but people had been shocked by news reports of gang
violence, crack wars, drive-bys, school shootings and youths
everywhere with guns.
"You had local news pounding on the issue, so presumably the
jury came in sort of primed to accept the message that the
juvenile crime rate is a problem," said Victor Streib, a law
professor at Ohio Northern University and an expert on the
juvenile death penalty. "The arguments in court were no
different than they ever were, but the public awareness of
juvenile violence was."
Robert Blecker, a New York law professor who researched the wave
of juvenile killers firsthand, thinks they were a frightening
aberration that had never been seen in society or the criminal
justice system.
Blecker spent more than 2,000 hours interviewing young offenders
in a Virginia prison that served Washington, D.C., one of the
early venues in the outbreak of juvenile violence. He said the
death sentences that ensued from their murders were
understandable when details of the crimes are explored.
"It was an incomparably vicious generation, so it doesn't
surprise me there were these death penalties," said Blecker, who
teaches at New York Law School. "There was a depraved
indifference to human life that I think has peaked. There
reached a point where it got so out of control that even the
older street criminals recognized themselves that they wanted
something better for their younger brothers. The older kids were
now reining in the younger kids."
Dianne Clements, head of the Houston-based victims rights group
Justice for All, said she was disappointed that the court would
treat juvenile offenders with a broad brush instead of letting
their crimes be considered individually.
"I was hoping the majority of justices would give credence to
the types of murders that these 16- and 17-year-olds commit,"
she said, "and understand how important it is to impose the type
of penalties states permit and (let) juries decide, instead of
turning their backs on innocent victims and families."
No state will be more affected by Tuesday's ruling than Texas,
which leads the nation by far in sentencing juvenile offenders
to death, even though state law permits only 17-year-olds to be
considered.
Texas' 28 juvenile offenders on death row is double that of
Alabama, the only other state in double digits. Alabama, which
allows 16-year-olds to receive death sentences, has never
executed any of its juvenile offenders. Texas has executed 13.
No other state has more than five juveniles on death row.
For those familiar with Texas' willingness to use capital
punishment, such numbers are hardly surprising. Its 338
executions since the resumption of capital punishment in 1977 -
more than a third of all those carried out in the United States
- have earned it worldwide distinction.
Many are not sad to see that distinction end, at least with
respect to juveniles.
"Up until today, I think there were six nations in the world
that executed people for crimes they committed as children -
including China, Saudi Arabia, Republic of Congo and Iran," said
Jim Marcus, director of the Texas Defender Service, which
handles the appeals of a number of Texas death row inmates. "So
it's about time that the United States conformed to the criminal
justice standards of the Western Hemisphere."
For the families of victims, however, the argument for standards
pales beside their pain and outrage.
"They were certified as adults, they should be executed like
adults," said Adolph Peņa, whose daughter Elizabeth and her
friend Jennifer Ertman were murdered in 1993 by a gang of
teenagers that included three juveniles. "Let those guys up in
D.C. worry about whether they knew what they were doing. I know
my 16-year-old knew what they were doing."
The reasons behind the rise in juvenile homicides in the early
'90s - the reaction to which may be indirectly responsible for
Tuesday's court ruling - will be debated by social scientists
for years.
Blecker said several factors played a role. The first was a
widely observed phenomenon: the flight of the minority middle
class from communities that had previously been segregated. When
the merchants and dentists and postal workers left, the only
people with money were those involved in crime.
Of greater influence, he said, was an epidemic of abuse of crack
and marijuana soaked in PCP. The drug culture seized control of
a sizable segment of youth.
Its assumptions - kill or be killed, no one makes it past 21,
live entirely for the moment - went hand in hand with violence.
The drugs themselves left the teens feeling both invulnerable
and paranoid, a lethal combination.
As the epidemic waned, the killings dropped. And so did death
sentences. There have been only 22 in the last five years and
only two in Texas.
Streib, however, said only some of that decrease should be
attributed to fewer killings. In recent years, he said, the
practice of executing juvenile offenders has become less
palatable for society. Death penalty opponents have campaigned
steadily against it, increasing their effort after the Supreme
Court banned execution of the mentally retarded in 2002.
"The (death) sentencing rate is much, much lower than the
(juvenile) homicide rate," Streib said. "There has been a lot of
campaigning against the juvenile death penalty. It's sort of out
of favor politically now. And whether they face the death
penalty depends on what the local prosecutor wants to do."
WED 03/02/2005
THE SUPREME COURT RULING / Juvenile offenders on death row from
Harris County
Efrain Perez
Born: Nov. 19, 1975
Raul Villarreal
Born: Sept. 25, 1975
Their offense: June 24, 1993
Of all the juvenile offenders on Texas' death row, two who will
never provoke sympathy are Perez and Villarreal, who were
involved in the abduction, rape and murder of Jennifer Ertman
and Elizabeth Peņa in Houston's most notorious crime of the
1990s. The two girls were taking a shortcut home along some
railroad tracks near T.C. Jester late at night when they were
set upon by a group of young men who had been drinking and
fighting as part of a gang initiation. The violence that ensued
shocked a city normally numb to crime news.
Unwittingly, Villarreal set the chain of events in motion when
he ran into Perez, an old friend whose car had broken down
outside the convenience store where Villarreal was playing a
video game. The two began to chat and eventually went together
to the house of one of Perez's friends, Joe Medellin. An
afternoon of loose banter and trash talking among those three
and others led to Villarreal's initiation into a loose gang. The
initiation session, which mostly involved beer drinking and
Villarreal's fighting the gang members, was about to break up
when the girls, who had been enjoying a pool party at a nearby
apartment complex, crossed their path near a train trestle.
For logistical reasons, the five adults charged with the crime
were tried simultaneously. All received the death penalty.
Villarreal had no criminal record. Perez did. Neither was the
instigator of the assault, but both participated fully, both in
the rapes and murders. Each had received an execution date in
2004 (on the anniversary of the murders), set aside when the
Supreme Court said it would consider the issue of juvenile
offenders. A juvenile who was involved in the assault received a
40-year sentence.
SAT 12/11/04
High court considers rights of convicted foreigners
Killer on Texas death row says his case violated international
agreements
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court stepped into an
international controversy over the legal rights of foreigners
Friday, agreeing to hear the appeal of a Mexican national sent
to Texas' death row for the gang rape and murder of two Houston
teenagers. The high court will hear arguments next spring in the
case of Jose Medellin, one of five gang members condemned in the
deaths of 14-year-old Jennifer Ertman and 16-year-old Elizabeth
Pena. The girls were raped, sodomized and strangled with a belt
and their shoelaces on their way home one night in 1993. At
issue is whether lower federal courts should have allowed
Medellin to appeal his conviction and sentence on the grounds
that his rights under international treaties were violated.
Under the treaties, his lawyers argue, the Mexican government
should have been told of Medellin's arrest and given a chance to
help defend their countryman.
In reviewing the case, the Supreme
Court will enter a larger debate that strained relations between
the United States and Mexico and could affect the treatment of
U.S. citizens accused of crimes while traveling or living
abroad. A decision, expected by July, could determine the fate
of more than 50 Mexicans on death row in the United States,
including 16 in Texas. Friday's announcement comes eight months
after the International Court of Justice at The Hague, the
United Nations' highest court to resolve disputes, ruled that
U.S. officials should review the convictions and sentences of 51
Mexicans on death row. It said the United States had violated
the Mexicans' rights under the 1963 Vienna Convention by failing
to inform their government of their arrests and trials.
Attorneys for the state of Texas had argued in lower courts that
it was too late for Medellin to appeal because he did not object
at his trial.
But Sandra Babcock, who represents Mexico, said in
court papers that if Mexico had been told about Medellin's
trial, the country would have made sure he had a good lawyer and
enough money to hire investigators and expert witnesses.
Medellin's case has widespread support outside the United
States. Dozens of countries, the European Union, former
diplomats, international law experts and legal and human rights
groups have weighed in on Medellin's side. "The Hague said the
United States had breached the treaty and the remedy is an
opportunity to review the convictions and sentences," said Lori
Damrosch, a Columbia law professor who filed a supporting brief
on behalf of a group of international law experts. "The
International Court of Justice is binding on the United States
as a whole and therefore is biding on all courts in the U.S.,
and the Supreme Court has the responsibility to clarify its
previous rulings so lower courts know what to do." Medellin's
lawyer, Donald Donovan of New York, could not be reached Friday
for comment.
The Texas Attorney General's Office, which will
argue for the state before the high court, released a statement
Friday saying: "These crimes were committed in Texas, the cases
were tried in Texas courts and the defendants sentenced by Texas
juries. We will continue to enforce Texas state law." Andy Kahan,
director of the Mayor's Crime Victims Assistance Office in
Houston, said the court's decision to hear Medellin's appeal
came as a blow to the victims' families, who have waited years
for the executions of their daughters' killers. "I continue to
be shocked and amazed by the actions of a system that is
supposed to protect our victims and their families, but seems to
go out of its way to protect brutal, violent, remorseless
killers," he said. "No ruling will ever bring back these two
young girls, but the families are hopeful the court will see
through this attempt to circumvent the justice these two
families so richly deserve."
Former U.S. diplomats and others
told the justices that following the Hague's order also would
set a good example if it cares about the rights of its own
citizens in other countries. About 6,000 Americans arrested or
detained each year in other countries need consular help to
understand foreign legal systems, the diplomats said. Last year,
the high court refused to consider the case of Osbaldo Torres,
another Mexican national on Oklahoma's death row whose case was
similar to Medellin's. But Justices John Paul Stevens and
Stephen Breyer said they had misgivings. Because Oklahoma's
governor commuted Torres' sentence to life after the ruling at
The Hague, Medellin's case becomes the first to make it to the
Supreme Court since the World Court ruled in April. Mexican
President Vicente Fox canceled a meeting with President Bush at
his Crawford ranch in August 2002 after the state of Texas
refused to grant clemency to Mexican Javier Suarez, who was on
death row. Fox still raised the touchy issue when he finally
visited Crawford 19 months later.
The fate of two other killers
of Pena and Ertman - Efrain Perez and Raul Omar Villarreal -
also could be determined by the high court this term when it
decides in a Missouri case whether 16- and 17-year-old killers
are too young for the death penalty. "It's like it's never going
to end," Melissa Pena said Friday of the long vigil she and
husband Adolph Pena have kept over their daughter's killers.
"I'm just kind of shocked." Melissa Pena said the Supreme Court
case will be "just another hurdle for us to jump through." It
would have been nice, she said, if her daughter had been given
10 years to argue for her life. "Where were her appeals?" she
said.
WED 10/13/04
Fate of state's youngest killers in justices' hands
28 murderers on Texas' death row will live or die by court's
ruling in Missouri case
WASHINGTON - The murders are brutal and hideous. The murderers
are 16 or 17. And the question before the U.S. Supreme Court
today in a case from Missouri is whether, like mentally retarded
killers, young killers should be spared execution under the
Constitution's ban against "cruel and unusual punishment."
Awaiting the justices' ruling, expected by next summer, are 28
killers on Texas' death row who were 17 at the time of their
crimes and will live or die by the decision, and the families
and friends of their victims, many of whom insist the ultimate
punishment must be carried out. "It would have been fine with me
if they had gotten life without parole, but we're in Texas here,
and they get execution," said Houstonian Adolph Peņa, whose
16-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, and her 14-year-old friend
Jennifer Ertman were gang-raped, sodomized, and strangled with a
belt and their shoelaces on their way home one night in 1993.
One of the rapists was 14 and was sentenced to prison. The
girls' five killers - two of whom were 17 at the time - were
sentenced to death. Efrain Perez, who admitted raping and
strangling Elizabeth Peņa, and Raul Omar Villarreal, who bragged
that he stepped on Ertman 's neck when she didn't die fast
enough, are now 28 and 29, respectively. Their executions were
scheduled back-to-back for June, but were put on hold pending
the Supreme Court's decision. "They knew exactly what they did
to my daughter," Peņa said as he prepared to travel to
Washington to hear today's arguments in the Missouri case. "I
think of that every day, and I say, `Hey, they are going to die,
too.' But I wish my daughter could have been put to death like
that, with lethal injection. . . . Any man, in my book, would
stand up and take what he's got coming." The problem, say
those opposed to executions for the nation's youngest death row
inmates, is that the murderers weren't adults when they
committed their crimes, but adolescents still developing. They
plan to argue today that young killers, like many mentally
retarded killers, know right from wrong. But their brains are
immature, making them biologically incapable, in many cases, of
controlling their impulses and thinking through the consequences
of their behavior, and are therefore less blameworthy than
adults who commit the same crimes. "Adolescents engage in
harmful, aggressive, stupid behavior - but it passes" when they
grow up, said Dr. David Fassler, a child psychiatrist who
opposes the death penalty for those under 18 because of new
research indicating the brain is still developing in teenagers.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't be held accountable for their
crimes, Fassler said. They should be punished severely, he said,
but they should be spared the needle. "Junk science
mumbo-jumbo," counters Dianne Clements, president of Justice For
All, a pro-death-penalty group in Houston that filed a
"friend-of-the-court" brief supporting Missouri. "The five
murderers that killed Jenny and Elizabeth just didn't know what
they were doing when they raped them and strangled them? That's
outrageous. That is just a pathetic argument and those
scientists, or those anti-death-penalty doctors, should be
ashamed." The high court last reviewed the issue of executing
juveniles in a Kentucky case in 1989. At that time, the justices
OK'd executions for killers as young as 16. Under Texas law,
killers as young as 17 may be executed. In a 6-3 ruling in a
2002 case, Atkins v. Virginia, the justices said 31 states that
once allowed executions of the mentally retarded indicated a
significant change of heart and became opponents of the
practice. Today, the court considers the case of Christopher
Simmons, who was 17 when he and a young accomplice broke into
the Fenton, Mo., home of a woman in 1993, bound her with
electrical tape, drove her to a railroad bridge and pushed her
off, leaving her to drown. After the court's decision in Atkins,
a Missouri court used the high court's reasoning on the mentally
retarded case to overturn Simmons' death sentence because of his
youth. The death penalty supporters on the bench are Chief
Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and
Clarence Thomas. Four justices - John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader
Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and David Souter - have written in
court papers that the practice of executing juveniles is "a
relic of the past" and a "shameful practice." Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy both voted against the
death penalty with regard to mentally retarded killers.
TEEN KILLERS
Capital murderers who were 17 or older at the time of their
crimes can be executed in Texas. Since 1982, the state has
executed 12 such killers. 28 now on Texas death row.
SAT 03/13/04
Two inmates on Texas death row given reprieves
Expected ruling on juvenile crimes affects two other Harris
County cases
CORRECTION: Because of an editing error, this story misstated
the number of Texas death row inmates who committed their crimes
when they were younger than 18 and whose executions are
scheduled. Although the U.S. Supreme Court recently stayed the
execution of Edward Capetillo and Harris County prosecutors say
they will ask judges to withdraw the execution dates for Raul
Villareal and Efrain Perez, a fourth inmate, Mauro Barraza, is
still scheduled to die on June 29. Correction published 3/16/04.
The U.S. Supreme Court's order to postpone the lethal injection
of a Harris County man who committed murder when he was 17 has
spurred local prosecutors to back away from the scheduled
executions of two other inmates with similar cases. The three
Harris County killers who were scheduled to die this year will
get a reprieve until after the Supreme Court considers whether
the death penalty is constitutional for juvenile crimes. They
were the only inmates in the nation with scheduled executions
for murders committed when they were younger than 18 (SEE
CORRECTION). The high court last week stayed the execution of
Edward Capetillo, who was scheduled to die on March 30 for a
1995 robbery and double murder. His attorney had urged the court
to put off the execution until it hears a Missouri case in
October. In the wake of Capetillo's successful appeal, Harris
County prosecutors say they will ask judges to cancel the
execution dates for Raul Omar Villarreal and Efrain Perez, who
were set to die on June 24 and 25, respectively. Both men were
17 when they raped, kicked, stomped and strangled Jennifer
Ertman and Elizabeth Pena in northwest Houston as the two high
school students walked home one summer night in 1993. "We will
wait and, obviously, see what the U.S. Supreme Court does,"
Assistant District Attorney Jane Scott, who is handling Perez's
appeal, said Friday. "If we took any other action, we would be
pursuing an execution that we know would probably eventually be
stayed." District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal said in January that
he intended to pursue the executions on this year's calendar
despite the Supreme Court's plan to consider the Missouri case,
in which a death sentence was overturned because the defendant
was 17 at the time of the murder. The prosecutors' new position
came as a surprise to some in Houston. "The general policy of
the DA here is to force the lawyers representing the death row
inmates to do everything possible to obtain relief, whether
temporary or permanent," said David Dow, a professor at the
University of Houston Law Center who also represents condemned
inmates. But others outside of Texas said the prosecutors have
little choice. "The writing is clearly on the wall: The Supreme
Court is going to grant stays in these cases until it has heard
the issue at hand," said Richard Dieter, director of the Death
Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C. "That is, whether
they can execute juvenile offenders." Harris County prosecutors
may be showing some deference to the nation's highest court,
which has heard numerous capital appeals from Texas in recent
years, Dieter said. "You don't want to be in defiance of the
Supreme Court," he said. "When a signal is sent, it's good to
take the hint and not have to be shouted at." Prosecutors had
opposed the initial request for a stay in January from
Capetillo's attorney, Elizabeth DeRieux of Longview, and state
District Judge William Harmon ordered that Capetillo be executed
as scheduled. DeRieux then went to the high court, and Justice
Antonin Scalia signed the order staying the execution last week.
Capetillo, now 26, was 17 when he and two other teens killed
Matt Vickers, 19, and Kimberley Williamson, 20, during a robbery
at a Champions Park home in January 1995. The Supreme Court has
repeatedly found the death penalty to be constitutional, but has
imposed limits on its use. It ended capital punishment for
rapists in 1977 and for those judged insane in 1986. Two years
ago, the court barred executions of people with mental
retardation. The justices look at "evolving standards of decency
that mark a maturing society" to determine what punishments are
too extreme, according to a 1958 ruling. The Texas attorney
general's office maintains that the question of whether a death
sentence is appropriate for a crime committed by someone under
age 18 should be decided by juries on a case-by-case basis. A
sweeping ban on executions in all such cases is beyond the
Supreme Court's authority, according to Texas' state attorneys,
who handle death row appeals in federal court. "It is the job of
the courts to identify `evolving standards of decency,' not to
create them by judicial fiat," Assistant Attorney General
Margaret Schmucker wrote in a Supreme Court brief opposing
Capetillo's stay.
OTHER TEEN KILLERS
Harris County prosecutors say they will ask judges to cancel the
execution dates for Raul Omar Villarreal and Efrain Perez. The
two Houston inmates were scheduled to be executed on June 24 and
25, respectively. Both men were 17 when they raped and murdered
two teenage girls - Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena - in
northwest Houston in 1993.
SUN 02/29/04
High court to revisit age in executions
Debate pits scientific data against horror of crimes
Convicted killer Raul Villarreal groped for words to explain the
inexplicable: how a kid who had never been in serious trouble
with the law could take part in murders so horrible they shocked
a city all but numb to crime reports. He mentioned the mob
mentality that overwhelmed the group of young men after a night
of drinking and fighting. But he had no real answer for why he
participated in the rape and murder of two high school girls,
seemingly aware that anything he could say would sound like an
excuse. "I look back on all that and carry a lot of guilt,"
Villarreal said behind the sheet of Plexiglas that separates
inmate and visitor on Texas' death row. "It's one of the things
I struggle with when I think about whether I deserve to be here.
I know these are the consequences of decisions I made. I just
don't think I was mature enough to make a wise decision,
especially under the pressure of what was going down at the
time." Immaturity is a subject close to the heart of any parent
of a teenager; in the next few months, it will become fodder for
the U.S. Supreme Court. For the first time since 1989, when it
set 16 as the minimum age for the death penalty, the high court
will wrestle with whether inmates who committed crimes while 16
or 17 should be executed. The argument will pit believers in
retributive justice and the deterrent effect of executions
against child welfare experts and scientists specializing in
human brain development. Villarreal, who is scheduled to die
June 24, was 17 when he and five others raped, kicked, stomped
and strangled Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena as they made
their way home in northwest Houston on a summer night in 1993. A
young 17, he says. He had never spent much time on his own, held
down a steady job or had a serious girlfriend. He never really
thought about the future. The justices will be inundated with
medical research suggesting that offenders such as Villarreal
deserve lenience, no matter how serious the crimes committed.
Much as advocates claimed that mental retardation should reduce
criminal culpability, those who oppose executing juvenile
offenders will argue there is an emerging scientific consensus
that even 16- and 17-year-olds are not the emotional or
intellectual equivalent of adults. "The reason we ought to
abandon the juvenile death penalty is not because I am a
bleeding-heart liberal - I'm not," said Laurence Steinberg, a
Temple University psychologist who specializes in adolescent
development and juvenile justice. "It's because the science says
it's a bad practice." Steinberg cites repeated psychological
testing he has done of young people regarding impulse control,
thinking ahead and understanding the consequences of what they
are doing. Performance keeps improving into early adulthood, he
said. It does not plateau in adolescence. Over the last two
decades, researchers at Harvard Medical School, the National
Institute of Mental Health and other institutions have used
magnetic resonance imaging to chart the development of different
regions of the human brain. One of the most surprising
discoveries was that the frontal lobe undergoes significant
change in the years 12 to 22. Because that part of the brain has
great bearing on judgment and control of impulses and
aggression, there is an important connection to criminal
behavior in teens. Adolescents may look mature, but often they
are making decisions and evaluating consequences using different
parts of the brain - those associated with emotions - than
adults in the same circumstances, researchers have learned.
"Understanding of context, possibilities, future consequences of
what they are about to do is not there," said Ruben Gur, chief
of the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of
Pennsylvania Medical Center. "If you talk to them later, they
can understand it. But the information gets there a little bit
too late, and the consequences can be devastating." Gur
attributes the lapses in part to the uncompleted process of
myelineation, in which fat tissue, often referred to as white
matter, grows around the pathways that conduct the exchange of
information between different parts of the brain. This
insulation is essential for proper functioning of the brain's
circuitry. A related process called pruning also continues
during adolescence to clear away unused brain cells and
connections. When that is done, the brain works more
efficiently. Gur said the research is at odds with current law
or any likely revision of it. "Scientifically, if you want to
make a line in the sand, 21 or 22 would be more reasonable than
18," he said. "And 18 is more reasonable than 16, certainly. For
the average person, that maturation process is complete between
21 and 22. That would be the biological definition of adulthood
in the brain." The matter of executing juvenile offenders landed
in the Supreme Court's lap when the Missouri high court
overturned the death sentence of Christopher Simmons in August.
The Missouri justices concluded that condemning those 16 and 17
is no longer in keeping with prevailing opinion or common
practice, employing similar logic to that used by the Supreme
Court two years ago when it banned execution of the mentally
retarded. Missouri prosecutors appealed, and the Supreme Court
was all but forced to decide whether the state court's use of
the so-called Atkins rationale, the one it used in the mental
retardation ruling, is correct. Fewer than 80 juvenile offenders
are among the 3 ,500 inhabitants of the nation's death rows. But
26 of those are in Texas, which leads all states in juvenile
offenders executed with 13. The small number of inmates affected
is used by both sides as ammunition. Those who argue against
executing them say banning the practice would do nothing to
undermine the purported benefits of capital punishment because
few would notice. Proponents, however, say that because the
cases are so few and the interest of justice so profound it is
reasonable to allow juries to consider a defendant's maturity on
a case-by-case basis. "I know 17-year-olds who are more mature
in every way than some 25-year-olds," said Dudley Sharp, a
policy analyst for Justice For All, a Houston-based victims
rights organization. "It should be up to the jury to decide
whether the individual is fully culpable for the crime they have
committed." True, Steinberg countered, but when dealing with an
irrevocable act such as execution, it is better to err on the
side of caution. "I'm not saying 18 is a magic number,"
Steinberg said. "Under the law, at some point, we just pick an
age above which we say we don't care if you're immature - you're
old enough. Of course, there is going to be variability on
either side of the line. We live with it. "But if we have to
pick our best guess where to draw the line, it seems to me that
if we are going to say a person who is 16 is not mature enough
to see an R-rated movie, sign a lease or buy a car, I don't see
how we can say he is mature to be held to the adult level of
criminal responsibility." Villarreal had no hope for reprieve
until the Supreme Court decided to review the Simmons case. He
has expressed remorse for his role in the Ertman and Pena
murders, but he knows that only a landmark ruling can save his
life. "It was an impulse, a reaction in the moment," Villarreal
said. "When you are young, there are things that don't cross
your mind. My whole situation has made me change my way of
thinking and change who I am. I was a different person. I've
experienced a little bit of life now, even in here."
CASES IN THE STATE
Texas law allows the death penalty to be used on anyone who
committed a crime when they were 17 or older. The state leads
the nation with 28 juvenile offenders on death row. Five of
those recently have been given execution dates, though one,
Anzel Jones, received a stay last week by the U.S. Supreme
Court. Mauro Barraza (Tarrant County): In 1989, he broke into
the Haltom City home of 73-year-old Vilorie Nelson. He hit the
woman in the head with garden shears, cut her throat and stomped
on her chest. His robbery netted costume jewelry and a carton of
cigarettes. Edward Capitello (Harris County): In 1996, he led
three others in the robbery and murders of Matt Vickers and
Kimberly Williamson in a Champions Park home. A third victim,
Grant Barnett, was shot but escaped. Anzel Jones (Grayson
County): In 1995, Jones broke into the Paris home of Sherry Kay
Jones and her mother, Edith Jones. The women offered him $125.
He took the money, then stabbed both before setting the house on
fire. The older woman lived. Efrain Perez and Raul Villarreal
(Harris County): In 1993, both were part of a group of six young
men that abducted, raped and murdered Waltrip High School
sophomores Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. The group had
been drinking and fighting in a northside park when the pair was
spotted walking along railroad tracks nearby. Five of the six
attackers received the death penalty. The sixth was ineligible
because he was too young.
TUE 01/27/04
High court will rule on under-18 killers
Capital cases from Harris County could be affected
The decision echoed loudest in Houston. The U.S. Supreme
Court said Monday it will consider whether to ban as "cruel and
unusual punishment" the execution of murderers who were younger
than 18 when the crimes took place. The move stems from a
Missouri case, and the court is expected to settle the issue
sometime after October. But in the entire nation, experts said,
only three such killers are scheduled for execution on specific
dates. All are from Harris County. Efrain Perez and Raul Omar
Villareal (SEE CORRECTION) are set for lethal injection in June
for their role in the notorious 1993 gang-ritual rape and murder
of teenagers Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. Edward B.
Capetillo is scheduled to die March 30 for a 1995 slaying. Most
likely, those executions will be postponed until the top court
rules, legal experts said. Twenty-three other Texas inmates
await execution, without set dates yet, for crimes they
committed as 17-year-olds. Texas limits execution to those 17 or
older, while some other states also make 16-year-olds eligible
for capital punishment. Outside of Texas, about 50 other U.S.
inmates await execution for crimes committed at 16 or 17. Of the
22 such youthful killers executed across the country since 1973,
13 were put to death in Texas, according to Ohio Northern
University law professor Victor L. Streib. But in Texas, which
leads the nation in executions, only 4 percent of the inmates
put to death were classified as juvenile murderers. Predictably,
death penalty opponents hailed the court's decision to re-open
the constitutional issue of proper punishment for teen killers
while victims' advocates shook their heads. David Atwood of the
Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty said 17-year-olds
are not able to take responsibility for their crimes the way
adults can, and therefore should be exempt from the death
penalty. "Teenagers do things that are spontaneous, without
thinking," he said in Houston, being sure to add that the
organization does not try to minimize the horror of the crimes.
Randy Ertman , father of 14-year-old murder victim Jennifer
Ertman , said killers should be judged by their acts rather than
their age, and that the court's re-opening of the issue is
unneeded. "After our daughters were kidnapped, robbed, raped,
sodomized and murdered, I am disappointed in the (national)
criminal justice system," Ertman said. "But I am very happy with
the way the system works in Texas, and I thank the people of
Texas for standing behind us." Texas victims advocates pointed
out that juries are allowed to consider a killer's age when
deciding whether the punishment should be life in prison or
death. Supreme Court justices vote in secret on whether to
accept a case, and at least four of the nine must say yes for a
case to be heard on appeal. In 2003, four justices wrote that it
is shameful to execute juveniles. "The practice of executing
such offenders is a relic of the past and is inconsistent with
evolving standards of decency in a civilized society," Justice
John Paul Stevens said. He was joined by David H. Souter, Ruth
Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. The statement came a few
months after the court ruled 6-3 to ban as unconstitutional the
execution of the mentally retarded. The appeal from Missouri
stems from the case of Christopher Simmons, who was 17 when he
and a young accomplice broke into the Fenton, Mo., home of a
woman in 1993. They bound her with electrical tape and pushed
her off a railroad bridge to drown. Simmons told teenage friends
that they would avoid punishment because of their young ages,
prosecutors said. A Missouri court overturned Simmons' death
sentence, adopting Supreme Court thinking on its ban on
executing the mentally retarded. Missouri and Texas are among 21
states that allow the execution of convicts under 18. It is
banned for capital crimes prosecuted in federal courts. The
Texas attorney general's office would not comment on why it has
not joined the legal arguments in the Simmons case in support of
the death penalty for 17-year-olds. Nor would it comment on the
Texas cases that could be affected. In Harris County, Assistant
District Attorney Roe Wilson said prosecutors will review the
local cases to see if they should ask that the execution dates
be postponed. If the Supreme Court preserves the death penalty
for young killers, a postponed execution could be carried out
more quickly than if the original date was halted by Supreme
Court order, Wilson explained. The execution of Napolean Beazley
in May 2002 drew internal criticism of Texas for allowing such
punishment. He was 17 when he committed a 1994 murder in Tyler.
Lawyer Walter Long, who unsuccessfully asked for Beazley's
punishment to be blocked, said it is fascinating that the
Supreme Court will decide on the clashing approaches to the law
in Texas and Missouri. "Two different states, two different
results," he said of the Beazley and Simmons cases. Now that
Beazley is dead, he said, the Supreme Court action "is ironic, I
guess." Dianne Clements of Houston, president of Justice for
All, took a different view as someone who favors the death
penalty option for the worst young offenders. She said that if
the Supreme Court bans the punishment, it will be saying it
doesn't care about victims' survivors. "If the ultimate outcome
is that defendants who are 17 are not eligible to be executed,
then we have taken an entire process and completely dismantled
it," she said.
TRIO FROM
COUNTY AWAIT EXECUTIONER
Three inmates from Harris County are the only ones in the nation
with execution dates set for crimes they committed while 17,
according to experts. Edward Brian Capetillo, 26, former laborer
born in Harris County; March 30 execution date. Convicted in
1996 as one of five men who killed two young Houston adults in
their home after the victims refused to buy a gun and a scale.
Efrain Perez, 28, former painter born in Cameron County; June 23
execution date. Convicted in 1994 as one of six young men who
committed the rape and murder of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth
Pena in Houston. Admitted raping and strangling Pena. Raul Omar
Villareal, 28, former carpenter born in Harris County; June 24
execution date. Convicted in 1994 in the Ertman-Pena murders.
Bragged that he stepped on Ertman's neck.
TUE 12/09/03
Second execution is set for deadly anniversary
Two teens raped, killed in 1993
Back-to-back
executions next summer will mark the anniversary of the 1993
gang-ritual rape and murder of two Houston girls. Efrain Perez,
28, on Monday was the second man scheduled for lethal injection
for his role in the killings of 14-year-old Jennifer Ertman and
16-year-old Elizabeth Pena. The girls were walking home through
a wooded area on June 24, 1993, when they were sexually
assaulted, beaten and strangled. State District Judge Jim
Wallace set Perez's execution for June 23, 2004. He chose the
date in part because, last month, another judge set the
execution of Raul Omar Villarreal for the following day to
coincide with the 11th anniversary of the killings. Wallace said
he was thinking of the victims' families when he set Perez's
execution. "I wanted to put the two days together so the
families, if they are there, would not have to make two separate
trips," Wallace said. Five men were convicted in the crime that
shocked the city and sparked a change in the way Texas' criminal
justice system deals with victims' families. Perez maintained
his innocence Monday when he appeared in court in a prison-issue
orange jumpsuit. "I never killed nobody," he said. "And if I
did, after all the things that I've been through . . . I would
tell you that I did, and I'd even apologize for it. But I
didn't." Perez has exhausted nearly all of his appeal options
but still has a standing request for a hearing before the U.S.
Supreme Court. Perez's attorney, Kevin Dunn, was unavailable for
comment. Randy Ertman , whose daughter was killed in the gang
attack, said he plans to attend the executions and hopes that
another of the five men, Jose Medellin, also can be scheduled
for execution next summer. "I like this," Ertman said. "We've
got to get the other one on (June) 25th and we're set."
Medellin, who was 18 at the time of the murders, is expected to
be sentenced in 2005. The remaining two men convicted of capital
murder in the girls' deaths, Peter Cantu and Derrick O'Brien,
both also 18 at the time, are expected to be executed in 2006.
The death chamber in Huntsville can accommodate more than one
execution in a day, said Michelle Lyons, spokeswoman for the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice. But prison officials
discourage scheduling more than one per day because of the
logistics, such as providing a last meal and visits by relatives
and the chaplain, said Harris County Assistant District Attorney
Jane Scott. Pena and Ertman were high school sophomores walking
home late at night near White Oak Bayou and T.C. Jester Park, on
the northwest side, when they happened upon the group of young
gang members engaged in a violent initiation. The girls' bodies
were found four days later. The gang members were arrested after
police received a tip. It was a landmark case for victims'
rights advocates. Cantu's trial was one of the first in which a
judge permitted a victim's relative to speak directly to a
convicted murderer. Although criticized at the time, the
practice is common today. The state also had prohibited victims'
family members from viewing executions, but that policy has also
been changed.
MON 11/17/03
Victim's dad, death penalty foe in heated debate
PERHAPS DAVID ATWOOD picked a touchy time to debate the death
penalty with Randy Ertman. Atwood, of the Texas Coalition to
Abolish the Death Penalty, was hanging out on the eighth floor
of the Harris County Criminal Justice Center last week, right
after a judge set an execution date for one of the men who raped
and killed Ertman 's daughter. "You're not proving anything with
the death penalty," Atwood told Ertman. "You're just repeating
what was done to your daughter." "I think he's a piece of crap
who deserves to die," Ertman told Atwood, referring to his
daughter's killer, Raul Villarreal. Ertman was on his way out of
the courtroom, where he had just saluted Judge Mike Anderson for
setting Villarreal's execution date for June 24, the 11th
anniversary of the rape and murder of Ertman's 14-year-old
daughter, Jennifer, and her 16-year-old friend, Elizabeth Pena.
"The death penalty's not good for anybody," Atwood told Ertman,
a painter. "Well, it's good for me," Ertman said, looming over
Atwood. "It's vengeance," Atwood said. "I'm not into vengeance,"
Ertman said. "You are, too, into vengeance," Atwood insisted.
"If you've got something to say to me, you want to say it
outside?" Ertman asked. The exchange was broken up by bystanders
and the two parted without further incident. "We also care very
much for the victims of crime and their family," Atwood
explained afterward. "But sometimes they are so angry, they will
totally reject any type of concern that we might have."
WED 11/12/03
Judge schedules execution for murders of 2 teen girls
Date to be on anniversary of deaths
A judge Tuesday announced the first execution date to be set in
the brutal 1993 murders of two teenage girls, Jennifer Ertman
and Elizabeth Pena, who stumbled onto a gang initiation while
walking home. Raul Omar Villarreal is to die on June 24 - the
11th anniversary of his victims' deaths. "You committed a crime
against two young girls and against the entire community on the
24th of June," state District Judge Mike Anderson told
Villarreal, who stood before the bench in handcuffs and an
orange jail jumpsuit. Because his crime had made the girls'
families and friends "dread the coming of June 24," Anderson
said, "I am setting that date for your execution. That may give
you some idea how they feel about that date." Asked if he had
anything to say, Villarreal replied, "No sir." Jennifer's
father, Randy Ertman, tossed Anderson a salute. Ertman, 14, and
Pena, 16, both high school sophomores, were taking a shortcut
home from a party when they happened upon Villarreal and five
other young men, ages 14 through 18, near railroad tracks in a
wooded area of northwest Houston. The girls were sexually
assaulted, beaten and strangled with a belt and a shoelace.
Their bodies were found four days later. A Crime Stoppers tip
led to the arrests. he case was a landmark for families of crime
victims. Largely through the efforts of Randy Ertman, the
parents won the right to make statements in court to their
daughters' murderers, and to witness the executions. Both are
now common practice for most courts. Outside the courtroom,
Ertman said he and his wife, Sandy, will attend Villarreal's
execution in Huntsville. Elizabeth's parents, Adolph and Melissa
Pena, said they will be there, too. "It seems kind of fair for
him to go down the same day our daughters did," Randy Ertman
said. "He's going down a lot easier, but I think it's pretty
good for the judge to do that. "This is why we have a death
penalty. He deserves to be executed, and now he's going to be,"
Ertman said. After waiting 10 years, he said, "six months ain't
nothing." Adolph Pena agreed. "It's been a long time coming, but
I feel good," he said. "I've been looking forward to this a
long, long time." Ertman, a house painter, now lives with his
wife at Lake Somerville. Pena, who does drywall work, and his
wife live near Hockley. Villarreal's mother, Luisa, choked back
tears and declined to comment. But Dave Atwood, of the Texas
Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, said, "Every time we
have an execution, we create another set of victims. Luisa and
her family are now the other set of victims . . . It just keeps
this cycle of vengeance and violence going." Villarreal's
attorney, John Wynne, said he will appeal to the U.S. Supreme
Court on grounds that his client, now 28, was a 17-year-old
juvenile at the time of the murders. But Wynne said the high
court in 1989 held that it is constitutional to execute
defendants who were juveniles when they committed their crimes.
Crime victims advocate Andy Kahan said execution dates are
expected to be set for 2005 for defendants Efrain Perez and Jose
Medellin, who were 17 and 18, respectively, at the time of the
killings, and in 2006 for Peter Cantu and Derrick O'Brien, both
18 at the time. Another juvenile, Venancio "Vinny" Medellin, who
was 14, is serving a 40-year sentence as a juvenile.
OTHER DEFENDANTS
Possible execution dates for others in the case:
2005 for Efrain Perez, Jose Medellin
2006 for Peter Cantu, Derrick O'Brien
Venancio "Vinny" Medellin is serving a 40-year sentence.
WED 06/25/03
TEENAGERS' LEGACY / Double murders changed Texas law
Adolph and Melissa Pena rarely have to wait long for another
reminder of what might have been. In their home they have photos
of a smiling, teenage girl with long, curly hair cascading over
her shoulders. And then there are the occasional visitors, whose
presence revives happy thoughts of that girl, and painful
memories of a life cut short. "Friends of hers still come over
to see us," Adolph Pena said. "Some of them have babies now."
The Penas' daughter, Elizabeth, was 16 when she and a friend
took a shortcut home from a party 10 years ago and unwittingly
walked into a drunken gang initiation in northwest Houston.
Their badly mauled bodies were found four days later, leading to
a real-life horror story that hit the city, and even the nation,
like a kick in the gut. The vicious murders of Pena and
14-year-old Jennifer Ertman led to major changes in how the
criminal justice system deals with crime victims and their
families. It also gave momentum to the victims' rights movement.
Five men remain on death row and another is serving a prison
sentence for their roles in the murders. "I'd like to have been
a grandpa, but those sons of bitches took that away from me,"
Adolph Pena said this week. The two girls, sophomores at Waltrip
High School, were walking home on the night of June 24, 1993,
when they took a shortcut down a trail near White Oak Bayou and
T.C. Jester Park. hey walked into the midst of the Black and
White Gang, a small, violent group of teens who were initiating
17-year-old Raul Omar Villarreal. To join the gang, Villareal
had to fight members Derrick Sean O'Brien, Peter Anthony Cantu
and Jose Ernesto Medellin, all 18, and Efrain Perez, 17.
Medellin had brought his brother, Venancio "Vinnie" Medellin,
14. The group had been drinking heavily when the girls walked
up, police said. Ertman and Pena were subjected to every kind of
sexual assault, police said, before being beaten, kicked,
stomped and strangled with a belt and a shoelace. The deaths
were the 250th and 251st homicides in a year that totaled 497,
but the police and prosecutors who worked on the case will never
forget them, said Harris County Assistant District Attorney
Kelly Siegler. "They were horrible," she said. "Those pictures -
all of us were seasoned prosecutors, and they were the worst any
of us had ever seen." The adult defendants were convicted and
sentenced to death. Vinnie Medellin received a life sentence. A
major precedent was set at the end of Cantu's trial, when state
District Judge Bill Harmon allowed Ertman's father, Randy, to
address the convicted murderer. His blistering comments shocked
many onlookers and outraged a few. Harmon was castigated by
fellow judges and newspaper editorials for allowing the display.
But while few people knew it, victim impact statements were
allowed by the Crime Victims' Bill of Rights, which the
Legislature adopted in the late 1980s. "It was the law at the
time," Harmon said recently. "I wish I could say I was smart
enough to know that . . . It just seemed like the right thing to
do." Harmon said he believed the parents deserved the right to
speak after conducting themselves with dignity through days of
gruesome testimony. He made the same offer to Adolph Pena, who
declined in Cantu's case but later made statements after other
trials. Andy Kahan, director of the Houston Victims' Assistance
Center, hailed Harmon's decision as the start of a statewide
trend. Kahan recalls that, after Harmon told Ertman he could
address the killer, one of the deputies in the courtroom told
Kahan that they would give Ertman a few minutes and, "If he
comes over the rail, we'll give him a few more." Ertman declined
to be interviewed for this article, except to praise Kahan as "a
good man." Adolph Pena said the statements he made in court
helped, but true closure won't come until he sees his daughter's
killers executed. "Unless I'm dead, I'll definitely be there to
see them die," he said. "It just seems to go on forever," he
said, noting that no execution dates have been set. "I met a
woman in Parents of Murdered Children who waited 20 years. God
forbid it takes that long." Another change that resulted from
the Ertman-Pena case was the decision to allow victims'
relatives to witness executions. Randy Ertman expressed such a
desire after Cantu's trial, but Kahan said he found that
victims' families, along with prison inmates, were prohibited
from viewing executions. With help from the then-fledgling group
Justice for All, Kahan said, two sponsors were found for a bill
that would change that. It died without coming to a full vote,
however. Kahan, the Ertmans and the Penas then went to the Texas
Board of Criminal Justice, which voted unanimously to change the
policy. Today, Kahan said, about 75 percent of executions are
viewed by victims' families. "The Ertman-Pena legacy will live
on in this state," he said.
PRECEDENTS SET
Victim impact statements:
Although a 1980s state law allowed the statements, few people
knew about the provision until state District Judge Bill Harmon
allowed Randy Ertman to address killer Peter Cantu after Cantu's
conviction.
Victims' relatives witnessing executions:
Ertman and Adolph Pena expressed a desire to witness the
executions of their daughters' killers. Victims' rights
advocates helped to get the prison system's policy changed, and
now most executions are viewed by victims' families.
FRI 07/02/99
Killer stabs guard with metal spear
Investigation of
incident under way
Efrain Perez, a young Houston killer once described by a
prosecutor as "a predatory animal," stabbed a death-row guard
with a homemade spear, a prison official said Thursday. The
guard, identified as Curt Jarry, 30, was hospitalized. Jarry was
walking past Perez's cell at the Ellis Unit near Huntsville
around 7 p.m. Wednesday when he was stabbed in the left forearm
by a piece of sharpened flat metal attached to a full-length
broom handle, according to prison officials. They said Perez,
23, thrust the spear through a hole torn in the wire mesh across
the front of his cell. Jarry was taken to the prison medical
unit and later transferred by ambulance to Huntsville Memorial
Hospital. Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman Glen
Castlebury said the officer underwent surgery Thursday to repair
nerve damage to the arm. Castlebury said an internal affairs
investigation is under way to determine how Perez obtained the
metal piece used to fashion the blade of the spear, how long it
had been in his cell and if it had been overlooked during
inspections. The attack by Perez occurred in the same unit where
seven inmates staged a daring escape attempt by using a hacksaw
to cut their way out of a recreation yard last November. One of
them, Martin Gurule, made it outside the prison but was found
dead a week later floating in a creek not far away. Last Sunday
a convicted murderer from Dallas escaped from the Estelle
high-security prison, located not far from the Ellis Unit. That
inmate, Clifford Jones, 33, slipped his hand out of handcuffs
and shoved a guard away. He was captured two days later. Perez
was 18 years old when he was convicted, along with four other
Houston men, of murdering two teen-age girls in a gang
initiation ritual in 1993. The girls, Jennifer Ertman, 14, and
Elizabeth Pena, 16, were walking home near T.C. Jester and West
34th Street when they came upon Perez and the others, who were
drinking and beating a new gang member as part of his
initiation. The girls were raped, strangled, kicked and stomped
to death. Arguing for the death penalty at Perez's trial,
prosecutor Marie Munier told the jury he was "a predatory animal
and Houston and Harris County was his roaming ground." Life in
prison, she said, would not declaw him. "Just because you put
him in a cage doesn't make him any less a predator," she said.
"You stick your hand in a lion's cage and he's going to try to
scratch it."
SUN 06/28/98
FIVE YEARS LATER
For families of young murder victims, living getting a bit
easier
THE fifth anniversary of his daughter's vicious murder mostly
means one thing to Randy Ertman - he is five years closer to
watching her killers die. On June 25, 1993, his daughter,
Jennifer, 14, and her friend, Elizabeth Pena, 16, were sexually
assaulted, beaten and strangled by a gang they happened upon as
they hurried home from a party. The girls, both high school
sophomores, were strangled with a belt and a shoelace after
stumbling upon the gang's initiation ceremony. Now, five years
later, the Ertmans and the Penas say day-to-day living is
finally getting a bit easier. The sadness is far from gone, but
it's not all-consuming anymore. Anniversaries of their deaths
always bring up the old emotions. For Ertman, 46, it's still
rage. "I'm five years closer to seeing those pieces of dog dung
die," he said, while putting his cigarette butt into his third
drained beer bottle of the afternoon. "I'd pull the switch in a
New York minute." The anger, however, stays dormant in his mind
until people ask about his girl, his only child. He said the
madness doesn't burn inside like it once did. These days Ertman
and his wife, Sandy, 55, worry about more mundane things, like
finding the day's good fishing spots and keeping pesky deer away
from their fledgling tomato plants. They laugh and have fun
together again. He works as a painter and they live on
three-quarters of an acre in the peaceful country in Lyons,
miles and miles away from their Heights-area neighborhood where
there are constant reminders. There's the bayou where the teens
had the misfortune of taking a shortcut across railroad tracks
as a gang was finishing its initiation "ceremony" - the beating
of an inductee. The girls' partially decomposed bodies were
found near White Oak Bayou and T.C. Jester Park four days later.
Since then the Ertmans and Melissa and Adolph Pena have tried to
survive the grief of losing a child in one of the city's most
vicious crimes. The families endured the graphic testimony in
five separate capital murder trials, where all five were
sentenced to die. Another defendant, a juvenile, is serving 40
years. Over and over again they listened to the confessions,
which detailed the hour-long torture of the girls. Now the
families can think of the girls differently, as the
happy-go-lucky, innocent girls they were when they were alive.
Others will join the families in remembering the girls in a
short memorial service at 6 p.m. today near the benches on the
south side of T.C Jester Park. Victims rights volunteers
organized the memorial with the parents blessings, however,
Sandy Ertman said she will not be there. She said it is too
painful. Hardly a person who read or heard about the crime has
forgotten the details. There is still disbelief that six young
men could be so vicious - egging each other on like a pack of
wolves. Prosecutors, police officers and victims rights
activists - who are regularly exposed to gruesome crimes - say
their lives still are affected by the murders. The Ertmans, who
moved into a small, yellow, country home near Somerville four
months ago, do not talk much about the murders anymore. They can
relax with a short walk to a pond, and an even shorter walk to
the shaded porch. "We are not escaping," said Sandy Ertman. "We
just changed our lives." In the old house, there was a
photographic shrine to Jennifer. In the new house, there are two
pictures on display. Neighbors don't know about the killings
unless they notice Randy Ertman's tattoo shrine to his daughter
on his arms. On one arm is a rising sun with Jennifer's name and
birth date. On the other is the Grim Reaper with the date of her
death. Living in the country has offered them a hideaway from
the anger and bitterness that simmered as they sat through the
trials. "I was getting eaten up with rage and revenge," said
Randy Ertman. "I was tired of death." But he never tires of
talking about the death of the perpetrators, expected to be
executed in the next five years. He is obsessed with their
deaths. He plans to quit smoking this year so he can live long
enough to witness each one of them receive the lethal injection.
Ertman even visited death row to get a feel for the killers' new
home. While touring it, he spotted Efrain Perez, one of the
defendants, in the day room. Perez charged at Ertman - they were
separated by plastic shield and bars - and began cursing him in
Spanish. Soon after the murders, Ertman said, he gave serious
thought to having the defendants killed. He said he was consumed
with anger. And that rage combined with about 20-30 beers a day
made for a very "crazy" man, he said. He said he is much
mellower now, but still drinks about eight beers a day. Sandy
Ertman also hit bottom after the murders and during the trials.
She took Valium to help calm her and soon became addicted. She
was hospitalized and needed four months at home to break her
habit. Now she's content to learn how to can fruit, and has
started learning how to bake bread. With money they had saved
for Jennifer's college education and money they made from
selling their Houston home they paid for the land near Lake
Somerville. The couple built the little yellow house that has
been a haven for them. They are enjoying their marriage and the
outdoors. Life is renewed. They return to Houston every two
weeks only to visit their daughter's grave. They no longer go to
victim rights meetings; the focus on death and crime was not
helping them heal, they said. Being away from constant talk
about crime has done wonders for them, they said. The only group
Sandy Ertman belongs to is her neighborhood ladies club. The
Penas also are considering moving to the country. They want to
shield their 10-year-old daughter from the crime in Houston, and
Melissa Pena, 40, wants to own a horse. The past five years have
brought the same exhausting sorrow for them. But unlike the
Ertmans, the Penas still live in the same house, near the park
where their daughter was killed. At least now, Melissa Pena
said, they think of happy things about Elizabeth, not just about
her death. The family, however, is not the same. There are
problems at home that have gotten worse over the past five
years. The couple's 18-year-old son has had serious problems
since his sister's death, and has not learned to cope with the
tragedy, Melissa Pena said. "From age 13 to 18 for him has been
a living hell," she said. Adolph Pena, 42, a drywall contractor,
said he now has an appreciation for more of the little things in
life. The other day he witnessed a heated argument between a
friend and his son over a fishing lure. He said he thought to
himself, if they only realized how silly they were. As the June
25 date approaches each year, the Penas say they brace
themselves for an onslaught of emotions. At the beginning of the
month, the sadness creeps in and then it builds as the day gets
closer. Elizabeth would have been 21 on Father's Day. The Penas
also have backed off their involvement in victims rights groups
because their efforts seemed fruitless. Now they volunteer with
the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo, helping children. Even
those who were not related to the girls get a familiar lump in
their throats this time of year. Prosecutor Kelly Siegler said
she is still affected by the case, though she has had numerous
murder trials. Siegler, who prosecuted Raul Villareal, 18, said
the murder scene was the worst she has seen in her career.
Siegler said back then she wasn't sure about seeking the death
penalty for young first offenders, like Villareal. "That was my
fourth death penalty case. I used to think if they were young we
ought to cut them some slack," she said. "Youth doesn't bother
me anymore. It made me a little harder." She said Houstonians
also have not forgotten the girls, or the horrific nature of the
crime. In every capital case, she asks potential jurors if they
could sentence someone to die. Each time, there is at least one
person who uses the Ertman-Pena case as an example of why they
could. Houston police Sgt. Ray Zaragoza was an investigator on
the case, and he also thinks about the case regularly. He said
he will never forget the murder scene, and what the girls looked
like after four days in the woods. He said he can still picture
their partially decomposed bodies, and the injuries they
sustained. Zaragoza, who now works as an investigator for the
district attorney's office, took vacation time to watch the
trials when he was not testifying. Victim rights volunteers say
the murders changed the city, in tangible and subtle ways.
Justice for All was just starting to draw members when the girls
were murdered. That crime was the last straw for people, and the
group began to grow, said Dianne Clements, president. "It was so
unbelievable," she said. "Because of the absolute innocence of
these two girls. "Everybody looked at Jennifer and Elizabeth and
said this could have been my daughter, my sister, or my friend."
She said that crime motivated people to join the group, which
now has 2,000 members and is influential, successfully lobbying
legislators. In the aftermath of the murders there were also a
few policy changes. After the final trial, Ertman asked the
mayor's crime liaison, Andy Kahan, if he could watch the
executions. At that point, only family members of the inmates
watched. With Ertman and Kahan's advocacy, the Legislature
passed a law making it possible for the victim's family to watch
executions. Since the law changed in 1996, 75 percent of the
families have opted to watch, Kahan said. Also, Ertman was the
first family member of a victim to address defendants face to
face in court after sentencing. The policy had existed, but
judges had not allowed it. Now the practice is common. The
Ertmans and Penas know this memorial service will unleash their
grief again, but they also know they have come a long way. "It
sounds kind of trite to say," Melissa Pena said, "but life does
go on."
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
McVeigh's death penalty is just
Viewpoints letters of June 14 from David Atwood and Jimmy Dunne
say the taking of life is uncivilized. We looked at some
pictures in court that were uncivilized. The six pieces of
garbage that murdered Jenny our daughter and her friend,
Elizabeth Pena, are where they belong. Our focus is their death,
Atwood. They had counseling, alternative schooling and more
chances than our daughters were given. To Dunne: The death of
five pieces of scum is nothing to be ashamed of - they shamed
themselves. Do you know what they did to our daughters? On
killing scum, Texas is doing all mothers and fathers a favor.
Also, to all anti-death penalty people, get a life, if you can.
Our daughters don't have that option anymore. Randy and Sandra
Ertman, Houston
THU 03/20/97
Punishment affirmed
The last of 5 young gang members sent to death row for the rapes
and
murders of 2 teenage girls in Houston 3 1/2 years ago had his
death
sentence upheld Wednesday by the Texas Court of Criminal
Appeals. Jose
Medellin has been on death row since September 1994 for the
slayings of
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Wednesday affirmed the
capital murder convictions of serial killer Kenneth Allen McDuff
and gang leader Peter Anthony Cantu. It was the second time this
month the court has affirmed a capital conviction against McDuff,
50. Last week, it refused to overturn his death sentence in the
1991 kidnap-murder of Austin accountant Coleen Reed. On
Wednesday, the court affirmed McDuff's conviction in the 1992
kidnap-murder of pregnant Waco convenience store clerk Melissa
Northrup. He was tried in Harris County on a change of venue.
McDuff, currently dying of untreatable cirrhosis and hepatitis,
was on death row for a 1966 triple killing in a Fort Worth
suburb when, because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, his
sentence was commuted to life. He remained imprisoned until 1989
and, after being paroled, went on another killing binge. Various
law enforcement agencies believe that McDuff, after being
released from prison, murdered as many as a dozen Waco-area
women while he was a student at Texas State Technical Institute
in Waco. In the Cantu case, the appeals court, in an opinion
written by Judge Steve Mansfield, brushed aside each of the 45
points of error challenging his capital conviction in the 1993
murders of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14. Only the
capital conviction of Cantu's co-defendant, Jose Medellin,
remains unresolved at the state appellate court. Earlier, the
court affirmed the convictions of Derrick Sean O'Brien, Raul
Villarreal and Efrain Perez. Cantu and the "Black and Whites"
gang he led were initiating Villarreal as a member one night,
forcing him to fight each of them in turn in a clearing off T.C.
Jester. Soon after they finished, the two girls approached on
nearby railroad tracks, taking a shortcut home. Jose Medellin
ran up and grabbed Pena, who screamed for help. Ertman might
have escaped, but she, too, was caught when she ran back to help
her friend. Both girls were dragged into a wooded area, sexually
assaulted, tortured and killed. The appellate decision notes
that Cantu, wearing steel-toed boots, kicked out several of
Pena's teeth and stood on Ertman's throat until she quit moving.
Afterward, the gang went to see Cantu's brother and
sister-in-law. At his trial, the couple told how the gang
members gleefully described how they had raped and killed the
girls. All five were sentenced to death. Attorney Robert Morrow,
who represented Cantu at trial and on appeal, said it was the
most difficult of the many capital cases he has handled. The
appeal made no effort to show Cantu did not commit capital
murder, but focused largely on the issue of his "future
dangerousness," one of the key questions Texas jurors must
decide before returning a death penalty. "On the facts, it's an
overwhelming proposition to try and convince a jury that they
shouldn't give somebody the death penalty on a case this bad,"
Morrow said. He said he will now appeal the case in federal
court.
WED 01/22/97
Verdict upheld in murders of two teen girls
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the capital murder
conviction of Derrick Sean O'Brien, one of five teens sent to
death row in the rape-murders of two northwest Houston girls
during a gang initiation. He was 19 on June 24, 1993, when
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and her friend Elizabeth Pena, 16, stumbled
onto a late-night drinking party and gang initiation at a
railroad trestle near 34th Street and T.C. Jester. The girls
were raped, strangled, beaten and stomped, their bodies left to
be found four days later. Prosecutor Steve Baldassano said
Monday that O'Brien's role was especially aggravated, since
others present testified that he raped the girls, then handed
over his belt to help strangle them, pulling on one end to choke
the life out of Ertman. O'Brien, 21, also could be seen in a
photo taken before his arrest, smiling in an onlooking crowd as
police searched the crime scene, Baldassano said. Baldassano
said an execution date is usually set by the trial judge. That
was state District Judge Bob Burdette, who has since been
succeeded by state District Judge Jan Krocker.
THU 11/28/96
Appeals court upholds conviction in gang rape-slaying of two
teens
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has upheld the conviction of
one of five youths condemned to die for killing two teen-age
girls during a gang initiation in 1993. Judges affirmed the 1994
capital murder conviction of Raul Omar Villarreal in the
rape-murders of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, in
a clearing near T.C. Jester and 34th Street. The panel
previously affirmed the convictions of Jose Medellin, Peter
Cantu, Derrick Sean O'Brien and Efrain Perez. All five cases are
being appealed to federal courts. Testimony showed the girls
were hurrying home to meet a parental curfew on the night of
June 24, 1993. They were walking along railroad tracks in the
darkness when they happened onto the initiation of Villarreal,
then 17, into the Black and White gang. To get into the gang, he
had to fight each of the other members, all of whom had been
drinking heavily. Ertman might have escaped, but she returned to
help her friend, Pena, who was calling for help. Both girls then
were dragged into a wooded area and repeatedly raped by all five
defendants. Villarreal's appeal did not challenge the jury's
guilty verdict, but instead attacked the jury's finding in his
trial's punishment phase that he poses a future danger to
society. Although Villarreal did not have the history of
violence of some of his co-defendants, Judge Lawrence Meyers
wrote in his opinion that the sheer viciousness of the killings,
the giddy way the youth acted afterward and the fact that he
stabbed someone in jail while awaiting trial supported arguments
that he is likely to be violent in the future. The appellate
opinion devoted a full page to describing how Villarreal behaved
in the aftermath of the murders. He was among gang members who
told Medellin's relatives what they had just done. "Appellant
was laughing and giggling and appeared very excited," the
opinion says. "Appellant bragged about numerous sexual and
sadistic acts he performed on both victims. Appellant also
laughed about how the girls pleaded for their lives." Medellin
looped a belt around Ertman's neck, and O'Brien and Villarreal
pulled on opposite ends of it to strangle her. When the belt
broke, the opinion says, Villarreal began "jumping up and down
on her throat."
SUN 10/06/96
`It's too big a battle to fight'
Hearing to decide youth's fate in Pena-Ertman killings
Before the events of one particularly dark night in June 1993,
Venancio Medellin Jr. was regarded as a decent kid who had
something that was not always evident on the streets of his
North Side neighborhood: potential. He got good grades, stayed
out of trouble, kept away from gangs and made a good enough
impression to be admitted to a magnet school that would
cultivate his artistic ability. But he also had an older brother
who could boast none of those things. When Jose Medellin, a
troubled 9th-grade dropout, invited 14-year-old Vinny along to
watch a gang initiation, the prospect of a little excitement
among the street-wise crowd was a temptation the younger boy
couldn't resist. He did not bargain on the sudden eruption of
predatory violence that occurred when the group snatched two
young girls who had the misfortune of crossing their paths in an
isolated patch of north Houston. Nor could he have believed that
he would have a significant part in it. The final consequences
were literally unimaginable: two innocent teen-agers savagely
raped and strangled, five young men ticketed for death row, and
Vinny - half-man, half-boy - placed in a legal limbo that would
certainly mean a few years at a youth facility and perhaps
decades more in prison. Medellin returned to Houston 10 days ago
for a mandatory hearing pegged to his soon turning 18. At issue
was whether he would be transferred from the Giddings State
School, the Texas Youth Commission site for serious offenders,
to the adult prison system. Having been given what is called a
determinate sentence, he could have been paroled at that time,
held by TYC until he is 21 and then released, or sent to prison
to serve the remainder of his 40-year term. TYC's
recommendation, glowing in its praise, was to keep him till 21.
Medellin held out hope that would happen. Everybody else,
including his attorney, knew it would not. "The crime is so
heinous it's like the blob - it just spreads over anybody
involved in it," said Esmerelda Pena-Garcia, who has represented
him from the beginning. "His past record, his actions that
night, his exemplary behavior before and since then, none of
that matters. It's too big a battle to fight." No local case has
better represented the new dimension of teen-age violence than
the murders of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. It was no
surprise that neither the prosecutor nor the judge wanted to
hear talk of Medellin's potential. Though Medellin was not
accused of complicity in the abduction or the killings, the
simple fact that he had been part of a brutal assault that
turned bestial at its conclusion was all that needed to be
known. "Medellin's offense in and of itself is sufficient to
justify that sentence," said Judge Pat Shelton, who at the end
of the hearing dismissed TYC's report as "psychobabble" and said
he hopes Medellin's future parole officer has not been born yet.
"What we are saying (to him) is that we can't trust you based on
what you did that one day, no matter how perfect you were before
and after. I think the system has got to put the interests of
the victim and the public first," Shelton said. Shelton's
opinion is that serious crimes deserve serious time no matter
what the age of the offender. Period. It is a philosophy that
stands sharply in contrast to the traditional rehabilitative
mission of the juvenile justice system, but he does not
apologize for it. "Can we rehabilitate the 15-year-old, and is
it worth the time and expense (considering) the crime committed?
The answer is no." Shelton said. "At the time of the transfer
hearing, I have to consider what that offense was worth, not
what the offender is worth. That's the difference between the
court and TYC." Juvenile authorities, however, strongly defend
their recommendation for Medellin. And they worry that the rush
to heap maximum punishment on young offenders will only backfire
down the line. "I said in my cover letter to the judge it would
be easy to transfer him," said Giddings Superintendent Stan
DeGerolami. "It would be easy in many of these cases . . . But
I'd rather have a kid who spent four to five years in TYC living
next to me than one who spent 15-20 years in the adult prison.
We make every effort to take violent young people and make them
less violent and likely to re-offend." Given how messed up their
lives are, that is no easy task. Within three years of release
from TYC, 42 percent of youthful offenders are re-incarcerated.
The rate for the adult prison system is only slightly worse,
running just under 50 percent. The statistics on violent
offenders have not been broken out, however. Nor has the ""new
TYC" been around long enough to fully demonstrate an impact, its
backers say. TYC has changed in recent years, putting much more
emphasis on punishment and accountability. Discipline is serious
and offenders' days are highly structured. Treatment programs
have been enhanced. But for many judges and prosecutors, this
change begs the question of punishment for violent young
criminals. "That's not time to do sufficient penance," Shelton
said of the handful of years an offender serves at TYC. There is
no doubt that the increase and severity of juvenile crime has
resulted in youthful offenders being treated far differently
than they were a decade ago. The determinate sentencing law,
first passed in 1987, gave authorities the ability to imprison
youths guilty of violent offenses for up to 40 years instead of
having to release them at 21. The law has proved a useful and
often used tool. Almost 700 offenders have been sentenced with
it, half of them getting terms 15 years or longer. And of those
whose hearing had come up by the end of 1995, 40 percent were
sent on to prison. On Jan. 1, 1996, the age at which juveniles
can be tried as adults was lowered to 14. There is talk of
pushing it lower, and some, like Judge Shelton, would like to do
away with age limits altogether. Hearings to "certify" juveniles
as adults are now commonplace. Shelton said he alone did 70 last
year and is already up to 64 in 1996. The three local juvenile
courts combined to certify 131 last year. Five years earlier,
the total was 20. Head juvenile prosecutor Elizabeth Godwin said
her office is taking advantage of the broader certification law,
especially now that TYC has been given authority to keep
offenders till 21 or parole them before without having to get a
court's permission. That scenario, under which Medellin never
would have gone to the adult system, makes using determinate
sentencing much less palatable to prosecutors. Unless the crime
rate dips dramatically, more and more juvenile offenders are
likely to be certified as adults. "The public and the
Legislature came to the conclusion we (the juvenile system)
shouldn't be wasting time with kids like this," said Godwin, who
wholeheartedly agrees with them. "I have no sympathy for violent
offenders no matter what age." That black-and-white view, which
enjoys much public support, troubles experienced juvenile system
officials. Left unchallenged, it could lead to the undoing of
the system. "I would hate to see what this society would be like
if everybody gave up hope that we can make a difference with
some of these kids," said Judy Briscoe, TYC chief of staff and
head of delinquency prevention. "I realize there are some kids
who need to be locked up for the rest of their lives. But not
all of them." Briscoe argues that even those who have committed
a very serious violent crime deserve a chance to go through the
program. If they do well in it, they should be considered for
release, she said. Added DeGerolami: ""I don't think the adult
system is such a good system that you can send a 14-year-old
over there and like what you see when he comes out." That may
be, but to those who view themselves on the victims' side -
including some judges - rehabilitation simply does not enter
into the equation. The issue of punishment is paramount. Mark
Kent Ellis, another Harris County juvenile judge, has rejected
TYC's recommendation to keep offenders under its custody six out
of eight times this year. Medellin is an example that can be
used for both sides of the debate. He did very well in the TYC
treatment program. He got into no trouble and received his GED.
Over time he accepted full responsibility for his actions. For
the record, he also cooperated with authorities and testified in
all of the murder trials save his brother's. But the crime in
which he was involved was very serious. Shouldn't he have to pay
for that? "We've lost the whole history of the juvenile justice
system," said Pena-Garcia, who saw in Medellin a good kid who
made one mistake for one minute of his life. "Until we have a
system where a judge feels safe making a ruling on law rather
than popular opinion, we're going to have that problem."
Responded Shelton: "Our system is as rational as it's ever been.
What is a crime worth? You make your best call. He was lucky. If
he'd been a year older, he'd be in prison for life and have to
serve at least 40 years."
FRI 09/27/96
Teen rapist transferred from youth home to prison
The youngest of six defendants convicted in the savage rape,
torture and killing of two Houston girls in 1993 was ordered
transferred from a Texas youth facility to prison Thursday.
Venancio Medellin Jr., 17, must serve the remainder of his
40-year sentence for the aggravated sexual assault of Jennifer
Ertman. Medellin - described as a role model in the youth home -
will earn credit for the three years served there and be
eligible for parole in seven years. The other five, who were
gang members and include Medellin's older brother, are on death
row. Family members of the victims, Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth
Pena, 16, were surrounded by victims rights advocates in state
District Judge Pat Shelton's packed courtroom. Shelton ignored
the Texas Youth Commission's recommendation to keep Medellin
under its jurisdiction until he is 21. Ertman's father, Randy,
had begged the judge to send Medellin to prison. ""I'll look
forward to him catching AIDS in prison and dying," said Ertman.
I am happy again." On June 24, 1993, the two girls were walking
on railroad tracks in the 3600 block of T.C. Jester when they
encountered the gang members, who had just finished an
initiation event. The girls were raped, beaten and strangled.
The murders sparked immense community outrage and remain one of
the city's most notorious crimes. Medellin, then 14, pleaded
guilty to aggravated sexual assault and was sentenced to the
maximum juvenile sentence of 40 years. He was not accused in the
murders. During Thursday's transfer hearing, a TYC psychologist
said Medellin had perfect behavior in the home and was making
excellent progress toward rehabilitation. Medellin testified
that he has remorse for raping Ertman. Prosecutor Beverly
Malazzo said she asked for the prison time because of the
heinous nature of Medellin's crime and concern for the safety of
the victims' families. After hearing Randy Ertman testify that
his daughter's murder has destroyed his life, Shelton said more
penance is needed. The judge's other options were to send
Medellin back to TYC until he turns 21 or parole him. Defense
attorney Esmerelda Pena Garcia said the ruling makes Medellin's
chances of rehabilitation slim now. She called him an
intelligent man who has talent in art and wants to be an
architect.
THU 05/16/96
Death sentence upheld in 1993 slayings of girls
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Wednesday upheld the
death sentence given to one of the five youths convicted in the
1993 slayings of two teen-age girls. The court rejected 32
points raised in Derrick Sean O'Brien's appeal, including not
being allowed to move the trial due to publicity and the use of
a prior murder against him. O'Brien was the second to be tried
and sentenced to death for the 1993 rapes and murders of
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16. The first was Peter
Anthony Cantu, who led the assault on the girls as they took a
shortcut home from a party. On June 24, 1993, Cantu, 18;
O'Brien, 18; Jose Ernesto Medellin, 18; Raul Omar Villarreal,
17; Efrain Perez, 17, and Vinny Medellin, 14, were gathered in a
clearing near T.C. Jester and West 34th Street, drinking beer
and taking turns pummeling a gang initiate when the girls walked
by. O'Brien's was the first case to be heard by the high court.
After his arrest, prosecutors learned of a murder six months
earlier involving O'Brien and used it against him in the
punishment phase. Patricia Lopez, 27, was found with her throat
and abdomen slashed open, her clothes torn off and scattered
about a northeast Houston park. O'Brien admitted that he, Cantu
and Medellin bought Lopez gasoline in exchange for beer. She was
killed when O'Brien ordered her to perform oral sex and she
failed to arouse him.
THU 05/25/95
Execution-witness bill dies in House
A bill that would allow crime victims' families to witness
executions died Wednesday in the Texas House, but it may be
resurrected. The bill, sponsored by Sen. J.E. "Buster" Brown,
R-Lake Jackson, would have allowed five relatives to attend the
execution of their loved one's killer. Approved by the Senate
28-0 in March, the bill died in the House because it ran out of
time to consider the measure. "I cannot understand why this bill
died," said Andy Kahan, director of the Mayor's Crime Victims
Office. "It sailed through committee and the Senate with no
opposition. It does not cost anything." Louisiana is the only
state that by law allows families of victims to witness
executions. California, Washington and North Carolina allow such
witnesses through its prison department policy, Kahan said. He
said he would try to resurrect the bill as an amendment to the
pending Crime Victims' Bill of Rights. "That's where it belongs
anyway," Kahan said. "If that fails, I'll go to Plan B." That
would be requesting the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to
include the new witnesses in its policy on viewing executions.
"This is an issue of fairness," Kahan said. "Right now, the
inmate is allowed five witnesses, so why shouldn't the victim?
"Most families would not want to witness it, but the option
should be available." If those measures fail, Brown said, he
would attempt to reintroduce the bill in the next legislative
session. He said he doubts it can be resurrected this session.
The bill's biggest supporters include Houstonians Randy Ertman
and Melissa Pena, whose daughters were raped and killed by a
gang of youths, five of whom are on death row. "I want to watch
them die," Ertman said. "That's the final chapter, and I can
close the book." He, among other families, testified before the
Legislature in support of the bill. "We spent a lot of time
going up there," he said. "It kicks your butt to rehash all that
in your head and to have it come down to politics of whose bill
to ignore." Prison officials also testified before committees,
showing blueprints of wall dividers that could separate inmates'
witnesses from victims' witnesses, Ertman said.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
SAT 04/01/95
Let victims' kin see executions?
Victims deserve consideration By SANDRA ERTMAN
The death penalty is not a deterrent, it's punishment for the
crime. The families and survivors of rape and murder victims
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena -- as well as survivors of
similar vicious and violent crimes -- desire and need to be
allowed to view the executions of the murderers. This will bring
closure to the family members. As victims, we also deserve
consideration in the final step of this horror in order to
restore our faith in the criminal justice system and in our
fellow citizens. (The state Senate approved a bill this week
allowing up to five relatives of a murder victim to attend the
execution of their loved-one's murderer.)
WED 03/22/95
The right to witness executions
Victims' rights advocates won a small victory Tuesday when the
Senate Criminal Justice Committee approved a bill that would
give relatives of murder victims the opportunity to witness the
killers' executions. The bill -- sponsored by Sen. J.E. "Buster"
Brown, R-Lake Jackson -- was sought by the Houston families of
Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. They want to watch as the
five youths now on death row for raping and murdering the girls
are put to death by lethal injection. Committee members limited
to five the number of victims' family members who could view an
execution, and said that some sort of partition should be placed
between viewers and the person to be executed.
SAT 10/15/94
Apology demanded of killer's attorney
Group protests "insensitive" remark
A local victims' rights organization wants a defense attorney in
the Ertman -Pena murder case to apologize publicly for his
"insensitive and unprofessional" comments earlier this week. But
the attorney, Ricardo Rodriguez, said Friday that his comments
had been misconstrued. About 30 members of Justice for All
demonstrated outside Rodriguez's downtown law office Friday.
They said his comments made them believe he meant the two
teen-age victims' families were in some way responsible for
their deaths. Rodriguez was the attorney for Raul Villareal, one
of five gang members given the death penalty. The comment that
sparked the protest was made after a Tuesday court hearing where
the parents of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, were
allowed to address the court with three of their daughters'
killers -- including Villareal -- present. During an interview
in a hallway, Rodriguez said, "I'll say this, and you may not
like it, but the parents bear some responsibility, too . . . the
parents of the victims." "Those thugs did what they chose to
do," said Pam Lychner, president of Justice for All. "These
families and all crime victims' families deserve an apology."
Lychner said Rodriguez's comments were unprofessional,
insensitive, outrageous and unethical, and she has asked the
State Bar of Texas to see whether he should be reprimanded and
possibly disbarred. Rodriguez said he was talking about all
parents' basic duty to raise their children in a proper way and
to know where they are. "The parents are zero percent
responsible for these crimes," he said. "The defendants are."
But Rodriguez added, "I don't think I have to make a public
apology." He said his comments had been misrepresented and he
never used the words "contribute," "blame" or "death" when he
spoke about parental responsibility. He said he would be willing
to meet with the Ertman and Pena families privately to discuss
the incident. As for a State Bar inquiry, Rodriguez said he felt
confident he would be vindicated, because "I've done nothing
wrong." Ertman and Pena were walking home through a park near
midnight in 1993 when they were raped and murdered by six
youths.
SAT 10/15/94
Group pushes right to view executions
Victims advocates want families to have a say
Correct: CORRECTION: Steve Hall is not an attorney. He is the
director of administration at the Texas Resource Center.
Correction published 10/18/94.
Victims' rights advocates are preparing to launch a campaign to
give relatives of murder victims the opportunity to witness the
killers' executions. The families of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and
Elizabeth Pena, 16, say they want to watch as the five youths
now on death row for raping and murdering the girls are put to
death by lethal injection. Andrew Kahan, head of the city's
victims' assistance office, said he expects the Ertman-Pena
murders to provide impetus for a successful effort to change
state law, which now authorizes only five witnesses to
executions -- none of them family members of victims. "From the
victims' perspective, it is equal opportunity, and for those who
choose to take it, it will be closure," he said. "I don't expect
a lot of family members to do this, but again, the issue is they
should have that opportunity if they are so inclined." While
prison wardens in some states allow victims' families to witness
executions, Louisiana is the only state with a law that
explicitly authorizes the practice. The first people to take
advantage of that law were Elizabeth and Vernon Harvey, whose
18-year-old daughter was slain in 1980. "Until you are in that
position, you do not know how it feels. You really see how out
of balance the system is," Elizabeth Harvey said. "It is not
something that is taken lightly. It is a door you can open, or
not open, but you should have that choice." She said the idea of
observing the execution emerged when her husband was interviewed
by a reporter after their daughter's body was discovered, eight
days after she disappeared from a nightclub where she had been
in a fashion show. "Somebody asked my husband if he had the
choice of a million dollars or seeing him (Robert Lee Willie,
the convicted killer) put to death, which would he take," Harvey
recalled. "He said they could keep the money." The prospect of
victims' families watching executions in Texas is not
universally acclaimed, however. "I would not want the victims'
family to be there if they are just going to gloat over the
execution," said Jimmy Dunne, head of the Death Penalty
Education Center, which opposes capital punishment. "That would
just bring the execution down to a lower level to have someone
there cheering a man's homicide." Steve Hall, the director of
administration at the Texas Resource Center, a group that
provides legal assistance for indigent death row inmates, said
authorizing families to observe executions is an idea that is
"ripe for problems." Hall pointed to a shouting and shoving
match between families of Ertman and Pena and the father of a
defendant in the case after one of the killers was sentenced
this week. "The kind of display you saw in the courthouse, there
is some potential for that to happen at an execution," he said.
South Texas College of Law professor Neil McCabe said the effort
to authorize families to watch executions has a good chance of
success. "It is politics. The victims' rights groups have a lot
of political clout now," McCabe said. "The pendulum has swung
and I don't see that it has gone as far as it will." Whether
watching an execution would help a grieving relative heal would
depend on the individual, said University of Houston psychology
professor Dr. John P. Vincent. "I think for each it will have to
be an individual thing," Vincent said. "What works for one
victim may not work for another." In Louisiana, Harvey said she
has no regrets about her decision. "I kept being told that it
was going to be so awful," she said. "His death was not near
what my daughter went through. He had his last meal, his friends
all around. I wish I could have said goodbye to my daughter,
served her her favorite meal. "I had to see that it was really
over," she said. "I had to know no one was going to hurt like we
do again."
THU 10/13/94
Speaking up over speaking out in court
Tense monologues in Ertman-Pena cases lead many to back more
controls
Highly emotional remarks from two grieving fathers after the
sentencing of their daughters' killers is stirring debate about
whether a state law allowing the speeches provides victims a
chance to publicly purge their emotions or creates a courthouse
sideshow. "I just left there yesterday kind of thinking, "Man, I
don't know if that did anybody any good or not,' " prosecutor
Kelly Siegler said Wednesday. "To expect someone to stand up
there and sound dignified and stay in control when all they
really want to do is get their hands on that defendant's neck, I
have to wonder, "What's the point?' " Siegler summed up the
feelings of many who witnessed the tense monologues delivered by
Randy Ertman and Adolph Pena after the last three of their
daughters' killers were sentenced to die. The highly charged
courtroom face-off spilled into a nearby hallway and ended in a
shouting and shoving match between families of the victims and
families of the killers. Though no one Wednesday suggested the
victims or their families should not be allowed to address the
court, everyone agreed there needs to be more control. "My
greatest fear is that this will absolutely degenerate into a
free-for-all inside the court just like it did outside the
courtroom," said defense attorney Jerry Guerinot. District
Attorney John B. Holmes Jr. said he supports the victims' right
but opposes the event being played out before the cameras, which
he said makes people behave differently. "I am one of those
old-fashioned guys," Holmes said. "I don't think the proceedings
should be made to be a spectacle. The proceedings in the halls
of justice are not meant for entertainment." Until Randy Ertman
stood before the media floodlights earlier this year and
lambasted Peter Cantu, the 19-year-old leader of the gang that
savaged Ertman's daughter Jennifer, 16, and her friend Elizabeth
Pena, 14, many prosecutors and judges did not even know about
the law allowing victims to speak out. The right to speak was
approved by the state Legislature in 1991 at the behest of
victims' rights advocates, who argued that crime victims should
have a role in the justice system other than bystander or
witness. "From what we have seen, anything can happen when you
let people express their pain without guidelines," said Robert
Keppel, general counsel for the Texas District and County
Attorney's Association and a participant in drafting the law.
Janie Wilson of Victims Organized To Ensure Rights and Safety
predicted the law will be used more as the public become aware
of it. "The victims' rights movement in Texas has shown a lot of
maturity on the whole." The law specifically provides victims a
chance to address the court, not the defendants. Still, despite
admonishments from the judge, victims tend to aim their remarks
at the defendants. To avoid situations similar to what happened
in the Ertman -Pena cases, state District Judge Jim Barr said he
would push to have victims write their statements before
delivery. In addition, he wants to consider limiting who can be
at the hearings where the victims are allowed to speak. "I don't
think it was meant for a whole room of victims' rights people,"
Barr said. "It sets up a volatile situation. It is the judge's
responsibility to keep the order of the court." State District
Judge Caprice Cosper also wants to establish guidelines. "The
law only gives us parameters," she said. "I think the courts
would hope this particular statute would afford victims the
chance to say what they feel, but I think that everyone should
always be mindful that this is a courtroom and these are legal
proceedings." Dr. John P. Vincent, a University of Houston
psychology professor, said the law, despite its pitfalls,
affords what can be an important part of the healing process for
crime victims. "For many of these people, there is a depth of
rage that is beyond most of our comprehension," he said. "Their
feelings and needs often get lost in the shuffle. "I think there
are instances where confronting the person that has caused you
grief and distress provides you some measure of relief," even if
it is indirect, he said. South Texas College Law Professor Neil
McCabe supports the practice but says an argument can be made
against it as a throwback to the Dark Ages. "All these kinds of
public punishments tend to demean society," he said. "One could
make an argument that this is the modern-day equivalent of the
pillory where you were put before the community and subject to
ridicule. Why not just turn them over to the victims' families?"
Two fathers, whose teen-age daughters were raped and murdered
last year, Tuesday spoke angrily to their convicted killers
during an emotion-packed court hearing that ended in a shouting
match in a courthouse hallway. "In 16 months I have never seen
any remorse," said a tearful Randy Ertman, after the three --
Efrain Perez, Raul Villareal and Joe Medellin -- were sentenced
to die by lethal injection. "You belong in hell," Ertman told
the trio. "We live for the day that you die." Jennifer Ertman,
14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, had left a party and were taking a
shortcut home June 24, 1993, when they crossed paths with six
youths engaged in a drunken gang initiation rite. The girls were
repeatedly raped before being strangled and stomped to death.
Separate juries found Perez, 18, Villareal, 18, and Medellin,
19, guilty of capital murder last month and sentenced them to
die for the girls' rapes and murders. Two other gang members,
Peter Cantu and Derrick Sean O'Brien, both 19, were already
sentenced to die in the case. Because of the high level of
emotion surrounding the case, and in the interest of avoiding
conflict, a request by the victims' parents to address the court
in the defendants' presence was postponed for 19 days to allow
both sides to cool down. Texas law allows victims or their
surviving relatives to speak at sentencing. One of the criminal
court's larger courtrooms was chosen for the sentencing. The
overflow crowd of spectators consisted largely of crime victims
who have supported the girls' families. State district Judges
Caprice Cosper, Doug Shaver and Ruben Guerrero occupied the
bench and each judge sentenced a youth to die by lethal
injection for the slayings. Afterward, the families were offered
the chance to address the court from the spectator's gallery.
Randy Ertman, who lashed out at Cantu after the gang leader's
trial earlier this year, this time read from a prepared
statement. "When these killers are in the ground, our job as
parents is over with," he said tearfully. "For someone to
destroy two loving children is sick." Ertman also said, "You are
worse than spit. You belong in hell." Sandra Ertman stood at his
side holding a plastic bag containing a watch and rings of
Jennifer's still tagged as police evidence. Testimony showed
gang members traded the items among themselves and their
girlfriends after stomping, kicking and strangling the girls and
leaving their bodies in woods off T.C. Jester and W. 34th in
northwest Houston. "I wish that these guys could get executed
the way they (the girls) did and be left there, just left there
on the ground to die," Adolph Pena said, challenging the youths
to look at him as he spoke. Villareal kept his back to Adolph
Pena while Medellin turned to him periodically. Perez, eyes
rimmed with tears, looked at Pena often. Defense attorney Jerry
Guerinot repeatedly objected when comments were directed at the
defendants but otherwise could not prevent the monologues. "I
just want to say that, well, the way they are going to be
executed is not fair to us," Adolph Pena concluded. Afterward,
the crowd spilled outside the courtroom into the spotlights of
television cameras. It was then that the shouting broke out
between families of the victims and the killers. Adolph Pena
became angry after overhearing a comment by Perez's stepfather,
Ismael Castillo, about being insulted by the comments made in
court and suggesting that the girls' parents also shared in the
blame for the girls' deaths. Finger-pointing led to a brief, but
intense, face-to-face confrontation. Randy Ertman plunged into
the fray and was held back by Adolph Pena while it appeared
Castillo raised a fist. The huge crowd gathered in the hallway
outside the courtroom pressed into the pair, adding to the
chaos. Bailiffs quickly pushed the Perez family out a side door
while Ertman, Pena and their wives left via another route
without comment. Castillo's comments enraged many of the
onlookers. Justice For All's Pam Lychner said, although she can
understand the Perez family's pain, "it is not their right to
lash out at the families either. The Ertmans and Penas have not
lashed out at them, they were lashing out at the boys who are
responsible." Prosecutor Johnny Sutton concurred. "It's a sad
day for them (the killers' parents) as well, and I don't think
it was their fault," Sutton said. "Those boys made choices.
There was time for them to have turned back." The outburst
surprised no one given the intensity of anguish on all sides of
the case. Nearly every emotion the Ertmans and Penas have had
since the girls' bodies were discovered has been captured by the
media. Randy Ertman's pained and angry rebuke to Cantu after he
received the death penalty was shown on television. A small band
of protesters who appeared to protest the death penalty caused
an angry exchange on the streets outside the courthouse.
Prosecutor Marie Munier said the victim-impact law affords an
important moment for victims, allowing them to feel a part of
the system they became a bystander to by a cruel act of fate.
"It's cleansing."
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
SUN 10/02/94
Supporting executions - By KAREN CAIN PERRY
Regarding the Sept. 25 story about the trials of those who
killed Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena: I cannot imagine the
thoughts of those who oppose the death penalty for the animals
who committed these crimes and for others like them. Opponents
of the death penalty blame the zealousness of the Harris County
District Attorney's office. I say, "hurrah and congratulations"
to District Attorney Johnny Holmes. Some believe that the death
penalty doesn't provide adequate deterrent to crime, and is
therefore, purposeless. I say that we should increase the number
of offenses for which the death penalty can be imposed and
decrease the number of potential appeals. Forget civil rights --
forget being "humane." Even if this doesn't provide more of a
deterrent, at least those people will not be around to torture,
maim, rape, murder and ruin the lives of others. My heart goes
out to the Ertmans and Penas.
TUE 09/27/94
Times may be changing - By D.J. MOTHEN
Are times changing? Five killers, five trips to death row (in
the deaths of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena). It seems if
this had happened a few years ago the men convicted in Houston
recently would have served possibly 10 years of a life sentence
and then be set free on parole. Is the country rebelling against
such crimes? I hope so. Congratulations to all the jurors and
prosecutors on the superb jobs they did. And sincerest
condolences to the Pena and Ertman families.
MON 09/26/94
Jurors' message clear - By LEE FLOWERS
We should all be very proud of some of our recent jurors'
willingness to deliver very appropriate verdicts and truly
proper sentencing to the heinous killers of Tracy Gee (slain in
1990) and Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena, who were raped and
murdered last year. The expedience in which they arrived at
their decisions should serve as a loud and very clear message to
all of the "scum" that so coldly and willingly take our children
from us without as much as a second thought in their sick minds.
SUN 09/25/94
Victims' kin grateful
By RANDY ERTMAN, SANDRA ERTMAN, ADOLF PENA, MELISSA PENA
Hoping we forget no one, we wish to thank the many people who
helped in the process of convicting those responsible for the
murders of our daughters, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. To
the Houston Police Department, special thanks to Sgt. Ramon
Zaragoza, Sgt. Robert Parish, Sgt. Robert Ruiz, officer Todd
Miller and officer Roy Swainson. Also any other officers
involved. To the Harris County District Attorney's office, we
thank Harris County District Attorney Johnny Holmes and
prosecutors Don Smyth, Jeannine Barr, Steve Baldassano, Donna
Goode, Mark Vinson, Terry Wilson, Marie Munier, Johnny Sutton
and Kelly Siegler -- our deepest thanks for your compassion and
understanding. To the victim-rights group, Justice For All,
thanks to all of you for showing up rain or shine. To members of
Parents of Murdered Children, you know the pain. To all our
friends, especially Bob Carreiro and Woody Clements, no one
forced you to be there, but you were. Thanks. To the people of
Houston, we don't know you all, but we do love you. And thank
you for your prayers. And finally, to the 60 people who
convicted the five of capital murder, we know the hell you went
through. You did the right thing. To all of you, our sincerest
love. God bless you.
SUN 09/25/94
5 rape-murder trials shake city inured to crime
THE ENTRANCE to an unnamed patch of woods hugging a short
stretch of White Oak Bayou just above West 34th Street is
scarcely noticeable from a distance. Even close up, even when
professionally photographed and made into an 8x10 glossy, it
looks like, well, not much at all. The hole in the wall of green
becomes ominous only in the retelling of the events that turned
the canopied lair beyond it into Houston's own heart of
darkness. On one moonless night in the summer of 1993, a pair of
teen-age girls -- dazed, wounded and shivering with fear --
disappeared through the opening, re-emerging only on funeral
home gurneys four days later, well after climate and insects had
rendered them featureless. Murders seldom claim hold on the
daily chatter of the nation's fourth-largest city. One might as
well talk of the humidity. During the wild days of Houston's
boom, when the promise of jobs lured the dispossessed of a dozen
depressed states, more than 700 were committed one year. And
even by the end of a relatively tame 1993, Houston police had
been confronted with 497. But the woods across from T.C. Jester
Park were destined to remain a site of distinction. Few
nightmares are as wrenching as the hour-long destruction of
Elizabeth Pena and Jennifer Ertman. Public imagination, at first
only teased by news of their disappearance, was stoked to an
unbearable height by quickly revealed details of their final
moments. This does not happen. Roving packs of young men do not
devour two unknown girls scurrying home to beat their curfew.
"There is a point where the inhumanity of it, the brutality of
it, just flows," said Don Smyth, an assistant district attorney.
That point was reached three times last week, as Smyth and his
colleagues prosecuted the final three defendants in the case.
Each received the death penalty, as had two others before them.
The lone juvenile involved had previously been sentenced to 40
years. His age saved his life but not did not spare him from the
duty of testifying again and again about the savage rapes and
awkward strangulations. By trials' end the tally was this: two
deaths likely to grow to seven, scores of shattered relatives on
both sides, 60 jurors seared by the photographs they saw and
confessions they heard, millions of dollars in current and
future legal expenses, and a city forever disabused of any
lingering notion that crime somehow contains its own logic.
There was no logic here, no sense. In the primeval silence of
the woods by the bayou, there was only opportunity and attack.
ONE MIGHT like to think that the killings of Ertman and Pena,
which spawned more death sentences than any murder in recent
American history, began with a plan. If somehow the girls,
however innocent, stood between the design and execution of a
great criminal notion, then the talk can turn to fate. Their
deaths become less threatening, if no less horrible. In truth,
however, the sequence of misbegotten events began out of
nothing, a momentary impulse, an innocuous request by a bored
17-year-old boy who lived with his parents in a poor
neighborhood on the near north side. It all started with a
quarter. Around 3 o'clock on the afternoon of June 23, 1993,
Raul Villareal, a sporadically employed 7th-grade dropout, asked
his mother for a quarter so he could go play a video game at the
corner store. When he got there he came across an old friend,
Efrain Perez, who was dealing with a broken-down car. They
chatted briefly and Villareal went inside for a session of
Streetfighter. Perez was still there when he came back out. The
conversation resumed, an invitation to drink some beer was
extended, and soon Villareal was at the home of a friend of
Perez's, someone he did not know named Joe Medellin who lived in
a fraying subdivision out toward Greenspoint. They drank, smoked
cigarettes and talked trash. Villareal was invigorated. Another
friend, Peter Cantu, showed up in his red pickup and the trash
talking heated up. Villareal said he could take any of them on.
Cantu, the de facto leader of the group, was not impressed by
the newcomer despite the fact he was taller and heavier than
anyone else. "You talk too much sh-t," Cantu said. "Man, I'll
come to your house and rape your mom and then kill you." Soon
Villareal learned that the guys were a gang, more or less, and
they called themselves the Black and White. Though he could not
have known how serious they were or what their past crimes may
have been, he must have recognized amid the bluster of punkspeak
that their lives seemed more exciting than his. By then the
seduction was a fait accompli. Cantu could see him for what he
was, a wannabe among badasses, but if the sturdy new guy could
manage to prove himself . . .What happened next -- the rounding
up of more guys, the so-called initiation fight, the drinking,
the unexpected arrival of two girls taking a short-cut home, the
frenzy of sexual assault and its segue into murder -- have
become details stored in Houston's collective memory. Again and
again, with each trial or journalistic recount, we heard Pena
imploring her friend for help, heard them both plead for their
lives, heard the thud of fist against face and the final,
gagging sounds of their deaths. We saw Villareal prove himself
in a baptism of fire, no longer a wannabe. In his final speech
to the jury, Terry Wilson, who prosecuted Joe Medellin, spoke of
the "cloud of darkness he brought over the community." Don
Smyth, who prosecuted Cantu and Efrain Perez, said that the
specifics of these crimes have a resonance that will endure.
"These people (the jurors) will not be the same people they were
when they came in here a few days ago," Smyth said during a
break in the punishment phase of Perez's trial, well aware of
the effect the testimony was having. "Houston as a corporate
entity will not be the same again." Harris County District
Attorney John B. Holmes Jr. made the decision early to go after
all five adult defendants for capital murder and seek the death
penalty for each. This was unusual even for Houston, the hotbed
of capital punishment prosecution in the nation. Those who
regularly keep track of death penalty cases can recall only one
crime this century with as many or more defendants sentenced to
die, the 1949 gang rape of a Martinsville, Va., woman by seven
men. All seven were executed. The men were black, the victim
white. As Holmes and his assistants explained it, the decision
arose not out of zealotry but from the circumstances of the
murders. Each of the adult defendants had a direct role in the
killing. "It's not like you had one main actor and others
standing around," said Jeannine Barr, who prosecuted Sean
O'Brien. "You don't usually get all of the people with that much
participation. That case gave me nightmares." Her and every
other prosecutor. Of the nine assistant DAs involved in the
cases, all said it was the most savage they had ever seen. "The
first week of jury selection, I dreamed they were alive, running
from the wood line," said Mark Vinson, one of Medellin's
prosecutors. "Hollywood wouldn't write a script like this and
let those girls die like they did. But they (the defendants)
outdid Hollywood. This was worse than Friday The 13th. They made
Jason look like a baby." The self-imposed pressure on the
prosecutors was tangible during the final three trials. There
was no danger of not getting a capital murder conviction -- the
facts of the crime and the young men's confessions assured that
-- but death penalties can be undone by one balky juror. And
anything less than a death sentence would have been regarded as
failure. Because of a history of extraneous offenses and violent
behavior on the part of Perez and Medellin, it was very unlikely
that any juror would conclude they did not represent a
continuing menace to society, or that there was anything that
significantly mitigated their acts, the two most important
issues juries must answer. The only real chance to get a life
sentence belonged to the defendant who had unwittingly set the
fatal sequence of events in motion, Villareal. He had no
juvenile record, and he had dropped out of school so early there
was no history of problems with administration. A string of
defense witnesses painted him as a shy, deferential boy likely
to be easily led by others. Girls who knew him said they had no
fear of him. Other than one jailhouse incident involving
Villareal and another inmate, the prosecution had nothing to
make a case that he was a continuing menace other than the facts
of the crime itself. Defense attorneys emphasized what they
claimed was Villareal's lesser role. They said he was not a
"monster" like Peter Cantu and Joe Medellin. Prosecutor Kelly
Siegler said it did not matter if Villareal was not as bad as
the others. "Don't fall into the grading game," she told jurors.
"They're all monsters. They all deserve to die." Much if not
most of Houston agrees. One of Villareal's attorneys, Jerry
Guerinot, understood that his cause was all but hopeless.
Villareal's jury stayed out longer than any other on punishment,
10 hours, but the verdict was still death. "There are cases so
bad it does not matter what you individually did," Guerinot said
while he was waiting for the punishment decision to be made.
"The jury just can't get beyond the facts of the crime."
DEATH PENALTY opponents
constantly hold Houston up as a jurisdiction where bloodlust has
grown to extreme proportions. The county sends more defendants
to death row than most states, they point out, and far more than
any other Texas county. It can't be, opponents argue, that
simply more heinous murders are committed here than elsewhere.
"I absolutely think prosecutorial discretion is a major factor,"
said Jordan Steiker, a University of Texas law professor and
death penalty specialist. "I think it (Harris County) is known
to have a zealous DA's office." Even so, even with the
unprecedented number of potential death penalties at stake, it
took nerve -- some would say gall -- for Jimmy Dunne and a
half-dozen other local death penalty opponents to show up in
front of the courthouse during the trials, demonstrating for an
end to the "cycle of killing." The young men whose lives they
would spare could serve as poster boys for the death penalty.
The protesters were quickly surrounded by outraged relatives of
the dead girls, friends of their families and members of a local
chapter of Parents of Murdered Children. There was no pretense
of civility. Substantially outnumbered, the protesters were more
decisively outshouted. "Every time you kill a murderer, it's
good for society," yelled one. "We want to be purged. We want
the murderers out of our society," screamed another. "Your
information does not match the look in Elizabeth Pena's eyes,"
spit a third. Upstairs on the third floor, in the narrow
hallways where families of victims and defendants wordlessly
passed each other for two weeks, a young man sat on a windowsill
and stared out toward the roofs of nearby buildings. He was
related to one of the defendants, and he was despondent, not
only at the likely resolution of events, but at the
pointlessness of all that had happened. "Understand it?" he
said. "There's no way to understand it. It is senseless." He
talked some more about the boys who had committed the crime, now
men in the eyes of the law, and said it was not too surprising
where they had ended up. Guys like that, he said, were not made
to succeed. Asked about himself, he allowed that he was married
but had no children and never would have. "Why would I bring
children into this screwed up world?"
SAT 09/24/94
Experiment with simultaneous trials called successful
An experiment in speedy justice involving the simultaneous trial
of three co-defendants in separate courtrooms was called a
success Friday, but it was a learning experience no one wants to
go through again any time soon. Faced with five defendants
accused of the rapes and slayings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and
Elizabeth Pena, 16, state district court officials in Harris
County set out to speed up the trial process. Initially, the
idea of having five juries seated in the same courtroom to hear
the cases was tossed around, but some of the judges and
attorneys in the case balked, so the notion was dismissed. Peter
Cantu and Derrick Sean O'Brien, both 19, were tried, convicted
and sentenced to death earlier this year for their roles in the
June 24, 1993, slayings of the two girls. Left to be resolved
were the cases against Joe Medellin, 19, Raul Villarreal, 18,
and Efrain Perez, 18. State District Judges Caprice Cosper, Doug
Shaver and Ruben Guerrero agreed that three defendants was a
workable number to try simultaneously, an agreement that led to
Harris County's first-ever simultaneous trials of three
defendants on the same charges. The decision by Cosper, Shaver
and Guerrero set in motion a series of meetings with
prosecutors, a law enforcement representative and court
coordinators Joseph Debruyn and Joan Taliaferro. "We had to be
very open-minded," Taliaferro said. "We took all their ideas and
expectations and figured out how to make it work." Debruyn said
their biggest concern was that prosecutors' work had as little
disruption as possible. "Our job was to coordinate things so
that they could focus on the business at hand," he said. The
coordinators' tasks included taking a list of nearly 30
witnesses in two of the cases and timing their movements from
court to court to avoid delays in testimony. Debruyn and
Taliaferro, who went through three years of training to be
certified for their jobs, also coordinated security for each
courtroom when a particularly ticklish witness took the stand or
was brought to or from court. They spent most their time in the
halls connecting the courtrooms and the judges' chambers.
Although some involved were skeptical initially, it appears that
it all went as planned. For the Ertman and Pena families, the
biggest concern was the end result -- death sentences for
Medellin, Villarreal and Perez, who have been moved to death row
with Cantu and O'Brien. Randy and Sandra Ertman said afterward
that they were satisfied with the way things were handled and
were relieved it was over. Although Adolph and Melissa Pena
seemed to share the sentiment, Melissa Pena said not being able
to stay together as they had in the prior two trials was
difficult. "All of us not being able to be together was about
the worst thing," she said Friday. "I do thank the judges for
waiting so we could hear all the closing arguments together."
Prosecutor Johnny Sutton, who handled the Villarreal case, said
having an understanding and flexible judge helped. "The danger
is not getting it coordinated well," Sutton said. "I think in
this case, the prosecutors were so well coordinated and the
judges were so reasonable it was able to work. "I am not ready
to sign on for this every time we have a case with five
co-defendants. It will have to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis." Prosecutor Mark Vinson said, "I would like to think we
would never have to do this again because I would hope that
nobody would go out and create an offense like this again, (but)
it may be a viable alternative. The coordination was excellent."
Vinson, who prosecuted Medellin, credited the enthusiasm of all
involved for seeing it through successfully. Perez's prosecutor,
Marie Munier, held sentiments similar to Vinson's. Debruyn said
that, although the process was streamlined in these cases, "this
is not streamlined justice, it was just effective justice."
FRI 09/23/94
5 killers, 5 trips to death row
Last trial ends in rape-murders
Jurors took about 10 minutes Thursday to return a verdict of
death for 18-year-old Efrain Perez, the last of five young men
to be tried on capital murder charges for the savage gang-rape
and murder of two teen-age girls in 1993. The verdict brought to
four the number of death sentences Harris County jurors handed
down to defendants over three days, the most in so short a time
in recent memory. Perez was the fifth man sentenced to die by
injection for his role in the June 24, 1993, murders of Jennifer
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16. He will join Peter Cantu,
19, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, on death row, where they have
been since early this year. Joe Medellin, 19, and Raul
Villarreal, 18, whose trials were held simultaneously with
Perez's, were sentenced to death on Wednesday. The brutal murder
of the two girls, who were attacked while taking a shortcut home
to make a parental curfew, shocked city residents. The victims'
parents, who have attended all five trials, have had to recount
repeatedly to jurors how it felt to awaken and find that their
daughters had failed to return from a party. They told of the
panic that gave way to horror at the news that while they were
printing up fliers with the girls' pictures, police were finding
their battered and decomposing bodies in some woods off T.C.
Jester and West 34th in northwest Houston. The Ertmans and Penas
have had to listen to excruciating details about their
children's final moments, the repeated sex acts forced on them
just before their lives were strangled, kicked and stomped out
of them. They watched the sneering, scowling bunch of toughs
paraded into the police station after their arrests and they
tried to control their emotions as they sat within a few feet of
the young men in court. Tears flowed and relief showed in the
faces of both sets of parents after the final verdict came in
Thursday. Perez also wept after the sentence was heard. Melissa
Pena, clutching a laminated white doily with her daughter's
picture in the center, said the end of the trials brought no
comfort to her. "Nothing will ever make me feel good again," she
said. "But we'll take it one day at a time." Adolph Pena thanked
his supporters and the jurors and prosecutors "who had to go
through all this. I know it was very difficult." Randy Ertman
said all parents should learn from his pain that "if you have a
child, make sure you love them because they may not be there in
the morning." His wife, Sandra, said she takes solace in the
knowledge that "those terrorists and killers are off the
streets. The city of Houston can rest easier." Likely
accelerating the jury's decision to impose the death penalty in
Perez's case was his lengthy and violent history. Testimony
showed that he grew from schoolyard brawler to a robber and
murderer, having shot two people and killed a third. Defense
attorney Terry Gaiser said Perez was a follower who fell in with
the wrong crowd. Prosecutor Marie Munier called Perez "a
predatory animal, and Houston and Harris County was his roaming
ground." Arguing against the defense request for a life
sentence, Munier said: "Just because you put him in a cage
doesn't make him any less a predator. You stick your hand in a
lion's cage, and he's going to try to scratch it." Prosecutor
Don Smyth, who also presented the state's case against Cantu,
told jurors that because of what they know about Perez, "you
will hold your loved ones closer every time you say goodbye."
September has been a month of record-setting events in Harris
County courts. Two weeks ago, an unprecedented six juries in
separate courts were preparing to hear death penalty cases. This
week, the 100th juvenile this year was certified to stand trial
as an adult. In addition to the three death sentences handed
down to the killers of the two teen-age girls, Lionell
Rodriguez, 23, was sentenced to die this week for shooting Tracy
Gee, 22, at a Meyerland-area traffic light in September 1990.
Two other defendants in separate cases narrowly escaped
execution and were sentenced to life in prison. Just as his
trial was slated to begin, Andy Douglas Baptiste, 24, pleaded
guilty to capital murder for the January 1993 slayings murders
of a Baytown convenience store clerk and a customer. And Edward
John Benavides, 22, facing capital murder charges for the
slaying of a Pasadena SWAT officer, was convicted of a lesser
charge of murder. District Attorney John B. Holmes Jr. said he
does not know whether the death penalty total is a record
because it is not the kind of statistic he tracks. "You don't
brag about things like this," he said gruffly. "I am turned off
by that kind of thing. I don't think it is appropriate."
THU 09/22/94
Gang members sent to death row
Pair raped and killed two teen girls
Jurors handed down death sentences Wednesday against two young
men being tried separately in the killings of two teen-age
girls, while another youth is awaiting sentencing in a third
courtroom for his role in their deaths. Joe Medellin, 19, and
Raul Villarreal, 18, were sentenced to die by lethal injection
for the June 1993 gang-rape and murders of Jennifer Ertman and
Elizabeth Pena. The verdicts returned by juries in state
District Judge Caprice Cosper's and Doug Shaver's courtrooms
were the third and fourth death sentences to be handed down in
connection with the Ertman -Pena slayings and the third rendered
in Harris County in less than 24 hours. Two other teens -- Peter
Cantu and Derrick Scott O'Brien -- were convicted in the girls'
slayings earlier this year and already are on death row. In an
unrelated case on Tuesday, Lionell Rodriguez, 23, was sentenced
to die for the 1990 slaying of 22-year-old Tracy Gee, who was
fatally shot while sitting in her car at a traffic signal. "This
is never a victory. We can't bring the victim back," prosecutor
Mark Vinson said after Medellin was sentenced Wednesday.
Medellin's fate was discussed by the jury in Cosper's court for
about four hours over Tuesday and Wednesday. Medellin was said
to have been the one that first grabbed the girls as they walked
past a drunken gang initiation. Ertman, 14, and Pena, 16, had
taken a shortcut home after a party and ran into the group near
some railroad tracks off T.C. Jester and West 34th in northwest
Houston. Medellin, who has displayed little emotion throughout
the trial, remained stoic as the verdict was read, but was said
to have tearfully embraced his family behind closed doors. After
the verdict, family members of the victims and their supporters
moved across the hall to Shaver's court, where they shared a
crowded courtroom with Villarreal's family and friends to await
a verdict. Villarreal was being tested for entry into the gang
led by Cantu, 19, and O'Brien, 19. Villarreal's involvement in
the girls' killings is the only criminal offense he was known to
have committed, which gave defense attorney Ricardo Rodriguez a
glimmer of hope that he could convince jurors to spare
Villarreal. Jurors in Shaver's court deliberated for 10 hours
over two days before determining that Villarreal should die.
Rodriguez said Villarreal's family was rocked by the decision.
"One family lessens their grief and the other's is increased,"
he said. "You always have mixed feelings when a death sentence
is handed down for someone so young," said prosecutor Johnny
Sutton. "But when you hear all the facts in this case you know
that this is the only punishment." Jurors in state District
Judge Ruben Guerrero's court will continue hearing testimony in
the punishment phase of Efrain Perez's trial today. Much of the
testimony has been about other shootings, including a fatal one
during a botched robbery, in which Perez is alleged to have been
involved prior to the girls' murders. Prosecutors Marie Munier
and Don Smyth are expected to ask jurors to return a verdict of
death for Perez, 18. The three trials were held simultaneously
over the past two weeks in an effort to save time and money and
to reduce the demands on witnesses.
WED 09/21/94
"He does not deserve to ... live among us ever again'
Prosecutors asked jury members Tuesday to hand down death
sentences against two youths being tried separately in the rapes
and murders of two teen-age girls. Raul Villarreal, Efrain Perez
and Joe Medellin, whose trials were held simultaneously in
separate courtrooms, were convicted of capital murder last week
for killing Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. The punishment
phase of the trials started Monday for all three defendants, but
final arguments by the prosecution and defense were heard only
in Villarreal's and Medellin's cases as witnesses were still
being called in the Perez hearing. Among the witnesses called by
prosecutor Marie Munier, who was trying to show that Perez is a
continuing threat to society, was Jose Orellano, who was flown
from California to testify before the jury in state District
Judge Ruben Guerrero's court. Orellano, who was wounded in a
botched robbery in which Jose Adiel Acosta was shot to death in
December 1992, identified Perez as the triggerman in what until
Tuesday was an unsolved murder. Orellano testified that he and
Acosta were shot by Perez as they arrived at a Houston apartment
complex for a wedding. In state District Judge Doug Shaver's
court, prosecutor Kelly Siegler urged jurors to return a death
sentence for Villarreal, 18, who she said has shown no remorse
for his role in the rapes and strangulations of Ertman and Pena.
He does not deserve to have the right to live among us ever
again," she said. Defense attorney Ricardo Rodriguez reminded
the jury that assessing the death penalty will not bring the
murdered girls back. "This is not an eye for an eye or a life
for a life," he said. Rodriguez said that the prosecution did
not present any evidence that Villarreal posed a future threat
to society and asked the jurors to sentence him to life in
prison. "I am asking you to have some compassion," he said.
Villarreal was the reason Perez, 18, Medellin, 19, Peter Cantu,
19, and Derrick Scott O'Brien, 19, were together the night of
June 24, 1993. The youths got together for a night of drinking
and planned to initiate Villarreal into their gang by making him
fight each of them. Shortly after the young men finished
fighting, Ertman, 14, and Pena, 16, walked past. The girls had
left a party and took a shortcut near T.C. Jester and West 34th
to get home by curfew. They were grabbed by the five teens,
raped and then strangled. Their bodies were found four days
later. In state District Judge Caprice Cosper's courtroom,
defense attorney Jack Millin reminded the jury that giving
Medellin the death penalty will not restore life to the victims.
"What you have here is a chance for saving a life," Millin said.
However, prosecutor Terry Wilson told the jury that Medellin has
a long history of violence and that he would be a threat to
society if he were not sentenced to death. "This crime was every
parent's nightmare. That nightmare has a face, and there he is,"
Wilson said, pointing to Medellin.
TUE 09/20/94
Prosecutors to seek death for young rapist-murderers
Juries hearing the cases against the last three of five Houston
youths convicted in the rapes and murders of two teen-age girls
are expected to be asked today to sentence them to death. Raul
Villarreal, Efrain Perez and Joe Medellin, whose trials were
held simultaneously in separate courtrooms, were convicted of
capital murder last week for killing Jennifer Ertman and
Elizabeth Pena. On Monday, jurors in state District Judge Doug
Shaver's court heard from a series of witnesses who said
Villarreal showed no signs of violence before the girls were
killed. In separate courtrooms before state District Judges
Caprice Cosper and Ruben Guerrero, witnesses testified of
violent episodes involving Perez and Medellin, one involving a
gang-related shooting and the other a shooting during a robbery
attempt. Villarreal, 18, was the reason Perez, 18, Medellin, 19,
Peter Cantu, 19, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, were together the
night of June 24, 1993. The youths got together for a night of
drinking and planned to test Villarreal's mettle before letting
him join their gang. Shortly after they finished taking turns
fighting the initiate, Ertman, 14, and Pena, 16, walked past.
The girls had left a party and took a shortcut near T.C. Jester
and West 34th to get home by curfew. After a search by their
parents, police followed up on a tip and found the girls'
battered bodies. They had been gang-raped and strangled. Cantu
and O'Brien were convicted in earlier trials and already are on
death row. On Monday, jurors in Cosper's court were told that
Medellin and Perez showed contempt for authority in the wake of
a gang-related shooting shortly before the Ertman-Pena slayings.
Witnesses testified that the two said "they could take care of
it themselves" rather than let police handle the shooting
incident. Also, a Harris County Jail deputy testified that he
removed an L-shaped shank from Medellin's mattress Monday
morning. One end of the metal bracket had been sharpened.
Defense attorney Jack Millin suggested that the homemade weapon
had been in the mattress before Medellin occupied the cell. In
Guerrero's court, evidence was offered about Perez's involvement
in a robbery-related shooting. The shooting victim testified
that Perez confronted him on a northwest Harris County street in
the Chimney Hill subdivision Feb. 8, 1992, and threatened to
rape his mother if he did not surrender his L.A. Raiders jacket.
The youth was shot as he fled and was hospitalized for a week
with chest and shoulder wounds. Prosecutors said they plan to
ask the juries in the cases to sentence Villarreal, Perez and
Medellin to death.
SAT 09/17/94
Heated debate
Murder victims' kin, protesters clash
Emotions high after teen-ager convicted
A guilty verdict for the final teen to be tried for the gang
rape and murder of two young friends ended quietly in the
courtroom, but the emotion spilled out to the sidewalk as
several anti-death penalty protesters clashed with victims'
families and their supporters Friday. A jury in state district
Judge Caprice Cosper's court took only about 15 minutes to
decide that Joe Medellin, 19, was guilty of capital murder. Two
other juries found co-defendants Raul Omar Villarreal and Efrain
Perez, both 18, guilty of the same Thursday. Prosecutors now
will prepare to push for the death penalty for the trio. The
punishment phase is scheduled to begin Monday for all three.
Peter Cantu, 19, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, were handed death
penalties after being convicted earlier this year for their
roles in the slayings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth
Pena, 16. Venancio Medellin, Joe's younger brother, received a
40-year sentence in the juvenile system for aggravated sexual
assault. Ertman and Pena had left a party and were taking a
shortcut home June 24, 1993, when they crossed paths with the
six youths engaged in a drunken gang initiation rite. The girls
were repeatedly raped before being strangled and stomped to
death. Joe Medellin was said to have been the first to grab one
of the girls when they spotted them near railroad tracks at T.C.
Jester and West 34th. Prosecutor Mark Vinson likened the group
to "a pack of wolves" and said the actions brought "a darkness
about this city." The elder Medellin -- who trembled with tears
a day earlier when his brother was sentenced to six months in
jail for refusing to testify against him as he had against the
others -- showed no visible reaction to the verdict. Adolph Pena
and Randy Ertman each leaned over and kissed their wives,
Melissa Pena and Sandra Ertman. In an effort to ease some
of the stress on witnesses and victims' families, and to save
money and time, state District Judges Cosper, Ruben Guerrero and
Doug Shaver agreed to the unprecedented step of conducting the
defendants' trials simultaneously. Witnesses have been shuttled
from court to court on the same floor with seeming success, but
the Ertmans and Penas were forced to split up so as to hear
something from all of the trials. Emotions had been
well-contained until Friday just after the families and several
dozen of their supporters left the courthouse and found a lone
anti-death penalty protester outside the door. Ronald Carlson
was awaiting back-up for a scheduled protest outside the
courthouse at 1302 Preston when Randy Ertman, Adolph Pena and
Bob Carreiro spotted him. The three linked arms, creating a
barrier between Carlson and passers-by, pinning him next to a
garbage can and against a wall. "This is the wrong time for you
to be here, man," Randy Ertman said. "I think it is a matter of
opinion," said Carlson, who added that he came to the courthouse
because he knew the city's media would be there for the trials.
An increasingly tearful and impassioned crowd, consisting
largely of people who have had loved ones murdered, surrounded
Carlson as he moved away from the three men. They accused
Carlson of being insensitive. But Carlson, whose sister Deborah
Thornton was one of death row inmate Karla Faye Tucker's
victims, stood his ground, saying, "There is no right or wrong
place." Protest planner Jimmy Dunne, head of the Death Penalty
Education Center, finally arrived with one other protester, an
anti-death penalty attorney with her children, ages 9 and 7, in
tow and carrying hand-made signs. Dunne struggled to be heard,
especially after a motorcycle rider with opposing views revved
his bike to drown him out. Dunne said he feels compassion for
the families but cannot condone death. "We don't want to do the
same thing the killers do." He denied being insensitive, saying
he chose to make his platform there because it was a perfect
example of "assembly line justice." "An eye for an eye leaves us
all blind," Dunne said, raising the ire of the crowd, mostly
from Justice for All and Parents of Murdered Children. "Have you
been to the morgue? Do you have a daughter? You are not a
victim! How dare you!" were some of the shouts. Carreiro's
daughter Kynara, 7, and her playmate Kristin Wiley, 10, were
murdered in July 1992. Feeling a kinship in tragedy with the
Ertmans and Penas, he has attended the five trials to show
support. Almost nose-to-nose with Dunne, he challenged him to
spend five minutes in his shoes. "Then we will see how you
feel," he said. "The guy that is executed won't have the
opportunity to kill anymore." Joe Medellin's brother, Jose,
stepped up and took a sign from Dunne. Someone from the crowd
asked if he would be there holding a sign if he had not had a
relative facing death. "I don't know," he said coolly. "I am
holding it now." Jeanne Bayley, whose stepson Robbie was
murdered in Bear Creek Park last September, gave this analogy to
justify death for someone guilty of a murder: "Do you teach a
pit bull to bite? No, But once they taste blood, you have to put
them to sleep."
FRI 09/16/94
Guilty -- times two
Trial continues for last gang member in Ertman-Pena slayings
case
Two more youths have been found guilty of capital murder in the
rape-slayings of two two-age girls caught by a drunken gang as
they took a shortcut home late at night. Raul Omar Villareal and
Efrain Perez, both 18, were convicted Thursday in the June 24,
1993, deaths of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena, while the
trial of Joe Medellin, 19, continues today -- without the
testimony of his juvenile brother, convicted earlier. Peter
Cantu and Derrick Sean O'Brien, both 19, are already on death
row for their roles in the killings. In an experiment designed
to save money, time and stress for the victims' families and
witnesses, the state set the three remaining defendants' cases
to run simultaneously and separately this week. Ironically, the
last to start was the first to finish, with jurors in state
District Judge Doug Shaver's court convicting Villareal in about
three hours. His trial began Tuesday with Sandra Ertman's
emotional testimony about her "sensitive, modest, compassionate
and childlike" only child. She recounted the agony of waking to
find that her reliable daughter had failed to come home from a
party the night before. She described the outfit her daughter
wore the last time she saw her -- baggy jeans, purple high-tops
and a shirt her father bought her for graduation. The items,
soiled and torn, were shown the jury by prosecutors Johnny
Sutton and Kelly Siegler. Ertman detailed the copious amounts of
jewelry her 14-year-old daughter insisted on wearing -- two gold
chains, several rings and a Goofy watch -- that were later
shared among the gang members, "like trophies of their night,"
Sutton said. The young men were together that night to initiate
Villareal into their gang -- if he could withstand the customary
pummeling of initiates. They gathered near railroad tracks off
T.C. Jester and West 34th to drink and take turns beating
Villareal. Ertman and Pena, 16, anxious to make curfew, cut
across the youths' paths and were repeatedly raped before being
strangled, kicked and stomped to death. Cantu's brother, Joe,
testified the defendants bragged about the rapes to him, and he
asked them with exasperation, "Who did you kill this time?" He
admitted he was not bothered by what they told him. He said he
helped get rid of a bloody shirt and took some of the jewelry
from them, but ultimately he tipped police at the urging of his
wife, who had been a victim of a gang rape and was having
nightmares. Perez, whose case began in state District Judge
Ruben Guerrero's court on Monday, stared at the defense table,
bracing himself with outstretched arms and trembled,
occasionally swiping a sleeve across his tear-filled eyes.
The jury returned a guilty verdict against him in about 90
minutes. Prosecutor Marie Munier said she will spend the next
three days preparing for the punishment phase. Pivotal to the
state up to now has been the testimony of Venancio Medellin, 15,
who pleaded guilty in the killings and was sentenced to 40 years
in juvenile lockup. But he balked at testifying against his
brother, Joe, being tried in state District Judge Caprice
Cosper's court. Venancio's attorney, Esmeralda Pena Garcia, said
she told prosecutors he would cooperate in every case except his
brother's. "He said he wanted no part in the case in which the
state was seeking to kill his brother," Garcia said. Prosecutor
Terry Wilson angrily denied having made any such arrangement,
and as Joe Medellin sobbed and quivered -- his first public
display of emotion in his trial -- an obviously irritated Cosper
sentenced Venancio Medellin to six months in jail, to be served
after his juvenile term is complete. Prosecutor Mark Vinson said
closing arguments would be held today. If Joe Medellin is
convicted, the punishment phase in all three trials will begin
Monday, with the death penalty being sought in all three. The
trials have been running smoothly, with many participants
expressing relief at getting their roles completed at one time.
Perhaps the most difficult aspect has been for the victims'
parents, who have divided time among the trials. But when told
the jurors had made their decisions, the parents positioned
themselves on the front rows of both courts and held hands until
the verdicts were read, then embraced in relief.
WED 09/14/94
3 trials move smoothly in girls' slayings
The simultaneous trials of three defendants accused of raping
and murdering two teen-age girls were held Tuesday without any
problems as court officials juggled witnesses and evidence to
keep the proceedings moving smoothly. Joe Medellin, 19, Efrain
Perez, 18, and Raul Villareal, 18, are being tried in three
different courtrooms on the third floor of the Harris County
Courthouse annex. Just a few feet separate the three rooms where
chilling and graphic testimony is being given in the deaths of
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16. The girls were
walking home late at night in June of last year when they came
across a group of youths who had been fighting and drinking as
part of a gang initiation. The girls were grabbed, gang-raped
for an hour and strangled. Peter Anthony Cantu and Derrick Sean
O'Brien, both 19, already have been sentenced to die, and a
juvenile, Medellin's brother, Venancio, was given a 40-year
sentence. The state is seeking the death penalty for the
remaining three. Holding the trials at the same time is being
done to make it easier for witnesses and to save court costs.
"There have not been any problems yet. There have been no
stoppages due to delayed witnesses or any evidence not being
available," said court coordinator Joseph DeBruyn. However, the
decision to try all three defendants at the same time in
different courtrooms was criticized by Andrew Kahan of the
city's Crime Victims Division. "It's a problem for the family
members because they want to be in the court for all the
testimony, and they can't be in all three places at the same
time," Kahan said. "But we will just have to make the best of
it. They are shuffling from one place to another. The positive
aspect of this is that in a few weeks, if everything goes as
scheduled, this will all be over for them." In testimony in
state District Judge Ruben Guerrero's court, where Perez is
being tried, the defense moved for a mistrial after a witness
mentioned that the defendants had talked of committing other
crimes. In response to a question from the prosecution, Joe
Cantu, older brother of Peter Cantu, testified that the
defendants had taken part in at least one other offense. After
the defense motion for a mistrial, the jury was removed from the
courtroom. Guerrero then ruled against the motion, and the trial
resumed.
TUE 09/13/94
Chilling testimony in trials
Three face death in rape-murders of teen-age girls
Gruesome and often chilling testimony marked the beginning of
simultaneous trials for two of the three remaining defendants
accused of raping and murdering two teen-age Houston girls. The
capital murder trials of Joe Medellin, 19, and Efrain Perez, 18,
got under way Monday in courtrooms separated by just a few
steps, and the trial of Raul Villareal, 18, begins today. By
coincidence, three other capital murder trials also began
Monday, a fact that certainly will underscore Houston's growing
reputation as a center for death-penalty convictions. Holding
the simultaneous trials in the deaths of Jennifer Ertman, 14,
and Elizabeth Pena, 16, is being done to make it easier for
witnesses and the victims' parents and to save money. Peter
Anthony Cantu and Derrick Sean O'Brien have already been
sentenced to die, and a juvenile -- Medellin's brother, Venancio
-- was given a 40-year sentence. The state is seeking the death
penalty for the remaining three. So far, the tricky matter of
coordinating witnesses and evidence has not proved a problem.
"We thought it would be, but apparently it's not," said state
District Judge Ruben Guerrero, presiding over Perez's trial.
"The biggest problem is with the physical evidence." Because the
same physical evidence must be used in all three trials, it is
being kept in a central room. After the evidence is introduced,
a photo of it is substituted and the item returned for use
elsewhere. The order of witnesses is slightly different in each
trial to eliminate delays. Because different officers
interrogated each defendant, many of the witnesses do not
overlap. Ertman and Pena were walking home late at night on June
25, 1993, when, while taking a shortcut across some railroad
tracks, they came across eight boys who had been fighting and
drinking. The girls were grabbed, gang-raped for an hour,
strangled and left in an isolated patch of woods. The bodies
were found several days later after Cantu's brother, Joe, called
authorities. Christina Cantu, Joe's wife, testified in Perez's
trial that the group of young men, minus O'Brien and Venancio
Medellin, showed up at their house in the middle of the night
and gradually revealed their crime, often laughing about it. "I
kept walking out of the room," she said. "I know what those
girls went through. I was crying." She said Perez admitted
holding one end of the shoelaces used to strangle Pena. In Joe
Medellin's trial, Roman Sandoval, one of two gang members who
left when the girls were grabbed, testified he saw Medellin
knock Pena down on the tracks. She cried out for Ertman to help
her, he said, and her friend came running back. Eventually,
Sandoval said, all except his brother, Frank, disappeared down
the other side of the tracks. "I told the others, "Let's go,
let's get out of here,' " Sandoval said. "But there was no
reply."
MON 09/12/94
Last trials set this week in girls' slayings
Another chapter in the slayings of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth
Pena gets under way this week as the last three defendants are
tried simultaneously before three separate juries. Joe Medellin,
Efrain Perez and Raul Villareal face execution if they are
convicted of the rapes and murders of Ertman, 14, and Pena, 16,
whose bodies were found near some railroad tracks off T.C.
Jester and W. 34th in June 1993. Already on death row for the
girls' deaths are Peter Cantu, 19, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19.
When the trials of Medellin, 19, Perez, 18, and Villareal, 18,
begin, a total of six capital murder trials -- the most ever at
one time -- will be under way at the Harris County Criminal
Courthouse. Three other defendants also go to trial this week on
capital murder charges in unrelated cases. Late last week,
jurors in state District Judge Michael McSpadden's court began
hearing the case of Edward Benavides, a 22-year-old grocery
sacker and suspected drug dealer who fatally shot Pasadena SWAT
officer Les Early, 28, during a drug raid at Benavides' home,
5526 Robertson. Also scheduled for trial this week is Lionel
Rodriguez, 23, whose earlier capital murder conviction was
overturned on a technicality. Rodriguez is accused of shooting
Tracy Gee, 22, to steal her car because his vehicle was running
low on fuel. Rodriguez was sentenced to die for the
September 1990 murder of Gee, who was fatally shot at a Meyerland-area stop light. Her body was dumped into the street
and her killer drove away in her car. Also going to trial early
this week on capital murder charges is Andy Douglas Baptiste,
24, one of five people accused in the execution-style slayings
of convenience store clerk Lanorah June Tetzman of Baytown and
store customer Todd Ray Thompson of Pittsburg, Texas. Today,
state district judges Ruben Guerrero, Caprice Cosper and Doug
Shaver will undertake the unprecedented step of trying three
defendants at the same time on the same floor of the courthouse.
The judges plan to stagger the starts of the trials today and
Tuesday. They opted to try the three cases simultaneously to
save money, time and to reduce the emotional stress of the
victims' families and the witnesses, some of whom have already
testified in two other trials. By the end of 1994 in Harris
County, known as the death-penalty capital of Texas, court
officials expect to have tried at least 22 capital murder cases,
each which could result in the death sentence for the defendant.
TUE 07/12/94
Parallel trials in slayings of girls
Three juries will be seated simultaneously for the capital
murder trials of the last three youths charged with raping and
strangling two young girls in June 1993. Jury selection began
Monday for Efrain Perez, 18, and separate juries will be seated
for Jose Medellin, 19, and Raul Omar Villarreal, 18. The trials
are scheduled to begin Sept. 12, with Perez in state District
Judge Ruben Guerrero's court, Medellin in state District Judge
Caprice Cosper's court, and Villarreal in state District Judge
Doug Shaver's court. To expedite the court proceedings, all the
trials will be conducted on the same floor of the Harris County
criminal courts annex, which allow for swifter exchange of
witnesses and transfer of evidence. Prosecutors said they do not
foresee any serious problems with the simultaneous trial format
in prosecuting the defendants charged in the murders of
Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, on June 24, 1993.
The trials will involve many of the same witnesses covering the
same ground -- the people who found the bodies, the coroner who
performed the autopsies, and others such as evidence
technicians. Harris County Assistant District Attorney Johnny
Sutton, who will prosecute Villarreal, said he expects witnesses
to have an easier time with the three trials running
concurrently; otherwise they would be coming back to the Harris
County Courthouse repeatedly for two more trials that could take
many months. "This way they can have it over in a few weeks,"
Sutton reasoned. "They may have to testify three times back to
back, but at least it is over with and out of their lives."
Perez's attorneys have filed a change-of-venue request with
Judge Guerrero, who will continue to hear arguments on the issue
Wednesday. Defense attorney Jerry Guerinot, who represents
Villarreal, said that if the trials remain in Houston, he does
not believe the defendants can get a fair trial. "The real
concern is publicity," Guerinot said. "I'm sure the media will
be there in droves. If I were a judge, I would move the trial. I
think what they are doing is compromising any chances that they
will get a fair trial." Prosecutor Mark Vinson, who will handle
the case against Medellin, said that "publicity is not that big
of an issue." "The issue is, can you get 12 fair citizens who
have not formed an opinion one way or another that can hear this
case and return a verdict based on the law and based on the
evidence," Vinson said. Five adults and a juvenile have been
charged in connection with the slayings of Pena and Ertman.
Their bodies were found days after they stumbled onto a drunken
gang initiation near T.C. Jester and West 34th. Ringleader Peter
Cantu, 19, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, are now on death row. A
juvenile was sentenced to 40 years in juvenile custody. State
District Judges Bill Harmon and Bob Burdette, who presided over
those cases, were not persuaded to move those trials outside
Harris County because of the publicity.
SAT 07/09/94
Local crime victims form lobbying group
Parents whose children were slain, women who were raped, and
others whose lives have been scarred by violent crime gathered
Friday at City Hall to announce creation of a new anti-crime
lobbying group -- the Houston Crime Commission. "The criminal
element in this society completely dictates the way we live our
lives," said state District Judge Mike McSpadden, who
participated in the announcement of the group to lobby for crime
reform and to assist in raising funds for victims of violent
crime. "Five percent of the population commits the crime, and
the other 95 percent live in fear," said McSpadden. "This group
is our chance to do something about it." The father of a jogger
killed by a group of young men in MacGregor Park last month
asked all Houstonians, not just those directly affected by
crime, to help. Levi Perry Jr., the 38-year-old son of Dr. Levi
Perry, was running in the park when he was attacked and shot to
death by four men who have yet to be arrested. "This is a bad
situation, when people live a good life and someone takes it
away. It's not right," said Dr. Perry. Watching quietly was
Randy Ertman, whose daughter Jennifer Ertman, 14, was slain
with her friend Elizabeth Pena, 16, a year ago. The two girls
were raped and strangled near T.C. Jester Park as they walked
home. Two of five gang members have been convicted and sentenced
to death in the slaying. Three are awaiting trial. Robert G.
Carreiro stood and watched, too, as lawyers and judges and City
Council members offered the new commission their support.
Carreiro wears a tattoo of his daughter, Kynara, 7, who was
stabbed to death with Kristin Wiley, 10, in 1992. A former
neighbor has been charged in the crime. Hester Pollard held up a
sign saying "He got 5 years. I got life." She was attacked in
her apartment 21 years ago by a man who poured acid on her face.
She has since had 59 operations trying to repair the damage. "It
has affected every area of my life, my relationships, my
employment," she said. The man who committed the crime served
five years in prison. Pollard is a registered nurse but is
unable to get a job, she said, because of her scars. "The people
that interview me say, "How would patients deal with your
appearance?' We do not live in a caring society. It's hard to
compete when you're abnormal." She believes, as do other victims
of crime, that the new commission will help. "Maybe, if enough
victims fight, make noise, let the government know we're here,
people will listen," she said. One of the first items on the
agenda of the organization is to fight the early release of
Texas inmates.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
THU 06/30/94
Crosses in park OK By CAROLYN TARLETON
Their murders were tragic, brutal and grisly -- actions almost
too horrible to comprehend. Crosses to commemorate the deaths of
these two young girls are completely acceptable in my book, as
would be Stars of David or the recognized symbols of other
established religions, or even of atheists and agnostics, if
they exist. Most of us respect the right of others to believe
differently, or not to believe at all. The presence of those
crosses in T.C. Jester Park should offend no one. What happened
to Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena should.
SUN 06/26/94
Service held for girls a year after slayings
Melissa Pena released a butterfly from a small plastic bag
Saturday during a memorial service at T.C. Jester Park. The
insect stood on her finger for several minutes, flapping its
colorful wings; then it flew away. The service was for Melissa
and Adolph Pena's slain daughter Elizabeth, 16, and her friend
Jennifer Ertman, 14. A year ago last Friday, the two girls were
raped and strangled near the park as they were walking home. The
butterfly on Pena's finger and 49 others were released during
the service as a symbolic gesture, said Dianne Clements, a
family friend who organized the service. "The butterflies are
free; they are not earthbound," she said. The 50 butterflies
were donated by breeder Hoa Chua. An estimated 200 people
gathered under two large trees near the back edge of the
northwest Houston park. Under one of the trees, two white
crosses had been erected. They were surrounded by dozens of
flowers and the girls' pictures. During the service, Earl
Hatcher, a neighbor and friend of the Ertman family, spoke on
the family's behalf. He said the family had not dwelled on
hatred and self-pity and wanted to thank everyone for their
diligence, compassion and support. He said he and Sandra Ertman
wrote the remarks for the service. And Sandra Ertman selected
the poem "I'm Free" to be read on her daughter's behalf.
Elizabeth Pena's aunt, Patti Zapalac, spoke on her family's
behalf. She read a brief poem. "I think it's an absolutely
amazing tribute to the girls that people continue to come to
this park day after day," said Zapalac after the service. As
Jane Vandiver sang her rendition of Eric Clapton's Grammy-award
winning song "Tears in Heaven," many in the crowd wiped away
tears. Six youths were charged in the girls' murders. Two have
been sentenced to death, a juvenile was sentenced to 40 years
and the others await trial. "A year has passed, yet our hearts
still yearn," said the Rev. Sara Owen-Gemoets, pastor of Grace
United Methodist Church. City Parks Director William Smith said
Friday that the city is researching a request to rename the park
for the two girls. Anytime a request comes in, he said, the
department has to investigate whether the park land was donated
to the city with a covenant attached to it. If no covenant is
found, a notice will be posted for 45 days in the park asking
residents to offer their opinions about a name change. Then the
parks department will deliver a recommendation to the City
Council. But during the entire process, Smith said, "The
position of the department is neutral."
FRI 06/24/94
Reliving a family tragedy
Teen girls slain a year ago today
For the past year, Sandra Ertman has grieved for her teen-age
daughter, who was savagely raped and killed a year ago today.
She has tried to cope, but knowing that she must sit through
three more trials is almost too much to bear. Jennifer Ertman,
14, and her friend Elizabeth Pena, 16, were tortured and killed
after crossing paths with a group of male youths near T.C.
Jester Park. They were walking home from a party late at night
and took a short-cut through the woods. In the past year, two
youths were sentenced to die for the killings and a juvenile was
sent to jail for 40 years. This summer, two more defendants will
be tried, forcing the families to continue reliving the tragedy
and to hear the gory details again and again. "The trials,
believe me, are not easy," Sandra Ertman said. "It puts you in a
very deep depression. But we do have to be there for our
daughters." To mark the anniversary, Ertman and her husband,
Randy, have planned a memorial service for 1 p.m. Saturday at
T.C. Jester Park. They will place two white crosses there in
memory of the girls. Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, and Peter Anthony
Cantu, 19, are on death row for their part in the murders.
Awaiting trial are Efrain Perez, 18; Jose "Joe" Ernesto Medellin,
19; and Raul Omar Villarreal, 18. Medellin's younger brother,
Vinny, 15, is serving a 40-year sentence. With some justice
carried out, the loss has become a little easier over time,
Ertman said. One year ago, a drive past a swimming pool or a
Taco Bell would leave Ertman in tears. Her daughter loved both.
Now, she still cries, but not every day. "What you do, like an
alcoholic, is take it one day at a time," she said. "You just
never know when you wake up in the morning what kind of day you
will have." The families have also coped by working with
victims' rights groups and with children. They believe their
daughters would have approved. The murders outraged the city and
generated extensive press coverage. Strangers grieved with the
families. Harris County prosecutor Steve Baldassano said he has
never worked on a case that received so much publicity. It was,
he said, his toughest case of the year. "I remember driving down
Kirby and I was doing my final argument in the car and I was
really choked up," he said. Baldassano said the case wasn't hard
to prove because of the facts, but it was hard to deal with the
attention it drew. "They were girls who had nothing to do with
anything, but were just late for curfew," he said. "They weren't
in a gang, they weren't shooting up drugs." The girls were
gang-raped, kicked, stomped and finally strangled with a
shoelace and O'Brien's red nylon belt. Nan Gurski of the group
Parents of Murdered Children sat with the families during the
trials and will sit with them when they resume in July. Gurski
thinks the case has received so much attention in the past year
because the public can relate to the parents' fears.
THU 06/23/94
Memorial crosses approved by city
City officials Wednesday approved a father's request to place
memorial crosses in T.C. Jester Park near where his teen-age
daughter and her friend were raped and murdered. After receiving
a legal opinion on the matter, the Parks and Recreation
Department has approved the request by Randy Ertman, the father
of one of the girls, said Susan Christian, assistant parks
director. Ertman asked the city if two homemade crosses could be
placed in the park Friday in memory of his daughter Jennifer,
14, and her friend Elizabeth Pena, 16. The two girls were killed
a year ago Friday as they were walking home from a party. City
Attorney Benjamin L. Hall III concluded that there is no law
permitting or prohibiting such memorials on city property.
However, Don Sanders, a Houston atheist activist, said the
erection of the crosses on public property violates the
principle of separation of church and state, and said he will go
to court if necessary to prevent it. The crosses were made by
the victims' friends at Waltrip High School. "I think it's a
beautiful gesture on the part of the kids," Ertman said. A
memorial service is planned for 1 p.m. Saturday at the site.
Ertman said the city has offered to supply the public address
system for the short service. Six youths were charged in the
murders of Pena and Ertman. Two have been sentenced to death
and a juvenile was sentenced to 40 years. The others are waiting
for trial.
WED 06/22/94
City plans to OK memorial crosses
T.C. Jester Park site selected near where 2 girls slain
The city plans to approve a request by a slain girl's father to
place memorial crosses in T.C. Jester Park, near where the girl
and a friend were slain a year ago this Friday. Because of
considerations over the mingling of church and government, City
Parks Director William Smith asked City Attorney Benjamin L.
Hall III for an opinion about the three crosses, made by friends
of the victims. Hall's response was there are no existing laws
permitting or prohibiting the erection of such memorials on city
property, and city officials plan to move ahead with the
project. "You'd have to be a blithering idiot to stand in the
way of something like that," said Dave Walden, chief of staff to
Mayor Bob Lanier. "As long as it's legal and we can justify it,
anyone can sue if they want to." The girls, Jennifer Ertman, 14,
and Elizabeth Pena, 16, were raped and strangled near the park
as they were walking home in northwest Houston the night of June
24, 1993. Six youths were charged in their murders. Two have
been sentenced to death; a juvenile was sentenced to 40 years
and the others await trial. Ertman's father is to meet with city
officials today to discuss plans for the installation of the
crosses. Elizabeth Pena's birthday was Tuesday. Ertman was
quoted as saying he did not understand the city's slowness in
responding to his request. "The possible confusion may derive
from the fact I had to get guidance from the Legal Department,"
Smith said Tuesday night. "I've gotten guidance on that, and we
can make the decision to do that. Part of the confusion may also
come from that I was ill today (Tuesday) and didn't take his (Ertman's)
call. We have a lot of empathy with those families and we want
to show our concern with their situation. I'm a parent, too.
Even though those two awful murders didn't occur in that park, I
believe it's a good idea (to erect a memorial)." The late County
Commissioner Bob Eckels once erected a Christian cross in the
county's Bear Creek Park, sparking protests by the American
Civil Liberties Union. Its claim that the cross violated the
constitutional separation of church and state forced Eckels to
remove the cross.
TUE 05/03/94
DNA test links murder suspect to another killing
Authorities have positively linked a teen-ager, already accused
of participating in the gang rape-slaying of two young girls
last summer, to the brutal murder of another woman five months
earlier. Semen found on the body of 27-year-old Patricia Lopez
on Jan. 4, 1993, and blood samples recently taken from Jose
Ernesto Medellin, 19, matched genetically, sources close to the
investigation said Monday. The positive match made through DNA
testing suggests that Medellin raped the woman before she was
stabbed to death and left to die in a northeast Houston park in
the 400 block of Carby, sources said. Medellin is awaiting trial
in the rape-slayings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena
16, on June 24. The girls took a short cut home to meet a
parental curfew when they came upon a group of youths off T.C.
Jester and West 34th Street and were attacked. Peter Anthony
Cantu, 19, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, have been convicted of
capital murder and sentenced to death by lethal injection for
their roles in the girls' brutal deaths. Days before O'Brien's
trial started last month, investigators confronted him with
information linking him, Medellin and Cantu to Lopez's death.
O'Brien gave a statement to authorities about the Lopez murder.
Details of Lopez's death and O'Brien's statement were revealed
during the punishment phase of his trial. Lopez ran out of gas
and was looking for help when the trio found her and offered gas
money in exchange for beer. Further testimony showed O'Brien
bragged that he had told Lopez he would kill her if she could
not arouse him. She was found with her throat and abdomen
slashed open, her clothes torn off and scattered about. A beer
can bearing O'Brien's fingerprint was discovered beneath her
body. Blood samples were obtained from O'Brien, Cantu and
Medellin, but only Medellin's positively matched semen found on
Lopez's body, sources said. It is unlikely that Cantu and
O'Brien, now on death row, will be charged with Lopez's murder.
Unless Medellin is found not guilty, the information will likely
be used during the punishment phase of his trial, similar to the
way it was used in O'Brien's trial, sources said. "I think they
should file some more charges," Cathy Lopez, Patricia Lopez's
mother-in-law, said. "I think whatever they did, no matter how
much there is, they should stand trial for every single thing."
Medellin's attorney, Jack Millin, said he was surprised. Based
on conversations with his client, "I had no reason to think he
would be a positive match."
SUN 04/10/94
O'Brien gets death sentence
After days of testimony painting Derrick Sean O'Brien as an
teen-ager with a propensity for crime, alcohol and mistreating
women that likely included the rape and evisceration of a woman,
a jury took only 33 minutes to decide he should die. O'Brien,
19, was immediately escorted from the courtroom as many in the
audience quietly sobbed. He was convicted Thursday of capital
murder for his role in the 1993 rapes and murders of Jennifer
Ertman and Elizabeth Pena. The families of the girls occupied
the front row throughout the trial and Saturday their supporters
occupied three of the five rows in State District Judge Bob
Burdette's courtroom. New among them were relatives of Patricia
Lopez, whom the state said died by O'Brien's hand six months
before the girls' bodies were found. As many in the crowd
embraced in celebration of the verdict, Cathy Lopez and her
family sobbed in relief. Peter Anthony Cantu, 19, is already on
death row as the leader of the gang that savaged Ertman, 14, and
Pena, 16. Cantu, O'Brien, Jose Ernesto Medellin, 19, Raul Omar
Villarreal, 18, Efrain Perez, 18, and Vinny Medellin, 14, were
gathered June 24 in a clearing off T.C. Jester and West 34th
Street, drinking beer and taking turns pummeling an initiate
into their gang when the girls happened past while taking a
shortcut home. The girls were gang raped, kicked, stomped and
finally strangled to death with the two things the young men had
handy -- a shoelace and O'Brien's red nylon belt. There was
little going for O'Brien when the state began laying out its
case. Witnesses said O'Brien raped the girls before handing over
his belt to help strangle them, straining and grunting as he
pulled one end of it to choke the life from a flailing Ertman.
Once arrested, he tearfully confessed and led police to a broken
piece of his belt which he kept like a trophy after fleeing the
death scene. After jurors found him guilty, the story of
O'Brien's past began to unfold. Elementary school teachers told
of a boy who, at age 11, would rage so intensely he had to be
physically restrained. Psychologists who worked with him
evaluated him as being of average intelligence, with a problem
working math and an increasing resistance to authority. He was
also building a habit of blaming others for his bad behavior.
Alicia Siros, 17, testified that O'Brien and classmate Cantu
were among a group of boys who dragged her off of a swing set
and around a park. Outside of school, O'Brien continued his
drinking and sometimes drugging and passed the time bouncing
around in stolen cars -- at least 45 of them before his arrest
last July. He threatened to kill his girlfriend when she tried
to break up with him. But the most damning evidence to be
presented against O'Brien was coming to light behind the scenes
of the trial. Joe Cantu, whose tip that his brother and his
friends had bragged about the Ertman and Pena slayings led to
arrests in that case, called authorities again and told them
O'Brien had bragged of another murder. Prosecutor Steve
Baldassano said they knew little when they turned to Houston
police Officer Todd Miller and asked him to search for the case.
The case that emerged was that of Patricia Lopez, 27, who was
found with her throat and abdomen slashed open, her clothes torn
off and scattered about a northeast Houston park. When
confronted in jail recently, O'Brien admitted that he, Cantu and
Medellin bought Lopez gasoline in exchange for beer. A friend of
O'Brien's testified that O'Brien told him that he had ordered
Lopez to give him oral sex or die and that he killed her when
she failed to arouse him. A belt, with the same belt buckle and
type of belt he handed over to kill Ertman, and the same type he
wore upon his arrest, was found under her neck. O'Brien, whose
fingerprint was found on a beer can under Lopez's right knee,
said he was simply a drunken bystander in the incident. Before
turning the case over to the jury, prosecutor Jeannine Barr said
O'Brien had proved incorrigible. His history of "wilding and
criming with his friends" should "make your blood boil," she
told the jury. O'Brien, "packed 50 years of crime into 19,"
Baldassano said. Williams and co-defense counsel Steven Greenlee
maintained their client used the gang to fulfill insecurities he
felt after a disrupted childhood, an abusive stepfather and
oft-absent mother. Greenlee said O'Brien has been prepared for
the sentence. "He told me he would prefer they would give him
death because he couldn't spend 35 years in prison."
SAT 04/09/94
Witness: O'Brien admitted killing
Jurors in sentencing told of his link to unsolved murder
Derrick Sean O'Brien told a friend that it was true what others
were teasing him about -- that O'Brien had killed a woman
because she could not arouse him, a witness testified Friday.
Jurors, who Thursday convicted him of capital murder for his
role in the slayings of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena last
summer, listened as investigators and witnesses put the pieces
of evidence together linking O'Brien to an unsolved murder six
months earlier. O'Brien, Peter Anthony Cantu, Jose Ernesto
Medellin, all 19; Raul Omar Villarreal, 18; Efrain Perez, 18;
and Vinny Medellin, 14, were all charged in the girls' slayings.
Cantu was sentenced to die last February for leading the group
from a drunken night of gang initiation into the gang rape and
stranglings of the girls who took a shortcut home from a party
on June 24. Their brutalized bodies were found in a clearing off
T.C. Jester and West 34th Street. The Medellin's middle brother,
17, also named Jose, testified that O'Brien, Cantu and brother
Jose Medellin were gathered at Cantu's home early last year when
Cantu said that "Sean O'Brien had killed this girl some days ago
and that Sean had tried to rape her and he couldn't so he killed
her." Medellin said he was skeptical until O'Brien chimed in
saying he forced her instead to have oral sex and told her if he
could not be aroused he would kill her. The woman, who was found
stabbed to death in a northeast Houston park on Jan. 4, was
later identified as Patricia Lopez, 27. Houston police crime
scene investigator K.H. Webb told of finding a Budweiser beer
can under Lopez' body. A fingerprint expert testified that a
print from the can matched O'Brien's right ring finger. O'Brien,
who has not been charged with Lopez' murder, has given a
statement to police placing him with Jose Medellin and Cantu.
Closing arguments are scheduled for today. Jurors will be
deciding whether to give O'Brien death or life in prison.
FRI 04/08/94
O'Brien convicted of killing 2 girls
Jurors take 90 minutes in decision
Derrick Sean O'Brien was convicted Thursday of the capital
murders of two teen-age girls raped and killed when they
stumbled into a gang initiation while taking a shortcut home.
Jurors took only 90 minutes to convict O'Brien in state District
Judge Bob Burdette's court. O'Brien, 19, who admitted to police
he handed over his belt to be used to strangle Jennifer Ertman,
14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, after raping the terrified pair,
stared straight ahead and showed no emotion after the verdict.
Testimony showed he had a direct hand in helping to strangle
Ertman. The family of the victims said they would reserve
comment until after the case is complete, though Randy Ertman,
Jennifer's father, offered thanks to all who have been showing
support. O'Brien is the second teen convicted of capital murder
in the June 24 slayings. The girls were gang-raped, stomped and
strangled when they took a shortcut to Pena's house across
railroad tracks near T.C. Jester and West 34th in northwest
Houston. The girls wanted to be home to meet a parental curfew,
but stumbled into a gang initiation led by Peter Anthony Cantu.
Cantu, who lead the violence against the girls, was convicted in
February and sentenced to death by lethal injection. Three other
teens, Efrain Perez, 18; Jose "Joe" Ernesto Medellin, 19; and
Raul Omar Villarreal, 18, are awaiting trial for capital murder.
All could get the death penalty. Medellin's younger brother,
Vinny, is serving a 40-year sentence -- the maximum under
juvenile law -- for his part in the rape-killings. Before
turning the case over to the nine-man, three-woman jury,
prosecutors Steve Baldassano and Jeannine Barr gave closing
statements rehashing some of the testimony presented since
Tuesday. Jurors heard from two brothers who passed the girls as
they walked toward the drunken bunch the brothers had just left,
and who saw Jose Medellin grab Pena by the arm. Vinny Medellin,
then 14, described how the boys took turns raping the girls, and
how O'Brien and Villarreal tugged at each end of O'Brien's red
nylon belt as it encircled Ertman's neck. Testimony showed a
large piece of the nylon belt was found in O'Brien's apartment.
Jurors heard O'Brien's statement in which he confessed to raping
the girls but portrayed himself as a bystander to the murders.
He told of his concern that beer cans left littered around the
bodies might have fingerprints that could link the gang to the
girls' bodies. A noise he heard coming from the murder scene
frightened him away from collecting the cans later that night
because he thought the girls were still alive. "If you are not
talked into the fact that this defendant is guilty, I don't know
what else to say," Baldassano told jurors. Defense attorney
Connie Williams tried to discount Vinny Medellin's testimony. He
also suggested O'Brien's statement was improperly obtained,
though the state provided substantial evidence that it was
legal. "Give him the label he richly deserves," Barr said.
"Label him what he is and that is a capital murderer." After the
verdict, the state moved into the punishment phase, presenting
one witness after the other to show how O'Brien grew from a
troubled fifth-grader into a prolific car thief. Testimony
showed he used alcohol and drugs heavily. The jury must sentence
him to death or a life prison term that can't end in parole
until he's served 35 years. When testimony continues today,
investigators are expected to testify to O'Brien's jail
statement regarding the murder of a woman six months before the
Ertman and Pena deaths. Sources have confirmed that O'Brien has
admitted being present during the rape and murder of Patricia
Lopez, a 27-year-old mother of two whose body was found in a
northeast Houston park Jan. 4, 1993. She had been raped,
disemboweled and her throat cut. O'Brien has told investigators
that he, Cantu and Jose Medellin approached Lopez after she ran
out of gas and pushed her car to a station in exchange for beer.
Derrick Sean O'Brien, on trial for his alleged role in the
rape-slaying of two teen-age girls last summer, gave a
videotaped statement to police last week that he was present
during the rape and killing of another woman last year. O'Brien
was questioned after homicide investigators received a tip that
he and two other Houston teens implicated in the slayings of
14-year-old Jennifer Ertman and 16-year-old Elizabeth Pena had
bragged about killing Lourdes Patricia Lopez, a 27-year-old
mother of two. The tipster is listed in court records as Joe
Cantu, the brother of Peter Anthony Cantu, 19, who was convicted
of capital murder and sentenced to death in February for his
role in the deaths of Ertman and Pena. Joe Cantu's previous tip
led investigators to Peter Cantu, O'Brien, Jose "Joe" Medellin,
19, Efrain Perez, 19, Raul Villarreal, 18, and Venancio "Vinny"
Medellin, then 14, who have all been charged in the Ertman/Pena
case. Authorities declined to provide details, but sources said
O'Brien also placed Peter Cantu and Jose Medellin at the scene
of the Lopez murder. Lopez's body was found Jan. 4, 1993, in a
parking lot at Melrose Park in the 1000 block of Canino in
northeast Houston. Her body was naked from the waist down. She
had been raped, disemboweled, and her throat cut. O'Brien has
told investigators that he, Peter Cantu and Jose Medellin
approached Lopez after she ran out of gas. The trio offered to
push her car to a convenience store for gas in exchange for
beer, which they were not old enough to buy legally, sources
said. The youth, now 19, did not say where the store was or
where they found Lopez, but that after getting beer and gas, all
four left the store together. It was not clear from his
statement whether Lopez went willingly, sources said. O'Brien
said he was "too drunk to know who did what" but maintained that
he had nothing to do with her rape or murder, sources said.
Fingerprints found on a beer can beneath the woman's tortured
body matched O'Brien's, sources said. Results of a DNA test
comparing tissue and blood of O'Brien's to semen on the victim
cleared him of having intercourse with her, sources said. Peter
Cantu just recently complied with a request for blood and tissue
samples, but neither he nor Jose Medellin has made any
statements regarding the Lopez case, sources said. In O'Brien's
current capital murder trial, jurors Wednesday listened as
O'Brien's statement regarding the Ertman/Pena murders was read.
In it, he admitted being present, having sex with the two girls,
and allowing his nylon belt to be used to strangle Ertman.
Ertman and Pena were killed June 24 when they took a shortcut to
Pena's house in northwest Houston and stumbled into a gang
initiation lead by Peter Cantu. According to his statement,
O'Brien later expressed concern that beer bottles left over from
the gang rite and drinking party would be found with their
fingerprints on them. Cantu sent him to retrieve them but
O'Brien said he turned back when he neared the area because he
thought he heard a noise and that the girls might be alive.
"Peter said no way, not to worry," the statement read. The state
rested its case and closing arguments are expected today. Perez,
Jose Medellin, and Villarreal are awaiting trial for capital
murder in the case. All of the defendants face the death
penalty. Medellin's brother Venancio is serving a 40-year
sentence -- the maximum under juvenile law -- for his part in
the rape-slayings.
WED 04/06/94
O'Brien trial focuses on red belt used to kill girl
A large piece of the red nylon belt used to strangle to death
one of two teen-age girls last summer was found in Derrick Sean
O'Brien's apartment, a Houston homicide investigator testified
Tuesday. Detective Todd Miller was among the witnesses to take
the stand as testimony began in O'Brien's capital murder trial.
O'Brien is the second teen to go on trial for his role in last
summer's gang rape-slaying of two girls. The gang leader, Peter
Anthony Cantu, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to
death in February. Three others are awaiting trial. Jurors, who
were returned to seclusion at the close of testimony Tuesday,
heard details of the final hours of Jennifer Ertman and
Elizabeth Pena as told by witnesses starting with Ertman's
mother and ending with a juvenile, who pleaded guilty to raping
Ertman and was sentenced to 40 years, the maximum under juvenile
law. After a frantic search by their families, the battered
bodies of Ertman, 14, and Pena, 16, were found June 28 near some
railroad tracks off T.C. Jester and W. 34th in northwest
Houston. The girls apparently stumbled into a drunken gang
ritual four days earlier on June 24 when they took a shortcut
home. Though the order of witnesses has changed, the testimony
closely resembled testimony heard in Cantu's February trial.
Ertman's mother, Sandra Ertman, described the last time she saw
her daughter, saying goodbye with an "I love you" as she left
for the grocery. A girlfriend of the girls' testified to seeing
the pair at the pool party they attended just before their
deaths. The juvenile, Vinny Medellin, 15, who testified for the
prosecution in the Cantu trial, testified against O'Brien
Tuesday, telling of watching O'Brien and Raul Villarreal, 18,
strangle the life out of Ertman. O'Brien and Villarreal wrapped
O'Brien's red nylon belt around a kneeling Ertman's neck and
pulled so hard it broke, the young man testified. Detective
Miller said once in custody, O'Brien led him to his apartment
where he produced the large piece of the belt. Judge Bob
Burdette has ordered the jury in this case sequestered after
having dismissed a juror who admitted he discussed the case
against O'Brien with a friend. The friend apparently alerted the
juror to news reports that O'Brien was being investigated in
connection with the murder of another woman. Search warrants
were served last week seeking blood and tissue samples from
Cantu, O'Brien and Jose "Joe" Medellin, Vinny's 19-year-old
brother, in an effort to link them to the rape, stabbing and
strangulation of Lourdes Patricia Lopez. The 27-year-old mother
of two was found in the 400 block of Carby in northeast Houston
Jan. 4, 1993. Efrain Perez, 18, Medellin, 19, and Villarreal are
awaiting trial for capital murder in the Ertman-Pena case. All
of the defendants face the death penalty.
TUE 04/05/94
Judge to sequester jury in slaying case/Teen accused in
rape, death of 2 girls
The judge overseeing the capital murder trial of one of the
youths accused in the rape-slayings of two teen-age girls said
Monday the jury will remain sequestered throughout the trial.
State District Judge Bob Burdette announced his decision after
having dismissed a juror who admitted he discussed with a friend
the case against Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19. The friend apparently
alerted the juror to news reports that O'Brien was being
investigated in connection with the murder of another woman. To
allow jurors time to pack enough clothes to last to Saturday,
Burdette scheduled testimony in the case to begin today. O'Brien
is accused of participating in last summer's murders of Jennifer
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16. Assistant Harris County
District Attorney Steve Baldassano told jurors how Ertman and
Pena were at a pool party the night of June 24, while a mile
away, O'Brien and his companions prepared to initiate a new
member into their gang. The beer drinking and fist fights
included in the initiation were under way as the girls were
preparing to take a shortcut across railroad tracks near T.C.
Jester and West 34th in northwest Houston to be home by curfew,
Baldassano told jurors. The girls were grabbed as they attempted
to walk past the group. The defense declined to make an opening
statement. In February, Peter Anthony Cantu, believed to have
been the gang leader, was convicted of capital murder and
sentenced to death for the rape-murder of the two girls. Capital
murder is defined as a killing that has occurred in the course
of another felony. The other suspects, Efrain Perez, 18, Jose
Ernesto Medellin, 19, and Raul Omar Villareal, 18, are awaiting
trial. All of the defendants face the death penalty. A juvenile,
Vinny Medellin, 15, pleaded guilty to raping Ertman and was
sentenced to the maximum under juvenile law -- 40 years. He
testified for the prosecution in Cantu's case and is expected to
do the same in O'Brien. Defense attorneys have said O'Brien had
a troubled childhood and that he has shown remorse since the
Ertman-Pena killings as evidenced by two suicide attempts in
jail. Search warrants were served last week for blood and tissue
samples from Cantu, O'Brien and Medellin in an effort to link
them to the rape, stabbing and strangulation of Lourdes Patricia
Lopez. The body of the 27-year-old mother of two was found in
the 400 block of Carby in northeast Houston Jan. 4, 1993.
Defense attorney Connie Williams said he believed the publicity
so close to the start of the trial tainted the jury and asked
Burdette to dismiss the panel. Burdette agreed to poll the jury
about what members may have read about the case after the one
juror admitted he knew about the other killing, and was
dismissed from the panel.
SAT 04/02/94
Recent events shed light on earlier victim
Patricia Lopez died the way she lived -- hard. Her death, like
her life, was of interest to only a few people: the
investigators assigned to the case, the estranged husband they
first suspected, the two small children she left behind. Two
years later, there is renewed interest in the death of Patricia
Lopez, who police now believe may have been a victim of young
gangsters now facing capital murder charges in the highly
publicized murders of two teen-age girls last summer. Peter
Anthony Cantu, Jose "Joe" Medellin, and Derrick Sean O'Brien,
all 19 and all accused in the brutal 1993 rape-slayings of
16-year-old Elizabeth Pena and 14-year-old Jennifer Lee Ertman,
are now suspects in the earlier death of Lopez. Pena and Ertman
were killed June 24 when they stumbled across an initiation rite
being conducted by the Black and White Gang, a small group led
by Cantu. Cantu is on death row, convicted and sentenced in
February for his role in the two deaths. O'Brien and Medellin
both await trial on charges of capital murder. The gang members
were arrested after Joe Adam Cantu, Peter's older brother and a
former Black and White Gang member disgusted by his little
brother's violence, tipped police. Sources say it was again the
elder Cantu who told investigators recently that his brother,
Medellin and O'Brien had boasted in January 1993 of raping a
woman at Melrose Park after she ran out of gas. Thursday, police
got permission to take blood and tissue samples from Cantu,
Medellin and O'Brien, for comparison with samples taken from
Patricia Lopez's body. Patricia was last seen on Dec. 31, 1992,
when she went by her mother-in-law's house in the 1100 block of
Warwick to see her estranged husband, Joe Lopez, and their two
children. "The kids weren't here," said Joe's mother, Cathy.
"She left crying, because she wanted to see them so." Patricia's
son and daughter, now 10 and 11, would never see their mother
again. Early in the morning of Jan. 4, 1993, a Houston patrol
officer checking Melrose Park in the 1000 block of Canino found
Patricia's body, naked from the waist down, in a back parking
lot. She'd been raped, then stabbed repeatedly. As soon as they
heard, Joe and Cathy went to the park, just down the street from
their house. "There was so much blood," Cathy said. "Blood on
the ground, on a post to keep cars out. And beer cans,
Budweiser, all over, like a big party." When Joe Lopez went
downtown with detectives afterward, Cathy said, "He had no idea
they would think he had done it. They kept him for hours, and
the kids were so upset and needed him here. "And then, after
that, we kept in touch with the police for a while, but there
just didn't seem to be any clues." Cathy Lopez was shocked to
learn that police suspected the trio in Patricia's death: "Oh my
God, Cantu? That animal?" Still, she said, it would be a
blessing to have the case resolved. "We always felt more than
one person killed her," said Cathy Lopez. "She was very strong.
She would have fought." "I'm glad Patricia is going to get some
attention finally, even if it's because the people who killed
her are famous," said Rebecca Delgado, who described herself as
"a friend of Patricia's, when she would let anyone be her
friend. "Patricia was lost. She and her mother had a real bad
relationship, and she had a hard life, and she never really
seemed to get past it. But she was human, you know. Sometimes
she'd feel real bad about herself, and her kids, and she'd
decide to straighten up and do right. She may have, someday,
too, but they didn't give her that chance, did they?" Cathy
Lopez said most of Patricia's problems stemmed from her use of
drugs, "but she could be a sweet person when she wasn't using
them. She liked to do things for people. She wanted to be liked.
"And what it comes down to is, nobody deserves what she and
those other girls got, do they?"
FRI 04/01/94
Girls' slaying trial may be postponed
Teen a suspect in another death
Revelations that a young man scheduled for trial Monday in the
rape-murders of two teen-age girls is a suspect in another
murder will likely cause his trial to be delayed. Defense
attorney Connie Williams said he will ask that the jury
impaneled to hear the capital murder case against Derrick Sean
O'Brien be thrown out because of the latest publicity. O'Brien
is the second of five suspects to be tried for the deaths of
Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16. The young women
were sexually assaulted and murdered last June as they took a
shortcut to get home before curfew. "I tell you, after the
article, I guess the first thing we are going to do is probably
ask this panel to be excused," Williams said, referring to a
story in Wednesday's Chronicle that said authorities are seeking
blood and tissue samples from O'Brien, 18, Peter Anthony Cantu,
18, and Jose Medellin, 19, that could link them to a murder
prior to the girls' murders. Prosecutors would not comment on
the latest developments. The case against the young gang members
has gotten a lion's share of publicity both locally and on
national tabloid television shows since the bodies of Ertman and
Pena were discovered last summer. Cantu, who reportedly led the
brutal attack on the girls, was convicted last month and
sentenced to die for his part in the rape-murders. The case
continued to get attention after its conclusion when the judge
allowed Ertman's emotional father to shout his disdain for Cantu
in front of rolling news cameras and reporters. The continued
publicity resulted in repeated requests for changes of venue,
repeatedly denied for O'Brien and the others -- Medellin, 19,
Raul Villareal, 18, and Efrain Perez, 18 -- facing death in the
case. A total of 212 potential jurors were interviewed for
O'Brien's trial in recent weeks, the majority of whom had heard
of the case, Williams said. But despite defense contentions that
an unbiased jury could not be found, 12 jurors and an alternate
was impaneled and the case was set for opening arguments Monday.
Williams said the recent turn of events likely tainted the jury.
Clearly exasperated, Williams said: "I don't know where it
leaves us."
THU 03/31/94
3 gang members suspected in a third death
Search warrants were being sought Wednesday for blood and tissue
samples from three of the Houston teens charged in the
rape-slayings of two teen-age girls last summer after police
received a tip the trio may have been involved in another
homicide. The samples will be sought from Peter Anthony Cantu,
Jose "Joe" Medellin and Derrick Sean O'Brien for comparison with
samples taken from the victim in the unsolved case. Authorities
declined to specify to which case the three -- all 19 years old
-- are suspected. Cantu is on death row after his conviction in
February for his role in the June 1993 rape-slayings of
16-year-old Elizabeth Pena and 14-year-old Jennifer Lee Ertman.
Pena and Ertman were killed June 24 when they took a shortcut to
Pena's house and stumbled into an initiation being conducted by
the Black and White Gang, a small group led by Cantu. Pena and
Ertman were beaten and repeatedly raped for about an hour before
the girls were strangled with shoelaces and a belt. Cantu told
police he stood on the girls' throats to be sure they were dead.
O'Brien and Medellin both await trial on charges of capital
murder. O'Brien's trial is scheduled to begin Monday. Also
awaiting trial is 19-year-old Raul Villarreal. Medellin's
15-year-old brother, Venancio "Vinnie" Medellin, who testified
against the others, is serving a 40-year juvenile court sentence
for his part in the rape-slayings. Sources said police received
a tip this week implicating Cantu, Medellin and O'Brien in the
rape and killing of a young female prior to the Ertman-Pena
deaths. Authorities are planning to compare DNA in blood and
tissue samples from the three teens with a DNA "fingerprint"
already obtained from samples taken from the victim in that
case. Beyond that, sources familiar with the case declined to
elaborate. Attorney Connie B. Williams, who represents O'Brien,
acknowledged Wednesday that he knew his client, Cantu and
Medellin are considered suspects in another case. Williams said
he was aware police planned to get search warrants for the
teens' blood and tissue samples, but said he did not know any
details of the case. Other sources who asked not to be named
said the tip was being treated very seriously. They declined to
say why, other than pointing out that it was a telephone tip
that solved the Ertman-Pena case last year. That telephone tip
came from Joe Adam Cantu, Peter's 21-year-old brother and a
member of the same gang. When making that call, Joe Adam Cantu
called himself Gonzalez and told police where to find the bodies
of the two girls, who had been missing four days. Police traced
the call to the Cantu apartment in the 1100 block of Ashland.
The elder Cantu eventually implicated his brother and the other
gang members and testified at his brother's trial. The motive
for that call apparently was disgust, police said. Testimony in
Peter Cantu's trial indicated he and other gang members went to
the Ashland apartment after Ertman and Pena were killed and
gloated about the deaths in front of the elder Cantu and his
young wife. One source told the Chronicle the caller who tipped
police to the trio's possible involvement in the previous case
apparently waited to be reasonably certain the three would not
be freed soon out of fear of retaliation. Another source
familiar with the case said the search warrants probably would
be executed today.
WED 03/09/94
O'Brien denied change of venue
A judge decided Tuesday that an unbiased jury could be found in
Houston to hear the capital murder case of the second youth to
be tried for last summer's rape-slayings of two teen-age girls.
State District Judge Bob Burdette joined attorneys in quizzing
55 potential jurors in the case against Derrick Sean O'Brien. Of
those, 52 said they had seen or read reports of the case, but
only 19 said they formed an opinion. The bodies of Jennifer
Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were found June 24, about five days
after they were accosted by a gang of youths involved in a
drunken initiation rite. A jury last month decided that Peter
Anthony Cantu orchestrated the murders, and sentenced him to
death. O'Brien and three others will be tried as accomplices.
Lawyers for O'Brien were earlier denied a change of venue, but
made the request again after Cantu's trial ended in an emotional
courtroom outburst by Jennifer's father, Randy.
WED 02/23/94
Jury selection to proceed in teen rape-killing case
Jury selection in the trial of a second teen-ager accused in the
capital rape-killings of two northwest Houston girls is to
proceed next week despite renewed efforts by defense attorneys
to get a change of venue. State District Judge Bob Burdette
bypassed the venue-change bid and ordered jury selection in the
case of Derrick Sean O'Brien to begin Wednesday. If it turns out
juror candidates' views were shaped by news coverage of the
Peter Anthony Cantu capital trial this month, Burdette said, he
could still opt to move O'Brien's trial out of Harris County.
"We'll see how we do," Burdette said. "I have no earthly idea
what to predict." Cantu and O'Brien are among five 18-year-olds
charged in the June 24 slayings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and
Elizabeth Pena, 16. Ertman and Pena were attacked as they took a
short-cut across a railroad trestle and walked into a drunken
gang initiation rite. All five defendants previously lost bids
to have the cases tried outside Houston, but their efforts were
renewed Feb. 9 after jurors in state District Judge Bill
Harmon's court sentenced Cantu to die by injection.
SAT 02/19/94
Judge's sentencing expedites Cantu's transfer to death row
A judge cleared the way for Peter Anthony Cantu's immediate
transfer to death row on Friday when he ruled that the murderer
violated the probation he received for trying to stab another
youth when he directed the June 24 murders of two girls. The
19-year-old gang leader, sentenced to death last week for the
murders of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, could
not have been taken to the Huntsville prison as long as a case
remained pending against him. At the time of the murders, Cantu
was on probation for a January 1993 incident at a monster truck
show at the Astrodome where he tried to stab another youth,
apparently just for kicks. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced
to four years probation, the terms of which included avoiding
"injurious and vicious habits," adhering to a curfew that began
at midnight and ended at 5 a.m. and enrolling in a program to
pass a high school equivalency test. By February, a urine test
taken by his parole officer revealed he had smoked marijuana. He
never signed up for the GED program. It was about 30 minutes
before midnight when Pena and Ertman, taking a short cut to get
home, were seized by Cantu and his gang near some railroad
tracks at West 34th and T.C. Jester. After being raped
repeatedly, they were choked, strangled and finally stomped to
death. Cantu, who had smirked and rolled his eyes through most
of his trial, was more polite Friday before Judge Woody Densen.
Wearing an orange county-jail jumpsuit and white high-top
athletic shoes, he answered "yes sir" and "no sir" to the
judge's questions. Before Densen sentenced him to 10 years in
prison for violating probation, he asked Cantu if he had
anything to say. Cantu replied, "Would it help?" The judge
indicated it would not. Prosecutor Don Smyth said sentencing
Cantu for probation violation means that if the capital-murder
conviction were to be overturned for any reason Cantu would have
to remain in prison. More importantly, he said, it expedites his
transfer to death row. "We cannot send him on to (prison) with a
pending case," Smyth said. "It is not a wasted effort."
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:
WED 03/02/94
Remember the "true victims' By JUDE WIGGINS
The Page One story, "Senior justice denounces death penalty in
all cases," about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun
denouncing all death penalty cases, just reinforces my belief
that Supreme Court justices and federally appointed judges, e.g.
Judge Wayne Justice of Tyler, should also have term limitation.
Justice Blackmun decries the killing in Texas by lethal
injection of a murderer as "cruel and unusual." e states:
"within days or perhaps hours the memory of (condemned Texas
inmate Bruce) Callins will begin to fade." Callins' memory
should have faded 13 years ago when he killed an unsuspecting
victim and left him to die on a tavern floor. His victim
certainly didn't have an additional 13 years of life or even a
second, third and probably fourth chance. People like Callins,
Peter Cantu (recently sentenced to death in the murder and rape
of Jennifer Ertman) and others of their ilk deserve the same
swift action they meted out to their victims. Let's remember the
"true victims" of crime, and their families and friends who
remain.
WED 02/16/94
Judge deserves a thumbs up By ANDY KAHAN
State District Judge Bill Harmon deserves kudos for having the
guts and foresight to grant a few moments of relief to surviving
family members of a homicide. (Harmon allowed Randy Ertman,
whose daughter was raped and murdered by Peter Cantu, to address
the condemned killer in court.) For over eight days we heard
gruesome testimony of the tortuous, slow, agonizing death
Elizabeth Pena and Jennifer Ertman underwent, not to mention
being sexually violated every which way known to mankind. Now
all of a sudden we are shocked and upset because a grieving
parent was granted the opportunity for some emotional healing.
Unbelievable. You are right when you state in your Feb. 13
editorial, "Unjudicial," that crime victims cannot vent their
frustrations toward their perpetrators in a Texas court, however
several states do allow victims to address their perpetrators in
court after sentencing. Recently, Wisconsin allowed surviving
family members of serial killer Jeffery Dahmer to speak their
mind about how their lives were destroyed forever by Dahmer.
Ertman's statements were directed at Peter Anthony Cantu only,
not the other four defendants; therefore concern over the
pending trials is unjustified. If the presiding judges are
worried about moving the trials out of Harris County, then why
make statements such as, "It can't be anything but detrimental,"
when referring to the courtroom scene. Such statements only add
fuel to the fire. Finally, perhaps we should consider legalizing
Judge Harmon's precedent-setting move where it became obvious,
at least in his courtroom, that the system cared more about
victims' rights than of those convicted of brutally destroying
our families. It is difficult to change the status quo and Judge
Harmon deserves a thumbs up for trying to change the
criminal-justice system to the "victim-justice system."
TUE 02/15/94
Wrong to slam judge By AUDREY SCHAMBON
I am amazed and appalled at the editorial, "Unjudicial -- Judge
Harmon wrong in sanctioning confrontation," branding state
District Judge Bill Harmon "unjudicial" because he allowed Randy
Ertman to address in court that scum ball Peter Cantu, who was
sentenced to death for raping and murdering Ertman's daughter
(Editorial page, Feb. 13). Harmon is the most "judicial" judge
we have in the courtroom, and we will remember his critics,
state District Judges Bob Burdette, Miron Love and Doug Shaver,
when we cast our votes. Randy Ertman showed remarkable restraint
in addressing the fiend. Whose side are you on, Chronicle?
MON 02/14/94
Judge made right call, By G. JAMES
Regarding the story, "Verdict on court drama divided," about
state District Judge Bill Harmon allowing Randy Ertman, whose
daughter was raped and murdered by Peter Cantu, to address the
condemned killer in court (Chronicle, Feb. 11): I can't believe
the idiocy of the people complaining about Harmon allowing Randy
Ertman to confront Cantu in the courtroom over the rape and
murder of his daughter. This punk not only freely admitted his
guilt, but has shown only contempt and disrespect for the court
system and the victims' families.
I don't care how he was brought up or what he has gone through
in life, he knows that what he did was wrong, even before he did
it.
SUN 02/13/94
EDITORIAL: UNJUDICIAL/Judge Harmon wrong in sanctioning
confrontation
It is understandable that Randy Ertman would want to yell across
a crowded courtroom at Peter Cantu, the man sentenced to die for
the rape-murders of Ertman's daughter and another girl. What is
not understandable is that state District Judge Bill Harmon
would sanction such a scene. It was improper for Harmon to
permit the confrontation last week. Harmon is known for his unjudicial actions and comments in the past, such as his remark
in open court during a capital murder trial some three years ago
that he was "doing God's work to see that the defendant is
executed." This newspaper sympathizes with the natural emotions
of Ertman in wanting to confront the man convicted of murdering
his daughter. But the scene had no place in a courtroom. Such
theater is damaging to the judicial atmosphere and to the
judicial system. The Texas Code of Criminal Procedures has been
altered to allow families of crime victims to tell judges about
the effect on them of the crimes, and what they think of the
accused. But the revised code says nothing about the right of
family members to call defendants names in open court. What
impact, if any, this confrontation will play in Cantu's appeal
or what effect it may have on the trials of the four other
defendants in this case is unclear. Several judges were shocked
by Harmon's action and have expressed concerns about the pending
trials. Apparently, there will be a renewed effort to move one
or more of the trials out of Harris County. If granted, such
moves could result in delays and additional costs to taxpayers.
Courts have no real way of controlling possible outside
influences in criminal cases, but they do not need to add to
such outside influences. Judge Harmon's decision to permit this
confrontation does not help.
SAT 02/12/94
Courtroom confrontation stirs bid to change venue
Murder defendants' attorneys fear adverse publicity from a
father's speech
Attorneys for two teen capital murder defendants said Friday
that the courtroom confrontation between convicted murderer
Peter Anthony Cantu and the father of one of his victims has
rekindled efforts to move their trials out of Houston. Four of
six defendants in the Jennifer Ertman-Elizabeth Pena murder case
were denied changes of venues to move their trials out of
Houston after judges ruled that all could get fair trials here.
Especially anxious is the attorney for Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18,
the next in the batch of defendants facing the death penalty for
his alleged role in the rape-slayings of Ertman, 14, and Pena,
16. The girls were attacked as they were taking a shortcut home
to make curfew and stumbled into a drunken gang initiation rite
June 24. Minutes after the jury delivered the death sentence to
gang leader Cantu on Wednesday, Judge Bill Harmon allowed Randy
Ertman, father of one of the dead girls, to make personal
remarks to the killer of his only child. Although the courtroom
address was perfectly legal -- and emotionally healing for
Ertman -- it has caused some fallout around the courthouse.
O'Brien's attorney, Steven Greenlee, who already has had one
change of venue request rejected by state District Judge Doug
Shaver, said Ertman's speech could be considered adverse
publicity for his client, therefore compelling him to take
another shot at moving the trial. As for his chances of getting
a venue change, "I think they have improved." Friday, Ertman
defended his admittedly emotional display at the end of Cantu's
trial and apologized for using a swear word, but said he was
grateful to the judge for the opportunity to release some the
feelings he was told not to show during the proceedings. "It
made me feel excellent," said Ertman during a news conference
Friday. He said having the opportunity to publicly speak to
Cantu helped the grieving father in his healing process. He said
all crime victims should have the opportunity to address
defendants in court. But Ertman did take issue with how a
Houston Chronicle article published Friday described his
comments to Cantu. Ertman said he only uttered one swear word at
the defendant and then apologized to the audience for making it.
Defendant Raul Omar Villarreal's attorney, Ricardo Rodriguez,
also previously denied a change of venue for his client, agreed
with Greenlee that his chances for getting the trial moved have
improved. "We intend to do the same thing (request moving the
trial), more than likely," he said. "Of course we are not at all
pleased with the way that Judge Harmon handled the situation,"
Rodriguez said, but the result has given him "a stronger reason
to re-urge" the move.
FRI 02/11/94
Two cases of two dead girls
Courtroom confrontation
Verdict on court drama divided
Allowing father to speak prompts strong reactions
It made for great theater -- a crime victim's grieving father
screaming obscenities across a crowded courtroom at the
belligerent young man sentenced to die for the rape and murder
of his teen-age daughter. Randy Ertman's outburst at condemned
killer Peter Anthony Cantu, sanctioned if not encouraged
Wednesday by state District Judge Bill Harmon, infuriated
defense lawyers, horrified some Harris County judges and pleased
victims' rights advocates. Not only were senior administrative
district Judges Miron Love and Doug Shaver unhappy that Harmon
set up a confrontation where Ertman was able to shout
profanities at the defendant, they also were not overjoyed that
the judge had allowed a small herd of newspaper and television
photographers to gather in front of the courtroom to capture the
scene on film. "I'm shocked," Love lamented. "That shouldn't
have happened. It may not be reversible, but it doesn't show
proper procedures. It wouldn't happen in my court or any court I
know of." Harmon was attending a friend's funeral in San Antonio
and was unavailable for comment. Marinell Timmons of the
county's Victims Assistance Center initially said she liked the
idea of victims being able to have their say in court but added
that judges should set boundaries about what can and cannot be
said. But after thinking about it for a moment, she added:
"We're telling the man (Ertman) in court all those horrible
things that happened to his daughter, and then we're backing up
and being shocked by his language. "I guess it's not even proper
to tell him to use proper language. Anybody would be angry in
those circumstances." Timmons added that it made her feel much
better when she was able to tell off the man who killed her son
in a drunken-driving manslaughter case. Shaver earlier turned
down motions to move the trials for four of Cantu's
co-defendants out of the county, and now he's worried that he
may have to conduct another hearing because of the massive burst
of publicity evoked by the dramatic conclusion to the Cantu
trial. When co-defendant Raul Villarreal, 19, goes on trial in
Shaver's court for the June 24 gang rape and strangulation
killings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, Shaver
said he'll allow no repeat of the finale Harmon sanctioned.
State District Judge Bob Burdette clearly was not happy to have
such a widely publicized emotional display just before he starts
jury selection on the capital murder case of Cantu co-defendant
Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, on Feb. 28. "If it has an effect at
all," Burdette said, "it can't be anything but detrimental."
Defense attorney Jim Skelton accused Harmon of "exploiting an
unspeakable tragedy" for his own gain via media coverage.
Defense attorney Mary Conn groused that existing public
dissatisfaction with the American justice process can only be
amplified by such displays. "That was the biggest circus I've
ever seen," trial lawyer Stan Schneider said. "It should never
have been allowed. There's no reason for it." Word spread among
the 90 or more people watching Ertman yell at Cantu that the
Legislature recently altered the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure to allow the families of crime victims to address
convicted defendants. Not so, state District Judge Ted Poe said.
A reading of Chapter 56 in the code lists numerous ways crime
victim's can tell courts -- meaning judges, not defendants
personally -- about the impact of crimes on them and what they
think about the accused. But the code says nothing about giving
unhappy fathers the right to call defendants names in open
court. Poe does favor altering court procedures to give victims
more say about the crimes and their impact. "Victims were
victimized by the system for years," Poe said. "They were kept
out of the courtroom, but now they have the right to be informed
and know about their cases."
FRI 02/11/94
Murders expose our vulnerability
Cantu becomes symbol of social ills
It was a typical Monday morning, complete with the usual news
reports of weekend mayhem in Houston: An unidentified man found
shot and dumped in a ditch. Another fellow discovered murdered
and left in a grassy field. As the day wore on, however, word
began to spread of a crime that seemed shocking even by Houston
standards. A pair of teen-age girls, missing for several days,
had been located in woods near White Oak Bayou. They were dead,
but that simple fact did not hint at the horror that had
befallen them. By the next morning -- June 29, 1993 -- their
names were on the lips of thousands of people who had never met
them. With speed that can only attend the truly awful, Jennifer
Ertman and Elizabeth Pena became symbols of collapsed values, of
unthinkable barbarity among our young and, ultimately, of our
complete vulnerability to violent criminals. With the quick
arrest of the six teen-age gang members accused of raping and
strangling them, the cry for vengeance was swift and loud. That
cry was answered, in part, by the death sentence imposed
Wednesday on Peter Anthony Cantu, 19, leader of the gang. "They
were so young, and the way they were murdered -- it was like the
"Texas Chainsaw Massacre" in reality," said Andy Kahan, Houston
Mayor Bob Lanier's director for victims' rights. "It was a slow
torturous death. They had to undergo that treatment for more
than an hour and were left to rot." Ertman and Pena died because
they took an ill-advised short cut to beat a midnight curfew.
Nan Gurski, a past president of the local chapter of Parents of
Murdered Children, wonders what hope there is if children have
to pay the ultimate penalty for such a little mistake. "What
does any parent have to give his child to protect them when
somebody else makes a conscious decision (to hurt them)?" she
said. Coincidentally, the death sentence against Cantu in this
case was imposed on the same evening Rex Mays confessed to
another incident that captured our attention the year before,
the vicious slayings of two young girls in northwest Harris
County. The murders of 7-year-old Kynara Carreiro and
10-year-old Kristin Wiley in their northwest Harris County
neighborhood were the talk of Houston in the summer of 1992,
much as the Pena-Ertman killings were a year later. Kynara's
father, Bob Carreiro, befriended Ertman's father and sat through
much of Cantu's trial. While the cases were similar in some
obvious ways, they also had some important differences. David
Klinger, a sociologist at the University of Houston who
specializes in crime, has no trouble ticking off the reasons why
the Ertman-Pena case touched all of Houston. It was a multiple
murder with a sexual angle. It involved innocents set upon by
palpable evil. And it heightened a contemporary fear -- youth
gangs -- by turning them into wolf packs eager to attack given
the slightest opportunity, and against whom there is little
defense. The Carreiro-Wiley case also heightened fear. The fact
that the killings went unsolved for so long raised the specter
of a child-killer on the loose in the community. Added to that
was the fact that the girls were slain in Wiley's home. "So
you've got a situation where the home is not even safe," Klinger
said. No neighborhood was more affected than the near North Side
area where Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena lived and died.
The Rev. Thomas Wendland, a priest of St. Rose of Lima Catholic
Church, where Pena worshipped, has watched fear and paranoia
grow among his parishioners. He spoke of their desire for higher
fences to keep evil out, of a growing "siege mentality." Worse,
he fears that Cantu and his group may not be sociopathic freaks,
but rather a shocking indication that moral training has left
too many households. "It says probably that most of the parents
are so deeply committed to trying to provide what they consider
the necessities that they missed the boat," Wendland said. "They
missed the point of what is a necessity."
THU 02/10/94
One father shares pain of 2 others
For a week, Bob Carreiro had heard how Elizabeth Pena and
Jennifer Ertman were repeatedly raped, beaten, strangled and,
finally, stomped to death. When it was over, he almost envied
their parents. "They are having some conclusion to some of their
pain," he said. "They are seeing some justice." The leader of
the gang that killed the two girls was sentenced to death
Wednesday, about eight months after the murders. But it has been
19 months since Carreiro's only child, Kynara, 7, and her best
friend Kristen Wiley, 10, were killed -- and no one has been
charged. Still, "their justice is my justice," he said of the
Ertman and Pena families, "It gives me hope." Four days before
the girls' bodies were found, Carreiro met the victims' fathers
at a meeting of the Justice For All group. They recognized him
from the many televised interviews he had given, and asked him
for help searching for their daughters. "The last thing (Randy
Ertman) said to me was, "Man, I hope I never see you again,'"
Carreiro said. "He knew if he did it was because something
really bad had happened." Since then, the two men have grown
close, and Carreiro shared Ertman's pain at hearing testimony
telling how Peter Cantu grew -- unchecked -- from bike thief, to
bully, and, finally, to rapist and murderer. "I could not
believe some of the things I heard," Carreiro said. "There is a
total lack of concern for human life." Especially indicative of
that, he said, was Cantu's courtroom behavior. "It infuriated me
that he was allowed to sit up there and snicker and sneer,"
Carreiro said. "And the families of the victims were told to
keep their emotions inside. When Randy took the stand and had to
keep in his tears while he described the murder of his only
child when what he really wanted to do was scream . . . it's not
fair.
THU 02/10/94
Cantu gets death
Killer scoffs at father of a victim
Peter Anthony Cantu was sentenced Thursday night to die by
injection for the rape-murders of two teen-age girls, then
responded "nah" when asked if there was any reason the sentence
should not be pronounced. Hands in his pockets, the 19-year-old
killer of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, then sat
down, and state District Judge Bill Harmon ordered, "Please
rise, Mr. Cantu." Looking into the audience, Harmon took the
unprecedented step of allowing Ertman's father, Randy Ertman, to
address the defendant. But as Ertman began to speak, Cantu
seemed to scoff and look away. "You look at me!" Ertman yelled.
"I've got cats that kill animals. When they kill something, they
eat it. You don't even eat it. You're not even an animal. You're
the worst thing I've ever seen." Again Cantu looked away,
scratching nervously at his face. "Look at me!" Ertman roared.
"Look at me good!" The dramatic conclusion was captured by eight
newspaper and television photographers permitted in front of the
courtroom rail to capture the end of the two-week capital murder
trial. Their focus shifted from Cantu being handcuffed and led
away under heavy guard to the victims' relatives crying in the
audience. The jury deliberated four hours before deciding the
sentence for Cantu, the first of five members of the Black and
White gang to be tried in the killings. The only other option
was life in prison. Jury selection is to start Feb. 28 in the
capital trial of codefendant Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19. The
killings occurred June 24, a day Cantu reported to his probation
officer. He was on four years' probation for bulling his way
through an Astrodome crowd last March, deliberately bumping into
people and trying to pick fights, ultimately cutting a
teen-ager's shirt with a butterfly knife. On the fatal June day,
witnesses said, Cantu spent hours drinking beer with friends and
fellow gang members. After sundown, his focus was on Raul Omar
Villarreal, 19, who wanted so badly to be a Black and White
member that he offered to fight everybody to gain admittance.
The group moved to a railroad trestle off T.C. Jester for
Villarreal's initiation rites. The teen fared well against his
first three rivals, but the fourth one knocked him out cold. But
Villarreal's performance was enough to win him a membership, and
the group went to the center of the trestle to drink beer and
congratulate him. They were giving him tips on gang etiquette
when they noticed two figures approaching in the darkness.
Frustrated the fighting ended before he could battle Villarreal,
Cantu decided to take it out on the larger figure, thinking it
was a male. The figures turned out to be Ertman and Pena,
Waltrip High School sophomores taking a shortcut home to make
their families' curfews. Two teens with the group, Roman and
Frank Sandoval, already were leaving, since they had wearied of
the gang's drunken antics and felt something bad was about to
happen. Roman Sandoval said he glanced back to see gang member
Jose "Joe" Medellin, 19, drag Pena off the railroad tracks. She
screamed for help, and Ertman rushed back to help, only to be
grabbed by Cantu. The girls were then gang-raped by five teens,
who molested each girl in pairs. Venancio "Vinny" Medellin, 15,
who was on his first social outing with his older brother, Jose,
said he kept asking Cantu to stop, only to be told, "get some."
Finally, Venancio Medellin said he had intercourse with Ertman.
That earned him a 40-year sentence in juvenile courts for felony
rape. When he was finished, Medellin testified, Cantu whispered
to him: "We're going to have to kill them." Pena was led into a
stand of towering pines and strangled with shoelaces by Jose
Medellin and Efrain "Junior" Perez, 19, witnesses said. Nearby,
according to testimony, Ertman was strangled with a red belt by
O'Brien and Villarreal. Cantu's confession said he kicked out
three of Pena's front teeth with his steel-toed work boots.
Prosecutor Donna Goode theorized the same boots were used to
break Ertman's ribs. Then, Cantu said, he stood atop each girl's
throat to ensure they were dead. Afterward, Jose Medellin,
Villarreal and Perez went to the Cantu home and boasted to gang
member Joe Adam Cantu, 21, and his wife, Christina, 16, they had
had "a lot of fun" with "a couple of chicks." After Peter Cantu
got there, he admitted to his brother and sister-in-law that the
"chicks" were dead. Jose Medellin, witnesses said, joked he had
"virgin's blood" in his underpants. He also lamented it had been
so hard to kill the girls, saying a gun would have been much
faster. Four days later, pretending to be "Gonzalez," Joe Cantu
called 911 to tell police where the bodies were. The call was
traced to the Cantu home, and Joe Cantu directed officers to the
homes of all the gang members except Villarreal. All five
defendants confessed and were soon charged with capital murder.
In court, defense lawyers Donald Davis and Robert Morrow tried
to portray Cantu as a pitiable teen with learning disabilities
and parents who could not hope to cope with all the troubles
their son caused.
THU 02/10/94
Gang leader Cantu sentenced to death
Convicted in rape-murder of two teens, killer smirks
Peter Anthony Cantu drew the death penalty Wednesday for the
June 1993 rape and murder of two teen-age girls who stumbled
onto a gang-initiation rite. The sentence ended an eight-day
trial into charges that Cantu led members of his Black and White
gang in the rape and murder of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer
Ertman, 14. Cantu, 19, thrust his hands in his pocket and
smirked at state District Judge Bill Harmon when the judge read
the sentence returned by a jury that deliberated a little over
four hours. Ertman's father, Randy Ertman, jumped to his feet
and began screaming at Cantu, calling him names before he was
led away by sheriff's deputies. "Look at me," Ertman screamed at
Cantu. "My cat kills something to eat it. You don't even eat it.
You're not even an animal. You're the worst thing I've ever
seen." Cantu's death sentence came on the heels of testimony
from dozens of witnesses who depicted him as a bull-headed,
argumentative youth who was prone to yelling obscenities at
people he passed, became violently angry at anyone who
aggravated him and bullied anyone who seemed weak. The girls,
who stumbled onto the gang initiation while taking a shortcut
near White Oak Bayou in northwest Houston, were raped for an
hour before being strangled with shoelaces, a belt and stomps to
the throat. Cantu ordered the girls killed so they would not
identify their attackers, testimony showed. Yet he and other
defendants returned from the scene and gloated to family members
what they had done, witnesses said. During the trial,
prosecutors introduced a statement from Cantu in which he
admitted ripping a gold chain from Ertman's neck as she was
being forced to perform sex acts. Cantu's confession said the
girls later were led into a wooded area, where Joe Medellin
began strangling Pena with his hands while Raul Villarreal and
Derrick Sean O'Brien used a belt and shoelaces to strangle the
girls. O'Brien, Medellin, Villarreal and Efrain Perez are
awaiting prosecution for capital murder. For four days after the
attacks on Ertman and Pena, their bodies remained in the woods.
Police were led to the scene by a telephone tip from Cantu's
brother, Joe, 21, who testified during the trial that he was
unhappy to hear his fellow Black and White members boasting
about having "a lot of fun" with the two girls.
WED 02/09/94
Slain girls' kin describe fear, anguish
The parents of two slain girls spent days putting up thousands
of fliers containing pictures of their missing daughters,
pleading for help on television and combing entire
neighborhoods, they told jurors Tuesday. But no sooner had they
heard June 28 that the bodies of two females had been found near
a railroad trestle, they knew that their children -- Elizabeth
Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14 -- were dead. Melissa Pena
said she drove 90 mph down Loop 610 after receiving the simple
message to "come home." Randy Ertman said he literally hijacked
a TV news crew and made them drive him to the trestle off T.C.
Jester. The girls, missing since June 24, lay decomposing in a
stand of towering pines, not far from where they had been gang
raped before being strangled -- only yards from the tracks they
had used as a shortcut to get home and meet their family
curfews. Upon reaching the spot where their bodies lay, Ertman
admitted to the jury that he went out of control, storming
around the area screaming while police fought to keep him back.
Ertman testified Tuesday in the punishment phase of gang leader
Peter Cantu's trial where jurors will decide if the convicted
capital murderer gets life in prison or death. "I about lost it.
I guess I'm glad the police stopped me," Ertman testified. "I
was in a rage." As Pena and Ertman related their feelings to the
jury, Cantu stared down at some pages before him, not making eye
contact with the parents as they spoke. It was much the same
demeanor he maintained last week while other participants and
Black and White gang members were describing the rapes and how
Cantu decided to kill the girls and eliminate witnesses. Neither
Ertman nor Pena looked into the face of the man convicted of
killing their daughters. Prosecutors rested their capital murder
case against Cantu, 19, after Ertman's testimony. Final
arguments will be late today or Thursday morning. As their
parents described it, the girls, both sophomores at Waltrip High
School, went out to see friends on the evening of June 23.
Ertman was expected to come home by midnight; Pena was expected
home before 11:30 p.m. Since they were reliable about not
missing their curfews, and since both were wearing electronic
pagers so their parents could reach them easily, neither family
was immediately concerned that the girls were late. Ertman said
he thought his daughter had stayed overnight with a friend and
he went to sleep. Adolph and Melissa Pena also went to sleep.
But by the next morning, both families were frantically calling
the girls' pagers. They began ringing the phones of the girls'
friends. Searches were organized. Missing-persons reports were
filed with the police. Assisted by 28 friends, Pena and Ertman
distributed flyers. They went up from Cleveland to Galveston,
taped to phone booths, stuck on utility poles with staple guns,
tucked under windshield wipers. "We put fliers all over the city
of Houston," Melissa Pena said. "We put out at least 3,000 in
three days." Prosecutor Donna Goode asked both parents about the
impact on their families of having their children brutally
murdered. "There's no birthdays, no Christmases, but most of all
there's no children. She was my baby," Ertman said at one point.
"That's the only one we'll ever have. My wife's 50 years old."
State District Judge Bill Harmon allowed jurors to hear the
testimony despite the protests of defense attorney Robert
Morrow, who said the emotional displays were irrelevant to the
choice the jury has to make. Cantu's other lawyer, Donald Davis,
said numerous appeals courts have frowned on prosecutors
encouraging such testimony, but he doubts Harmon's decision will
be enough to cause a reversal of his client's conviction.
TUE 02/08/94
Witnesses portray increasingly violent Cantu
"I think I'd like to kill somebody just to see what it felt
like'
About a month before he led the rape-killings of two Houston
girls, Peter Anthony Cantu dropped in at the Harper Alternative
School and had a chat with his former auto mechanics teacher,
testimony showed Monday. "You know, Malveaux, I think I'd like
to kill somebody just to see what it felt like," Cantu said,
Joseph Malveaux Jr. told jurors at the 19-year-old's capital
murder trial. Malveaux said he quickly pointed out to the gang
leader that he was headed for trouble if he did anything of the
kind. "I don't give a (expletive)," Cantu remarked. His
testimony about the May 1993 remark was only a fragment of the
information related by numerous state witnesses, who described
the steadily increasing level of violence by Cantu. Jurors in
state District Judge Bill Harmon's court now must decide whether
to send him to death row or impose a life term that cannot end
in parole before the year 2028. Cantu was convicted last week in
the June 24 murders of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena,
16, who were gang raped for an hour before they were strangled.
The girls took a shortcut home near a railroad trestle over
White Oak Bayou in northwest Houston and walked into a Cantu-led
gang initiation. Other state witnesses included Harper
Alternative School principal Paul Hanser and Dalton Hughes Jr.,
a former Houston school security officer, who said Cantu became
so enraged at them about separate incidents in 1989 and 1990
that he threatened to kill them. Worthing High School student
Mario Harkness, 18, told how Cantu deliberately bumped into him
on Jan. 9, 1993, at the Astrodome. Then, he said, Cantu tried to
pick a fight, pulled a knife and cut the teen's shirt. That got
Cantu placed on a four-year probation for assault. Police Sgt.
Paul Stavinoha told of stopping a car driven by Cantu on July
18, 1992, on 28th Street and finding a .38-caliber revolver
under a seat. Charges of unlawfully carrying a weapon were filed
against Cantu's passenger, Jose "Joe" Medellin, awaiting trial
for capital murder in the double rape-slayings. Policeman James
Godfrey testified he stopped a stolen car driven by Cantu on
Antoine on Dec. 7, 1991. That got Cantu placed on probation in
Harris County's juvenile courts. The overall testimony of
several teachers, principals, school bus drivers and security
guards depicted Cantu as a bull-headed, argumentative youth who
was prone to yell obscenities at people he passed, became
violently angry at anyone who aggravated him and bullied anyone
who seemed weak. Many witnesses said that whenever they tried
talking to Cantu's mother, Suzie Cantu, it was a waste of time.
Cantu's mother barely seemed to listen, brushed them off by
saying "I'll take care of it," or else contended whatever had
happened was not her son's fault but that of someone who
"provoked" him.
SAT 02/05/94
Cantu described as bully as sentencing begins
Peter Anthony Cantu, convicted in the rape and murder of two
teen-age girls, was portrayed Friday as an undisciplined bully
with a defensive, overprotective mother. Nine state witnesses,
testifying in the sentencing phase of Cantu's capital murder
trial, told jurors that he stole a bicycle, stalked a
fifth-grade girl, assaulted a middle school teacher and was
basically uncontrollable from age 11 to 13. They were the first
of what could become a parade of witnesses called by the
prosecution in an effort to get the death penalty for Cantu, 19.
The day's testimony ended at noon when state District Judge Bill
Harmon left because of what court personnel described as a
"personal emergency." The trial is to resume at 10 a.m. Monday.
The jury found Cantu guilty Thursday in the June 24, 1993,
rape-killings of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14.
Cantu's Black and White gang raped the girls for an hour, then
strangled them with shoelaces and a belt and finally stomped on
their throats. Prosecutor Don Smyth's first witness was Darrin
McElroy, who described how he was knocked off his bicycle in
1986, by a youth who then gave it to Cantu. The bicycle was
returned the same day by Cantu to claim a $10 reward, then was
stolen again two days later. Amber Law testified Cantu tried to
kiss her when she was a fifth-grader. She said she escaped then,
but on July 27, 1988, he came to her house and spent 10 minutes
circling it, yelling: "Let me in. I know you're in there." She
called her father, Sherman Law, who went to Cantu's apartment
and informed his mother, Suzie Cantu, that her son had broken a
window in his efforts to get to Amber Law. "She seemed like she
didn't believe he'd been over there," Sherman Law testified. And
when he spoke to Cantu, he was told: "(Expletive) you. I can do
whatever I want." His visit to the Cantu apartment at 3405 N.
Shepherd was followed up by Houston police juvenile Officer J.W.
Kirtley, who warned 13-year-old Cantu that such antics could
"come back to haunt him." Houston schoolteacher Diane Caudill,
saying she is still "terrified" of Cantu, described an episode
at Hamilton Middle School in January 1988, on his second day as
her student. Just as class was about to start, she said, she
noticed Cantu and another student standing nose to nose, inches
apart, in a sort of "face-off" in the classroom's doorway. When
she touched his collar to end the confrontation, she said, he
put his hands on her chest and shoved her the length of her
classroom, saying: "Leave me alone, old lady." Then, she said,
he grabbed her hands and pushed her out of the classroom and
down a hallway. It ended with social studies teacher Stephen
Seale grabbing Cantu from behind, causing both of them to fall
to the floor. "I've never had that happen before or since,"
Caudill testified. "We had fights every day, but never an attack
on a teacher in a classroom." Cantu was expelled, only to be
allowed back in the same school the next month. Seale's
daughter, Alicia Seale, 16, said she was at a concession stand
during a football game Nov. 17, 1988, when Cantu and his friends
were behind her in a line and began making threats. He said he
hated my father and wanted to kill him," Alicia Seale told
jurors.
FRI 02/04/94
Jury convicts gang leader in murder of two girls
Gang leader Peter Anthony Cantu was convicted Thursday of the
capital murders of two teen-age girls who were raped for an hour
before being strangled with shoelaces, a belt and stomps to the
throat. Cantu ordered the girls killed so they would not
identify their attackers, testimony showed, yet he and other
defendants returned from the scene and gloated to family members
what they had done. Jurors took just over an hour to convict
Cantu in state District Judge Bill Harmon's courtroom, packed
with at least 250 people. About 100 were Waltrip High School
students, many of them friends and acquaintances of the victims,
who had left class to watch. While the families of the victims,
Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, wept happily and
embraced after the verdict, Cantu, 19, seemed to sigh and then
smile faintly in resignation. The jury must sentence him to
death or a life prison term that can't end in parole until he's
served 35 years. Harmon estimated the trial should end by
Tuesday. Prosecutors Don Smyth and Donna Goode have subpoenaed
42 witnesses who likely will describe every misdeed ever blamed
on the defendant. Defense lawyers Robert Morrow and Donald Davis
said they will call some witnesses, but they would not detail
their plans. The prosecution's last exhibit was Cantu's final
confession, in which he admitted almost every detail that state
witnesses Venancio "Vinnie" Medellin and brothers Roman and
Frank Sandoval had related earlier this week. Cantu told a
police detective, Roy Swainson, how he had taken his Black and
White gang to a railroad trestle over White Oak Bayou in
northwest Houston on June 24 to drink beer and initiate a new
member. The latter, Raul Villarreal, 19, was to fight four gang
members, but he was knocked out before Cantu had his turn. That
frustrated Cantu, and when two figures were spotted approaching
in the darkness, he decided to take it out on the larger one,
who appeared to be a male. It turned out to be Pena and Ertman,
taking a shortcut home from a party to save 15 minutes and avoid
a parental scolding. Almost immediately, gang member Jose "Joe" Medellin, 19, grabbed Pena and dragged her away. Cantu grabbed
Ertman, who had run back to help her screaming friend. In his
confession, Cantu said he ripped a gold chain from Ertman's neck
as she was being forced to perform sex acts. "We were taking
turns having sex with them," the confession said, suggesting
that pairs of gang members were moving from victim to victim
like "a pack of dogs feeding on their prey," as Goode described
it. As that was ending, Venancio Medellin, 15, testified, Cantu
whispered that they would have to kill the girls. Venancio
Medellin, younger brother of defendant Jose Medellin, said he
stood in shock between the victims during the rapes as Cantu
kept urging him to "get some." Cantu's confession said the girls
were led into a wooded area, where Joe Medellin began strangling
Pena with his hands while Villarreal and defendant Derrick Sean
O'Brien, 19, used a red belt to strangle Ertman. "Efrain (Perez,
another defendant) started to help Joe strangle the brunette
(Pena)," the confession continued. "That's when I kicked her
once in the face. When she dropped to her back, we checked for a
pulse." In closing arguments, Goode pointed to the black,
steel-toed work boots Cantu had used to knock out three of
Pena's teeth. Despite all their efforts, Ertman's heart was
still beating. So, Cantu confessed, he stood on her throat with
his left foot, and then O'Brien did the same. "We did this to
make sure they were dead," Cantu said. "We didn't want to be
identified." Goode suggested that Cantu's boots were used to
break three of Ertman's ribs after she was dead. The girls'
decomposing bodies remained in the woods for four days. Then
Cantu's brother, Joe, 21, unhappy to hear his fellow Black and
White members boasting about having "a lot of fun" with two
murder victims, called police and gave the location of the
bodies. Joe Cantu said his name was "Gonzalez," but police
traced his 911 call to the Cantu family home in northwest
Houston, and he soon identified the culprits. Venancio Medellin
is serving a 40-year juvenile court sentence. Jose Medellin,
O'Brien, Perez and Villarreal await prosecution on capital
murder charges.
THU 02/03/94
Jury sees photos of decaying bodies
Families of slain girls hear testimony in Cantu murder trial
Jurors at the Peter Cantu capital murder trial spent hours
Wednesday listening to keenly detailed descriptions of the
bodies of two girls who were gang raped, strangled and their
bodies left abandoned for four days in 100-degree weather. While
the families of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, sat
watching in the audience, the jury was shown a series of
photographs of the decomposed bodies in a patch of trees near
White Oak Bayou. Harris County Assistant Medical Examiner
Marilyn Murr said decomposition had reduced the bodies,
particularly Pena's, to such a state that she could only say
they died of strangulation. She could not specify the precise
method used to kill the girls. Nor could efforts by Murr and
Houston police technicians establish that they were raped, even
though one of Cantu's five co-defendants described how the teens
were subjected to an hour-long mass rape at the hands of the
Black and White youth gang. It was established, though, that
Pena's front teeth were knocked out while she was still alive,
and that three of Ertman's ribs were broken after she died.
Prosecutor Donna Goode theorized the blows were struck with
Cantu's steel-toed work boots. As he has all week, Cantu, 19,
scribbled, read documents and whispered to defense attorney
Donald Davis throughout the grueling testimony, seldom looking
up or appearing anything but placid. He faces a possible death
penalty if convicted of capital murder in the June 24 slayings,
which occurred after the girls took a shortcut down a stretch of
railroad tracks and walked into a gang initiation late that
night. Cantu was leader of the gang and, prosecutors said,
directed the killings after Pena and Ertman had been raped. The
teens were strangled with a belt and shoelaces, and then had
their throats stomped, witnesses said. State District Judge Bill
Harmon hopes attorneys can argue Cantu's guilt or innocence of
the charges Thursday after police witnesses describe his
confession to jurors.
WED 02/02/94
Stranglings solved after brother's tip/Disgusted by gang,
he revealed location
An older brother's long-simmering resentment of his cocky
younger brother helped police solve the rape-murders of two
Houston teen-age girls, according to testimony Tuesday at Peter
Cantu's capital murder trial. Joe Adam Cantu, the accused
killer's 21-year-old brother, told jurors he was so disgusted to
learn that Peter Cantu had directed the Black and White gang in
strangling the teens after a mass rape June 24 that he
telephoned police. Pretending to be someone named "Gonzalez," he
dialed the police 911 emergency number and informed authorities
exactly where to find the bodies of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and
Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14. The call not only helped police locate
the girls' decomposing remains near the railroad trestle over
White Oak Bayou on June 28, but the call eventually led to the
arrest of gang members who were charged with raping and killing
the girls. Police traced the call to Joe Cantu, who helped
officers find Derrick Sean O'Brien, Jose "Joe" Medellin,
Venancio "Vinny" Medellin and Efrain "Junior" Perez, who were
later charged along with Peter Cantu. The only person allegedly
involved who Joe Cantu did not identify for police was Raul
Villarreal, who had become a full-fledged gang member only
minutes before the killings. O'Brien, Jose Medellin, Perez and
Villarreal, all 19, are awaiting prosecution for capital murder.
While Joe Cantu was testifying Tuesday, his brother Peter Cantu
never looked directly at him, only glancing toward him when he
was asked to identify small pieces of evidence. Instead, Peter
Cantu appeared to be reading documents and whispering to his
lawyer, Donald Davis, as Joe Cantu spent more than an hour
telling jurors in state District Judge Bill Harmon's court about
the Black and White gang and his brother. As Joe Cantu
explained, the gang was formed six years ago and was named after
the black and white clothing worn by its members. The gang was a
small group of friends, according to Joe Cantu, who made it
sound like a social group that disdained serious crime. All that
changed, he told jurors, when Peter Cantu became the gang's
"self-appointed" leader. Other gang members soon began following
Peter Cantu's directions, his brother said, and that tended to
reinforce the younger brother's control. Although Joe Cantu
never said he had been leader of the gang, he described how his
relationship with Peter Cantu had become "poor" by June 1993. By
then, Joe Cantu said, he "only now and then" accompanied the
Black and White gang on outings. Yet the gang continued to use
the Cantu family home as its social center, Joe Cantu said, and
it was there that Jose Medellin, Villarreal and Perez went after
the Ertman-Pena killings. When Joe Cantu asked what happened, he
recalled someone responding: "You'll hear about it on the news."
Cantu said he asked who got killed and Jose Medellin answered:
"A couple of chicks." Cantu testified that he and his wife,
Christina Cantu, 16, pressed Medellin, Villarreal and Perez for
details, at which point Villarreal and Perez admitted raping the
girls. When Peter Cantu came in later, the older brother
testified, he watched as the group divided up the rings, chains
and a small amount of cash taken from the girls. Joe Cantu
admitted that his brother gave him a chain, which he
subsequently pawned. Once the girls' belonging were split up,
Joe Cantu testified, the group began explaining what they had
done, with Peter Cantu acknowledging that it was all true.
Medellin, the older brother said, complained about the trouble
they had killing one of the girls. Joe Cantu recalled Medellin
observing: "It would've been easier with a gun." One of the
girls had bitten Perez during the rapes, Joe Cantu said, and the
gang members "all got a big laugh out of that." Their laughing,
joking, blood-stained clothes and descriptions were so cold and
vivid, Joe Cantu told jurors, that Christina Cantu had
nightmares afterward. "I couldn't stand to see my wife that
way," he said. Joe Cantu said he was so disgusted by what his
brother and the gang had done, and knew the victims' parents had
to be worried about their missing daughters, that he decided to
call police.
TUE 02/01/94
Girls' hour of terror before death detailed
15-year-old tells how gang initiation led to slayings
To get home 15 minutes faster and avoid a scolding, two teen-age
girls took a shortcut June 24 and blundered into a gang of
drunken youths who raped them for an hour before strangling
them, testimony showed Monday. The deaths of Jennifer Lee
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, were described in sad,
sterile terms by Venancio Medellin, now 15, a key state witness
in the capital murder trial of Peter Anthony Cantu. Now serving
a 40-year sentence received in a juvenile court, the teen
repeatedly marveled aloud at the life-wrecking mess he got into
because he went out socially with his brother, Jose "Joe"
Medellin, 19, one of five Black and White gang members accused
of the killings. The witness said he stood between the two girls
as they were being raped "every way you can assault a human
being," as a prosecutor phrased it. The teen-ager said he kept
thinking, "Why did this have to happen to me the first time?"
Venancio Medellin and brothers Roman and Frank Sandoval, who
left just as the girls were being dragged away, said they were
among seven teens who accompanied Cantu to "the tracks" late at
night to drink beer. But after reaching the site, a railroad
trestle in northwest Houston over White Oak Bayou, they
discovered that Cantu's main objective was to initiate a new
Black and White member, Raul Omar Villarreal, 19. To gain
admittance, Villarreal had to spend a half-hour having
five-minute punching and kicking fights with gang members to
prove, in effect, he was worthy of membership. The youths then
went to the middle of the trestle to sip malt liquor,
congratulate Villarreal and brief him on gang etiquette, such as
not getting too upset if another member jokes about having sex
with one's mother. The girls then began approaching on the
tracks, two indistinct forms on a dark night. The gang first
thought they were a male and a female, and Cantu, 19, decided
immediately he wanted to fight the male. Frank Sandoval was
already leaving with his brother, largely because he thought the
members were "all hyper and drunk, getting out of control." As
they left, the Sandovals passed two young girls, and Roman
glanced back. "Joe Medellin grabbed one of the girls, the tall
girl (Pena)," Sandoval told jurors. "She was screaming to
Jennifer. She was saying, "Help me, Jennifer.' " Ertman was past
the gang and could have run to safety, testimony suggested, but
she hurried back to help her friend. Venancio Medellin said he
saw Cantu grab Ertman's wrist and drag her down the railroad
embankment toward the dirt area where Villarreal had just
finished fighting for his membership. Moments later, the witness
continued, Cantu made Ertman undergo the first in a long series
of sex acts, while Pena had been stripped nearby and was being
assaulted by two gang members in turn. Venancio Medellin said he
stood between the crying girls. He asked his brother to stop,
only to be ignored, then made the same request of Cantu. Every
time, he said, Cantu told him: "Get some." The boy said he had
felt that Jose Medellin and Cantu were the only ones who might
listen to him. The third time he pleaded with Cantu, Venancio
Medellin admitted, he yielded to the defendant's demands and had
intercourse with Ertman. That landed him in sex offender therapy
at the Texas Youth Commission's maximum-security facility at
Giddings. The teen said he watched as the four youths who had
raped Pena began molesting Ertman, and that Cantu then spoke
with him privately. "He talked low to me," Medellin testified.
"He said, "We're going to have to kill them.' I said, "What?' "
At Cantu's directions, the teen told prosecutor Don Smyth, the
gang members led the girls toward a nearby wooded area. Then, he
said, his brother instructed him to stay back because he was
"too small to watch." Still, he said, he could see Villarreal
and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 19, put Ertman on her knees, get on
either side of her and loop a belt around her neck. He said he
saw her gagging and clawing at the belt with her hands as the
pair strangled her. Pena was similarly killed, apparently with
shoelaces, at a point in the trees beyond his vision. The day's
final witness, Cantu's sister-in-law, Christina Cantu, 16, said
Jose Medellin, Efrain Perez and Villarreal arrived at the family
home at 1128 Ashland soon after the killings with blood on their
clothes. "I asked them what happened," she testified. Medellin
and Perez said, " "We had a lot of fun,' like it was a big
joke." The trio later told a rambling story of meeting "two
bitches and having a lot of fun with them," Christine Cantu
explained. When Peter Cantu arrived, the gang quickly began
dividing the $40 and the many rings and necklaces stolen from
the girls, she said. Jose Medellin, she said, boasted he had
"virgin's blood" on his underpants.
FRI 01/28/94
Murder trial to begin
Testimony will begin Monday in the capital murder trial of Peter
Anthony Cantu, 19, leader of a group facing possible death
penalties in the June 24 rape-slayings of two girls near a
northwest Houston railroad trestle. Twelve jurors and an
alternate were picked to hear testimony in the deaths of
Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, after they walked
into what police described as a gang initiation.
SAT 01/15/94
Charge in stabbing
A teen awaiting prosecution in the killings of Elizabeth Pena
and Jennifer Lee Ertman was charged Friday with stabbing another
Harris County Jail prisoner in a dispute over a newspaper. The
new assault charge against Raul Omar Villarreal, 19, grew out of
a Jan. 12 incident where another prisoner, Lynn Holland, 24, was
stabbed in the side with a homemade metal shank.
FRI 01/07/94
Prospective jurors queried as teen's murder trial begins
Jury selection began Thursday in the capital murder trial of
Peter Anthony Cantu, the leader of a group of teens facing
charges in the June 24 rape-murders of two teen-age girls. The
first 30 juror prospects were brought to state District Judge
Bill Harmon's court for questioning as a group, before attorneys
begin the process of asking them individually about their views
on the death penalty. Harmon said selection of a full panel,
plus an alternate, may take three weeks. One defense attorney
estimated that testimony would take about a week. Elizabeth
Pena, 16, and Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14, were walking home from a
party when they happened upon a gang initiation being run by
Cantu, 18, and five other youths near a railroad trestle, police
have said. Authorities said the girls were gang-raped, strangled
with shoelaces and a belt, then had their throats stomped on, at
Cantu's directions. On Thursday, Cantu, seated beside his
lawyers, Donald Davis and Robert Morrow, smiled often during the
selection process. Still awaiting prosecution on capital charges
are Raul Omar Villarreal, 18; Efrain Perez, 18; Jose Ernesto
Medellin, 18, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18. Medellin's younger
brother, Venancio Medellin Jr., 14, was sentenced by a juvenile
court judge to a 40-year term in the same case on Sept. 30.
SAT 01/01/94
Killings dipped here in '93, but brutality didn't
Houston police Officer Danny Vaughan was shot in the head in the
middle of a police station in March. Elizabeth Pena, 16, and
Jennifer Ertman, 14, were gang raped and strangled beside a
railroad trestle in June. Robbie Allen Bayley, 18, was beaten to
death in the woods in July, and the site of his decaying body
attracted dozens of curious teen-agers, none of whom alerted
police. These are but a few of the bizarre and brutal cases
handled by the Houston homicide division in 1993, a year with a
relatively low homicide total but an abundance of the unusual.
January 1993 was a particularly bloody month with 62 homicides,
but it would not set the trend for the year. By year's end the
homicide tally was 497 compared with 502 in 1992 and 671 in
1991, which had the third highest total in Houston history. The
highest total ever was 701 in 1981. The second highest was 684
in 1982. Though homicide rates have been plotted along with
weather, unemployment rates and even moon phases, investigators
say they have no idea what makes one year deadlier than the
next. "You never know about homicides, whether it's going to be
low or high," homicide Lt. Joe Kunkel said. But 1993 saw the
first time ever in Houston that a police officer was shot in the
head in a police station. "I'm just surprised it hasn't happened
before," Kunkel said. Vaughan, a 10-year HPD veteran, was
filling in for a sick desk officer on a quiet Saturday morning,
March 20, at the South Central Police Substation. A man wearing
a backpack and a yellow T-shirt walked in and asked to see a
supervisor. Vaughan, who had been in the back of the station,
happened to walk into the front office at that moment. Vaughan
was wearing plain clothes. The gunman apparently mistook that
for a sign that he was a supervisor. He pulled a gun from the
backpack and shot the officer twice in the head. As other
officers dived for cover, the gunman slipped out. Minutes later,
Gilbert Smith, 22, was pulled from under a shotgun shack a few
blocks away. The arresting officers had to restrain some of
their own to get Smith to a patrol car. A female officer who
witnessed the shooting grabbed Smith by the hair, jerked his
head back and screamed, "It's him!" In the days that followed,
Smith was charged in another shooting, but, unlike Vaughan who
made a hard-fought recovery, bail bond office worker Steve
Meyer, 26, died in his office from three gunshot wounds to the
head. It was the night before Vaughan's shooting. Smith, who is
black, would later tell a jury he killed the Indiana University
student because he was white. As the summer heated up, the
homicide total continued to decline. But on a blistering June
afternoon an anonymous tip led homicide investigators to an old
railroad trestle and the nude, decomposed bodies of Ertman, 14,
and Pena, 16. The girls were returning from a June 24 party at
an apartment complex in the 4200 block of West 34th. The trestle
was a shortcut to Pena's home on the near northwest side. It was
also the gathering point for a group of teen-age boys performing
a gang initiation rite. The rite involved fighting and drinking
beer. When Ertman and Pena happened by, it led to rape and
murder. The girls were subjected "to just about every sex act
you can imagine, and a few you just couldn't imagine," a
homicide source said. Then they were strangled. The boys jumped
up and down on their throats to make sure they were dead. Five
days later police made their arrests. Charged with capital
murder and held without bond are Peter Anthony Cantu, 18, of
1128 Ashland; Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18, of 4000 W. 34th; Efrain
Perez, 17, of 2100 Beaver Bend; Raul Omar Villarreal, 17, of
4010 Chapman; and Jose Ernesto Medellin, 18, of 9211 Brackley.
All are awaiting trial. One suspect's 14-year-old brother is
being held by juvenile authorities. Sometime in the next month
two teen-agers lured Bayley into the woods of Bear Creek Park
near Langham Creek. They beat him to death for a drug theft,
police said. All Bayley's friends knew he was dead, knew where
his body lay, but no one told police or Bayley's family. Rather,
they took field trips to the site, taking pieces of his body and
hair as souvenirs, police said. One teen even brought a date to
view the body. In mid-August, two boys playing with BB guns
found the corpse, but authorities didn't know it was Bayley
until an anonymous caller said they should check Bayley's dental
records to identify the body. A 16-year-old boy was arrested in
November, and a 17-year-old in December. Both are being handled
by juvenile authorities.
TUE 11/23/93
3 teens lose bid to move trials
Three more youths facing possible death penalties in the
rape-murders of two girls lost bids Monday to have their capital
murder trials moved out of Harris County. State District Judge
Doug Shaver refused venue changes to Raul Omar Villarreal, Jose
Ernesto Medellin and Derrick Sean O'Brien, all 18. They are
charged in different courts, but Shaver presided over what was
called a consolidated hearing. Alleged gang leader Peter Anthony
Cantu, 18, lost his bid last month to get his trial moved from
Houston, while no venue change motion has been filed yet for the
fifth defendant, Efrain Perez. Jury selection in all five trials
is to start March 1, and testimony is to begin April 4. The idea
is that simultaneous trials will minimize the publicity. The
youths will be tried in the June 24 killings of Elizabeth Pena,
16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14. They were walking home from a party
when they happened onto the group of youths at a railroad
trestle in northwest Houston, prosecutors said. The girls were
gang-raped, then strangled. Defense attorneys sought to move the
cases because of intense local media coverage. Prosecutors,
however, said fair jurors whose opinions haven't been
contaminated by talk and media accounts can be picked from
Harris County's huge population base.
FRI 11/19/93
Memorial for Ertman and Pena is dedicated
Classmates of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena have not
forgotten how they died. And Thursday they wanted to remind
others how violence is ripping apart their community. About 100
students at Waltrip High School in the Heights gathered in a
circle clutching each other's hands and fighting back tears as a
memorial was dedicated to Ertman, 14, and Pena, 16, who were
raped, beaten and strangled. Six teen-agers have been charged.
"We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are,"
reads the plaque, calling on the girls' friends to help end the
kind of violence that ended their lives. "I want everyone to
know we will always remember them," said Leslie Rodriguez, 15, a
student who organized the fund-raising for the memorial. "It's
here to ask people to change their ways and make a difference."
Rodriguez said the students chose to plant a crepe myrtle behind
the 3-foot-tall memorial to represent the fragility of life.
After the tree was planted, the students prayed. Pena's father
Adolph Pena, stood in front of the plaque holding hands with his
daughter's friends. A few spaces down, Ertman's father, Randy
Ertman, held hands with Bob Carreiro, whose daughter, Kynara, 7,
and her best friend, Kristin Wiley, 10, were stabbed to death
July 20, 1992, in the Wiley home in northwest Harris County. The
slayings remain unsolved. After a brief dedication by Rodriguez
and Anne-Marie Franz, a teacher who helped the students with the
memorial, the students wended their way to the plaque, many
touching it, then blessing themselves. Others just stood and
stared as tears welled. Randy Ertman's eyes filled with tears as
he walked away from the plaque. "All of these children did this
out of their own pockets," he said. "I can't ask for more than
that. All I can do is thank them." Pena's father said he is
proud of the students' efforts. "But I'm also sad that they have
to do this for their friends," he said.
FRI 10/29/93
Judge won't move trial of defendant Cantu
Peter Anthony Cantu, leader of a group of youths accused of
raping and strangling two girls near a railroad trestle, will
not have his capital murder trial moved out of Harris County.
State District Judge Bill Harmon rejected a motion by Cantu's
attorneys Thursday to change the venue out of Harris County as a
result of intensive publicity. The judge based his decision on
the outcome of an opinion-sampling session with 35 juror
prospects. Cantu is the first of the five 18-year-olds charged
in the June 24 murders of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer
Ertman, 14, to have their venue motions decided by a judge.
State District Judge Doug Shaver will hear similar motions for
the other defendants Nov. 22. By rejecting the venue bid from
lawyers Robert Morrow and Donald Davis, Harmon moved closer to
falling into step with judges presiding over the cases against
Cantu's co-defendants, Raul Omar Villarreal, Efrain Perez, Jose
Ernesto Medellin and Derrick Sean O'Brien. The other judges want
to start jury selection March 1 in all the capital cases. That
tactic is meant to minimize publicity, but Harmon, citing other
pressing cases, had indicated he might start the Cantu trial
earlier. By calling in 35 juror candidates to find out how they
had been affected by media coverage of the two girls' deaths,
Harmon was following his own precedent, set in 1990 when he
quizzed 50 candidates about their knowledge of the killing of
Houston motorcycle policeman James Irby. During Harmon's poll of
that group on Aug. 16, 1990, he found that 43 of the 50 had
heard Irby's name, but only 13 had formed media-influenced
opinions of defendant Carl Wayne Buntion's guilt or innocence.
Harmon moved the Buntion trial to Fredericksburg, where the
nine-time ex-convict was sentenced Jan. 24, 1991, to die by
injection. Harmon indicated that the most telling finding in the
Cantu case was that only eight of the 35 people said their
opinions had been irretrievably influenced by news accounts of
how the girls were killed after walking accidentally into a gang
initiation.
Excerpt from Texas Magazine
SUN 10/24/93
When the phone rings, it is
Sandra Ertman who answers. Her voice is a gravelly monotone.
It's been just a few months since the death of her 14-year-old
daughter at the hands of six teen-agers. She still sounds lost.
Ertman used to stay busy taking care of Jennifer and doing
chores around the house. Now she has the chores and the
memories. Ertman swallows a sob. "My husband and I take it one
day at a time," she says. "We're joining different
organizations, trying to help out." They want to tell parents to
take responsibility for their kids, to help them with peer
pressure and self-esteem problems, to keep them away from movies
and TV shows that legitimize violence. Having to work, they say,
is no excuse for lousy parenting. The Ertmans also want to see
the juvenile justice system overhauled, with stiffer penalties
for teen-age thugs. The punishments handed out to teen-agers
today, they say, amount to a pat on the hand, a joke.
It's not known yet what will happen to five of the six teens who
raped, beat and strangled Jennifer and her 16-year-old friend,
Elizabeth Pena, as they walked home after a party in northwest
Houston. They have been charged with capital murder, two counts
each. The penalty for their crimes could be death. The youngest
criminal involved, a 14-year-old, recently wound his way through
the juvenile justice system and started a 40-year sentence at
Giddings. A month before his 18th birthday he must return to
juvenile court. The teen could be released; he could be
recommitted to Giddings until his 21st birthday (though the
Giddings staff could release him earlier); or he could be sent
into the state prison system. Even if the boy goes to the
penitentiary, however, he will receive credit for time already
served. His confinement will be nowhere close to 40 years. To
the Ertmans, none of those possibilities is satisfactory. All of
those choices are stabs in the heart, another series of assaults
against victims in the juvenile justice system. If Sandra Ertman
is sad and depressed, her husband, Randy, is livid. Insane, he
describes himself. These days, Randy Ertman can barely put two
words together without starting to curse. He was brokenhearted,
he says, to lose his only child. Everyday he is tormented anew
by foul-ups in the court system. Both want the boys who
committed the atrocities against Elizabeth and Jennifer put to
death. It's what they deserve, Sandra Ertman says. "They were
old enough to know better. Any 10-year-old, any 7- or
8-year-old, knows right from wrong, knows not to do bodily harm.
"I feel no mercy." One last bit of advice to parents from Ertman
: "Teach your children to appreciate the value of a human life."
She hangs up the phone, crying.
FRI 10/22/93
2 teens want trials moved in slayings
Two more change-of-venue motions were filed this week on behalf
of teens facing possible death penalties in the June 23
rape-strangulations of two girls in northwest Houston. The
motions filed for Raul Villarreal and Jose Medellin, both 18,
cite the massive news coverage of the slayings of Elizabeth
Pena, 16, and Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14, as well as the subsequent
arrests of their five accused killers. State District Judge Bill
Harmon plans to conduct a full hearing Thursday on the first
change-of-venue motion, filed by attorneys for Peter Cantu, 18.
Harmon indicated he first wants to see a two-hour videotape of
television news broadcasts about the Ertman-Pena killings. He
may also call in a block of 50 juror candidates to determine how
many of them have heard of the deaths and whether they can set
aside any opinions they may have already formed.
The judge took a similar step in 1990 before moving Carl Wayne
Buntion's capital murder trial to Fredericksburg. A jury there
sentenced Buntion in 1991 to die by injection for the killing of
Houston motorcycle police Officer James Irby. Judges overseeing
the capital cases against Medellin, Villarreal, Efrain Perez,
17, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, have agreed to try all of them
simultaneously starting March 1 in an effort to avoid drawing
out the publicity that would be generated by holding their
trials one after the other. Whether Harmon joins those judges
will be determined by his decision on the Cantu venue issue. If
he doesn't move the trial out of Harris County, and if he
completes the Gerald Eldridge capital trial in January-February,
he may join them in starting jury selection for Cantu on March
1.
FRI 10/01/93
Boy, 14, gets 40 years for rape-slayings
The 14-year-old co-defendant of five youths facing death
penalties in the rape-murders of two Houston girls was sentenced
Thursday to a 40-year term that can end in parole in less than
four years. State District Judge Robert Lowry sentenced Venancio
Medellin Jr. to the maximum term possible in Texas juvenile
courts, but it wasn't nearly enough to placate the parents of
the girls killed June 24 when they happened onto a gang
initiation near a northwest Houston railroad trestle. "How can
anyone tell us justice is working?" said Adolfo Pena, father of
16-year-old Elizabeth Pena. "I don't care if he's 14. He's a
sick individual. He's an animal!" Randy Ertman, father of
14-year-old Jennifer Lee Ertman, went even farther and called
for a death penalty for Medellin. Medellin, whose brother Jose
Ernesto Medellin, 18, is charged with capital murder in the same
case, admitted in court that he'd forced sex on Jennifer Ertman.
Unlike the adult defendants, the 14-year-old was not accused of
stomping on the girls' necks and strangling them with shoelaces
and a belt. The 14-year-old said little in court, but he kept
glancing nervously at the large audience and cluster of
television cameras behind him. One of his lawyers, Esmeralda
Pena-Garcia, read a statement from the teen outside the
courtroom later. "I'm very sorry for what happened," he said in
the statement. "I wish I could go back and do something to help
the girls. I lay awake every night and wish I had fought the
other (defendants), even my brother, to protect them." Weeks of
discussion between prosecutor Robert Thomas with Venancio
Medellin's lawyers, Pena-Garcia and Joel Salazar, preceded the
brief proceeding in Lowry's court. Defense attorneys had been
reluctant to let their client receive a maximum penalty, but
Pena-Garcia said she decided Wednesday it would be "the best
thing for the juvenile to do what we did today." If he stays out
of trouble in the Texas Youth Commission, he could be returned
to the same juvenile court a month before his 18th birthday and
then be freed on probation until he's 21. If his conduct is bad,
though, he could be funneled from a juvenile lockup straight
into the state prison system for the rest of the 40-year term.
However, he will receive credit for time already served, making
him eligible for parole within months. Regardless of which
avenue he enters, he'll likely be released by 1997-98. Since
he's less than 15 1/2 years old, he couldn't legally be
certified as an adult and prosecuted in state district court
with his co-defendants. One possibility is that Venancio
Medellin now may become a prosecution witness at the capital
murder trials early next year of his brother; Raul Omar
Villarreal, 18; Peter Anthony Cantu, 18; Efrain Perez, 17, and
Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18. Thomas and the defense attorneys said
that wasn't an ironclad condition attached to his admission in
the Ertman rape. "It's not out of the question," Pena-Garcia
said. "It's basically up to him." But attorneys for the adult
defendants said having the 14-year-old testify for the
prosecution may not even be necessary. Prosecutors are already
armed with full confessions.
TUE 09/28/93
Judge may try case early
Move could prevent 5 trials at once
Judges handling capital murder cases against five teen-agers
accused in the killings of two girls agreed Monday it would cut
costs and pre-trial publicity to try the suspects simultaneously
in February. However, state District Judge Bill Harmon,
overseeing the case against Peter Anthony Cantu, 18, said if his
trial is moved out of Houston, he plans to start it in January.
Why? Because, Harmon indicated, he's ready now. "I'm just not
going to wait ... Not if I have a change of venue," Harmon said,
after the initial meeting among judges, prosecutors handling the
cases and attorneys for the defendants. Harris County judges
have been working to devise a way to avoid trying the five cases
one after another, setting up massive publicity for each
separate case and increasing costs for transcripts, witness
travel and more as the trials drag on for years. State District
Judge Doug Shaver, handling the case against Raul Villarreal,
18, favored all five judges starting jury selection Feb. 28 and
starting testimony April 4. Everyone agreed that would be a good
idea. But Harmon went on to say his plan, if his trial goes out
of Houston, is to start selection in early January. Cantu
reportedly was the leader of the group of teen-agers who
allegedly were conducting a gang initiation on June 24 when the
victims, Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14,
happened to walk onto the scene near a railroad trestle in
northwest Houston. The girls were raped and strangled. It is
widely expected that Harmon will move Cantu's trial. And if that
trial ends in a death penalty, the outcome is expected to be
massive media coverage in Harris County, just as the other four
trials are getting under way. By having one of the trials start
early, Shaver indicated, it could cause postponement of the
others, upping publicity and trial costs. Other defendants
include Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18; Jose Ernesto Medellin, 18, and
Efrain Perez, 17.
THU 09/16/93
Judges call for 5 trials at one time
Case of girls' killings poses time problems
Rather than stage one case-clearing capital murder trial for all
five Houston teens charged with raping and strangling two girls
June 24, Harris County's Board of District Judges decided
Wednesday to conduct all five trials simultaneously -- but in
different courts. The idea, endorsed by the 22 felony court
judges, is only the latest to evolve as officials ponder ways to
reduce the time and cost of handling these cases. Judges now
must see if prosecutors and defense attorneys will agree to the
arrangement. The bottom line, state District Judge Doug Shaver
said, is time. If the trials occur normally in the five courts
where they are now pending, Shaver said, it could take three to
four years to try all the defendants. "And that's pretty
optimistic," state District Judge Miron Love added. Without
finding a method of expediting matters, Love said, the trials
still could be occurring at the end of the decade. And every
time one trial ends, attorneys for the remaining defendants or
defendant could then legitimately demand full transcripts for
all proceeding trials, stalling things and adding to the final
bill. As another time-saver, judges approved removing the case
of defendant Derrick Sean O'Brien from state District Judge
Donald Shipley's court and transferring it to state District
Judge Bob Burdette's court. The case of Raul Villarreal would
move from state District Judge A.D. Azios' court to Shaver's
court. Both Shipley and Azios have relatively crowded dockets
that could delay getting the defendants to court anytime soon.
Shipley's docket also is awash with capital cases, including the
case of Robert Coulson, accused of murdering his entire family
and setting their house afire. By trying the cases
simultaneously, it would mean all five cases could make it to
court in early 1994. The idea is a departure from Shaver's
initial suggestion to conduct one immense trial for all
defendants. The original idea was both ridiculed and welcomed by
defense lawyers for the many appeals avenues such a proceeding
might create. The five youths face possible death penalties if
convicted in June 24 rape-slayings of Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14,
and Elizabeth Pena, 16. Defendants include O'Brien, Villarreal,
Peter Anthony Cantu, Jose Ernesto Medellin and Efrain Perez.
WED 09/01/93
One trial, 5 juries urged in slay case/Cost would be cut but
chaos feared
Some prosecutors and judges would like to seat five juries
simultaneously and conduct one enormous capital murder trial for
all five Houston teens charged with raping and strangling two
girls June 24. State District Judge Doug Shaver said doing one
three-month-long trial could mean "a staggering savings" to
taxpayers and less stress for witnesses, who otherwise would be
coming back to the Harris County Courthouse repeatedly for five
separate trials that could take years. But attorneys for some of
the five gang members say conducting such a trial would create
endless chaos. One lawyer, Lon Harper, said it would be "the
Astroworld of criminal justice." Just finding a location for the
trial wouldn't be easy. It might take something as large as
Astroworld to accommodate five juries and 10 or more sheriff's
deputies, five or 10 court clerks, three or more prosecutors, 10
defense lawyers, numerous members of the media and the countless
people who would turn out to watch. Judges said it could be the
largest criminal trial in Texas history, not to mention the
first time -- perhaps in U.S. history -- that five death penalty
defendants go through complete capital trials together. Shaver,
Harris County's administrator for 22 felony courts, also would
like to use the trial to launch an abbreviated form of jury
selection. In the past, potential jurors have been quizzed
individually, a process that can take more than a month before a
dozen jurors are picked to hear testimony. What Shaver would
like to do is bring in 500 to 600 prospective jurors and spend a
day questioning them. Those who meet the criteria for
disqualification -- for example, people who have extreme
handicaps, who have relatives in prison and dislike the police
or those who can't consider anything other than an absolute
maximum or minimum punishment -- would be excused. Remaining
jury candidates would be divided into groups and questioned
individually on just one issue -- finding out if they can vote
to impose a death penalty. The actual trial would involve the
same witnesses covering the same ground they would at five
separate trials -- the people who found the bodies, the coroner
who performed the autopsies, and others such as evidence
technicians. Things might get complex, though, when it comes to
the written statements given police by defendants Derrick Sean
O'Brien, 18; Raul Villarreal, 17; Efrain Perez, 17; Peter
Anthony Cantu, 18; and Jose Medellin, 18. Some blame their
co-defendants for the killings of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and
Jennifer Ertman, 14. Some admit to being only small actors in
the sexual attacks and murders. A major snag in the whole idea,
said state District Judge Miron Love, is that staging such a
trial would require the consent of all lawyers representing the
five teens. And interviews with a few of the attorneys indicate
they will not agree. Attorney Don Davis, representing Cantu,
recalled a time recently when state District Judge Jim Barr
tried simultaneously seven gang members accused of rape,
creating a virtual mob scene in the small courtroom. "All
parties, including the judge and the prosecutor, decided it was
completely unmanageable," Davis said. One lawyer said even
trying to have such a trial would open "fertile grounds for
appeal."
TUE 08/31/93
Five teens indicted for capital murder in 2 girls' deaths
Five Houston teens accused of gang raping and strangling two
girls were indicted Monday by a Harris County grand jury on
capital murder charges. Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18; Raul
Villarreal, 17; Efrain Perez, 17; Peter Anthony Cantu, 18; and
Jose Medellin, 18, all face death penalties if convicted in the
June 24 slayings of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14.
All except Villarreal were indicted for murder in the course of
rape, robbery and kidnapping. Villarreal's indictment differs in
that while he is accused of kidnapping and raping in the course
of murder, he is not accused of robbing either of them.
Assistant District Attorney Don Smyth said there was
insufficient evidence to believe Villarreal shared in whatever
may have been taken from the bodies. Smyth would not identify
what the teens allegedly stole. "Either property or cash was
taken from the girls during the incident, but I'm not going to
say any more about it than that," Smyth said. A 14-year-old, who
allegedly took part in the killings, is being prosecuted in
juvenile courts and will not face the death penalty.
Investigators said the girls were walking through a wooded area
to Pena's house after a party June 24 when they came across the
group. Cantu, the purported leader, was conducting what was
described as beer-drinking gang initiation rites. The girls'
bodies were found June 28. Both had been sexually assaulted,
beaten and strangled. Police arrested the six youths the next
day. The grand jury met for two days, Wednesday and Monday,
before returning indictments. The only witness to appear before
the panel whom Smyth would identify was the medical examiner who
performed autopsies on the girls. Asked if the two boys who were
present before the violence began appeared before the grand
jury, Smyth said: "I won't comment on that." All now face
arraignment in the five courts in which they are charged. They
remain in the Harris County Jail with no bond. Cantu will be the
first tried, in early 1994 in state District Judge Bill Harmon's
court.
WED 08/25/93 DA approves proposal to seek death penalty for teens in
slayings
District Attorney John B. Holmes Jr. approved Tuesday his
staff's proposal to seek death penalties for all five Houston
teens charged with capital murder in the gang rape and
strangulation killings of two girls. Holmes' decision came after
meeting with prosecutors handling the cases scattered about in
different courts, each of which now face weeks of jury selection
to pick panels to hear the cases. If Harris County grand jurors
agree, Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18, Raul Villarreal, 17, Efrain
Perez, 17, Peter Anthony Cantu, 18, and Jose Medellin, 18, all
will face death penalties if convicted in the June 24 slayings
of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14. The only accused
participant in the killings who will not face the death penalty
will be a 14-year-old. He's being prosecuted in juvenile courts.
According to police, the girls were en route home when they
neared a railroad trestle where Cantu, purported leader of the
group, was directing what was described as a beer-drinking gang
initiation.
THU 07/29/93 Teens' murders lead residents to start crime-watch programs
Last year, Chris Branson couldn't muster up enough concerned Oak
Forest residents to start a neighborhood crime watch. Now, one
month after the bodies of two teen-age girls were found in a
heavily wooded area nearby, they're calling on Branson. "We're
scared," said Branson, president of the Oak Forest Homeowner's
Association. "We thought that area was a nice, serene place and
then we find out that there are murderers holding meetings in
the woods. That has spooked us." Residents have begun organizing
a group to patrol the neighborhood and help the city clear
underbrush from the southern tip of T.C. Jester Park -- a wooded
area residents call a haven for crime. Directly west of those
woods, across White Oak Bayou, is where the bodies of Jennifer
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, were found June 28. They had
been sexually assaulted, beaten and strangled, police officers
said. Six boys, ages 14 to 18, have been arrested in connection
with the deaths. Five have been charged with capital murder; the
youngest is being handled by juvenile authorities. "These crimes
are starting to hit home," Branson said. "We don't want them to
spread to our homes." Oak Forest residents will join with Parks
Department workers on Saturday to clear underbrush from the
southern half-acre of the park. Houston Police Department
Captain Jerry DeFloor said it might help. "I think it would make
that area more visible from the street (T.C. Jester Boulevard),"
he said. "That visibility would definitely make troublesome kids
think twice before they do anything." Branson said police should
patrol the wooded area where the girls were found, but DeFloor
said that would be difficult because the area is landlocked and
much of it is privately owned. City Neighborhood Protection
department officials have contacted the owner of the nearby
property. Parks inspector Jeanette Rogers said W.D. York Sr.,
who has a work address of 8729 Gulf Freeway, owns 11 acres of
the wooded area, and he has been notified that he must clear his
property of the dense underbrush. York's secretary said he was
out of town and could not be reached for comment, but that he
has agreed to clear the property. She added that it's not
certain that the girls' bodies were found on his property.
Harris County Appraisal District maps show the Harris County
Flood Control district owns 19 acres along the east side of
York's property. Rogers said clearing the dense wooded area may
not make much difference. "You know that place is thick and
there are all those pine trees and leaves and needles keep
falling," Rogers said. "It's not easy to keep those areas
cleared, and there are places like that all over Houston. Even
if it were cleared, I don't know how much of a difference it
would make."
TUE 07/27/93
Slain girls' dads get letters from Clinton
The fathers of two teen-age girls who were slain last month said
Monday that letters of condolence from President Clinton helped
ease their sorrow. The bodies of Randy Ertman's 14-year-old
daughter, Jennifer, and her friend, Elizabeth Pena, 16, were
found June 28. Both had been sexually assaulted, beaten and
strangled. The next day, police arrested six youths, ages 14 to
18, in the case. The five oldest have been charged with capital
murder; the youngest is being handled by juvenile authorities.
Investigators said the girls were walking through a wooded area
to Pena's house after a party June 24 when they came across the
young gang members, who were conducting initiation rites and
drinking beer. "I was deeply saddened by the news of Jennifer's
death," Clinton wrote to Ertman in a letter dated July 14. "The
death of a young person is especially tragic, and my heart goes
out to you. As a parent and as president, I feel strongly that
we must make America's streets safer for our children. Working
together, as parents, neighbors, and law enforcement officials,
we must dedicate ourselves to preventing senseless violence in
our communities." The letter, similar to one sent to the Pena
family, concluded: "You are in my thoughts and my prayers."
Adolph Pena said the letter was "pretty moving." At the same
time, Pena said, he was "pretty excited about it, to get one,
from the president. It's hard to put it in words." Ertman said
the death of his daughter has shattered his world. He added: "I
know I'm just a little person in the giant scheme of things.
This helps a lot," he said of Clinton's letter. "It makes you
feel pretty good, and I'd like to tell him, 'Thank you.' I used
to be a Republican," Ertman added. "Now I'm a Democrat."
WED 07/21/93
One defendant faces gag order in gang rape-slaying
A gag order was issued Tuesday in the case of one of five
Houston teens charged with capital murder in the June 24 gang
rape and strangulation of two girls. State District Judge Donald
K. Shipley granted a prosecution motion banning Derrick Sean
O'Brien, 18, and parties in his case from telling news
organizations about the slayings of Elizabeth Pena, 16, and
Jennifer Ertman, 14. The order was aimed solely at O'Brien and
his attorney, Lon Harper, who were preparing for an interview
today with a crew from "NBC News." The crew, which was waiting
in a downtown Houston hotel, was to have taped O'Brien in the
Harris County jail. Although the order killed the O'Brien
interview, it was not expected to apply in courts where similar
capital murder charges, based on the same facts, are pending
against others allegedly involved in the slayings -- Raul
Villarreal, 17, Efrain Perez, 17, Peter Anthony Cantu, 18, and
Jose Medellin, 18. Harper said his client, whose picture
dominates an entire page in the current issue of Newsweek
magazine, has been pilloried by the media, the police and the
prosecution. Harper said it's time for the world to know O'Brien
isn't "a cold-blooded killer. A TV interview would show he's
just a scared little kid," Harper explained. "He wants to talk
to the media. He wants to give one interview." Prosecutor
Jeannine Barr, who urged Shipley to prohibit the jailhouse
interview, said she was worried about the impact of such an
interview on O'Brien's trial. Barr also said that by exposing
his client to the public in such a way, Harper might set up an
"incompetent counsel" appeal if O'Brien is convicted. Harper had
acknowledged beforehand that an appeal could result if a
court-appointed lawyer "threw his client to the wolves." He also
acknowledged that many other lawyers would question the
propriety of allowing it to happen. Yet Harper has been freely
discussing details of the case with local reporters, dangling
the possibility of interviewing O'Brien before each of them, but
in the end he opted to give it to NBC. Also increasing the
stakes was another TV interview, done as part of a local
station's coverage of teen gangs a week before the girls were
killed, in which O'Brien was taped hoisting a can of beer and
saying: "Human life means nothing."
FRI 07/09/93 Forget all other options
Letter to the Editor, By J. REYNOLDS
Regarding the story, "Death may be sought against 5 --
Prosecutors weigh case against suspects in 2 girls' killings"
(Chronicle, July 8): The horror visited upon Elizabeth Pena and
Jennifer Ertman demands nothing less than capital punishment for
everyone who participated. Why any other options are even being
debated is infinitely beyond the scope of rational
understanding.
THU 07/08/93 Death may be sought against 5/Prosecutors weigh case against
suspects in 2 girls' killings
Although the investigation indicates two gang members allegedly
strangled two teen-age girls on orders of their gang leader,
prosecutors want to seek the death penalty for all five of the
adults accused in the killing. Black N White gang members Raul
Villarreal, 17, and Efrain Perez, 17, actually strangled
Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, according to
several sources who said the two acted on orders of Peter
Anthony Cantu, 18. The two least culpable members -- Jose Medellin, 18, and Derrick O'Brien, 18 -- told authorities of
their involvement in the rapes of both girls. It was O'Brien's
belt that was used to strangle Ertman, and Medellin confessed to
holding the shoelaces used to strangle Pena. This is the
scenario that a parade of prosecutors will be relating in coming
weeks to District Attorney John B. Holmes Jr., who must decide
which of the five teens -- perhaps all of them -- Harris County
juries will be asked to sentence to death. A sixth gang member
allegedly involved in the killings is 14 years old, a juvenile
who under Texas law cannot be sentenced to death. Worried
attorneys appointed to represent the five accused killers who
are 17 and over say they expect prosecutors to go all out to win
death penalty convictions for their clients. A lot can happen to
change that. A grand jury might opt not to indict one of them
for capital murder. Even if they did, a defendant might be able
to evade the death sentence by testifying against others
allegedly involved. And a trial jury could bypass a death
penalty for a teen based on his age and lack of proven future
danger. Holmes knows all that, and he knows what an expenditure
of resources it would take to tie down five district courts for
weeks-long trials. "I don't have the foggiest idea what call
I'll make on this one," he said Wednesday. When survivors of
crime victims descend on Holmes to ask about seeking the death
penalty, he usually presents them with copies of appellate
decisions that center on the second of two "special issues"
juries must consider when deciding if a defendant should be put
to death. That issue asks jurors if the accused is likely
someday to commit more crimes of violence. Prosecutors usually
try establishing a pattern of violent behavior with evidence
from the defendant's record, and in most Harris County capital
cases these records are extensive. But there have been cases --
"the worst of the bad," as Holmes describes them -- in which
prosecutors seek death penalties because of the sheer awfulness
of the crime itself. Among them are the capital murder trials of
Frances Elaine Newton and Lionell Rodriguez. Newton, a person so
serene and angelic-looking that no one could image her doing it,
was sentenced to die after she was convicted of killing her
husband and two children. Rodriguez, who had a record only for
nonviolent burglaries, got the death sentence for killing Tracy
Gee at a stop light so he could steal her car. Holmes approved
those prosecutions even though Newton didn't have so much as a
parking ticket on her record and Rodriguez was only 20 years
old. Since Newton and Rodriguez were tried, a small change in
Texas law makes it possible for prosecutors to seek what are
known as "nondeath" sentences. Previously, juries could sentence
offenders only to death or to a life term that could be served
in 15 years. At present, the choice is between death and a life
sentence that can't be served in less than 35 years. If Holmes
opts to seek the death penalty against all five gang members,
his assistants will have little to refer to from the criminal
histories of the defendants. Cantu is on probation for menacing
a man with a knife on Jan. 9. Defendant Jose Medellin, 18, will
be on probation through Sept. 22 for a misdemeanor conviction
for carrying a weapon. The other three accused killers are
clean-cut by Harris County Courthouse standards. But the crime
fits into Holmes' worst-of-the-bad category. Numerous interviews
with prosecutors, the defendants' lawyers and others indicate
that the group's alleged leader, Cantu, was the focal point of
what happened to the girls beside a railroad trestle over White
Oak Bayou after they left a party late on June 24. Even though
Cantu is not believed to have personally strangled either of the
girls, lawyers say, what happened when the girls who stumbled
into what police described as a gang "initiation" was done at
his behest. "My understanding is that Cantu gave the orders,"
prosecutor Jeannine Barr explained, "and Raul (Villarreal) and
Efrain (Perez) did the strangulations." The killings followed
what defense lawyers said was a group rape in which two or more
defendants molested each girl simultaneously, subjecting them to
a gamut of sex acts. Prosecutors said each of the six adult and
juvenile defendants somehow participated. Ertman died first,
strangled with a belt worn by O'Brien. According to several
sources, Villarreal exerted such force on the belt that it
broke, at which point he stood atop her throat. The belt later
was recovered from O'Brien's home in a police search. One
defense lawyer said Villarreal next used shoelaces to strangle
Pena, but prosecutors and others named Perez as the defendant
who pulled the laces tight and did the fatal throttling.
Medellin told police he held the laces in place at one point
during the episode. Afterward, lawyers said, all the defendants
took turns stomping and standing on the girls' necks "just to be
sure they were dead."
WED 07/07/93 Sadly, it's "human-like'
Letter to the Editor, By AMBER DUNTEN
In the July 1 story about the killings of Jennifer Ertman and
Elizabeth Pena, you reported that police described the crimes as
"animal-like" (Chronicle, July 1). I believe that was a gross
misjudgment on part of the police. Animals could never be so
sadistic, so deliberately malicious. To be honest, perhaps they
should have used the term: "human-like." Of all the violent and
predatory creatures on this planet, only humans are capable of
such sickening atrocities. It makes me sick at heart to live in
a world where such things are commonplace, and people habitually
treat each other with such profound lack of respect.
WED 07/07/93 Final vigil held for two slain girls
The funerals have been held and most of the good-byes said, but
family, friends and neighbors of Elizabeth Pena and Jennifer
Ertman gathered in tribute one final time Tuesday evening just a
few hundred yards from where the two teen-agers were slain after
a party on June 24. Between 100 and 125 mourners and
sympathizers held candles and silently prayed beneath rustling
pines near White Oak Bayou. On a park bench at the center of the
throng were the girls' parents, once more publicly grieving for
their daughters' brutal murder. Before the brief service, Adolph
Pena thanked the Houston Police Department homicide division and
the neighbors who had helped in the search for the girls, who
were missing for several days. He also called on neighbors to
organize and put pressure on the city to clear wooded areas
across from Oak Forest Park that now are havens for juvenile
delinquents. "We must band together to make our neighborhood a
safer place for all," he said in a prepared statement. Choking
back tears and unable to continue, he left the rest of the
statement to his wife, Melissa. She said any donations made to
her daughter's memorial fund will be donated to Child Search, an
organization that aids in locating missing children. "The last
thing we would like to say (is) we hope and pray the justice
system will not fail us now," she said. "We also pray that those
who have deprived us of these two beautiful children will be
punished to the full extent of the law, although there is no
punishment that can help with the pain we all have to live
with." Afterward, residents of the Oak Forest subdivision said
they were very concerned about the declining character of the
area. "It's gotten bad in the last year or so," said Joe Wick,
who has lived in the area for eight years. "The police have been
really good to us, but they can't be here all the time. It's
going fast, and if people don't wake up, it will be gone."
SAT 07/03/93 40-year sentence to be sought for juvenile
A grand jury will be asked to endorse a plan to seek up to a
40-year sentence for the 14-year-old defendant in the gang rape
and killings of two Waltrip High School girls. Juvenile
prosecutor Elizabeth Godwin said Friday she'll seek approval to
try the 14-year-old in the June 24 killings of Jennifer Lee
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, under the "determinate
sentencing" program. If grand jurors agree, and if a juvenile
court jury returns a maximum sentence, the teen could be sent to
a maximum-security juvenile facility until he's 18. If he stays
out of trouble there, he could then be freed on probation. If
not, state District Judge Eric Andell could send him to prison
for the rest of his sentence. The teen, a member of the Black N
White gang, was formally charged Friday with capital murder.
Prosecutors said the girls were walking home when they happened
onto the gang near a railroad trestle not far from White Oak
Bayou. According to police, the six gang members sexually
assaulted the girls, then strangled them. The adult defendants,
also charged with capital murder, are Peter Anthony Cantu, 18,
Jose Ernesto Medellin, 18, Efrain Perez, 17, Raul Omar
Villarreal Jr., 17, and Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18.
SAT 07/03/93 Loved ones share pain at funeral/Victim is buried near her
friend
Vanessa Rivera and Elizabeth Pena had been best friends for a
year. They had pledged to keep their bond for life. But Rivera,
15, said goodbye to Pena on Friday at St. Rose of Lima Catholic
Church, the bond broken by her friend's death. "We were the best
of friends," said Rivera, wiping away tears after Pena's
funeral. "On her birthday, she said her wish was that we stay
friends forever." Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, were raped
and killed June 24 after crossing paths with a gang of teen-age
boys near West 34th and T.C. Jester, police say. The Waltrip
High School students' bodies were found four days later. Six
members of the gang -- called the Black N Whites -- have been
charged with capital murder, including a 14-year-old. On Friday,
at 3600 Brinkman St. near West 34th, not far from where Pena
died, friends and family gathered at a church for her funeral.
During the service, the Rev. Steve Laliberte told the story of
how Mary stood silently at the foot of the cross where Jesus was
crucified. While his disciples fled in fear, Mary remained. "A
mother's love for a child can only be understood by a mother,
and today we witness the same crucifixion over again," Laliberte
said. "Today we are saddened because Elizabeth Christine has
gone from us, but we also rejoice because we know she has gone
with the almighty God. And we know one day we'll be reunited
with her in the Kingdom of our Father." Near the end of the
service, Dallas Young, 17, read a letter, speaking of the love
friends and family felt for Pena and of the anger she felt about
her friend's death. "Don't cry; she has gone on, and she'll
forever be our beautiful guardian angel," Young said in her
handwritten farewell. After the service, Young said she was
still struggling to understand. "Nobody thinks this is going to
happen to them," she said. "And nobody can imagine the pain or
how their family and friends will feel. Nobody can take this
pain away." Pena and Ertman are buried a few yards from each
other, in Woodlawn Garden of Memories Cemetery. Ertman's
funeral was Thursday.
FRI 07/02/93 Friends bid farewell to slain teen-ager
Hundreds of grieving teen-agers, overwhelmed by the tragic
reality of murder, packed a funeral home chapel Thursday to say
goodbye to a friend. They spoke softly, often clinging together,
in a subdued effort to understand Jennifer Ertman's horrifying
death. "It's hard. It really is. It's supposed to be a free
world, and you can't go out," said Monica Alvarez, 16. "Jennifer
was innocent. She had her whole life, and dumb guys like that
come and take it all away." Jennifer, 14, and Elizabeth Pena,
16, were raped and brutally murdered June 24 on their way home
from a party near West 34th and T.C. Jester in northwest
Houston. They apparently stumbled upon a gang of drinking
teen-age boys. Their bodies were found four days later. Police
say it was a crime of opportunity. Five teen-agers have been
charged with capital murder, and a 14-year-old is being held by
juvenile authorities. Little was said about the crime Thursday
at the Heights Funeral Home. Friends and family wanted to talk
about Jennifer, not how she died. "No one who has ever known her
can say Jenny was not a good person. I believe she was. I know
she was," said Randy Ertman, her father, in a written eulogy.
"Every friend she has, either called, helped or looked for her
when asked. What more can be said?" A family friend had to read
the eulogy for Ertman, who called Jennifer a "little stinker."
"Her life was short, but everyone here cared, and that's a lot
right there," the eulogy said. "All the young adults here,
please believe in your parents so that they don't have to do
this for you." One of the nearly 300 teen-agers listening was
Dallas Young, 17, who went to Waltrip High School with Jennifer.
Wearing dark glasses, she stood at the podium, near the
flower-laden casket, and said, "The thing I'll miss the most
about her is the way she laughed." While putting up posters last
week, Young said she expected Jennifer to bound out of the
woods, saying she was embarrassed by all fuss her disappearance
had caused. More fond words were spoken at the brief funeral by
longtime family friend and neighbor Earl Hatcher. "To Jennifer:
We love you. We need you. We miss you. We are here for you," he
said. Talking through tears, he reminisced about a younger
Jennifer, buzzing tirelessly up and down the street on a
go-cart. "I watched her grow up, and her interests changed from
go-carts to cars," he said. "She was becoming a woman and, like
a butterfly, I saw the transition." When the tributes were
finished, young and old began solemnly passing by the casket and
an enlarged photograph of Jennifer. Even a Houston police
homicide detective who investigated the case was there to pay
his respects. Tribute also was paid to Pena Thursday in a prayer
vigil at the Pat H. Foley Funeral Home. Friends and family, many
who also were at Jennifer's funeral, gathered to pray for the
young girl. "I won't have anyone to talk to anymore, and I lost
my best friend," said Gillian Hemphill, 15. "I just wish she was
back, that's all." Services for Pena are at 10 a.m. today at the
funeral home, 1200 W. 34th St.
THU 07/01/93
STOMACH-WRENCHING/Community sense of shock and horror over a
crime
Staff Editorial
Violent crime -- some of it quite brutal -- is unfortunately not
a rarity here. But the sense of shock and horror the community
feels over the particular circumstances of the gang rape and
murder of 14-year-old Jennifer Lee Ertman and 16-year-old
Elizabeth Pena reflects just what a vicious act has been
committed and how much of an aberration has occurred. This
newspaper as a general rule does not editorially comment on
pending criminal cases, for the reason that they are pending and
have not come to legal judgment. In this case, we make no
judgments on its legal particulars, and would have no standing
to do so. We simply wish to share the community's outrage that
such a thing could have happened, and offer an observation. When
a crime of appalling nature and high public visibility occurs,
it frequently becomes a vehicle for various people or groups to
try to advance causes or interests or make a case for things
that are essentially peripheral. It would be unusual if that did
not happen in a case where five teen-agers are charged with two
capital murders with overtones of gang activity, and an underage
juvenile is also implicated. At this moment, these murders,
regardless of their notoriety, make no case for anything other
than for the swiftest possible resolution in the judicial system
of who is responsible, and of the appropriate punishment. They
do not make a case for changes in the law, for stiffer
punishments or more prison cells, for implying blame to society
or various hapless people or groups for such a tragedy, or for
careless and ill-informed speculation about the state of the
community. It is enough for now to handle the aftermath of a
stomach-wrenching crime.
THU 07/01/93 Black N Whites gang probably formed recently, police believe
Just a few days ago, police officers working in the northwest
part of town where two teen-age girls were slain would have
drawn a blank if asked about the Black N Whites. "We started
looking into these killings, and that was when we first heard
about them," said Officer B.F. Simien, of the North Shepherd
substation's gang unit. "We believe they have been in existence
for only about a month or so." Six teen-agers have been charged
with capital murder in the slayings, which occurred sometime
after the girls were last seen at 11:30 p.m. Thursday. "It was a
crime of opportunity," homicide Lt. John Silva said. "We don't
think this was an obvious and organized gang event." He said the
gang had been conducting initiation rites earlier, but the new
members had left an hour or two before the two girls walked by.
"We believe there were some other people looking to get into the
group," Silva said. "As part of the initiation rite, there was a
fight between the present gang members and the wannabes." "While
there may have been some gang-initiation rites prior to what
happened to the two young girls we don't think that the capital
murders were gang-related." Police who specialize in gang crime
say it's difficult to keep track of the groups and their members
because they are mobile, poorly organized and don't have clearly
defined leaders. "They change names all the time," Simien said.
"The members come and go. Over a period of time one guy might be
in 10 different gangs. To keep track of them, you have to know
the players, not the gangs." Officer Ralph Walker, also a member
of the unit, agreed. "It's hard to define what is a gang. They
are not highly organized, and sometimes there is no clear
hierarchy with a leader and lieutenants and so on," he said.
"Unlike Chicago and L.A., where a guy stays in a gang for a long
period of time, these guys here move around a lot. We'll see a
gang form up, and then six months later it's not in existence
anymore. They change names and change members all the time."
Simien said initiation rites vary, but that most gangs severely
beat new members before letting them in. "Also they usually have
to commit some sort of crime, like stealing a car. But sometimes
a more serious crime is involved," he said. Simien said gang
activity is probably no worse or better in the northwest part of
town than other areas. "It's hard to compare to other parts of
the city. I would guess we have between 200 and 300 gang members
in this part of town, and I'm afraid it will only get worse."
"Part of the problem is that we can only arrest them. The courts
and the penal system have to do their part. If you can catch
them early enough, say around 13, you could probably steer them
right," he said. "Past that age it's probably too late to change
them." Simien said the teen-agers probably never gave a thought
to the consequences of the murders, which surprised and shocked
even officers who deal with gang violence on a daily basis. "I
don't think they really understand what kind of trouble they are
in," he said. "They probably don't yet know how severe this is."
THU 07/01/93 "Animal-like' gang initiation snared 2 girls/Police say
victims subjected to "sadistic' sexual slayings
Two teen-age girls, strangled after they stumbled across a gang
initiation rite, were first subjected to what one source called
"one of the most vicious, sadistic, animal-like attacks I've
ever seen." About 6 p.m. June 24, six of the Black N White
gang's approximately 10 members gathered at a favorite haunt, a
railroad trestle crossing White Oak Bayou near T.C. Jester and
West 34th in northwest Houston, to initiate two prospective
members. Police said the initiation, which required that the two
"wannabes" fight the existing gang members, was accompanied by a
lot of drinking. About 11:15 p.m., Elizabeth Pena, 16, and
Jennifer Ertman, 14, left a friend's apartment in the 4200
block of West 34th to walk to Pena's house in the 1600 block of Lamonte. They took a shortcut through the woods behind the
apartments. "They walked right by these guys," said Houston
Police Department Lt. John Silva. "I think it was purely a crime
of opportunity ... these girls happened along, and they were in
the wrong place at the wrong time." When the attack on the girls
began, Silva said, the two would-be gang members left, but none
of the six gang members attempted to stop the assaults.
Prosecutor Ted Wilson agreed: "They all participated in the
rapes and the strangulations." Charged with capital murder and
held without bond are Peter Anthony Cantu, 18, of 1128 Ashland;
Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18, of 4000 W. 34th; Efrain Perez, 17, of
2100 Beaver Bend; Raul Omar Villarreal, 17, of 4010 Chapman; and
Jose Ernesto Medellin, 18, of 9211 Brackley. One suspect's
14-year-old brother is being held by juvenile authorities.
According to a source, the girls were forced to submit to "just
about every sex act you can imagine, and a few you just couldn't
imagine." Statements by some of the suspects say that after the
girls stopped moving, the six took turns jumping up and down on
their bodies, to make sure both were dead. Police have said the
ages of the girls, both Waltrip High School students, the
brutality of their deaths and the suspects' apparent lack of
remorse made it a particularly grueling case for the
investigators. "This is what we do for a living, and this is
what we're constantly exposed to," Silva said. "In a case like
this ... it's a much bigger test of your self-control. "These
guys (investigators) spent hours with guys who had done
something like that ... it's very hard to work with." Family
members and neighbors of the suspects were unavailable or
reticent Wednesday, and little was known of their backgrounds.
Medellin, a Nuevo Laredo, Mexico-born, ninth-grade dropout,
pleaded guilty in September to illegally carrying a firearm, a
misdemeanor, and received a year of probation with deferred
adjudication. Once employed in construction, he apparently was
neither employed nor enrolled when arrested in the killings.
Cantu pleaded guilty Jan. 12 to third-degree aggravated assault,
a felony, after threatening a man with a knife. State District
Judge Woody Densen sentenced him to four years deferred
adjudication and 240 hours of community service. The five adult
suspects made court appearances Wednesday. The county jail
uniforms of Cantu, Perez and O'Brien bore the words "I am,"
along with various epithets, on the back. It was unclear whether
the slurs were written by other inmates or by sheriff's
deputies, one of whom called the five "not real popular" with
inmates and guards. Perez was late in court because of a trip to
the jail clinic one bailiff said was the result of a beating
from other prisoners. Asked to confirm reports that Perez turned
in the other teens to police, Silva said a lot of information
was used to make the arrests, adding that Perez "is not the only
factor." Medellin had no writing on his uniform, but a deputy
said other prisoners had harassed and intimidated him and
threatened him with sexual assault. Attorney Lon Harper,
appointed to represent O'Brien, described his client as "scared
to death," and said he told Sheriff Johnny Klevenhagen to
monitor O'Brien closely because of three prior suicide attempts
-- by overdose, hanging and cutting his wrists. Officials could
not confirm reports the 14-year-old suspect was attacked and
beaten by other inmates at juvenile facilities. More than a
dozen homicide officers were assigned to the case, and some were
present at Wednesday's news conference. Silva praised them for
closing the case within 24 hours. Services for Ertman will be
held at 3 p.m. today at Heights Funeral Home, 1317 Heights Blvd.
Services for Pena will be at 10 a.m. Friday at St. Rose of Lima
Catholic Church, 3600 Brinkman. She, like Ertman, will be
buried in Woodlawn Garden of Memories Cemetery. A memorial fund
for the victims has been set up at Compass Bank, and any of its
offices in the Houston area will accept contributions.
WED 06/30/93 Six teens held in two girls' rape-murders/"Vicious' youths
reportedly were bragging in their cells
Six teen-agers, the youngest 14 years old, were arrested Tuesday
in the brutal gang rape and murders of two northwest Houston
girls whose nude, decomposed bodies were found dumped in a
wooded area. Charged with capital murder and held without bond
were: Peter Anthony Cantu, 18, of the 1100 block of Ashland;
Derrick Sean O'Brien, 18, 4000 block of 34th St.; Efrain Perez,
17, address unknown; Raul Omar Villareal, 17, of the 4000 block
of Chapman; and Jose Ernesto Medellin, 18, of the 9000 block of
Brackley. The 14-year-old was being handled by Harris County
Juvenile authorities. "This is pretty vicious stuff," a police
source said Tuesday. The belligerent youths, who hurled
profanities at reporters and cameramen Tuesday, one even
attempting to kick a TV camera from a reporter's hands, were
picked up overnight after police received a Crime Stoppers tip.
Sources said they were bragging of the rapes and killings in
their jail cells Tuesday. All the suspects have given signed
statements to police, officers said. Police said Jennifer Lee
Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, were taking a shortcut to
Pena's house in the 1600 block of Lamonte from a party at the
Springhill Apartments in the 4200 block of West 34th Thursday
night. "Just a couple of little girls taking a shortcut home,
and they get killed," a police source said. The girls' path took
them from the back of the complex down a trail to a railroad
trestle, where police said the suspects were hanging out and
drinking beer. The girls were attacked and dragged into the
woods, police said. A police source said the girls' clothes were
torn, and the charges state both girls were sexually assaulted.
Ertman then was strangled; Pena's cause of death has not yet
been determined. The bodies were found around noon Monday, just
inside the woods about 100 feet from the trestle, near West 34th
and West T.C. Jester, after police received a phone call telling
where the remains could be found. Their clothes were scattered
around them. One investigator said both girls were nude, but the
official Police Department report said one was partially
clothed. One of the girl's tennis shoes and a hair barrette were
found on the west end of the trestle along a path to beneath the
trestle where police took several beer cans into evidence.
Police would not discuss the motive for the slayings, but
callers from the neighborhood have suggested everything from a
gang initiation rite to an insult to a rival gang, with which
one or both of the girls was reportedly friendly. The families
of both girls said the victims did not associate with gangs.
Ertman's father, Randy Ertman, said he was relieved to hear of
the arrests in the slaying of his only child. "I'm real happy
for what the police have done," he said. "I don't feel like
going out and killing somebody, getting revenge anymore, like I
did yesterday. I thought this was going to become just another
one of those unsolved cases." The area where the bodies were
found drew some curiosity seekers and friends of the victims
Tuesday. One group of teens who knew the girls ventured into the
woods on the west side of White Oak Bayou. "It's a real shame,"
13-year-old Victor Saavedra said, looking at the two
indentations in the leaf-strewn sod where the remains had been.
When asked what should happen to the people who killed the
girls, 17-year-old David Garcia made his hand into a pistol
sign, and said, "Pow, kill "em."
TUE 06/29/93 Daughters' deaths unite two fathers
Randy Ertman and Bob Carreiro stood in the front yard of Ertman's Heights home Monday, two fathers with something horrible in
common -- both of their daughters were brutally murdered. Carreiro's ordeal began 11 months ago, when his 7-year-old
daughter, Kynara, was found stabbed to death, along with her
10-year-old playmate, Kristin Wiley, in the Wiley's northwest
Harris County home. Ertman's began Monday, when a nude,
decomposed body believed to be that of his daughter, Jennifer,
14, was found dumped in the woods in northwest Houston. Next to
her was another nude body thought to be that of her Waltrip High
School classmate Elizabeth Pena, 16. "I always figured if
anything was going to happen to someone in this family, it was
going to happen to me," Ertman lamented. "My baby was pure. She
was beautiful and innocent." Carreiro crossed his arms, gave a
conciliatory nod and said, "I know how you feel." Ertman and
Carreiro met at a Sunday rally protesting efforts for a new
trial for convicted murderer Gary Graham. Carreiro was there
because he had become a victims' rights advocate since his own
loss. "It was probably somebody very similar to (convicted
murderer) Gary Graham that killed my daughter," Carreiro said.
Ertman, a heavy-set painting contractor, was at the rally,
desperately seeking news media assistance in finding his
daughter, who had been missing since Thursday night. "I told him
yesterday (Sunday), "You're a good man, but I never want to see
you again,' " Ertman said. "Yesterday I was an observer. Today
I'm actively involved." But in less than 24 hours, Ertman saw
Carreiro again. The two stood in Ertman's yard, drinking beer,
trying to find solace in each other's company. "He asked for
help, and I've been in this 11 months," Carreiro said. "I've
gone through all of it." "He's really helped me a lot," Ertman
said. Carreiro expressed a controlled anger, tempered by time,
when asked what he felt was proper punishment for his daughter's
murderer, who still hasn't been caught.
"We want the same kind of justice they dealt to our kids," he
said. "Our kids deserve better than this." But Ertman's rage was
new and white hot. "I'd tell you (what he would do to the
murderer), but you couldn't print it anyway," he growled.
Carreiro, a thin man with graying hair, moved closer to Ertman.
"But we're going to get them," Carreiro promised
Ertman. "We'll
never give up until we find the murderers of our children." Ertman nodded agreement. "Your baby is an angel looking down on
us," Carreiro said, sounding like a father who has begun to deal
with his child's death. "I believed in God up until today; today
God is in hell," said Ertman, sounding like a father who
hasn't.
TUE 06/29/93 Six arrested in death of girls/Bodies of slain teens believed
to be Waltrip High students
Houston police said six people were in custody today in the
slayings of two girls believed to be Waltrip High School
students reported missing last week. Detectives, who worked all
night on the case, arrested five adults and a juvenile and were
preparing charges early today. Officers would not immediately
explain who the suspects are or how they were connected to the
case. The nude, badly decomposed bodies of the two girls were
found Monday in northwest Houston along the reported route the
two Waltrip students had taken when last seen Thursday night.
The state of the bodies prevented positive identification, but
police and the families indicated other factors led them to
believe they are those of Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth
Pena, 16. "I know it's my daughter," said Randy Ertman,
Jennifer's father. "My daughter's dead." The cause of death
could not be immediately determined. Houston police said an
anonymous man called Monday to report the bodies. Officers had
also received such a call Sunday, but it resulted in a search of
the wrong side of railroad tracks in the area. The bodies were
discovered about 12:30 p.m. in a wooded area about 100 feet
northwest of a railroad trestle that crosses White Oak Bayou
near T.C. Jester Boulevard and West 34th Street. The remains
were about 15 feet beyond the tree line, with clothing scattered
around them. A tennis shoe and a hair barrette were found near
the north side of the railroad tracks, and police recovered
several beer cans from the bayou's bank. Those items and several
others made a southward trail toward the back of the apartment
complex where the girls were last seen. Randy Ertman said the
girls left a party at Springhill Apartments in the 4200 block of
West 34th on Thursday between 11 p.m. and midnight and were on
their way to Pena's home in the 1600 block of Lamonte, less than
a mile away. The bodies of the girls, who did not have a car,
were found between the apartments and Pena's home. Springhill
resident Jean Johnson, 59, said the densely wooded area is a
haven for criminals and youths who fancy themselves as street
gangs. Gang graffiti is spray painted on the bayou's concrete
banks. "You hear shooting over there all the time," Johnson
said. "A woman got raped in those woods a couple of months ago."
Another neighborhood man, who asked not to be identified, said
there is a "little hole down there in the woods. I guess you
can't call it a crack (cocaine) house because there ain't no
house. I guess it's a crack tree." The families said they began
looking for the girls about noon Friday. They were reported
missing to police at 5:50 p.m. Friday. Since the information in
that report did not indicate foul play, the case was held for
assignment to investigators until Monday morning, said police
juvenile division Sgt. C.L. Boone. Randy Ertman was outraged
about the 60-hour lapse before the case was assigned. "There's
no excuse for a 60-hour lapse," he said. Ertman said a juvenile
officer, Gary Gryder, was helpful after he was assigned to the
case Monday, and an FBI agent stayed in contact over the
weekend, but no investigator came by during the weekend to get a
picture of the missing girls. The girls' families spent the
weekend peppering the area where the two were last seen with
posters bearing pictures of the friends, a plea for information
and a $10,000 reward. Adolph Pena, Elizabeth Pena's father,
telephoned police about 7:30 a.m. Monday to say that some
youngsters told him during the weekend they thought they had
seen the girls being pulled into a red Dodge Shadow, said Boone.
TUE 06/29/93
Bodies of two girls discovered/Grim find ends weekend search
in northwest Houston
A weekend search for two northwest Houston teen-age girls ended
Monday with the discovery of two nude and badly decomposed
bodies along the pair's reported route when last seen Thursday
night. The state of the bodies prevented positive
identification, but police and the families indicated other
factors led them to believe they are those of Waltrip High
School friends Jennifer Lee Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16.
"I know it's my daughter," said Randy Ertman, Jennifer's
father. "My daughter's dead." The cause of death could not be
immediately determined. Houston police said an anonymous man
called Monday to report the bodies. Officers had also received
such a call Sunday, but it resulted in a search of the wrong
side of railroad tracks in the area. The bodies were discovered
about 12:30 p.m. in a wooded area about 100 feet northwest of a
railroad trestle that crosses White Oak Bayou near T.C. Jester
Boulevard and West 34th Street. The remains were about 15 feet
beyond the tree line, with clothing scattered around them. A
tennis shoe and a hair barrette were found near the north side
of the railroad tracks, and police recovered several beer cans
from the bayou's bank. Those items and several others made a
southward trail toward the back of the apartment complex where
the girls were last seen. Randy Ertman said the girls left a
party at Springhill Apartments in the 4200 block of West 34th on
Thursday between 11 p.m. and midnight and were on their way to
Pena's home in the 1600 block of Lamonte, less than a mile away.
The bodies of the girls, who did not have a car, were found
between the apartments and Pena's home. Springhill resident Jean
Johnson, 59, said the densely wooded area is a haven for
criminals and youths who fancy themselves as street gangs. Gang
graffiti is spray painted on the bayou's concrete banks. "You
hear shooting over there all the time," Johnson said. "A woman
got raped in those woods a couple of months ago." Another
neighborhood man, who asked not to be identified, said there is
a "little hole down there in the woods. I guess you can't call
it a crack (cocaine) house because there ain't no house. I guess
it's a crack tree." Patrol officers at the scene said the
weekend rain reduced normal pedestrian traffic along the bayou
and may have delayed finding the bodies. The families said they
began looking for the girls about noon Friday. They were
reported missing to police at 5:50 p.m. Friday. Since the
information in that report did not indicate foul play, the case
was held for assignment to investigators until Monday morning,
said police juvenile division Sgt. C.L. Boone. Randy Ertman was
outraged about the 60-hour lapse before the case was assigned.
"There's no excuse for a 60-hour lapse," he said. Ertman said a
juvenile officer, Gary Gryder, was helpful after he was assigned
to the case Monday, and an FBI agent stayed in contact over the
weekend, but no investigator came by during the weekend to get a
picture of the missing girls. The girls' families spent the
weekend peppering the area where the two were last seen with
posters bearing pictures of the friends, a plea for information
and a $10,000 reward. Minutes before learning about the bodies
being discovered, Ertman said, "I don't know what's happened.
I'm afraid to think right now, so I'm just doing things,
anything I can think of, calling and calling and working until
I'm exhausted. That way I don't have to think." Adolph Pena,
Elizabeth Pena's father, telephoned police about 7:30 a.m.
Monday that some youngsters told him during the weekend they
thought they had seen the girls being pulled into a red Dodge
Shadow, said Boone. At that point, Boone said, he assigned two
additional investigators to the one already assigned the case
and notified homicide investigators and the FBI.
Translate this site
Copy this URL into the box below.
http://www.murdervictims.com/voices/jeneliz.html